Is the Tech/AI Rally Sustainable or Are We in a Bubble?

Tech and AI-related stocks have surged over the last few years at an almost unreal pace. Companies into chips, cloud AI infrastructure, automation tools, robotics, and generative AI platforms have seen their stock prices skyrocket. Investors, institutions, and startups, not to mention governments, are pouring money into AI innovation and infrastructure.

But the big question everywhere from small investors to global macro analysts is:

“Is this growth backed by real fundamentals… or is it another dot-com moment waiting to burst?”

• Let’s break it down in a clear, intuitive way.
• Why the AI Rally Looks Sustainable

There are powerful forces supporting long-term growth this isn’t all hype.

1. There is Real, Measurable Demand

But the technology companies aren’t just selling dreams, they’re selling infrastructure.

• AI data centers, GPUs, servers, AI-as-a-service products, and enterprise automation have become core necessities for businesses.
• Companies all over the world are embracing generative-AI tools.
• Governments are developing national AI strategies.
• Every industry- Hospitals, banks, logistics, education, and retail-is integrating AI at scale.

This is not speculative usage; it’s enterprise spending, which is durable.

2. The Tech Giants Are Showing Real Revenue Growth

Unlike the dot-com bubble, today’s leaders (Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, Tesla in robotics/AI, etc.) have:

• enormous cash reserves
• profitable business models
• large customer bases
• strong quarter-on-quarter revenue growth
• high margins

In fact, these companies are earning money from AI.

3. AI is becoming a general-purpose technology

Like electricity, the Internet, or smartphones changed everything, AI is now becoming a foundational layer of:

• healthcare
• education
• cybersecurity
• e-commerce
• content creation
• transportation
• finance

When a technology pervades every sector, its financial impact is naturally going to diffuse over decades, not years.

4. Infrastructure investment is huge

Chip makers, data-center operators, and cloud providers are investing billions to meet demand:

• AI chips
• high-bandwidth memory
• cloud GPUs
• fiber-optic scaling
• global data-center expansion

This is not short-term speculation; it is multi-year capital investment, which usually drives sustainable growth.

 But… There Are Also Signs of Bubble-Like Behavior

Even with substance, there are also some worrying signals.

1. Valuations Are Becoming Extremely High

Some AI companies are trading at:

• P/E ratios of 60, 80, or even 100+
• market caps that assume perfect future growth
• forecasts that are overly optimistic
• High valuations are not automatically bubbles

But they increase risk when growth slows.

2. Everyone is “Chasing the AI Train”

When hype reaches retail traders, boards, startups, and governments at the same time, prices can rise more quickly than actual earnings.

Examples of bubble-like sentiment:

• Companies add “AI” to their pitch, and stock jumps 20–30%.
• Social media pages touting “next Nvidia”
• Retail investors buying on FOMO rather than on fundamentals.
• AI startups getting high valuations without revenue.

This emotional buying can inflate the prices beyond realistic levels.

3. AI Costs Are Rising Faster Than AI Profits

Building AI models is expensive:

• enormous energy consumption
• GPU shortages
• high operating costs
• expensive data acquisition

Some companies do not manage to convert AI spending into meaningful profits, thus leading to future corrections.

4. Concentration Risk Is Real

A handful of companies are driving the majority of gains: Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Meta.

This means:

If even one giant disappoints in earnings, the whole AI sector could correct sharply.

We saw something similar in the dot-com era where leaders pulled the market both up and down.

We’re not in a pure bubble, but parts of the market are overheating.

The reality is:

Long-term sustainability is supported because the technology itself is real, transformative, and valuable.

But:

The short-term prices could be ahead of the fundamentals.

That creates pockets of overvaluation. Not the entire sector, but some of these AI, chip, cloud, and robotics stocks are trading on hype.

In other words,

• AI as a technology will absolutely last
• But not every AI stock will.
• Some companies will become global giants.
• Some won’t make it through the next 3–5 years.

What Could Trigger a Correction?

A sudden drop in AI stocks could be witnessed with:

• Supply of GPUs outstrips demand
• enterprises reduce AI budgets
• Regulatory pressure mounts
• Energy costs spike
• disappointing earnings reports
• slower consumer adoption
• global recession or rate hikes

Corrections are normal – they “cool the system” and remove speculative excess.

