Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
At QaskMe, we foster a community of shared knowledge, where curious minds, experts, and alternative viewpoints unite to ask questions, share insights, connect across various topics—from tech to lifestyle—and collaboratively enhance the credible space for others to learn and contribute.
prompt engineering different from tra ...
lifestyle habits reduce dementia risk
Good afternoon! I sent a request, but unfortunately, I haven't received a response. Please contact me on WhatsApp or Telegram. wa.me/+66960574873 or on Telegram t.me/sveta_bez_sveta
Good afternoon! I sent a request, but unfortunately, I haven’t received a response. Please contact me on WhatsApp or Telegram.
wa.me/+66960574873
or on Telegram
t.me/sveta_bez_sveta
scaling laws vs. efficiency-driven in ...
Scaling Laws: A Key Aspect of AI Scaling laws identify a pattern found in current AI models: when you are scaling model size, the size of the training data, and computational capacity, there is smooth convergence. It is this principle that has driven most of the biggest successes in language, visionRead more
Scaling laws identify a pattern found in current AI models:
when you are scaling model size, the size of the training data, and computational capacity, there is smooth convergence. It is this principle that has driven most of the biggest successes in language, vision, and multi-modal AI.
Large-scale models have the following advantages:
Its appeal has been that it is simple to understand: “The more data you have and the more computing power you bring to the table, the better your results will be.” Organizations that had access to enormous infrastructure have been able to extend the frontiers of the potential for AI rather quickly.
To better understand what
So, training very large-scale language models requires a huge amount of financial investment. Large-scale language models can only be trained with vastly expensive hardware.
Such large models are large energy consumers when trained and deployed. There are, thereby, environmental concerns being raised.
When models become bigger, the benefits per additional computation become smaller, with every new gain costing even more than before.
Most realistic domains, such as mobile, hospital, government, or edge computing, may not be able to support large models based on latency, cost, or privacy constraints.
These challenges have encouraged a new vision of what is to come.
Efficiency innovation aims at doing more with less. Rather than leaning on size, this innovation seeks ways to enhance how models are trained, designed, and deployed for maximum performance with minimal resources.
Key strategies are:
The aim is not only smaller models, but rather more functional, accessible, and deployable AI.
The value of AI is not created in research settings but by systems that are used in healthcare, government services, businesses, and consumer products. These types of settings call for reliability, efficiency, explainability, and cost optimization.
Efficiency enables start-ups, the government, and smaller entities to develop very efficient AI because they would not require scaled infrastructure.
Smaller models that are better understood can also be more auditable, explainable, and governable—a consideration that is becoming increasingly important with the rise of AI regulations internationally.
Such applications as smart sensors, autonomous systems, and mobile assistants demand the use of ai models, which should be loowar on power and connectivity.
The truth is, however, that neither scaling nor optimizing is going to be what the future of AI looks like: instead, it will be a combination of both.
Big models will play an equally important part as:
This is also reflected in other technologies because big, centralized solutions are usually combined with locally optimized ones.
The next wave in the development process involves:
Rather than focusing on how big, progress will be measured by usefulness, reliability, and impact.
Scaling laws enabled the current state of the art in AI, demonstrating the power of larger models to reveal the potential of intelligence. Innovation through efficiency will determine what the future holds, ensuring that this intelligence is meaningful, accessible, and sustainable. The future of AI models will be the integration of the best of both worlds: the ability of scaling to discover what is possible, and the ability of efficiency to make it impactful in the world.
See lessIran fast-tracking trials
1. Iran Sees the Protests as an Existential Threat Iran’s leadership frames the current wave of protests not merely as demonstrations, but as a direct challenge to the authority and stability of the Islamic Republic. Officials including the judiciary have publicly described many detainees as “rioterRead more
Iran’s leadership frames the current wave of protests not merely as demonstrations, but as a direct challenge to the authority and stability of the Islamic Republic. Officials including the judiciary have publicly described many detainees as “rioters,” “terrorists,” or even “enemies of God” under Iranian law, which carries the death penalty. This characterization is significant because charges like moharebeh (“waging war against God”) and corruption on Earth are among the most severe in Iran’s penal code and can justify expedited procedures and capital punishment.
