Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In


Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here


Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

You must login to ask a question.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

You must login to add post.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here
Sign InSign Up

Qaskme

Qaskme Logo Qaskme Logo

Qaskme Navigation

  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask A Question
  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog
Home/ daniyasiddiqui/Questions
  • Questions
  • Polls
  • Answers
  • Best Answers
  • Followed
  • Favorites
  • Asked Questions
  • Groups
  • Joined Groups
  • Managed Groups

Qaskme Latest Questions

daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 27/08/2025In: Company, Management, News

Are tariffs becoming more about politics than trade balance?

politics than trade balance

companynews
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 27/08/2025 at 4:02 pm

    Tariffs: From Economics to Politics Tariffs, in themselves, are relatively straightforward: they're levies on imports. Governments have employed them for centuries to defend domestic industry, balance trade books, or gain revenue. But now, in the modern age, tariffs are something entirely different—Read more

    Tariffs: From Economics to Politics

    Tariffs, in themselves, are relatively straightforward: they’re levies on imports. Governments have employed them for centuries to defend domestic industry, balance trade books, or gain revenue. But now, in the modern age, tariffs are something entirely different—they’re political statements and economic actions.

    If a country imposes tariffs on another country, it’s not just about moving numbers around on a trade sheet. It’s about sending a message: “We’re standing up for our workers, we’re making America great again, we won’t be pushed around.” That is why tariffs are likely to appear first in impassioned political speeches and then perhaps an economics textbook.

     Why Politicians Love Tariffs

    • Simplicity: Tariffs are easy to explain to voters. It’s much simpler to say, “We’re protecting our steelworkers by taxing foreign steel” than to explain the complexities of global supply chains.
    • Symbolism: They make leaders look tough. Tariffs say, “We’re fighting back against unfair trade,” even if the economic reality is more nuanced.
    • Short-term wins: Tariffs can boost certain industries or regions in the short run—important in an election year.
    • So even if economists argue about whether tariffs actually cure trade deficits, politicians employ them because they feel good.

     Real-World Examples

    • The U.S.–China trade war: Tariffs were less about balanced imports and exports. They were about controlling technology, national pride, and showing political muscle.
    • Tariffs on green technologies: Politicians typically justify them on economic terms, but they’re also motivated by domestic politics—courting local manufacturers, protecting jobs, or showing gravitas in relation to national security.
    • Election cycles: Tariffs often spike in election years, because they’re an easy way to show voters: “I’m fighting for you.”

    The Human Cost

    • Here’s the irony: while tariffs are sold as protecting workers, the everyday impact often lands on regular people.
    • Foreign products become pricier—be it phones, cars, or greens.
    • Other nations retaliate through tariffs, penalizing local farmers and exporters.
    • Small and medium enterprises that are dependent on international supply chains suffer the most.
    • So tariffs may be great in politics but can boomerang economically against the very people whom they’re intended to help.

    Trade Balance vs. Politics: What’s Winning?

    • The bad news is that politics is winning.
    • Trade deficits are driven by enormous forces such as consumer appetite, international supply chains, and exchange rates—tariffs tend not to “fix” them by themselves.
    • But as instruments of politics, tariffs are potent symbols of potency, sovereignty, and strength.
    • That is why governments continue to return to them, even when economists advise them they do not always work.

     Briefly: tariffs now are less to equalize trade and more to equalize narratives—the narrative that leaders spin for their citizens on behalf of whom they’re fighting and against whom they’re fighting back. For citizens, the fight is to see beyond slogans and demand: Is this about developing the economy—or merely to grab political advantage?

    See less
      • 1
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 2
  • 1
  • 110
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 27/08/2025In: Communication, Company, News

Is remote work reshaping cities and communities permanently?

reshaping cities and communities perm ...

communicationcompany
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 27/08/2025 at 2:37 pm

     How Remote Work Transformed Prior to 2020, the notion that millions would work their entire career from home was virtually unthinkable. Offices, commutes, and filled city streets lined with office workers seemed the inviolate status quo. And then the pandemic struck, and remote work wasn't an experRead more

     How Remote Work Transformed

    Prior to 2020, the notion that millions would work their entire career from home was virtually unthinkable. Offices, commutes, and filled city streets lined with office workers seemed the inviolate status quo. And then the pandemic struck, and remote work wasn’t an experiment—it was a matter of survival.

    Today, even as the world opens up, remote and hybrid work are here to stay. This revolution is subtly reshaping not only businesses, but also cities, communities, and lives.