Long-Term Outlook (5–10 Years)

• Most economists and analysts believe that
•  AI will reshape global GDP
• Tech companies will keep on growing.
•  AI will become essential infrastructure
• Data-center and chip demand will continue to increase.
•  Productivity gains will be significant
• So yes the long-term trend is upward.

But expect volatility along the way.

Human-Friendly Conclusion

Think of the AI rally being akin to a speeding train.

The engine-real AI adoption, corporate spending, global innovation-is strong. But some of the coaches are shaky and may get disconnected. The track is solid, but not quite straight-the economic fundamentals are sound. So: We are not in a pure bubble… But we are in a phase where, in some areas, excitement is running faster than revenue.

See less

 1. Why the Opposition Is Upset

Opposition leaders said that the government took too much time to declare the blast a terror incident, even as horrific visuals and casualty reports were pouring in. They questioned why the official stance changed after many hours.

As they say:

• The government should have immediately communicated clearly whether it suspected a terror angle.
• A slow official reaction creates confusion, panic, and space for misinforming.
• Calling it “just a blast” at first and then only later declaring it a “terror act” looked like the government was unsure or trying to control the narrative.

To them, such delays raise questions of preparedness, coordination, and transparency.

 2. Location Gives the Impression of Seriousness to the Delay

The explosion occurred right next to the Red Fort, one of India’s most sensitive and highly guarded areas. This heightens the criticism because:

• Such an attack in a high-security area hints at major intelligence or security lapses.
• In this situation, the public expects the government to respond quickly, resolutely, and confidently.
• Any hesitation by the authorities can give the impression of weak crisis management.
• The Opposition is using this to underline what they call “systemic failures.”

3. Opponents Believe the Government Was Trying to Manage Optics

Some leaders claimed the government was reluctant at first to refer to it as a terror attack because:

• It would raise questions about the security preparedness of the Union Home Ministry.
• It may reflect badly on the government’s claim of being tough on terrorism.
• Calling it a terror act right away could fuel public fear before full details were known.

They essentially believe that the government tried to control the narrative first, then label it formally only after internal alignment.

 4. Public Communication: The Heart of the Debate

In the event of mass casualty situations, the public depends on the government’s communication to be timely, candid, and coordinated.

According to the Opposition:

• Mixed or delayed messaging shows disorganisation.
• This may lead to citizens’ perception that the government is driven instead of driving.
• The families of victims deserve clarity, not silence or confusion.

They insist that the government should be more open in its communication during crisis situations.

5. The Government’s Side of the Story (Context)

While the opposition is vocal, it’s also fair to note common challenges the government faces:

• In the early stages, officials should not speculate.
• Confirmation of any “terror angle” has to rest on forensic evidence and intelligence validation.
• Announcing it prematurely could also be irresponsible.
• But the Opposition claims the delay was longer than need be, and that communication should have been more consistent.

6. The Political Temperature Is High

Because the incident comes at a politically sensitive period:

• Parties are using this to question the competency and credibility of the government.
• The government is defending itself by saying it acted with caution and responsibility.
• The public is torn between fear, anger, and uncertainty.
• Significant events related to national security often become politicized, and this would prove no different.

 7. What It Means for Citizens

For ordinary people, the debate ultimately touches on:

• How safe are our cities?
• How quickly does the state respond in crisis situations?
• Are we getting the truth or managed messaging?
• Are institutions working properly to protect us?

It has triggered a broader conversation about trust, safety, and governance.

Conclusion

The government is facing all round Opposition criticism for what they said was delaying the acknowledgment of the Delhi blast as a terror attack, while clear communication and fast action were required in an incident relating to national security. The government urged patience and said it was following due procedure. This clash reflects not only political rivalry but also deeper public concerns about security, transparency, and crisis management in India.

See less

 What Is the Impact of Tariffs on a Country’s Exports and Global Trade Flows?

Tariffs are like toll gates on international roads. When one country raises the toll for goods coming in, traffic patterns meaning global trade shift immediately. But those shifts don’t just affect imports. They also hit exports, supply chains, relationships, and the global flow of goods.

Let’s break it down using real-world logic instead of just economics jargon.

