tariffs / trade policy risks going fo ...
The Big Picture: A Market That's Run Far Ahead Equity markets, especially in the U.S., have had superb gains the past two years. A lot of that was fueled by AI optimism, solid corporate earnings, and central banks at the tail end of rate-hiking cycles. Yet when markets appreciate more quickly thanRead more
The Big Picture: A Market That’s Run Far Ahead
Equity markets, especially in the U.S., have had superb gains the past two years. A lot of that was fueled by AI optimism, solid corporate earnings, and central banks at the tail end of rate-hiking cycles.
Yet when markets appreciate more quickly than earnings, valuations (how much investors are willing to pay for a company’s earnings) become extended. That’s what is happening today: price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios at historically high levels, especially in tech-weighted indices.
So the great question investors are struggling with is:
Are stocks just pricey, or are they reasonably valued for a new growth cycle?
What “Stretched Valuation” Actually Means
When analysts refer to “valuations being stretched,” they’re usually referring to metrics like:
- P/E Ratio (Price-to-Earnings): How much money people pay for $1 of company earnings.
- CAPE Ratio (Cyclically Adjusted P/E): The 10-year inflation-adjusted version — a longer-term measure.
- Price-to-Sales or Price-to-Book: Indicators that help gauge sentiment beyond profit.
In the US, the forward price/earnings ratio of the S&P 500 is roughly 20–21x earnings, much more than the 10-year average of approximately 16x.
Technology winners — the “Magnificent Seven,” as they’re known — usually trade at 30x–40x earnings, and occasionally higher.
Historically, that’s rich. But — and this is important — it does not necessarily suggest the crash is imminent. It does imply, however, that subsequent returns will be lower.
The AI and Tech Impact
The overwhelming majority of gains achieved in the market recently have come from a small group of technology and AI-related stocks. Investors are anticipating monumental long-term productivity gains from artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and automation.
This creates a kind of “hope premium.”
That is, prices reflect not only what these companies earn today, but also what they can possibly earn in five years.
That is fine if AI really transforms industries — but it also makes expectations fragile. If growth is disappointing or adoption slows, these valuations can come undone quickly. It is like racing on hope: as long as the story holds, the prices stay high. But a weak quarter or a guidance cut can erode faith.
Corporate Earnings Still Matter
Rising price levels can be explained if earnings continue to climb so vigorously. And indeed, corporate profits in sectors like tech, health care, and financials have surprised on the upside.
But now that the earnings surprise has recurred, analysts are beginning to wonder:
- Whether earnings growth will slow as cost pressures are still very tight.
- To what extent further margin growth is available once inflation tapers off but wages are still high.
- Whether consumer spending can stay strong with rising borrowing costs.
If profit expansion is unable to keep step with these lofty expectations, valuations will look even more extreme — since price is high but profit expansion slows.
A Tale of Two Markets
Globally, the valuation story is not one:
- Region Future P/E Timing of Valuation View
- U.S. (S&P 500) ~20–21x Overvalued vs. history
- Europe (Stoxx 600) ~13–14x Fair / moderate
- Japan (Nikkei 225) ~16x Fair but rising rapidly
- India (Nifty 50) ~22–23x High, driven by domestic optimism
- China (CSI 300) ~10x Inexpensive by international standards
Therefore, not all markets are high-valued — it’s mostly localized in the U.S. and certain high-growth sectors.
The Psychological Factor: FOMO and Confidence
A lot of the reason valuations stay high is because of investor psychology.
After missing out on earlier rallies, more or less all investors are afraid of missing out — the “fear of missing out” (FOMO). Combine this with compelling company tales about AI, green technology, and digital transformation, and you’ve got momentum-driven markets going against gravity for longer than anyone can imagine.
Furthermore, central banks’ proposals for rate reductions inspire hope: if current money is cheaper, investors are willing to pay a premium for future growth.
So, Are They Too Stretched?
Here’s a balanced view:
- Yes, they’re stretched historically — i.e., returns may be slower and risk greater.