Fast-tracking trials and executions, from the regime’s perspective, is intended to crush dissent quickly and signal to the population that any large-scale challenge to state power will be met with overwhelming force.
Iran’s top judicial officials have explicitly stated that delays in prosecuting protesters would diminish the “impact” of judicial action. The head of the judiciary, Gholamhossein Mohseni-Ejei, emphasized that addressing cases promptly is essential in his view for justice to serve its purpose and deter further unrest. That official discourse is used internally to justify accelerated case handling and harsh sentencing.
The current protests are among the largest and most sustained anti-government demonstrations in Iran in decades, sparked by deep economic grievances and evolving into broader demands for political change. Security forces have killed large numbers of civilians in clashes with demonstrators, and tens of thousands of people have been arrested. The scale of unrest combined with efforts by the government to maintain control underpins the judiciary’s push to conclude cases rapidly and impose severe penalties, including death sentences, to create a chilling effect.
Iran’s leadership is operating under intense international scrutiny and pressure, including warnings from the United States and concerns from human rights bodies. Rather than softening its stance, the judiciary’s signaling of fast trials and executions appears partly intended to display resolve domestically and to international audiences that it will not bow to external demands. Officials often justify this approach by accusing foreign powers of inciting or supporting unrest.
Human rights organizations have long documented that Iran’s use of fast-track or “summary” trials in politically charged cases often comes at the expense of basic legal protections. Reports from earlier protest waves show that defendants have been denied meaningful access to lawyers, subjected to forced confessions, and convicted after proceedings that fall far short of international fair-trial standards. This historical pattern intensifies global concern about the current situation.
In legal and symbolic terms, swift judgments and executions serve multiple functions:
Deterrence: Harsh and quick punishments are intended to deter others from participating in protests.
Reassertion of Authority: It shows the regime is unwilling to tolerate challenges to its rule.
Internal Messaging: Within governmental, judicial, and security structures, such measures reinforce discipline and loyalty.
Taken together, these elements demonstrate that fast-tracking trials and executions for detained protesters is part of a broader strategy by Iran’s leadership to maintain control and intimidate opposition amid one of the most volatile periods in its modern history.
See lessframeworks help mitigate bias in AI l ...
Comprehending the Source of Bias Biases in AI learning tools are rarely intentional. Biases can come from data that contains historic inequalities, stereotypes, and under-representation in demographics. If an AI system is trained on data from a particular geographic location, language, or socio-econRead more
Biases in AI learning tools are rarely intentional. Biases can come from data that contains historic inequalities, stereotypes, and under-representation in demographics. If an AI system is trained on data from a particular geographic location, language, or socio-economic background, it can underperform elsewhere.
Ethical guidelines play an important role in making developers and instructors realize that bias is not merely an error on the technical side but also has social undertones in data and design. This is the starting point for bias mitigation.
A major advantage that can be attributed to the use of ethical frameworks is the consideration and incorporation of fairness as a main requirement rather than an aside. Fairness regarded as a priority allows developers to consider testing an AI system on various students prior to implementation.
In the educational sector, AI systems should ensure:
By establishing fairness standards upstream, ethical standards diminish the chances of unjust results becoming normalized.
Ethicists consider the role of transparency, stating that students, educators, and parents should be able to see the role that AI plays in educational outcomes. Users ought to be able to query the AI system to gain an understanding of why, for instance, an AI system recommends additional practice, places the student “at risk,” or assigns an educational grade to an assignment.
Explainable systems help detect bias more easily. Since instructors are capable of interpreting how the decisions are made, they are more likely to observe patterns that impact certain groups in an unjustified manner. Transparency helps create trust, and trust is critical in these learning environments.