1. Trading Is a Two-Way Street If You Tax Others’ Goods, They Tax Yours

When Country A imposes tariffs on imports from Country B, Country B often retaliates with tariffs on Country A’s exports.

This triggers a cycle:

• Country A protects its local industry

• Country B protects its own

• Both sides start losing export markets

• Businesses suffer, jobs get affected

This is exactly what happened during:

• The U.S.–China trade war

• EU–U.S. steel and aluminium dispute

End result:

Exports shrink, tensions rise, and companies lose predictable global customers.

2. Tariffs Increase Production Costs → Exports Become Less Competitive

If a country imports raw materials, machinery, or components that are suddenly taxed more, the cost of making finished goods rises.

Examples:

• Steel tariffs raise the cost of manufacturing cars

• Electronic component tariffs raise the cost of phones, laptops

• Chemical tariffs inflate the cost of pharmaceuticals

This means the final exported goods become:

• Expensive

• Less competitive

• Harder to sell internationally

So even though tariffs target imports, they quietly damage exports by making production costlier.

3. Global Supply Chains Get Disrupted

Today’s products are rarely made in one country.

A single smartphone may include:

• Chips from Taiwan

• Screens from Korea

• Batteries from China

• Assembly in India

• Software from the U.S.

When tariffs interfere:

• Shipping routes change

• Supply chains slow down

• Companies shift assembly to avoid taxes

• Some suppliers get replaced

This creates massive uncertainty and delays.

Impact:

Exports drop because companies can’t maintain stable, low-cost production networks.

4. Tariffs Create Trade Diversion Goods Start Flowing Through Different Countries

When a country raises tariffs on one partner, international companies find new paths to move products.

For example:

• If the U.S. imposes tariffs on Chinese electronics, companies may ship via Vietnam or Mexico

• If India raises tariffs on gold from one country, traders reroute through alternate hubs

This phenomenon is called trade diversion.

 It doesn’t reduce trade it redirects it.

But it disrupts existing export-import relationships and makes global trade more complicated.

5. Tariffs Slow Down Global Trade Growth (or Even Reverse It)

Whenever tariffs rise across the world:

• Shipping volumes fall

• Container demand reduces

• Global manufacturing weakens

• Commodity prices fluctuate

Businesses delay:

• investments

• factory expansions

• hiring

• new market entries

This “chill effect” reduces export opportunities for everyone especially developing economies.

6. Uncertainty Hurts Exporters More Than Tariffs Themselves

Businesses hate unpredictability.

Tariff wars create:

• Sudden price swings

• Contract complications

• Longer negotiation times

• Fear of future hikes

If an exporter is unsure whether their product will face a 0% duty or a 25% duty next month, they avoid long-term deals.

 This damages exports even before tariffs are applied.

7. Tariffs Can Sometimes Boost Exports But Rarely

There are rare cases where tariffs indirectly help exports.

For example:

• If a country protects a strategic industry long enough, it may grow strong

• Once the industry matures, it can compete globally

• Then it starts exporting successfully

This is called infant industry protection, used historically by countries like:

• South Korea

• Japan

• China

But this only works if:

• The protected industry actually improves

• It doesn’t become lazy due to over-protection

• There is a clear roadmap from protection → productivity → exports

Most countries fail at this, but when done right, it can transform an economy.

8. Tariffs Change the Direction, Speed, and Volume of Global Trade

Think of global trade like water flowing through pipes.

Tariffs act like:

• Blockages (trade slows)

• Redirectors (goods take new paths)

• Pressure points (companies shift production)

This leads to:

• New supply chain hubs (e.g., Vietnam, Bangladesh, Mexico)

• Decline of old hubs

• Reduction in export volumes for affected countries

• Boost for unaffected countries

It’s not just economics it’s like watching a river find new channels after a dam is built.

9. Developing Countries Suffer the Most

For developing nations:

• Exports are lifelines

• Jobs depend on global markets

• Tariffs from big economies hit hardest

If the U.S. or EU raises tariffs:

• Textile factories in Bangladesh struggle

• Electronics producers in Vietnam lose orders

• Automobile suppliers in India face uncertainty

Global tariff waves feel like storms to small and mid-sized exporting countries.

Putting It All Together The Big Picture

Tariffs are not just taxes. They reshape global trade in deep ways.

