daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 20/08/2025In: , ,

they outweighed by inflationary effec

companynews
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    On the upside, tariff income puts money in local governments' pockets. Tariff income can amount to billions of dollars for countries heavily involved in trade, and that money can be allocated to infrastructure, subsidies, or some form of social program. Politically, it is a way to make "foreign busiRead more

    On the upside, tariff income puts money in local governments’ pockets. Tariff income can amount to billions of dollars for countries heavily involved in trade, and that money can be allocated to infrastructure, subsidies, or some form of social program. Politically, it is a way to make “foreign businesses pay taxes” when a tariff is added.

    However, that cost is usually not borne by the foreign exporter. The cost is borne by the importer, and then it is passed on throughout the chain, meaning that typically businesses and consumers are paying more. This can be an issue when thinking about the impact on inflation—food, electronics, and even raw inputs must be compensated for, which will also add to inflation (and/or costs), which ultimately reduces profits for small businesses and creates an increased cost of living for families. Frequently, inflation can negate or surpass the gain of tariff income.

    So, the reality is that when the government thinks about tariff income, it is great to consider individually, but it tends to be money taken from one pocket to be put into another. The lingering question is whether or not the government is allocating the money wisely, e.g., investing in the impacted sector or providing protections to vulnerable sectors, rather than just patching a hole in their budget.

    See less
Anonymous
Asked: 19/08/2025In: , ,

modern tariff policies

newstechnology
  1. Anonymous
    Anonymous

    That's interesting, because digital commodities don't quite fit the old concept of tariffs, which were created for physical commodities moving across borders—steel, autos, fabrics. But now so much trade is occurring online: streaming, cloud storage, video games, even software downloads. Most nationsRead more

    That’s interesting, because digital commodities don’t quite fit the old concept of tariffs, which were created for physical commodities moving across borders—steel, autos, fabrics. But now so much trade is occurring online: streaming, cloud storage, video games, even software downloads.

    Most nations have not imposed tariffs on these digital flows historically, in part because they are difficult to measure and monitor. But as digital trade continues to expand, governments are beginning to wonder: why tax physical imports, while digital imports enjoy a free ride? Some are piloting digital services taxes, taxing large technology companies that derive revenue in a country without enjoying physical presence there.

    From the point of view of humans, it is important because it may alter how we pay for daily online utilities—such as our subscription to Netflix or the software we run our businesses on. For small companies, new taxes or tariffs on online services might make operating online stores or advertising overseas more expensive. To governments, however, it is perceived as a means of tapping into revenue from an increasingly online economy.

    In short:

    digital tariffs remain a gray area. The difficulty is striking the right balance in incorporating digital trade into modern policies without killing off innovation or driving things up for everyday users.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 19/08/2025In: ,

small business caused by new import t ...

company
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    Small businesses are hit hardest by tariffs, as they don't have the cushion that large corporations do. Take a small furniture store that buys some woods or hardware in import—when tariffs drive up those costs, they can't always take the hit. Burdening the customers with it all risks driving them awRead more

    Small businesses are hit hardest by tariffs, as they don’t have the cushion that large corporations do. Take a small furniture store that buys some woods or hardware in import—when tariffs drive up those costs, they can’t always take the hit. Burdening the customers with it all risks driving them away, but taking it on their own tightens already thinning margins.

    In order to survive, small businesses are getting creative. Some are reconsidering their supply chains, sourcing locally even if it means changing their product lines. Others are negotiating harder with partners, or collaborating with other small businesses in order to make bulk buys and cut costs. Others are being straightforward with customers, explaining why prices are changing—surprisingly, honesty seems to breed loyalty.

    It’s not easy by any means, though. For others, tariffs are a test of resilience and adaptability. People who can change quickly and find new ways to create value seem to prosper. For others, though, the higher costs are like a losing battle against forces well out of their reach.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 19/08/2025In: ,

do they backfire in the long run

news
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    At first glance, tariffs appear to be a shield. They increase the price of foreign goods, which provides domestic industries with breathing space to expand without foreign competition in the form of cheaper foreign products. For instance, a steel mill would receive some breathing room if foreign steRead more

    At first glance,

    tariffs appear to be a shield. They increase the price of foreign goods, which provides domestic industries with breathing space to expand without foreign competition in the form of cheaper foreign products. For instance, a steel mill would receive some breathing room if foreign steel suddenly becomes higher priced. The workers feel more secure, and the industry can perhaps be given a second chance to modernize.