Bias is further compounded if decisions made by AI systems are considered final and absolute. Ethical considerations remind us that no matter what AI systems accomplish, human accountability remains paramount. Teachers and administrators must always retain the discretion to check, override, or qualify AI-based suggestions.
By using the human-in-the-loop system, the:
Responsibility changes AI from an invisible power to a responsible assisting tool.
Biases and ethics are interwoven within the realm of data governance. Ethics emphasize proper data gathering and privacy concerns. If student data is garnered in a transparent and fair manner, control can be maintained over how the AI is fed data.
Reducing unnecessary data minimizes the chances of sensitive information being misused and inferred, which also leads to biased results. Fair data use acts as a shield that prevents discrimination.
Ethical considerations promote inclusive engagement in the creation and management of AI learning tools. These tools are viewed as less biased where education stakeholders, such as tutors, students, parents, and experts, are involved from different backgrounds.
Addition of multiple views is helpful in pointing out blind spots which might not be apparent to technical teams alone. This ensures that AI systems embody views on education and not mere assumptions.
Ethical considerations regard bias mitigation as an ongoing task, not simply an event to be checked once. Learning environments shift, populations of learners change, while AI systems evolve with the passage of time. Regular audits, data feedback, and performance reviews identify new biases that could creep into the system from time to time.
This is because this commitment to improvement ensures that AI aligns with the ever-changing demands of education.
Ethical frameworks can also reduce bias in AI-based learning tools because they set the tone on issues such as fairness, transparency, accountability, and inclusivity. Ethical frameworks redirect the attention from technical efficiency to humans because AI must facilitate learning without exacerbating inequalities that already exist. With a solid foundation of ethics, AI will no longer be an invisibly biased source but a means to achieve an equal and responsible education.
See lessAI rapidly transforming teaching and ...
Creating a Culture that Supports Personalized Learning Personalization of the learning experience is one of the main factors contributing to the widespread adoption of AI in the education sector. In a classroom setting, it is the job of one teacher to support dozens of pupils, each of whom may haveRead more
Personalization of the learning experience is one of the main factors contributing to the widespread adoption of AI in the education sector. In a classroom setting, it is the job of one teacher to support dozens of pupils, each of whom may have distinct skills, rates of learning, and interests.
Additionally, the use of artificial intelligence makes it easy to scale the delivery of quality education, as it can handle tens of millions of people worldwide.
What this means is that better-prepared learners get to advance faster while learners who are struggling can be supported, unlike in the former system. By AI platforms, personalization previously only possible in private tutor or top universities is going to be scalable.
Artificial intelligence is also changing the education sector in the aspect that it reduces the role played by teachers in administrative aspects. activities such as grading test results, recording the attendance level, analyzing performance results, and preparing school reports take time away from the teaching role of a teacher. Software applications that use artificial intelligence make all this relevant to the teaching role automatic.
Instead of replacing teachers, AI is increasingly becoming a teaching assistant that complements the effectiveness of teachers.
Traditional assessment methodologies involve a lot of exams at fixed intervals; hence, the results might not be received in time for improvement in the next exam. AI allows students to be assessed instantly and receive feedback at the time of assessment with the possibility of correcting their mistakes while they still have the concept in their heads.
This feedback cycle promotes active learning and minimizes anxiety associated with high-stakes testing. Students feel more informed about their learning process and develop a greater level of ownership of their learning process.
AI educational tools are closing the gaps that exist in educational access. Students who are located in distant and resource-challenged regions are gaining access to intelligent tutoring systems, language translation systems, and adaptive learning that they could not have otherwise.
In fact, for people with disabilities, assistive technologies such as speech-to-text, text-to-speech, or visual recognition technologies powered through AI are spreading inclusive learning. This is because inclusive learning resources are among those that have propelled AI’s swift integration in education.
