Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In


Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here


Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

You must login to add post.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here
Sign InSign Up

Qaskme

Qaskme Logo Qaskme Logo

Qaskme Navigation

  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask A Question
  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog

Become Part of QaskMe - Share Knowledge and Express Yourself Today!

At QaskMe, we foster a community of shared knowledge, where curious minds, experts, and alternative viewpoints unite to ask questions, share insights, connect across various topics—from tech to lifestyle—and collaboratively enhance the credible space for others to learn and contribute.

Create A New Account
  • Recent Questions
  • Most Answered
  • Answers
  • Most Visited
  • Most Voted
  • No Answers
  • Recent Posts
  • Random
  • New Questions
  • Sticky Questions
  • Polls
  • Recent Questions With Time
  • Most Answered With Time
  • Answers With Time
  • Most Visited With Time
  • Most Voted With Time
  • Random With Time
  • Recent Posts With Time
  • Feed
  • Most Visited Posts
  • Favorite Questions
  • Answers You Might Like
  • Answers For You
  • Followed Questions With Time
  • Favorite Questions With Time
  • Answers You Might Like With Time
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 05/09/2025In: Digital health, Education, Health

How can schools balance digital literacy with protecting children from screen overuse?

protecting children from screen overu

digital healtheducation
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 05/09/2025 at 4:17 pm

    The Double-Edged Sword of Technology in Education Technology has become inseparable from modern learning. From smartboards in classrooms to tablets in backpacks, digital tools open doors to information, creativity, and collaboration like never before. But alongside these opportunities comes a growinRead more

    The Double-Edged Sword of Technology in Education

    Technology has become inseparable from modern learning. From smartboards in classrooms to tablets in backpacks, digital tools open doors to information, creativity, and collaboration like never before. But alongside these opportunities comes a growing concern: children are spending more time on screens than ever before, and not all of it is healthy. Parents, teachers, and even students themselves are beginning to ask—how much is too much?

    Why Digital Literacy Is Essential

    In today’s world, digital literacy is as important as reading and math. Children need to know how to:

    • Safely navigate the internet.
    • Differentiate between credible and misleading information.
    • Use productivity tools, coding platforms, and AI responsibly.
    • Build a healthy online presence for their future careers.

    Without these skills, students risk being left behind in an economy where almost every job involves some level of digital fluency. Schools cannot ignore this reality; preparing students for the digital age is part of their responsibility.

    The Hidden Costs of Screen Overuse

    At the same time, research and lived experiences have shown the drawbacks of excessive screen exposure:

    • Physical health issues like eye strain, poor posture, and reduced physical activity.
    • Mental health impacts, including anxiety, sleep disruption, and digital addiction.
    • Reduced attention spans when students get used to rapid scrolling rather than deep, focused learning.
    • Social disconnection, as screens sometimes replace face-to-face friendships and play.
    • These risks make it clear that “more technology” is not always better in education.

    Striking the Balance: What Schools Can Do

    The challenge, then, is not choosing between digital literacy and screen protection, but designing a system that values both. Here are some strategies schools can adopt:

    1. Purposeful Screen Time
      Schools should distinguish between “active learning time” (coding, creating presentations, interactive lessons) and “passive screen time” (endless slideshows or videos). Quality should matter more than quantity.
    2. Blended Learning Approaches
      Encourage a mix of online and offline activities. For example, a history lesson might start with a short digital documentary, followed by group discussions or a physical project like creating posters or models.
    3. Digital Wellness Education
      Teach children not just how to use devices, but how to use them responsibly. Lessons on screen breaks, posture, mindfulness, and digital boundaries can empower students to self-regulate.
    4. Teacher Role Modeling
      Educators can lead by example, showing students when it’s better to put the laptop aside and engage in dialogue or hands-on work.
    5. Parent Partnerships
      Schools can work with families by sharing guidelines, resources, and workshops about healthy screen use at home. A consistent message between school and home makes a big difference.

