design assessments in the age of AI
What the facts show According to multiple news sources, the area of Southern Lebanon was hit by more than one strike by the State of Israel. For example, one major air-strike on the Ein el‑Hilweh refugee camp near Sidon killed at least 13 people, per the Lebanese Health Ministry. In addition, anotRead more
What the facts show
-
According to multiple news sources, the area of Southern Lebanon was hit by more than one strike by the State of Israel. For example, one major air-strike on the Ein el‑Hilweh refugee camp near Sidon killed at least 13 people, per the Lebanese Health Ministry.
-
In addition, another strike in the southern town of Al‑Tayri killed at least one civilian and wounded others, adding to the death toll.
-
Taken together, reports say “at least 14 people” were killed in the recent series of strikes.
So yes by the available information, Southern Lebanon did experience multiple attacks by Israel that resulted in at least 14 deaths.
Context & background
Cease-fire status
-
A cease-fire between Israel and Hezbollah was brokered in late 2024 (around November 27).
-
Despite the cease-fire, Israeli strikes have continued and Lebanon reports that several dozen people have been killed in Lebanon since the truce.
Targets and claims
-
Israel’s military claims the strikes targeted militant groups for example, in the refugee camp, Israel said it hit a “Hamas training compound.”
-
Palestinian factions (such as Hamas) deny that such compounds exist in the camps.
Humanitarian & civilian implications
-
The refugee camp hit (Ein el-Hilweh) is densely populated and considered Lebanon’s largest Palestinian refugee camp.
-
The presence of civilians, including possibly non-combatants, raises concerns about civilian casualties and international humanitarian law.
-
The strike on a vehicle in Al-Tayri reportedly wounded several students, indicating that non-combatants are among the casualties.
Why this matters
-
Regional stability: Southern Lebanon is a sensitive border area between Israel and Lebanon/Hezbollah. Continued strikes risk reopening larger escalation.
-
Cease-fire fragility: Even after a formal truce, lethal attacks show how unstable the situation remains, and how quickly the violence can reignite.
-
International law & civilian safety: When air strikes hit refugee camps or residential zones, questions arise about proportionality, distinction, and civilian protection in armed conflict.
-
Human cost: Beyond the numbers, families, communities, and civilian life in the region are deeply affected loss, trauma, displacement.
My summary
Yes based on credible reporting Southern Lebanon did suffer multiple Israeli attacks in which at least 14 people were killed. The best documented is the air-strike on the Ein el-Hilweh refugee camp (13 killed), plus another strike in Al-Tayri (at least 1 killed).
That said, while the basic fact is clear, some details remain less so: the exact motives claimed, the status of all victims (civilian vs combatant), and the full number of casualties may evolve as further investigations come in.
See less
How to Design Tests in the Age of AI In this era of learning, everything has changed — not only the manner in which students learn but also the manner in which they prove that they have learned. Students today employ tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or math solution AI tools as an integral part ofRead more
How to Design Tests in the Age of AI
In this era of learning, everything has changed — not only the manner in which students learn but also the manner in which they prove that they have learned. Students today employ tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or math solution AI tools as an integral part of their daily chores. While technology enables learning, it also renders the conventional models of assessment through memorization, essays, or homework monotonous.
So the challenge that educators today are facing is:
How do we create fair, substantial, and authentic tests in a world where AI can spew up “perfect” answers in seconds?
The solution isn’t to prohibit AI — it’s to redefine the assessment process itself. Let’s start on how.
1. Redefining What We’re Assessing
For generations, education has questioned students about what they know — formulas, facts, definitions. But machines can memorize anything at the blink of an eye, so tests based on memorization are becoming increasingly irrelevant.
In the AI era, we must test what AI does not do well:
Attempt replacing the following questions: Rather than asking “Explain causes of World War I,” ask “If AI composed an essay on WWI causes, how would you analyze its argument or position?”
This shifts the attention away from memorization.
2. Creating “AI-Resilient” Tests
An AI-resilient assessment is one where even if a student uses AI, the tool can’t fully answer the question — because the task requires human judgment, personal context, or live reasoning.
Here are a few effective formats:
Have students record how they utilized AI tools ethically (e.g., “I used AI to grammar-check but wrote the analysis myself”).
Choose students for the competition based on how many tasks they have been able to accomplish.
Example: “You are an instructor in a heterogeneously structured class. How do you use AI in helping learners of various backgrounds without infusing bias?”
Thinking activities:
Instruct students to compare or criticize AI responses with their own ideas. This compels students to think about thinking — an important metacognition activity.
3. Designing Tests “AI-Inclusive” Not “AI-Proof”
it’s a futile exercise trying to make everything “AI-proof.” Students will always find new methods of using the tools. What needs to happen instead is that tests need to accept AI as part of the process.
Mark not only the result, but their thought process as well: Have students discuss why they accepted or rejected AI suggestions.
Example prompt:
This makes AI a study buddy, and not a cheat code.
4. Immersing Technology with Human Touch
Teachers should not be driven away from students by AI — but drawn closer by making assessment more human-friendly and participatory.
Ideas:
Human element: A student may use AI to redo his report, but a live presentation tells him how deep he really is.
5. Justice and Integrity
Academic integrity in the age of AI is novel. Cheating isn’t plagiarizing anymore but using crutches too much without comprehending them.
Teachers can promote equity by:
Employing AI-detecting software responsibly — not to sanction, but to encourage an open discussion.
It builds trust, not fear, and shows teachers care more about effort and integrity than being great.
6. Remixing Feedback in the AI Era
Example: Instead of a “AI plagiarism detected” alert, give a “Let’s discuss how you can responsibly use AI to enhance your writing instead of replacing it.” message.
7. From Testing to Learning
The most powerful change can be this one:
AI eliminates the myth that tests are the sole measure of demonstrating what is learned. Tests, instead, become an act of self-discovery and learning skills.
Teachers can:
Final Thought
Not to be smarter than AI. To make students smarter, more moral, and more human in a world of AI.
See less