The generation of students today is brought up in a digital context that is interactive and responsive to them. The traditional textbook or lecture may just not be able to capture their interest. This is where technology and artificial intelligence help to develop interactive learning sessions such as simulations and virtual labs.
Learning that appears more relevant and more interactive increases motivation and hence improves retention and understanding.
The educational institutions are also incorporating AI into their systems because of an awareness of a need to equip pupils with knowledge of how to function within a future where AI is embedded into most of their lines of expertise. AI-enabled learning aids pupils not only in content mastery but also equips them to interact with intelligence.
Practical familiarity with AI can be accomplished through experiencing it, which is not possible through traditional methods of learning about it.
AI allows educational institutions and schools to make informed, data-backed decisions. AI is able to pick up on trends such as the risk of students dropping out of school, subjects or teaching methodologies, and so on, based on large chunks of educational data.
AI is disrupting the teaching and learning space at an unprecedented rate due to the alignment of AI with the actual educational requirements of personalization, efficiency, inclusion, and relevance. However, for the success of AI, there is a need to implement it judiciously, with proper ethics in place, and with robust and sound human intervention.
AI will transform the education experience, not redefine learning, by providing the means to adapt to the learner, support the teacher, and broaden the educational experience to all, regardless of traditional boundaries. As education advances into the future, the applications of AI are becoming an unprecedented catalyst.
See lessAI literacy play in compulsory school ...
AI Literacy as the New Basic Literacy Whereas traditional literacy allows people to make sense of the text, AI literacy allows students to make sense of the systems driving decisions and opportunities that affect them. From social media feeds to online exams, students are using AI-driven tools everyRead more
Whereas traditional literacy allows people to make sense of the text, AI literacy allows students to make sense of the systems driving decisions and opportunities that affect them. From social media feeds to online exams, students are using AI-driven tools every day, usually without realizing it. Without foundational knowledge, they might take the outputs of AI as absolute truths rather than probabilistic suggestions.
Introduction to AI literacy at an early age helps students learn the following:
This helps place students in a position where they can interact more critically, rather than passively, with technology.
One of the most crucial jobs that AI literacy performs is in solidifying critical thinking. Students need to be taught that AI doesn’t “think” or “understand” in a human sense. It predicts outcomes from patterns in data, which can contain errors, stereotypes, or incomplete standpoints.
By learning this, students become better at:
This is even more significant in an age where AI networks can now generate essays, images, and videos that seem highly convincing but may not be entirely accurate or ethical.
AI literacy also will play a very important role in ethical education. Students also need to be aware of issues revolving around data privacy, surveillance, consent, and algorithmic bias. All these topics touch on their everyday life in the use of learning apps, face recognition systems, or online platforms.
Embedding ethics in AI education will assist students in:
This approach keeps AI education in step with wider imperatives around responsible digital citizenship.
The future workforce will not be divided into “AI experts” and “non-AI users.” Most professions will require some level of interaction with these AI systems. Doctors, teachers, lawyers, artists, and administrators will all need to work alongside intelligent tools.
Compulsory AI Literacy will ensure that students:
Early exposure can also allow learners to decide on their interests in either science, technology, ethics, design, or policy-all fields which are increasingly related to AI.
Making AI literacy optional or restricting it to elite institutions threatens to widen social and economic inequalities. Students from under-resourced backgrounds may be doomed to remain mere consumers of AI, while others become the creators and decision-makers.
Compulsory AI literacy gives a mammoth boost to:
Such inclusion would make it an inclusive, democratic future in terms of technology.
There is no requirement that AI literacy need be complex and technical from the beginning. Simple ideas, such as that of “smart machines” and decision-making, may be explained to students in primary school, while the higher classes can be introduced to more advanced ideas like data, algorithms, ethics, and real-world applications. In the end, one wants progressive understanding, not information overload.