    The Bigger Picture: Teaching Balance as a Life Skill

    Perhaps the most important part of this conversation is recognizing that balance itself is a skill children need to learn. The future won’t eliminate screens—it will involve more of them, in workplaces, entertainment, and even social life. By teaching students early on how to manage screen time consciously, schools are not just protecting them in childhood, but equipping them for a lifetime of healthier digital habits.

    Final Thought

    Digital literacy and screen overuse may seem like opposing forces, but they don’t have to be. With intentional design, schools can foster environments where technology is a tool, not a trap. The goal is not to shield children from screens entirely, but to teach them when to plug in and when to unplug.

    See less
      • 1
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 136
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 05/09/2025In: Education, Technology

Is remote learning here to stay, or will students return fully to physical classrooms?

will students return fully to physica ...

education
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 05/09/2025 at 3:59 pm

    The Pandemic Shift That Changed Everything When the pandemic closed schools all around the globe, millions of students were overnight plunged into learning at home. What had been considered a backup or an experimental solution became the norm overnight. Homes became classrooms, teachers mastered vidRead more

    The Pandemic Shift That Changed Everything

    When the pandemic closed schools all around the globe, millions of students were overnight plunged into learning at home. What had been considered a backup or an experimental solution became the norm overnight. Homes became classrooms, teachers mastered video calls, and students learned both the flexibility and exhaustion of learning from home. This global trend set a large question: Was this only a short-term solution, or the start of a long-term shift in education?

    Why Remote Learning Isn’t Going Away Entirely

    Remote learning opened up new doors that are difficult to dismiss:

    • Accessibility: Rural students, or students with disabilities, suddenly had more access to education without the obstacle of traveling.
    • Flexibility: Older students in particular appreciated learning at their own pace—rewinding a taped lecture or doing assignments in flexible time slots—felt empowering.
    • Global Classrooms: An Indian student could take a coding workshop from a U.S. professor. That sort of borderless learning was not common before.

    For most, these advantages were a preview of the possibilities for education to be more inclusive and flexible.

    The Human Pull of Physical Classrooms

    But as classrooms reopened, another truth became clear: students missed each other. Education isn’t just about knowledge transfer—it’s about community, belonging, and growth through human interaction. In-person schools offer moments that screens can’t replicate: the chatter before class starts, group projects where creativity flows in real time, and the encouragement of a teacher’s smile when you’re struggling.

    Physical classrooms also give students structure. Students missed the structure, and many had trouble with focus, isolation, and motivation in remote environments. Schools are more than institutions to acquire knowledge—they are havens of safety where kids and young adults develop friendships, become resilient, and learn life skills.

    A Likely Future: Hybrid Education

    • Instead of an either-or solution, the future of learning could be a hybrid model. Schools could blend the best of both worlds:
    • Traditional classrooms for social interaction, collaboration, and personal guidance.
    • Online platforms for flexible assignments, supplementary lessons, and access to global expertise.

    For example, a high school student might attend math and literature in person but take an advanced coding or language course online from an international instructor. This blended model gives students a richer, more customized education.

    Challenges That Still Need Solving

    While the idea of hybrid learning is exciting, challenges remain:

    • Digital Divide: Not every family can afford laptops, high-speed internet or quiet learning spaces. If not addressed, remote learning could deepen inequality.
    • Screen Fatigue: Too much online learning can lead to burnout and health issues, especially for younger children.
    • Teacher Training: Educators need support to adapt their teaching methods for hybrid models, rather than simply transferring old lessons onto screens.

    Final Thought

    Remote learning isn’t a trend it will inevitably fade within the inevitable tides of time. Instead it is firmly securing a place in the future of education. But remote learning won’t entirely replace the classroom, because education isn’t just about knowledge-it’s also about connection and community. Classrooms tomorrow could be blended spaces where technology expands opportunities but in-person learning continue to shape their social, emotional lives.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 97
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 05/09/2025In: Education, Technology

Will AI tutors replace traditional classroom teaching, or simply support it?

traditional classroom teaching, or si ...

aieducationtechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 05/09/2025 at 3:37 pm

    The Rise of AI in Learning Over the past several years, AI tutors moved from lab equipment to ubiquitous companions on bedroom floors and classroom desks. Devices that can immediately answer a mathematical question, learn a language, or accommodate a child's skill set are now within reach of tens ofRead more

    The Rise of AI in Learning

    Over the past several years, AI tutors moved from lab equipment to ubiquitous companions on bedroom floors and classroom desks. Devices that can immediately answer a mathematical question, learn a language, or accommodate a child’s skill set are now within reach of tens of millions of students. To most, they’re virtually wizardly: an on-demand teacher in one’s hand 24/7.