 Negative Impacts:

• Retaliation reduces exports

• Input costs rise, hurting competitiveness

• Trade wars slow global trade

• Supply chains shift, causing instability

• Businesses hesitate to invest

• Developing countries suffer disproportionally

 Rare Positive Impacts:

• Temporary protection may develop strong export industries

• Countries may strengthen domestic production

• Strategic industries may gain time to mature

But overall, tariffs generally reduce exports and disrupt global trade flows rather than help them.

 Final Human Takeaway

Tariffs are like trying to fix one pipe by squeezing another water will find a new way, but the turbulence affects everyone.

In the global economy, protecting yourself too much can end up isolating you. And isolating yourself can reduce your ability to sell to the world.

Most nations learn that tariffs are powerful tools but double-edged ones.
They can protect a country in the short run, but often they shrink exports and slow down global trade in the long run.

See less

The World of Tokens

• Humans read sentences as words and meanings.
• Consider it like breaking down a sentence into manageable bits, which the AI then knows how to turn into numbers.
• “AI is amazing” might turn into tokens: → [“AI”, “ is”, “ amazing”]
• Or sometimes even smaller: [“A”, “I”, “ is”, “ ama”, “zing”]
• Thus, each token is a small unit of meaning: either a word, part of a word, or even punctuation, depending on how the tokenizer was trained.
• Similarly, LLMs can’t understand sentences until they first convert text into numerical form because AI models only work with numbers, that is, mathematical vectors.

Each token gets a unique ID number, and these numbers are turned into embeddings, or mathematical representations of meaning.

 But There’s a Problem Order Matters!

Let’s say we have two sentences:

• “The dog chased the cat.”
• “The cat chased the dog.”

They use the same words, but the order completely changes the meaning!

A regular bag of tokens doesn’t tell the AI which word came first or last.

That would be like giving somebody pieces of the puzzle and not indicating how to lay them out; they’d never see the picture.

So, how does the AI discern the word order?

An Easy Analogy: Music Notes

Imagine a song.

Each of them, separately, is just a sound.

Now, imagine if you played them out of order the music would make no sense!

Positional encoding is like the sheet music, which tells the AI where each note (token) belongs in the rhythm of the sentence.

Position Selection – How the Model Uses These Positions

Once tokens are labeled with their positions, the model combines both:

• What the word means – token embedding
• Where the word appears – positional encoding

These two signals together permit the AI to:

• Recognize relations between words: “who did what to whom”.
• Predict the next word, based on both meaning and position.

 Why This Is Crucial for Understanding and Creativity

• Without tokenization, the model couldn’t read or understand words.
• Without positional encoding, the model couldn’t understand context or meaning.

Put together, they represent the basis for how LLMs understand and generate human-like language.

In stories,

• they help the AI track who said what and when.
• In poetry or dialogue, they serve to provide rhythm, tone, and even logic.

This is why models like GPT or Gemini can write essays, summarize books, translate languages, and even generate code-because they “see” text as an organized pattern of meaning and order, not just random strings of words.

 How Modern LLMs Improve on This

Earlier models had fixed positional encodings meaning they could handle only limited context (like 512 or 1024 tokens).

But newer models (like GPT-4, Claude 3, Gemini 2.0, etc.) use rotary or relative positional embeddings, which allow them to process tens of thousands of tokens  entire books or multi-page documents while still understanding how each sentence relates to the others.

That’s why you can now paste a 100-page report or a long conversation, and the model still “remembers” what came before.

Bringing It All Together

•  A Simple Story Tokenization is teaching it what words are, like: “These are letters, this is a word, this group means something.”
• Positional encoding teaches it how to follow the order, “This comes first, this comes next, and that’s the conclusion.”
• Now it’s able to read a book, understand the story, and write one back to you-not because it feels emotions.

but because it knows how meaning changes with position and context.

 Final Thoughts

If you think of an LLM as a brain, then:

• Tokenization is like its eyes and ears, how it perceives words and converts them into signals.
• Positional encoding is to the transformer like its sense of time and sequence how it knows what came first, next, and last.

Together, they make language models capable of something almost magical  understanding human thought patterns through math and structure.

