students can “cheat” with AI,
How tariffs slow an economy (the simple mechanics) Higher import prices → weaker demand. Tariffs raise the cost of imported inputs and final goods. Companies either pay more for raw materials and intermediate goods (squeezing margins) or pass costs to consumers (reducing purchasing power). That combRead more
How tariffs slow an economy (the simple mechanics)
- Higher import prices → weaker demand. Tariffs raise the cost of imported inputs and final goods. Companies either pay more for raw materials and intermediate goods (squeezing margins) or pass costs to consumers (reducing purchasing power). That combination cools consumption and industrial activity.
- Supply-chain disruption & re-shoring costs. Firms respond by reconfiguring supply chains (finding new suppliers, on-shoring, or stockpiling). Those adjustments are expensive and slow to pay off — in the near term they reduce investment and efficiency.
- Investment chill from uncertainty. The prospect of escalating or unpredictable tariffs raises policy uncertainty. Businesses delay or scale back capital projects until trade policy stabilizes.
- Retaliation and cascading barriers. Tariffs often trigger retaliatory measures. When many countries raise barriers, global trade volumes fall, which hits export-dependent economies and global value chains.
These channels are exactly why multilateral agencies and market analysts say tariffs and trade restrictions can lower growth even when headline GDP still looks “resilient.”
What the major institutions say (quick reality check)
- The IMF’s recent updates show modest global growth in 2025–26 but flag tariff-driven uncertainty as a downside risk. Their 2025 WEO update projects global growth near 3.0% for 2025 and 3.1% for 2026 while explicitly warning that higher tariffs and policy uncertainty are important risks.
- The OECD and several analysts argue the full force of recent tariff shocks hasn’t been felt yet — and they project growth weakening in 2026 as front-loading of imports ahead of tariffs wears off and higher effective tariff rates bite. The OECD’s interim outlook expects a slowdown in 2026 tied to these effects.
- The WTO and World Bank also report trade-volume weakness and flag trade barriers as a material drag on trade growth — which feeds into lower global GDP.
- These institutions are not predicting a single global recession just from tariffs, but they do expect measurable downward pressure on trade and investment, which slows recovery momentum.
How big could the hit be? (it depends — but here are the drivers)
Magnitude depends on policy breadth and persistence. Small, narrow tariffs on a few goods will only nudge growth; widespread, high tariffs across major economies (or sustained tit-for-tat escalation) can shave sizable tenths of a percentage point off global growth. Analysts point out that front-loading (firms buying ahead of tariff implementation) can temporarily buoy trade, but once that fades the negative effects appear.
Timing matters. If tariffs are announced and then held in place for years, businesses will invest in duplicative capacity and the re-allocation costs accumulate. That’s the scenario most likely to slow growth into 2026.
Bloomberg
Who loses most
- Export-dependent emerging markets (small open economies and commodity exporters) suffer when demand falls in advanced markets or when their inputs become more expensive.
- Complex-value-chain industries (autos, electronics, semiconductors) where components cross borders many times are particularly vulnerable to tariffs and retaliations.
- Low-income countries feel second-round effects: slower global growth → weaker commodity prices → less fiscal space and elevated debt stress. The World Bank notes growth downgrades when trade restrictions rise.
World Bank
Knock-on effects for inflation and policy
Tariffs can be inflationary (higher import prices), which puts central banks in a bind: tighten to fight inflation and risk choking off growth, or tolerate higher inflation and risk de-anchored expectations. Either choice complicates recovery and could reduce real incomes and investment. Several policymakers have voiced concern that the mix of tariffs plus high policy uncertainty creates a stagflation-like risk in vulnerable economies.
Offsets and reasons the slowdown may be limited
- Front-loading and substitution. Businesses sometimes build inventories or substitute suppliers — that mutes immediate trade declines. IMF and other agencies note that some front-loading actually supported 2024–2025 trade figures, but this effect runs out.
- Fiscal and monetary support. Governments can cushion the blow with targeted fiscal spending, subsidies, or trade facilitation. But those measures have limits (fiscal space, political will) and can’t fully replace cross-border trade flows.
- Near-term resilience in consumption. Private sectors in some major economies have remained resilient, which helps growth hold up even as trade cools. But resilience erodes if tariffs persist and investment dries up.
Reuters
Practical indicators to watch in 2025–26 (what will tell us the story)
- Trade volumes (WTO merchandise trade stats): a sustained drop signals broad tariff damage.
- Business investment and capex plans: continued delays or cancellations point to a deeper investment chill.
- Manufacturing PMI and global supply-chain bottlenecks: weakening PMIs across manufacturing hubs show cascading effects.
- Inflation vs. growth trade-offs and central bank minutes: whether monetary policy tightens in response to tariff-driven inflation.