    What AI Does Extremely Well

    • AI teachers are best used in conditions where human teachers repeatedly fail on a time and quantity basis. They are able to:
    • Give immediate feedback on an individual basis.
    • Adjust teaching based on individual learning rates.
    • Display unlimited patience when one student repeats the same mistake.
      Speaking in several languages to prevent learning obstacles.
      For the night student having trouble with algebra, an AI teacher brings instant comprehension, something a typical classroom setting cannot.

    The Indispensable Work of Human Educators

    And that’s the truth: learning is not just information transfer. Great teaching is guidance, encouragement, and human contact. Teachers have a sense of what no computer program ever will: the little signals—a struggling student, a lack of confidence, the glint of interest in an eye—that can be the difference. They build not just minds but character, ethics, and social skills.

    A classroom is also a social setting. It’s where kids learn how to collaborate, feel for others, negotiate, and recover—skills that extend far beyond academic competence. No computer software, no matter how clever, can replace the reassurance of support from a teacher who believes in you.

    The Future: Cooperation, Not Replacement

    Instead of viewing AI as a replacement for educators, it is possible to view AI as an aide or co-pilot. Imagine a teacher utilizing AI to grade repetitive assignments, so they have more time for one-on-one mentorship. Or an AI system informing teachers that they need to provide special assistance to certain students so that they may react more effectively.

    In this manner, AI teachers would actually make instructors more human, removing the mechanical aspect of the profession and allowing teachers to concentrate on guidance, empathy, and creativity.

    Risks to Watch Out For

    Of course, we also have to be careful. Overuse of AI may:

    • Decrease critical thinking development if students rely on it for “answers” instead of learning.
    • Widen inequality if only rich families or schools will still be able to afford quality AI tutors in the future.
    • Cause burnout among teachers if they are being asked to compete with machines instead of being aided by them.

    Final Thought

    AI teachers are not here to replace educators—they’re here to boost learning. The future most likely holds is a hybrid approach, one in which AI provides customized advice, yet human educators continue to motivate, advise, and influence people in ways that no computer program ever could.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 154
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 04/09/2025In: Health, News

Are younger generations facing more burnout than previous ones?

younger generations facing more burno ...

health
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 04/09/2025 at 4:14 pm

    The Reality of Burnout Today Burnout is no longer simply a "middle-aged corporate" issue. The younger generations — Millennials and Gen Z — are experiencing more feelings of exhaustion, anxiety, and mental weariness than previous generations were at the same age. Surveys indicate that most young aduRead more

    The Reality of Burnout Today

    Burnout is no longer simply a “middle-aged corporate” issue. The younger generations — Millennials and Gen Z — are experiencing more feelings of exhaustion, anxiety, and mental weariness than previous generations were at the same age. Surveys indicate that most young adults are burnt out even before they are twenty or so. Why, though?

    Digital Pressure & the “Always-On” World

    Earlier generations were able to “leave work at work.” Now, with laptops and smart phones, younger employees are surrounded by an everywhere culture. Managers’ messages, clients’ pings, and around-the-clock emails cause the workday to never end. Social media layers it further: continuous comparison, needing to “keep up,” and the sense that you ought to always be doing more or receiving things sooner.

    For most of the youth, the division between work and leisure life becomes blurred to a point where rest is perceived as guilt.