     Leaving the Commute Behind

    • Cities have been built for decades around the concept of office commutes. Trains, freeways, and coffeehouses all centered on the daily commute. But work-from-home has disrupted this, and people are asking: Why pay to live in an overpriced downtown area if I can work from anywhere?
    • This has created trends such as:
    • Suburban or small-town relocation where housing is less expensive and quality of life appears greater.
    • Decline in downtown foot traffic, with office skyscrapers filling up empty and city businesses hurting.
    • New urban looks at how to redevelop office-concentrated areas as housing or mixed-use communities.

     Communities in Transition

    • Remote work is not only transforming cities but also neighborhoods:
      Higher neighborhood engagement: With more time spent at home, in local cafes, gyms, and stores, which stimulates local economies.
    • Fading of boundaries between work and life: Home is no longer “home anymore,” and neighborhoods evolve with shared working space and adjustable meeting rooms.
    • Worldwide communities: Individuals form friendships and professional associations worldwide, so “community” is no longer site-specific.
    • Others fear less face-to-face time with colleagues erodes social networks created in the workplace.

     Winners and Losers in This Shift

    • Winners: Rural areas, suburbs, and small towns are luring workers who previously felt trapped in large cities. Employees like flexibility and frequently save money.
    • Losers: Large cities with high populations that rely on office workers—transport networks, restaurants, and property—are confronted with a dismal future.
    • The transition isn’t level, and that is the reason some locations experience a “remote work boom” while others are confronted with vacant office buildings.

     A Permanent Trend or Just a Phase?

    It feels more enduring—but quietly. Remote full-time work will never be the norm, but hybrid models (2–3 days remote, remainder in the office) are the new norm. This still transforms cities, because even half-empty offices mean reduced demand for monster corporate campuses and less fixed commuting schedules.

    We might be going towards cities built less about 9-to-5 work and more about open, mixed-use communities where individuals live, work, and interact through the same space.

     The Human Side of It All

    At its core, this change isn’t economic—it’s what matters most. Most found they liked wasting time with family and friends instead of in traffic. They found mental health thrives when you get to control your day. And they found digital solutions can bring teams together without locking them in cubicles.

    Cities and communities will evolve to reflect these priorities—more green spaces, local hubs, and housing where people can balance both work and life.

    So, Are Cities Being Reshaped Permanently?

    • Yes—but not into ghost towns. Instead, they’re being reimagined. Remote work won’t kill cities; it will transform them. We’ll see:
    • Downtowns shifting from office clusters to mixed living, cultural, and social hubs.
    • Neighborhoods gaining new life as people work closer to home.
    • Communities expanding beyond geography, thanks to digital connections.

    In short: remote work has cracked open the rigid mold of how cities and communities function. What we’re seeing isn’t just a temporary adjustment—it’s the beginning of a new way of organizing human life around flexibility, connection, and choice.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 2
  • 1
  • 105
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 27/08/2025In: Education, News

How should schools prepare kids for jobs that don’t exist yet?

schools prepare kids for jobs

education
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 27/08/2025 at 10:54 am

    The Challenge of an Uncertain Future Consider this: twenty years ago, a career as an "app developer," an "AI ethicist," or a "drone operator" didn't exist. Move another twenty years into the future, and children sitting in today's classrooms will be working in industries that we can hardly envision—Read more

    The Challenge of an Uncertain Future

    Consider this: twenty years ago, a career as an “app developer,” an “AI ethicist,” or a “drone operator” didn’t exist. Move another twenty years into the future, and children sitting in today’s classrooms will be working in industries that we can hardly envision—directed by AI, climate change, space travel, biotechnology, and so forth.

    This ambiguity is thrilling and terrifying. How do we get children ready for jobs that don’t yet exist? The answer isn’t forecasting specific jobs, but equipping them with skills, attitudes, and grit that will enable them to succeed regardless of what the future holds.

     Beyond Memorization: Teaching How to Learn

    • Schools used to be about content—dates, formulas, definitions. But now with the internet and AI, facts are always available at our fingertips. The true benefit isn’t knowing something, it’s knowing how to learn, unlearn, and relearn.
    • Educate children in how to research, question, and critically evaluate sources.
    • Foster curiosity over correctness—encourage the process, not just the correct answer.
    • Create flexibility so that they can switch direction when industries change.
    • In a changing world, learning is the most important skill.

     Creativity and Problem-Solving at the Core

    • Jobs of the future will require solving tough, real-world problems—many of which have no definitive answers. Schools can assist by:
    • Fostering project-based learning where students work on problems with no one “right” solution.
    • Mixing arts with STEM (STEAM) to power imagination as well as technical expertise.
    • Teaching design thinking—empathize, experiment, and iterate—so kids become at ease generating new solutions rather than copying old ones.
    • Creativity is not only for artists; it’s survival gas in a volatile economy.