- No, not so in bubble land — as long as earnings keep on improving and AI-led productivity growth occurs.
- But — low breadth (fewer stocks propelling most of the advance) is a warning sign. Healthy markets see more broad-based participation.
In short: valuations are high but not crazy — the market is factoring in a soft landing and tech change. If either narrative breaks, watch for correction risk.
What This Means for Everyday Investors
Don’t panic, but don’t chase.
- Buying at high valuations tends to result in lower 5–10 year returns. Remain invested, but rebalance if overweight in dear sectors.
Diversify geographically.
- Europe, Japan, and a few emerging markets are priced at more reasonable valuations with solid fundamentals.
Focus on quality.
- Solidly cushioned companies with good cash flows, price power, and low debt withstand valuation stress better.
Have a bit of cash or short-term bonds in reserve.
If valuations correct, then that dry powder enables you to buy good stocks cheap.
The Road Ahead
Markets can stay expensive for longer than logic suggests that they should — especially when there is a decent growth story like AI. But fundamentals always revert in years to come.
The next 12 months will hinge on:
- Whether profit growth makes optimism justified.
- How steeply interest rates drop (lower rates can help soften high valuations somewhat).
- And how optimistic consumers and businesspeople are of the global environment.
- If the global economy holds up and AI’s promise continues to deliver real productivity gains, today’s valuations might look merely “high,” not “excessive.”
But if growth slows sharply, 2026 could bring a painful “valuation reset.”
See less
1) Why tariffs matter now (the big-picture drivers) Two things changed recently: (a) major economies — especially the U.S. — raised or threatened broad tariffs in 2025, and (b) geopolitical friction (notably U.S.–China tensions) pushed firms to re-think where they make things. That combination turnsRead more
1) Why tariffs matter now (the big-picture drivers)
Two things changed recently: (a) major economies — especially the U.S. — raised or threatened broad tariffs in 2025, and (b) geopolitical friction (notably U.S.–China tensions) pushed firms to re-think where they make things. That combination turns tariff announcements from abstract policy into real costs and rearranged supply chains. The WTO and IMF both flagged trade-policy uncertainty as a downside risk to growth in 2025–26.
2) The transmission channels — how tariffs actually bite
Higher consumer prices (import pass-through): Tariffs act like taxes on imported goods. Some of that cost is absorbed by exporters, some passed to consumers. Recent data suggest U.S. import prices rose where new duties applied. That raises headline inflation and can lower purchasing power.
Input-cost shock for industry: Tariffs on intermediate goods raise manufacturers’ costs (electronics components, chemicals), squeezing margins or forcing price increases downstream.
Supply-chain re-routing and front-loading: Firms often ship sooner to beat a tariff or divert production to other countries — that creates temporary trade surges (front-loading) followed by weaker volumes. The WTO noted AI-goods front-loading lifted 2025 trade but warned of slower growth thereafter.
Investment and sourcing decisions: Persistent tariffs incentivize reshoring, nearshoring, or supplier diversification — which costs money and takes time. Capex may shift away from trade-exposed expansion toward local capacity or automation.
3) Who gets hit hardest (and who can adapt)
Consumers of imported finished goods (electronics, apparel, some foodstuffs) feel direct price increases. Studies in 2025 show imported goods became noticeably more expensive in markets facing new duties.
Industries using global inputs (autos, semiconductors, pharmaceuticals) face margin pressure if inputs are tariffed and not easily substituted.
Export-dependent economies: Countries whose growth relies on exports may see demand shifts or retaliatory measures. The IMF and private banks have adjusted growth forecasts in response to tariff moves.
Winners/Adapaters: Local producers of previously imported goods may benefit (at least short term). Also, countries positioned as alternative manufacturing hubs (Vietnam, Mexico, parts of Southeast Asia, India) can capture relocation flows — but capacity constraints, logistics, and labor skills limit how fast that happens.