     Economic Stress & Uncertain Futures

    Burnout also results from economic and social stress. There are a lot of young generations who are experiencing increasing student loans, expensive housing, precarious job markets, and dwindling benefits relative to what their grandparents or their parents had at the same age in life. Picture yourself as an adult with massive loans, irregular gigs rather than stable jobs, and stratospheric rent — no wonder stress levels are off the charts.

    This makes rest a luxury, rather than a human right.

     Mental Health Awareness (a Double-Edged Sword)

    One of the healthier contrasts of the times now is that younger generations are not as humble about mental health issues. They’ll call burnout and get a therapist or counselor. The downside is that constantly worrying about mental health issues has a tendency to sometimes lead people to feel like they’re always under-diagnosing or overthinking themselves, thus contributing to stress.

    Clash of Values: Purpose vs. Survival

    Where previous generations enjoyed long hours, discipline systems, and hustle culture, the new ones prefer meaningful work, flexibility, and harmony. Yet, they are trapped in systems sustained by long hours, discipline hierarchies, and hustle culture. The paradox of yearning for meaningful life while trapped by depleting routines leads to burnout striking deeper.

    A Shift in How We Respond

    • The silver lining? Newer generations are rising up. We’re seeing things like:
    • The four-day workweek experiment boom.
    • Mental wellness days being accepted in workplaces.
    • More focus on self-care, therapy, and mindfulness.
    • Younger employees openly quitting bad jobs instead of grinding it out for decades.

    This revolution might lead to long-term cultural change — something previous generations may not have had the ability or means to do.

    Human Takeaway

    Yes, younger generations are burning out on epidemic scales, but not because they are “weaker” or “less resilient.” It’s because they’re coming of age in an accelerating, more dissonant, less secure, and more demanding world than any that has come before. The challenge is now to find ways — both individually and systemically — to reframe success not as perpetual productivity but as sustainable well-being.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 2
  • 1
  • 115
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 04/09/2025In: Communication, Company, News

Will tariff-free digital trade zones emerge as an alternative to fragmented global trade policies?

global trade policies

companynews
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 04/09/2025 at 3:41 pm

    A Divided World through Tariffs We are living in a time when tariffs are being used like chess pieces in a game of geopolitics. From steel and aluminum to semiconductors and clean tech, nations are slapping tariffs on one another in the name of protecting jobs, industries or national security. And aRead more

    A Divided World through Tariffs

    We are living in a time when tariffs are being used like chess pieces in a game of geopolitics. From steel and aluminum to semiconductors and clean tech, nations are slapping tariffs on one another in the name of protecting jobs, industries or national security. And as we all know, the European market is pretty fragmented with digital trade (data localization, cloud services, digital taxes, etc.).

    But this is the point: The digital economy is not like shipping containers. Data flows do not observe borders, and innovation is driven by openness. It is why the idea of tariff-free digital trade zones is beginning to make sense.

    What Are Digital Trade Zones?

    Suppose some countries sat down and decided on a few matters:

    • “No tariffs on software or services, AI, cloud storage, or streaming.”
    • No forced localization of computing facilities.”
    • “Free rules for digital payments and e-commerce.”

    It would be like a free-trade agreement for the internet, and businesses and citizens will be able to have digital trade without new charges or political hurdles.

    Why This Sounds Appealing

    Letting small businesses flourish: A Nairobi freelancer will find it easier to deliver web design services to a London customer without the burden of new digital taxes.

    • Researchers could collaborate freely across borders without any restrictions on tools or data.
    • Consumer benefit: Everyone around the world would have more affordable access to global apps, streaming, and cloud services.
    • Economic growth: Tariff-free trade zones powered manufacturing and exports. Tariff-free digital zones would similarly power startups.