    Developing Human Skills in an Age of Technology

    • Ironically, as AI and automation become more prevalent, the most “future-proof” skills are profoundly human:
    • Collaboration: Collaboration across cultures, across disciplines, and even with machines.
    • Emotional intelligence: Emotionally intelligent people understand, connect with others.
    • Ethics: Making considered decisions about how technology is used.
    • Resilience: Coping with failure, stress, and change at warp speed without losing it.
    • Schools that put empathy, collaboration, and communication at the top of their list will grow children prepared for a world where computers do tasks but human beings manage meaning.

     Digital & Entrepreneurial Mindsets

    • Children require more than mere “tech-savviness.” They should learn how technology influences the world—and how they might influence it in return. That includes:
    • Coding and digital proficiency, certainly—but also digital responsibility.
    • Exposure to entrepreneurship, where children learn to identify opportunities and build value from the ground up.
    • A mindset that believes: “If the job I want does not exist, perhaps I can create it.”

     Lifelong Learning Culture

    Maybe the greatest gift schools can provide isn’t an ingrained body of knowledge but a passion for learning. Children should leave school not thinking, “I’m finished learning at 18 or 22,” but “I’m just beginning.”

    Fostering curiosity, self-directed learning, and a growth mindset makes sure they’ll continue to grow long after they leave school behind.

     So, How Do Schools Really Ready Children?

    By moving from:

    • Teaching answers → to teaching questions.
    • Fixed curriculums → to flexible skills.
    • One-size-fits-all learning → to customized growth.
    • The end goal isn’t to prepare children for a single job, but to ready them for any job—and even for jobs they will invent themselves.

    In short: schools should prepare kids not for a single future, but for a future full of possibilities. The real curriculum of tomorrow is curiosity, creativity, adaptability, and humanity.

    See less
      • 1
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 3
  • 1
  • 106
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 26/08/2025In: Digital health, Health, News

Are wearable health trackers actually improving lifestyle habits?

health trackers actually improving li ...

digital health
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 26/08/2025 at 4:35 pm

     The Promise of Wearable Health Trackers From smartwatches that count steps to rings that track sleep, wearable health devices are now part of daily life for millions of people. They promise to get us moving more, sleeping better, and taking charge of our wellbeing. The idea is simple: if you can meRead more

     The Promise of Wearable Health Trackers

    From smartwatches that count steps to rings that track sleep, wearable health devices are now part of daily life for millions of people. They promise to get us moving more, sleeping better, and taking charge of our wellbeing. The idea is simple: if you can measure it, you can improve it. But the real question is—do they actually make us change behavior, or do they just give us more information we ignore?

     How They Do Help

    • For many people, wearable trackers serve as a gentle push toward healthier routines:
    • Awareness: Seeing how little you’ve walked in a day can be a wake-up call. Awareness often sparks change.
    • Motivation: Hitting a 10,000-step goal or closing those activity rings feels like a small victory, and small victories add up.
    • Accountability: Having your heart rate or sleep monitored makes you more mindful of daily choices—such as not scrolling in the middle of the night or going for a walk instead of sitting.
    • Gamification: Competing with friends or earning badges can make exercise entertaining instead of a chore.
    • For others, these prompts precipitate significant lifestyle shifts—more consistent movement, better sleep hygiene, or even earlier health detection.

    The Limits of Tracking Alone

    • But the personal anecdote: data does not always equate to action.
    • Short-term enthusiasm: Most people use their trackers religiously for a few weeks or months, then lose interest.
    • Obsession with numbers: Others get hung up on hitting targets (steps, calories expended) but forget the bigger picture of integrative health.
    • One-size-fits-all targets: Not everyone needs 10,000 steps daily. Individualized health is more nuanced, and trackers don’t necessarily track that.
    • Behavioral gap: You might be aware you slept poorly, but you won’t necessarily change your bedtime routine.
    • That is, trackers can tell and nudge—but real change still comes from within discipline, environment, and deeper motivation.

    What Really Drives Change

    • When tested, wearables perform best combined with:
    • Guidance or coaching (e.g., combining the data with a fitness app, trainer, or doctor’s advice).
    • Community (sharing progress with friends, participating in group challenges).
    • Intrinsic motivation (pleasure in getting well, not just to hit numbers).
    • Without these layers, trackers can turn into high-tech baubles hiding in a drawer.

    A More Human Way to See Them

    Maybe it’s not fair to expect wearables to completely overhaul us on their own. Rather, they are tools for awareness. They shed light on routines we’d otherwise ignore—like hanging out too long on our behinds, or chronically sleeping too little—and offer a chance to make a change.

    For others, that’s life-altering. For a few, it is just a push they already knew about but weren’t ready to deal with.

     So, Are They Making a Difference?

    • The reality: Yes—but with qualifications.
    • They motivate many to become more active, aware, and proactive about health.
    • Their impacts are most effective in the short-run, unless supplemented by more meaningful habit-change strategies.
    • They won’t work magic on motivation or replace effort in developing habits that stick.