4) Macro and market-level effects (what to expect)
Short-term volatility, longer-term lower global growth: Tariffs raise prices and reduce trade efficiency. The WTO’s 2025 updates show trade growth was partly boosted by front-loading in the short run but that 2026 prospects are weaker. That pattern — temporary boost then drag — is what economists expect.
Inflation stickiness in some economies: If tariffs persist, they can keep a higher floor under inflation for tradable goods, complicating central-bank policy. The IMF is watching this as a downside risk.
Sectoral winners/losers and realignment of global supply chains: Expect capex reallocation, more regional supply chains, and increased emphasis on technology enabling on-shoring (robotics, semiconductor investments). Financial markets will price in this realignment — some exporters lose, some domestic producers gain.
5) Policy uncertainty matters as much as direct cost
Tariffs aren’t just a one-off tax — they change expectations. If businesses believe tariffs will be long-lasting or escalate, they’ll invest differently (or delay investment), re-negotiate contracts, and move inventory strategies. That uncertainty reduces productive investment and raises the risk premium investors demand. Reuters and other outlets flagged rising policy unpredictability in 2025 as a meaningful growth risk.
6) Likelihood of escalation vs. negotiation
There are two plausible paths:
Escalation: More broad-based or higher tariffs, wider country coverage, and retaliatory measures (this would amplify negative effects). Recent 2025 moves show the possibility of stepped-up tariffs, and China responded strongly to U.S. measures.
Truce/targeted deals: Negotiations, temporary truces, or targeted carve-outs could limit damage (we’ve seen temporary truce dynamics and talks in 2025). The scale of damage depends on whether tariff actions become permanent or are negotiated down.
7) Practical implications — what investors, companies, and policymakers should do
For investors
Don’t treat “tariffs” as a binary doom signal. Instead, think in scenarios (low, medium, high escalation) and stress-test portfolio exposures.
Reduce single-country supply-chain exposure in sectors sensitive to input tariffs (autos, electronics). Consider diversification into regions benefiting from nearshoring.
Rotate toward quality, pricing-power stocks that can pass on higher input costs, and businesses with domestic demand and strong balance sheets.
Watch commodity and input-price plays — some sectors (basic materials, domestic manufacturing equipment) can benefit from reshoring and increased capex.
For companies
Re-evaluate procurement and contracts: longer contracts, alternative suppliers, and local inventory buffers.
Invest in automation if labor costs and on-shoring become favourable; that reduces sensitivity to labor cost differentials.
Hedge currency and input cost risks where feasible.
For policymakers
Targeted relief and clear communication reduce needless front-loading and volatility; multilateral engagement (WTO, trade talks) can limit escalation. The WTO and IMF emphasize rule-based stability to prevent damage to growth.
8) Quick checklist — what to watch next (actionable)
New tariff announcements or executive orders from major economies (U.S., EU, China, India). Reuters and major outlets will flag these quickly.
WTO / IMF updates and country growth forecasts — they summarize the systemic impact.
Corporate guidance from multinationals (Apple, automakers, chipmakers) — look for mentions of input-cost pressure, re-shoring, and supply-chain disruption.
Trade volumes and front-loading signals in trade data (month-on-month import surges before tariff dates). The WTO flagged front-loading of AI goods in 2025.
Currency and bond-market moves: if tariffs cause growth worries but keep inflation sticky, expect mixed signals in rates and currencies.
9) Bottom line — how meaningful are tariffs going forward?
Tariffs are material and meaningful in 2025: they have already altered trade flows, raised costs in certain categories, and injected persistent policy uncertainty that affects investment decisions and trade growth forecasts. But the degree of long-term damage depends on whether the measures become permanent and escalate, or whether negotiations and market adjustments (diversification, nearshoring) blunt the worst effects. The WTO and IMF see both short-term front-loading and a slower longer-term trade outlook — a nuanced picture, not a single headline.
If you want, I can:
-
-
See lessRun a short sector-scan of publicly traded companies in your region to flag which ones are most exposed to tariffs (by percentage of imported inputs), or
Build a two-scenario portfolio sensitivity table (low-escalation vs high-escalation) to show expected P/L pressure on different sectors.