    The Roadblocks

    Of course, it’s not all plain sailing. There are some genuine concerns:

    • Data sovereignty: Governments worry that technology titans now have too much information about their citizens.
    • Tax fairness: How will countries ensure that everyone is paying their fair share without tariffs or internet taxes?
    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 107
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 04/09/2025In: Analytics, Communication, News, Technology

Should tariffs be redesigned to target digital goods and AI services, not just physical products?

digital goods and AI services, not ju ...

newstechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 04/09/2025 at 3:00 pm

    Alright, let’s get real—tariffs made sense back when the world was all about factories belching smoke and ships lugging boxes of stuff from one country to another. Picture crates of steel, heaps of car parts, mountains of T-shirts… slap a fee on ‘em at the border, and boom: your local industry getsRead more

    Alright, let’s get real—tariffs made sense back when the world was all about factories belching smoke and ships lugging boxes of stuff from one country to another. Picture crates of steel, heaps of car parts, mountains of T-shirts… slap a fee on ‘em at the border, and boom: your local industry gets a bit of extra oxygen and the government grabs some cash for its rainy-day stash. Simple. Material goods, physical borders, easy math.

    But now? The whole thing’s basically turned into some weird digital Hunger Games. Everything’s in the cloud. Apps, Netflix binges, AI doodads—hell, people are dropping cash on pixelated sneakers and meme cats (yeah, NFTs, if you want to get technical). Meanwhile, the rules? Still stuck in the Stone Age, shuffling paperwork for things you literally can’t hold in your hand.

    So, why even mess with digital tariffs? Some folks are convinced it’s the only way for the “little guys” to stand a chance. Imagine you’re this plucky AI startup in Brazil, just trying to make rent, and then Google or Microsoft rolls in and wipes the floor with you. A digital tariff might actually slow the big guys down, give you a fighting shot. There’s also the whole “hello, pay your fair share” angle—giant tech firms hoover up profits from every corner of the map, but local governments? They’re lucky to find pocket change. A digital tax could actually make them cough up.

    And yeah, let’s not forget data sovereignty. Countries want a say over where their people’s data goes. Taxing cross-border data or foreign AI services? That’s one way to yank back a little control.

    But, come on, it’s a minefield. Jack up the price of cloud tools and suddenly college kids, indie devs, and tiny businesses are paying extra just to keep the lights on. Not exactly the dream. Plus, it could totally mess up the open, collaborative vibe the internet’s got going—coders building stuff across continents, scientists teaming up online… that could get ugly real fast. And if countries start lobbing digital tariffs at each other? Congrats, now you’ve got yourself a virtual trade war. Spoiler: lawyers win, everyone else loses.

    Some brainiacs—sorry, “industry experts”—say digital service taxes might work better. Rather than whacking everything with a fee, you just tax profits or usage. Feels a bit less like using a sledgehammer to swat a fly. Or maybe, wild idea, the world’s rule-makers could actually update the rules. The WTO, OECD, whoever—somebody’s gotta step in before it’s total anarchy.

    But, end of the day, this isn’t just about spreadsheets. It’s about real people. Imagine a tiny animation studio in India, hustling to sell their work in Europe. Smack them with digital tariffs and they might just pack up shop. But if you let the tech titans have free rein, they’ll squash everyone in sight, homegrown talent included.

    So yeah, digital tariffs: are they a necessary evil, or just innovation’s latest buzzkill? How do you protect the underdogs without nuking the whole system? No clue, honestly. But one thing’s obvious—the old-school playbook has officially expired. Someone’s gotta cook up a new one, and fast.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 110
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 03/09/2025In: Communication, News, Technology

Will AI widen the gap between rich and poor nations, or help level the playing field?

the gap between rich and poor nations

aitechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 03/09/2025 at 4:38 pm

     The Hope vs. The Fear Artificial intelligence has been called "the great equalizer" and "the great divider." On the one hand, it holds the potential to provide every individual with internet connection access to knowledge previously reserved for the elite—medical advice, legal advice, business planRead more

     The Hope vs. The Fear

    Artificial intelligence has been called “the great equalizer” and “the great divider.” On the one hand, it holds the potential to provide every individual with internet connection access to knowledge previously reserved for the elite—medical advice, legal advice, business planning, even high-end tutoring. On the other hand, creating and deploying these AI systems takes enormous data, capital, and computing power, resources in the possession of a few successful nations and firms.

    So will AI close the gap or increase it? The answer is nuanced—because it will depend on how AI is designed, shared, and regulated.