     In short: wearable trackers are sort of a mirror—they reflect back your habits and may motivate you to do better. But a mirror won’t make you exercise, go to bed early, or eat well. That’s still your choice.

    See less
      • 2
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 5
  • 1
  • 121
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 26/08/2025In: Health, News

Is longevity research bringing us closer to living past 100 in good health?

living past 100 in good health

healthnews
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 26/08/2025 at 3:49 pm

     The Human Dream of Longevity For centuries, humanity has sought to extend the boundaries of life—through ancient medicine, religious practices, or modern medicine. But longevity science today is different. It's not merely about adding years to life—it's adding life to years. The question isn't mereRead more

     The Human Dream of Longevity

    For centuries, humanity has sought to extend the boundaries of life—through ancient medicine, religious practices, or modern medicine. But longevity science today is different. It’s not merely about adding years to life—it’s adding life to years. The question isn’t merely “Can we live to 100?” but “Can we do it in good health, without enduring decades of frailty?”

     Where Science Stands Today

    • Aging research is progressing at a rate never before seen. Scientists are not only investigating aging as an unavoidable destiny but also as a natural process that can be slowed or even turned back. Some of the most important areas include:
    • Genetics & cellular repair: Telomere research (the protective cover at the end of DNA) and senescent cell research (the “zombie” cells that cause harm as we age) hold great potential in slowing cellular aging.
    • Nutrition & fasting: Dietary regimens such as intermittent fasting or caloric restriction have had strong correlations with longer, healthier lives in animals—and preliminary human trials are promising the same.
    • Drugs & supplements: Molecules such as metformin and NAD+ boosters are being investigated for their potential to add healthy years, rather than manage disease.
    • Regenerative medicine: Stem-cell therapies and tissue engineering are working to replace deteriorated components of the body.
    • All of these are signs that a future in which living to 100 in good health is not beyond imagination.

     Resisting Aging vs. Aging Well

    But the emotional crux of the argument is this: nobody wants to live longer if those extended years are lived in misery, dependency, or loneliness. What gets people truly excited is the prospect of being 90 and still hiking, traveling, playing with the grandchildren, or following a passion—not being bedridden.

    That’s why aging research has turned its attention away from lifespan and towards healthspan. Rather than inquiring “How do we live longer?” the more accurate question is “How do we live longer with vigor?”

     Challenges We Still Face

    Naturally, there are challenges:

    • Accessibility: Will longevity medicine be accessible only to the rich, widening the health divide?
    • Ethics: If humans live beyond 100 as a matter of course, what does this mean for population growth, work, or retirement funds?
    • Biology’s limitations: Even if aging is postponed, accidents, genetic disorders, and environmental causes are still risks.
    • And on an individual level, longer life also brings questions such as: Will I live longer than friends and loved ones? Will society care about elders if everyone is old?

    The Human Side of Longevity

    What’s lovely about this study is the way it moves our mind. Aging isn’t merely surviving death; it’s recapturing life—people having more time to dream, love, create, and give back. Think of a world where individuals in their 80s are still beginning companies, crossing the globe, or guiding next generations with decades of experience.

    For most, true hope isn’t immortality—it’s just having more years of good health, without the diseases that rob us of independence and dignity.

     So, Are We Getting Closer?

    • The short answer: Yes, cautiously.
    • Science is discovering methods to rewind the biological clock.
    • Early breakthroughs indicate human beings living beyond 100 in good health could become increasingly widespread in the years to come.
    • But it will not be one magic pill—it will be a combination of lifestyle, preventive care, and advanced treatments.
    • We might not all live to the age of 150, but it’s more and more possible that coming generations might have 100 as a new baseline for an active life instead of an exceptional milestone.

    In brief: Research into longevity is not so much a quest for immortality as a gift of more quality years. The aspiration is not endless life—it’s a longer, healthier, more fulfilling one.

    See less
      • 2
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 4
  • 1
  • 95
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 26/08/2025In: Communication, News, Technology

Are AI companions the future of human relationships or just a passing trend?

the future of human relationships or ...

aitechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 26/08/2025 at 3:27 pm

     AI Companions on the Rise Only a few years back, the idea of talking with a virtual "friend" that can hear you, recall your existence, and even get fond of you felt like it was straight out of a science fiction movie. Now, though, millions of us already have AI friends—be they chatbots that act likRead more

     AI Companions on the Rise

    Only a few years back, the idea of talking with a virtual “friend” that can hear you, recall your existence, and even get fond of you felt like it was straight out of a science fiction movie. Now, though, millions of us already have AI friends—be they chatbots that act like friends, emotional support virtual partners, or voice assistants that become progressively human each year. To most, these are not just machines—these are becoming significant connections.