- Announcements of trade retaliation or new tariff rounds: escalation increases downside risk; diplomatic rollbacks reduce it.
Bottom line — a human takeaway
Tariffs won’t necessarily cause an immediate, synchronized global recession in 2026, but they are a clear and credible downside risk to the fragile recovery. They act like a slow-moving tax on trade: higher costs, muddled investment decisions, and weaker demand — combined effects that shave growth and worsen inequalities between export-dependent and more closed economies. Policymakers can limit the damage with diplomacy, targeted support for affected industries and countries, and clear timelines — but if protectionism persists or escalates, the global recovery will be noticeably weaker in 2026 than it might otherwise have been.
If you want, I can:
• Turn this into a one-page slide for a briefing (executive summary + 3 charts of trade volume, investment plans, and projected growth scenarios); or
• Pull the most recent WTO/OECD/IMF bullets (with dates and one-sentence takeaways) to cite in a short memo.
If Students Are Able to "Cheat" Using AI, How Should Exams and Assignments Adapt? Artificial Intelligence (AI) has disrupted schools in manners no one had envisioned a decade ago. From ChatGPT, QuillBot, Grammarly, and math solution tools powered by AI, one can write essays, summarize chapter contenRead more
If Students Are Able to “Cheat” Using AI, How Should Exams and Assignments Adapt?
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has disrupted schools in manners no one had envisioned a decade ago. From ChatGPT, QuillBot, Grammarly, and math solution tools powered by AI, one can write essays, summarize chapter content, solve equations, and even simulate critical thinking — all in mere seconds. No wonder educators everywhere are on edge: if one can “cheat” using AI, does testing even exist anymore?
But the more profound question is not how to prevent students from using AI — it’s how to rethink learning and evaluation in a world where information is abundant, access is instantaneous, and automation is feasible. Rather than looking for AI-proof tests, educators can create AI-resistant, human-scale evaluations that demand reflection, imagination, and integrity.
Let’s consider what assignments and tests need to be such that education still matters even with AI at your fingertips.
1. Reinventing What’s “Cheating”
Historically, cheating meant glancing over someone else’s work or getting unofficial help. But in 2025, AI technology has clouded the issue. When a student uses AI to get ideas, proofread for grammatical mistakes, or reword a piece of writing — is it cheating, or just taking advantage of smart technology?
The answer lies in intention and awareness:
Example: A student who gets AI to produce his essay isn’t learning. But a student employing AI to outline arguments, structure, then composing his own is showing progress.
Teachers first need to begin by explaining — and not punishing — what looks like good use of AI.
2. Beyond Memory Tests
Rote memorization and fact-recall tests are old hat with AI. Anyone can have instant access to definitions, dates, or equations through AI. Tests must therefore change to test what machines cannot instantly fake: understanding, thinking, and imagination.
The aim isn’t to trap students — it’s to let actual understanding come through.
3. Building Tests That Respect Process Over Product
If we can automate the final product to perfection, then we should begin grading on the path that we take to get there.
Some robust transformations:
By asking students to reflect on why they are using AI and what they are learning through it, cheating is self-reflection.
4. Using Real-World, Authentic Tests
Real life is not typically taken with closed-book tests. Real life does include us solving problems to ourselves, working with other people, and making choices — precisely the places where human beings and computers need to communicate.
So tests need to reflect real-world issues:
Example: Rather than “Analyze Shakespeare’s Hamlet,” ask a student of literature to pose the question, “How would an AI understand Hamlet’s indecisiveness — and what would it misunderstand?”
That’s not a test of literature — that is a test of human perception.
5. Designing AI-Integrated Assignments
Rather than prohibit AI, let’s put it into the assignment. Not only does that recognize reality but also educates digital ethics and critical thinking.
Examples are:
Projects enable students to learn AI literacy — how to review, revise, and refine machine content.
6. Building Trust Through Transparency
Distrust of AI cheating comes from loss of trust between students and teachers. The trust must be rebuilt through openness.
If students observe honesty being practiced, they will be likely to imitate it.
7. Rethinking Tests for the Networked World
Old-fashioned time tests — silent rooms, no computers, no conversation — are no longer the way human brains function anymore. Future testing is adaptive, interactive, and human-facilitated testing.
Potential models:
These models make cheating virtually impossible — not because they’re enforced rigidly, but because they demand real-time thinking.
8. Maintaining the Human Heart of Education
So the teacher’s job now needs to transition from tester to guide and architect — assisting students in applying AI properly and developing the distinctively human abilities machines can’t: curiosity, courage, and compassion.
As a teacher joked:
Last Thought
“What do you know?”
but rather:
- “What can you make, think, and do — AI can’t?”
- That’s the type of assessment that breeds not only better learners, but wise human beings.
See less