    How AI Could Level the Playing Field

    Envision a physician at a rural clinic in Kenya using an AI assistant to diagnose illness without the need for pricey lab equipment. Or a Bangladeshi business with access to AI marketing strategies on par with those of multinational firms. Or a student at a village far from a city in India doing math with an AI tutor that adjusts their learning speed.

    • AI can cause knowledge and proficiency to be more evenly spread:
    • Education: AI instructors can possibly provide tailored instruction to millions of those who lack access to quality schools.
    • Healthcare: Telemedicine and diagnostics based on AI could be extended to remote areas.
    • Entrepreneurship: Small enterprises of poorer countries could compete with the world using AI without large budgets.

    This way, AI can potentially bypass infrastructure deficits—just like mobile phones enabled developing countries to bypass the costly installation of landlines.

     How AI Might Widen the Gap

    • There is, however, another aspect to the coin: AI craves energy. It needs to be trained on:
    • Ginormous computing resources (supercomputers, power, and state-of-the-art chips).
    • Massive amounts of data, usually controlled by giant tech companies.
    • Expert ability, which in return tends to group in rich countries.
    • This raises the possibility of AI colonialism: where rich nations create, own, and benefit from AI systems, and poor countries are passive receivers. For instance:
    • If large corporations in the US or China own AI, poor countries can “rent” but cannot develop their own.
    • Language and cultural bias in AI systems may silence Global South voices.
    • Those with inadequate digital infrastructures may be left behind completely.

     The Transition Dilemma

    And as with work, there is even an issue of timing here. Rich countries are leading the charge, and poor countries are trying to get into the game of bringing in AI. This disparity can have the possibility of creating new dependency—where poorer countries are depending upon AI systems they may not even own, just as many are presently depending upon drugs or technology brought in from abroad.

    What May Make the Difference

    • Whether AI will bring us together or tear us apart will be determined by decisions being made today:
    • Open-Source AI: If big models stay open, smaller countries can adapt them to their specific needs.
    • Global Cooperation: Global institutions can make AI a global right, and not pay-for.
    • Local Innovation: Developing local AI firms in Africa, South Asia, and Latin America could create solutions contextually appropriate.
    • Digital Infrastructure: Power, internet connectivity, and investment in education is a necessity for any country to realize the advantages of AI.

     The Human Element

    To an individual in Silicon Valley, AI is a productivity tool. To a teacher in Nigeria, it might be the sole means of teaching in classes that have 60 students. To a farmer in Nepal, a weather forecast generated by AI may mean the difference between a profitable harvest and a whole season lost.

    That’s why this isn’t just geopolitics—it’s whether technology will be for the many or the few.

     So, Which Way Will It Go?

    If things go on as they are, AI is going to exacerbate the gap in the short run because already wealthy countries and companies are racing far ahead. But with proper policies, collaborations, and open innovation, AI can turn out to be a great leveller, as mobile technology revolutionised the reach of communications.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 106
  • 0
Answer
Load More Questions

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 418
  • Answers 405
  • Posts 4
  • Best Answers 21
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Anonymous

    Bluestone IPO vs Kal

    • 5 Answers
  • mohdanas

    Are AI video generat

    • 3 Answers
  • Anonymous

    Which industries are

    • 3 Answers
  • daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui added an answer An AI agent is But that is not all: An agent is something more than a predictive or classification model;… 07/11/2025 at 3:03 pm
  • daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui added an answer Understanding the Core Differences That is, by choosing between CNNs, RNNs, and Transformers, you are choosing how a model sees… 07/11/2025 at 1:00 pm
  • daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui added an answer 1. The double-edged nature of drone technology Drones are powerful because they are affordable, accessible, and capable. For a few… 06/11/2025 at 3:42 pm

Top Members

Trending Tags

ai aiineducation ai in education analytics company digital health edtech education geopolitics global trade health language machine learning multimodalai news nutrition people tariffs technology trade policy

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help

© 2025 Qaskme. All Rights Reserved