     Why People Are Turning to AI Companions

    The attraction makes sense. Human relationships are rewarding, but they’re also complicated. People get busy, misunderstand each other, or sometimes can’t be there when needed. AI companions, on the other hand:

    • Always listen without judgment.
    • Respond instantly at any time of day.
    • Adapt to your personality and preferences.
    • Provide comfort without the risk of rejection.
    • For the lonely, socially fearful, or just curious, it can be a lifeline. Scores of users, in fact, state that AI companions fill emotional spaces—offering daily affirmations, reinforcement, and company in a strangely lifelike manner.

    Are They Real Relationships, Though?

    Here’s the twist. A relationship is generally founded on two beings—both with emotions, ideas, and desires. With AI, the relationship is one-way. The companion doesn’t experience anything in real time; it only echoes your own. It won’t even miss you if you leave for a while—it just picks up where you left off when you come back.

    But here’s the thing: if the comfort is real, who cares whether the source isn’t? Humans already bond with fictional people in books, movies, or even pets that don’t “speak back” quite the way people do. So in that sense, AI companions might be the newest iteration of a very old human impulse: looking for connection where it feels safe and fulfilling.

     What AI Companions Can—and Can’t—Replace

    • They may replace: relaxed company, daily affirmations, social skills training, and temporary consolation in solitude.
    • They may not replace: the unanticipated depth of genuine human connection—soft talk and physical contact, inside jokes exchanged in laughter, struggles and triumphs that are shared, and the sense of being profoundly and fully understood by an individual with a life of their own.
    • Over-dependence on AI companions might end up alienating individuals more, hindering them from participating in complicated but rich human relationships.

     Passing Trend or Long-Term Future?

    • It’s not going to fade as a trend, AI friends. Human connection is forever, and technology that delivers it will endure. It’s just that AI friends will simply coexist with human relationships as an extra dimension of how we connect—like social media or text messaging did.
    • To others, AI will never be anything but an aside-tool: a solo conversation when everybody else is in bed.
    • To some, especially those who are struggling socially, it might become a central part of their emotional life.
    • Eventually, society can make “hybrid companionship”—where people rely on human and artificial intelligence relationships in all sorts of ways—”normal.”

     The Human Side of the Future

    The real problem isn’t whether or not AI companions are real—they are—it’s how we choose to utilize them. If we use them as a substitute for human connection, they can reduce loneliness and bring comfort. However, if they replace human connection, we risk moving into a society in which relationships are safe but empty.

    Finally, AI companions are reflections. They reflect back to us our needs, our words, our emotions. Whether they are a bridge or a crutch to more human connection is our decision.

    Are AI companions the future of human relationships, then? In part, yes—they will redefine what we experience as companionship. But they will not replace the messy, beautiful, irreplaceable thing of being human together.

    See less
      • 2
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 4
  • 1
  • 105
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 26/08/2025In: Technology

Will AI replace more creative jobs than technical ones?

creative jobs

aitechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 26/08/2025 at 3:02 pm

     Creativity vs. Technical Labor In the AI Age When people think of AI taking jobs, the first image that comes to mind is usually robots replacing factory workers or algorithms replacing data analysts. But recently, something surprising has been happening: AI isn’t just crunching numbers—it’s writingRead more

     Creativity vs. Technical Labor In the AI Age

    When people think of AI taking jobs, the first image that comes to mind is usually robots replacing factory workers or algorithms replacing data analysts. But recently, something surprising has been happening: AI isn’t just crunching numbers—it’s writing poetry, generating music, creating paintings, and even drafting movie scripts. This shift has sparked a fear many didn’t expect: maybe the “safe zone” of creativity isn’t so safe after all.

    Why Creative Careers Seem Fragile

    Creative work is a lot of pattern spotting, storytelling, and coming up with something new—areas where AI has made incredible strides. Consider image generation from text prompts or AI that can write music in a matter of seconds. For businesses, this is attractive because it’s cheaper and faster than using a human. A marketing agency, for instance, might say: “Why pay a group of designers for a dozen ad options when AI can spit out hundreds on the fly?”

    That’s where the nervousness intervenes: it’s not that AI is necessarily better, but that it’s adequate enough in some cases—especially where speed and breadth are more valuable than depth.

     Why Technical Jobs May Still Have an Edge

    Technical careers—like engineers, doctors, or electricians—require accuracy, practical problem-solving, and often hands-on abilities. While AI might scan research or edit code, it simply can’t match practical uncertainty. A plumber fixing a leak, an engineer tracing hardware problems, or a surgeon making life-or-death decisions—these are tasks where human judgment, hand coordination, and adaptability shine.