See less

Personal vs. Generic Intelligence: The Shift

Until recently, the majority of AI systems-from chatbots to recommendation engines, have all been designed to respond identically to everybody. You typed in your question, it processed it, and gave you an answer-without knowing who you are or what you like.

But that is changing fast, as the next generation of AI models will have persistent memory, allowing them to:

• Remember the history, tone, and preferences.
• Adapt the style, depth, and content to your personality.
• Gain a long-term sense of your goals, values, and context.

That is, AI will evolve from being a tool to something more akin to a personal cognitive companion, one that knows you better each day.

WHAT ARE MEMORY-BASED AGENTS?

A memory-based agent is an AI system that does not just process prompts in a stateless manner but stores and recalls the relevant experiences over time.

For example:

• A ChatGPT or Copilot with memory might recall your style of coding, preferred frameworks, or common mistakes.
• Your health records, lists of medication preferences, and symptoms may be remembered by the healthcare AI assistant to offer you contextual advice.
• Our business AI agent could remember project milestones, team updates, and even the tone of your communication. It would sound like responses from our colleague.

1. This involves an organized memory system: short-term for immediate context and long-term for durable knowledge, much like the human brain.

How it works: technical

Modern memory-based agents are built using a combination of:

• Vector databases enable semantic storage and the ability to retrieve past conversations.
• Embeddings are what allow the AI to “understand” meaning and not just keywords.
• Context management: A process of efficient filtering and summarization of memory so that it does not overload the model.
• Preference learning: fine-tuning to respond to style, tone, or the needs of an individual.

Taken together, these create continuity. Instead of starting fresh every time you talk, your AI can say, “Last time you were debugging a Spring Boot microservice — want me to resume where we left off?

TM Human-Like Interaction and Empathy

AI personalization will move from task efficiency to emotional alignment.

Suppose:

• Your AI tutor remembers where you struggle in math and adjusts the explanations accordingly.
• Your writing assistant knows your tone and edits emails or blogs to make them sound more like you.
• Your wellness app remembers your stressors and suggests breathing exercises a little before your next big meeting.

This sort of empathy does not mean emotion; it means contextual understanding-the ability to align responses with your mood, situation, and goals.

 Privacy, Ethics & Boundaries

• Personalization inevitably raises questions of data privacy and digital consent.

If AI is remembering everything about you, then whose memory is it? You should be able to:

• Review and delete your stored interactions.
• Choose what’s remembered and what’s forgotten.
• Control where your data is stored: locally, encrypted cloud, or device memory.

Future regulations will surely include “Explainable Memory”-the need for AI to be transparent about what it knows about you and how it uses that information.

Real-World Use Cases Finally Emerge

• Health care: AI-powered personal coaches that monitor fitness, mental health, or chronic diseases.
• Education: AI tutors who adapt to the pace, style, and emotional state of each student.
• Enterprise: project memory assistants remembering deadlines, reports, and work culture.
• E-commerce: Personal shoppers who actually know your taste and purchase history.
• Smart homes: Voice assistants know the routine of a family and modify lighting, temperature, or reminders accordingly.

These are not far-off dreams; early prototypes are already being tested by OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind.

 The Long Term Vision: “Lifelong AI Companions”

Over the course of the coming 3-5 years, memory-based AI will be combined with Agentic systems capable of taking action on your behalf autonomously.

Your virtual assistant can:

• Schedule meetings, book tickets, or automatically send follow-up e-mails.
• Learn your career path and suggest upskilling courses.
• Build personal dashboards to summarize your week and priorities.

This “Lifelong AI Companion” may become a mirror to your professional and personal evolution, remembering not only facts but your journey.

The Human Side: Connecting, Not Replacing

The key challenge will be to design the systems to support and not replace human relationships. Memory-based AI has to magnify human potential, not cocoon us inside algorithmic bubbles. Undoubtedly, the healthiest future of all is one where AI understands context but respects human agency – helps us think better, not for us.

Final Thoughts

The future of AI personalization and memory-based agents is deeply human-centric. We are building contextual intelligence that learns your world, adapts to your rhythm, and grows with your purpose instead of cold algorithms. It’s the next great evolution: From “smart assistants” ➜ to “thinking partners” ➜ to “empathetic companions.” The difference won’t just be in what AI does but in how well it remembers who you are.

See less