    But over time,

    tariffs can subtly bite back. Shoppers pay more, small businesses that use imported parts hurt, and other nations retaliate with tariffs of their own. That chain can damage exporters—farmers, for example, tend to suffer greatly when markets abroad contract. In the long term, industries “protected” by tariffs often become less competitive on the world stage because they don’t get pushed hard enough to innovate.

    therefore,

    tariffs can be a good short-term shield, but if applied for extended periods, they could become a crutch. The equilibrium essentially lies in whether governments make good use of that “protected time” and not simply maintain tariffs perpetually.

    See less
Anonymous
Asked: 19/08/2025In: , ,

a fair measure of student ability

education
  1. Anonymous
    Anonymous

    Standardized tests were meant to provide everyone with a standard—to enable schools, parents, and policymakers to compare performance between regions or backgrounds. Sounds great in theory. But in practice, these tests usually gauge the ability of a student to perform on an exam, not what they knowRead more

    Standardized tests were meant to provide everyone with a standard—to enable schools, parents, and policymakers to compare performance between regions or backgrounds. Sounds great in theory. But in practice, these tests usually gauge the ability of a student to perform on an exam, not what they know and how they use it.

    For many children, particularly those who perceive differently, who struggle with language, or who simply get anxious about testing, typical tests do not reflect their true potential. A thinker, a solid problem-solver, or an applied-skills student may not perform well on a multiple-choice test, but perhaps would do amazingly well in the world.

    That’s not to say that tests aren’t useful—they identify holes and keep the schools in line. As one measure of capacity, though, they fall short. Increasingly, educators now subscribe to a balanced indicator: applying tests such as projects, presentations, and portfolios in addition to the conventional tests. That way, we prize not just memorization, but creativity, collaboration, and critical thinking as well.

    Ultimately, the best indicator of student ability is not one test score—it’s a more complete picture of what they are like as students and thinkers.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 19/08/2025In: ,

extra pressure

educationnews
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    The secret is making the transition from "process" to "performance." Rather than only rewarding grades or test scores, parents can see effort put forth by their child, curiosity, or how they recover from errors. That creates resilience and love of learning, not fear of failure. Support can be as easRead more

    The secret is making the transition from “process” to “performance.” Rather than only rewarding grades or test scores, parents can see effort put forth by their child, curiosity, or how they recover from errors. That creates resilience and love of learning, not fear of failure.

    Support can be as easy as establishing a peaceful study area at home, having routines, and being interested in what the child is studying—asking “What was the most interesting thing you learned today?” rather than “Did you get an A?” Small changes in language are very effective.

    And maybe most of all, modeling is key. When children observe mothers and fathers reading, solving a problem, or simply saying “I don’t know, let’s learn it together,” they will absorb that learning is a lifelong process, not only a school-only activity.

    Therefore, parents needn’t be second teachers. They need only to be cheerleaders, models, and safe havens—reminding children that growth is more important than being perfect.

    See less
Anonymous
Asked: 19/08/2025In: , ,

schools prioritize to prepare student ...

educationnews
  1. Anonymous
    Anonymous

    Though math, science, and language abilities will always be important, the actual "future-proof" abilities are those that enable students to adjust as fields change. Critical thinking, problem-solving, and digital literacy are at the top—because regardless of the field, individuals will need to collRead more

    Though math, science, and language abilities will always be important, the actual “future-proof” abilities are those that enable students to adjust as fields change. Critical thinking, problem-solving, and digital literacy are at the top—because regardless of the field, individuals will need to collaborate with technology, interrogate information, and make informed decisions.

    No less significant are soft skills: emotional intelligence, teamwork, and communication. In a global future where AI and automation perform technical work, it’s the capacity for working with others, leading with heart, and deciphering complicated human contexts that will differentiate people.

    And then there’s creativity. The careers of the future may not even be imagined yet, so it’s more important to teach students to envision, create, and learn forever rather than memorize information that can be Googled in a second.

    Short version: Schools should equip students not only for a “first job,” but for a lifetime of learning and relearning. Since the future won’t pay off for those who know everything—it will pay off for those who can continue to learn, unlearn, and relearn.

    See less
Load More Questions