    Even in technical knowledge work, there is still a human go-between between AI output and the physical world. A machine may be able to write 90% of a program, but it is a developer’s job to finish it off with polish, debug, and integrate it into complex systems.

    The Middle Ground: Not Replacement, but Collaboration

    • The future could be more about changing creative or technical work, rather than replacing it. Instead of painting it as substitution, our application of AI is better served as a co-pilot:
    • Writers can use AI to develop ideas for their drafts but write them in their own voice.
    • Designers can use AI to create ideas but use their taste and cultural awareness to refine them.
    • Developers can let AI generate routine code so that they can focus on architecture and innovation.
    • There is a new kind of work that emerges in which humans define the vision, and AI accelerates delivery.

     The Human Touch That AI Can’t Fake

    No matter how advanced AI may become, there remains something ineradically human to art, to narrative, and to invention. Creativity is not output—crap out is not equal to crap in. Creativity is lived experience, feeling, and perspective. A song written by an AI can be lovely, but without the dirty, raw history of suffering or joy that makes us care, it is not the same thing. A technically accurate solution by computer may solve an issue rationally but lack the moral or emotional component.

    That’s why the majority of experts believe AI won’t really displace technical competence or imagination—it will just make us work harder into what is uniquely human.

    So, What Work Is Safer?

    Soon:

    • Routine creative work (ad copy, stock music, generic pictures) is more at risk.
    • High-tech jobs, jobs requiring judgment, physical strength, or deep responsibility are safer.
    • Hybrid—humans who will be able to harness AI effectively and supercharge it with originality, ethics, and emotional intelligence—will be the most valuable.
    •  Put simply AI might chew faster at creative edges than technical ones. However, it can’t substitute the heart, context, and meaning humans inject into both. And the ultimate winners are people who learn how to cooperate with AI instead of fighting it.
    See less
      • 2
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 4
  • 1
  • 121
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 25/08/2025In: News, Technology

Will quantum computing make current cybersecurity systems obsolete?

current cybersecurity systems

aitechonology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    Best Answer
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 25/08/2025 at 4:30 pm

    Nowadays, most of the world's digital security—your bank account online, government secrets, WhatsApp messages, even your Netflix password—are protected using encryption. They rely on mathematical puzzles so challenging that even the most advanced supercomputers would take thousands of years to cracRead more

    Nowadays, most of the world’s digital security—your bank account online, government secrets, WhatsApp messages, even your Netflix password—are protected using encryption. They rely on mathematical puzzles so challenging that even the most advanced supercomputers would take thousands of years to crack them.

    But then comes the simplicity-killer: quantum computing. While traditional computers process information in bits (0s and 1s), quantum computers do so in qubits, which exist in more than one state at a time. That allows them to look for solutions in parallel, potentially doing some sort of math problems at speeds that are unfathomable.

    For cybersecurity, it is exciting and terrifying.

    Why Encryption Works Today

    • Most modern encryption (like RSA and ECC) uses problems that are easy to do one way but extremely hard the other way.
    • Finding two big primes multiplied together? Easy.
    • Figuring out which primes were multiplied (the “factoring problem”)? Essentially impossible with current technology.
    • This “hard problem” is what protects your online banking password and hackers.

     Enter Quantum Computing

    • Quantum computers, specifically Shor’s algorithm, could crack those “impossible” problems in hours or minutes. Suddenly, what was once safe for millennia could be exposed in an afternoon.
    • If quantum computers advance quickly enough, they would even have the potential to crack into:
    • Government intelligence files
    • Banking networks
    • Healthcare files
    • Private emails and personal photos kept online
    • That’s why some experts have dubbed it a “quantum apocalypse” for cybersecurity.

     But Here’s the Human Side

    It’s important to keep things in perspective. Currently, enormous, beneficial quantum computers don’t exist. We do have noisy, fragile prototypes that can do small-scale work only. Decoding the entire internet remains science fiction—at least through the foreseeable future.

    Yes, but looming on the horizon is also a threat in the guise of “harvest now, decrypt later.” Hackers or nations could be quietly vacuuming up encrypted information today, stashing it away, and holding out for quantum computers to be powerful enough to break them. Imagine intimate medical records, military communications, or bank accounts appearing years hence, naked and vulnerable.

     The Race for Post-Quantum Security

    The good news? We’re not standing still. Researchers and organizations like NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) are already developing post-quantum cryptography—new encryption methods that can withstand quantum attacks. Some approaches involve lattice-based math, code-based encryption, or even quantum key distribution (which uses the principles of quantum physics itself to secure communication).

    In a way, it’s like we’re redesigning the locks before the burglars have built the tools to break in.