This is where AI literacy should constitute a core and mandatory part of school education AI is part of students’ present reality. Teaching young people how AI works and where it can fail, and the responsible use of AI, equips them with critical awareness and ethical judgment and prepares them for the future. The fear of AI and blind trust in it are replaced by awareness of this as a strong tool-continuously guided by human values and informed decision-making. ChatGPT may make mistakes. Check impo
See less
What Is Traditional Model Training Conventional training of models is essentially the development and optimization of an AI system by exposing it to data and optimizing its internal parameters accordingly. Here, the team of developers gathers data from various sources and labels it and then employsRead more
What Is Traditional Model Training
Conventional training of models is essentially the development and optimization of an AI system by exposing it to data and optimizing its internal parameters accordingly. Here, the team of developers gathers data from various sources and labels it and then employs algorithms that reduce an error by iterating numerous times.
While training, the system will learn about the patterns from the data over a period of time. For instance, an email spam filter system will learn to categorize those emails by training thousands to millions of emails. If the system is performing poorly, engineers would require retraining the system using better data and/or algorithms.
This process usually involves:
After it is trained, it acts in a way that cannot be changed much until it is retrained again.
What is Prompt Engineering?
“Prompt Engineering” is basically designing and fine-tuning these input instructions or prompts to provide to a pre-trained model of AI technology, and specifically large language models to this point in our discussion, so as to produce better and more meaningful results from these models. The technique of prompt engineering operates at a purely interaction level and does not necessarily adjust weights.
In general, the prompt may contain instructions, context, examples, constraints, and/or formatting aids. As an example, the difference between the question “summarize this text” and “summarize this text in simple language for a nonspecialist” influences the response to the question asked.
Prompt engineering is based on:
It doesn’t change the model itself, but the way we communicate with the model will be different.
Key Points of Contrast between Prompt Engineering and Conventional Training
1. Comparing Model Modification and Model Usage
“Traditional training involves modifying the parameters of the model to optimize performance. Prompt engineering involves no modification of the model—only how to better utilize what knowledge already exists within it.”
2. Data and Resource Requirements
Model training involves extensive data, human labeling, and costly infrastructure. Contrast this with prompt design, which can be performed at low cost with minimal data and does not require training data.
3. Speed and Flexibility
Model training and retraining can take several days or weeks. Prompt engineering enables instant changes to the behavioral pattern through changes to the prompt and thus is highly adaptable and amenable to rapid experimentation.
4. Skill Sets Involved
“Traditional training involves special knowledge of statistics, optimization, and machine learning paradigms. Prompt engineering stresses the need for knowledge of the field, clarifying messages, and structuring instructions in a logical manner.”
5. Scope of Control
Training the model allows one to have a high, long-term degree of control over the performance of particular tasks. It allows one to have a high, surface-level degree of control over the performance of multiple tasks.
Why Prompt Engineering has Emerged to be So Crucial
The emergence of large general-purpose models has changed the dynamics for the application of AI in organizations. Instead of training models for different tasks, a team can utilize a single highly advanced model using the prompt method. The trend has greatly eased the adoption process and accelerated the pace of innovation,
Additionally, “prompt engineering enables scaling through customization,” and various prompts may be used to customize outputs for “marketing, healthcare writing, educational content, customer service, or policy analysis,” through “the same model.”
Shortcomings of Prompt Engineering
Despite its power, there are some boundaries of prompt engineering. For example, neither prompt engineering nor any other method can teach the AI new information, remove deeply set biases, or function correctly all the time. Specialized or governed applications still need traditional or fine-tuning approaches.
Conclusion
At a very conceptual level, training a traditional model involves creating intelligence, whereas prompt engineering involves guiding this intelligence. Training modifies what a model knows, whereas prompt engineering modifies how a certain body of knowledge can be utilized. In this way, both of these aspects combine to constitute methodologies that create contrasting trajectories in AI development.
See less