     Why It Matters to Everyday People

    For all of us, cybersecurity isn’t abstract—it’s belief. It’s the belief that your pay goes into your account, that your doctor’s notes remain confidential, and that your identity isn’t commandeered in the dead of night. If quantum computers one night ripped through these defenses, it could create panic and chaos and destroy the underpinnings of virtual society.

    But if the transition to quantum-resistant systems happens in time, though, most people won’t ever know it. Just as the internet switched from “http” to “https” without fanfare, the upgrade might happen quietly in the background.

    The Bottom Line

    Will quantum computing make current cybersecurity obsolete? Yes, eventually. But it doesn’t necessarily have to be catastrophic. The race between cryptographers and quantum scientists has already started, and humankind has a history of learning to adapt its weapons to thwart new threats.

    The real question isn’t that we will have a quantum security threat—it’s whether we will be ready when it arrives. And, as with climate change or epidemics, the destiny is in the preparation, the cooperation, and the vision.

    In the end, quantum computers won’t just break old locks—they will challenge us to build stronger, smarter ones. And that’s a human one: technology disrupts, but we adapt.

    See less
      • 2
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 6
  • 1
  • 113
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 25/08/2025In: News, Technology

Are AI-powered deepfakes the biggest threat to elections worldwide?

deepfakes the biggest threat

aitechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    Best Answer
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 25/08/2025 at 2:29 pm

    When people think of election threats, images of ballot tampering or foreign hacking often come to mind. But today, a newer, less visible danger is spreading: AI-powered deepfakes—ultra-realistic videos, audio clips, and images that can convincingly impersonate real people. Unlike obvious fake newsRead more

    When people think of election threats, images of ballot tampering or foreign hacking often come to mind. But today, a newer, less visible danger is spreading: AI-powered deepfakes—ultra-realistic videos, audio clips, and images that can convincingly impersonate real people. Unlike obvious fake news articles of the past, these manipulations are designed to feel authentic, making them especially dangerous in shaping public opinion.

    Why Deepfakes Hit Hard During Elections

    Elections are about emotions. Voters respond not only to policy but to trust, personality, and image of candidates. One effective video of a politician uttering something outrageous—or an outright false audio clip of them conspiring in secret—can go viral on social media before fact-checkers even get around to it. And before the truth finally comes out, the harm is already done.

    Unlike biased headlines or rumors, deepfakes take advantage of one of our strongest impulses: trusting what we see and hear. That makes them unusually effective at eroding faith, planting seeds of doubt, or stoking rifts at times of high stakes in democracy.

     Global Issues

    • In consolidated democracies, deepfakes have the potential to polarize already fractured societies. Even voters might suspect a video is a fabrication, but it can reinforce pre-existing prejudices (“I knew that candidate couldn’t be trusted”).
    • In new democracies, where resources for fact-checking and media literacy are lacking, the dissemination of deepfakes destabilizes faith in the entire election process.
    • International borders offer no obstacle, as malicious actors can exploit deepfakes to interfere with foreign elections at minimal expense, spreading propaganda campaigns without ever leaving another country.

     Are They the Biggest Threat?

    • While deepfakes are frightening, they might not be the sole or greatest threat. Other election threats still cast a shadow:
    • Disinformation networks: Plain old-fashioned text lies on social media still reach more individuals than video.
    • Cybersecurity vulnerabilities: Hacking into voter databases or election systems can have direct effects.
    • Polarization and echo chambers: Without deepfakes, partisan media bubbles allow misinformation to more easily flourish.
    • Deepfakes are different, though, because they can destroy faith in truth itself. If enough citizens get to the point where they think “anything could be fake,” then they might no longer trust any information—including genuine, fact-checked news. That loss of faith could be the most treacherous consequence of all.

     What Can Be Done?

    • Technology vs. Technology: While AI has the capability to produce deepfakes, AI tools also have the capability to identify them—albeit only a step behind.
    • Media Literacy: Educating individuals to stop, question, and confirm prior to sharing is paramount.
    • Regulation & Responsibility: Platforms, governments, and fact-checkers will require more robust policies to detect and mark deepfakes efficiently, particularly around election time.
    • Public Awareness: If citizens assume that deepfakes are real, then they’ll be more circumspect before reaching a conclusion.

     The Human Side

    • At the center of this problem is trust—trust in leaders, in media, and in one another. Elections are not merely about votes; they are about people having faith that the process is equitable. If deepfakes erode that faith, then democracy itself seems tenuous.
    • The twist is that deepfakes are strongest not because they’re untraceable, but because they sow doubt. Even the rumor that a video could be deepfake can leave citizens uncertain what is real. That doubt is sufficient to influence emotions, and emotions tend to drive ballots more than facts.

    In short: Deepfakes are perhaps not the only election threat, but they are something peculiarly unsettling: a world in which believing is no longer seeing. Their threat is less that they will deceive everybody and more that they will cause everybody to doubt everything. The battle against them is not merely technological—it’s also cultural, political, and fundamentally human.

    See less
      • 1
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 5
  • 1
  • 111
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 24/08/2025In: Health, News

Can mindfulness and meditation be as effective as medication for anxiety?

mindfulness and meditation

health
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 24/08/2025 at 3:48 pm

    Perhaps the most chronic problem of our time is anxiety. Some feel it as a low-level hum in the background — racing mind, tight chest, working brain. Others feel it as a storm: panic attacks, sleeplessness, and the sense that something is always about to fall apart. Traditionally, medication has beeRead more

    Perhaps the most chronic problem of our time is anxiety. Some feel it as a low-level hum in the background — racing mind, tight chest, working brain. Others feel it as a storm: panic attacks, sleeplessness, and the sense that something is always about to fall apart.

    Traditionally, medication has been the preferred option. But in recent years, meditation and mindfulness have moved from the fringes of religious practice into the mainstream of mental health. The question is, can they really match the power of medication for the treatment of anxiety?

    What Medication Offers

    • Medication for anxiety, like SSRIs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) or benzodiazepines, involves action on the brain chemistry.
    • They can knock out symptoms quickly, especially in severe situations.
    • They help many people function when anxiety feels overwhelming.
      But medication often doesn’t address the root causes of anxiety — thought patterns, life stressors, or emotional habits that drive it. And side effects, ranging from drowsiness to risks of addiction, are all too real.

     What Mindfulness and Meditation Can Offer

    • Mindfulness is not about halting anxiety; it’s about altering your connection to it. By way of techniques such as breathing, body scan, or guided meditation, individuals find themselves able to:
    • Recognize anxious thoughts without becoming submerged.
    • Peace the fight-or-flight reaction in the body.
    • Becoming self-aware and resilient with time.
    • Unlike medication, the outcomes build gradually. It’s similar to developing muscle – the more consistently you train, the better you become at stopping, grounding, and responding instead of reacting.

     What the Science Says

    • Increasingly, research is showing that mindfulness therapies, including Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), are as potent as medication for individuals with mild to moderate anxiety in most instances.
    • Mindfulness therapies reduced symptoms equal to antidepressants in certain studies.
    • Brain scans suggest meditation has the ability to change activity in the amygdala (the fear center in the brain), reducing its reactivity.
    • Unlike pills, meditation also improves concentration, emotional stability, and overall well-being.
    • That aside, with more severe cases of panic or anxiety disorder, medication provides quick relief that mindfulness is not always able to match. Often, the best path is a mix of both.

    The Human Side of the Choice

    • Most people’s solution isn’t either-or — it’s timing and need.
    • A young professional with social anxiety can use mindfulness exercises as enough to soothe nerves and gain confidence.
    • A parent who is plagued with debilitating panic attacks may need to take medication at first, simply in order to have stability enough to introduce mindfulness practices even.
    • Some find that medication enables them to “turn down the noise,” and meditation helps them with skills to remain calm in the long run.
    • The liberating part is that mindfulness shows you skills you’ll use for a lifetime — methods that you can turn to anywhere, anytime, without side effects.

     In Simple Words

    Mindfulness and meditation are as effective as meds for anyone with anxiety — especially when done every day. But in severe anxiety, medication will still be required, at least for the short term. The greatest outcomes seem to come from using both together: medicine for symptom control, and mindfulness for developing resilience.

    In the end, the question is not so much a matter of which one is superior, but rather what works for you, your body, and your life. The medication may level the foundation, but mindfulness teaches you how to walk it with more peace.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 5
  • 1
  • 93
  • 0
Answer
Load More Questions

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 410
  • Answers 398
  • Posts 4
  • Best Answers 21
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Anonymous

    Bluestone IPO vs Kal

    • 5 Answers
  • mohdanas

    Are AI video generat

    • 3 Answers
  • Anonymous

    Which industries are

    • 3 Answers
  • daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui added an answer Attention, Not Sequence: The major point is Before the advent of Transformers, most models would usually process language sequentially, word… 06/11/2025 at 11:13 am
  • mohdanas
    mohdanas added an answer Why Data Structures Matter Before we delve into each one, here’s the “why” behind the question. When we code, we… 05/11/2025 at 3:09 pm
  • mohdanas
    mohdanas added an answer  The Core Idea: Focus on Problem-Solving, Not Plumbing In interviews or in real projects time is your most precious resource.… 05/11/2025 at 2:41 pm

Top Members

Trending Tags

ai aiineducation ai in education analytics company digital health edtech education geopolitics global trade health language mindfulness multimodalai news nutrition people tariffs technology trade policy

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help

© 2025 Qaskme. All Rights Reserved