Home/ mohdanas/Questions

Qaskme Latest Questions

mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 05/11/2025In:

many recommend choosing languages wit ...

bestpracticescodinginterviewsinterviewpreparationprogramminglanguagessoftwareengineeringtechcareers
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

     The Core Idea: Focus on Problem-Solving, Not Plumbing In interviews or in real projects time is your most precious resource. You're often being judged not on how well you can manage memory or write a compiler, but rather on how quickly and cleanly you can turn ideas into working solutions. LanguageRead more

     The Core Idea: Focus on Problem-Solving, Not Plumbing

    • In interviews or in real projects time is your most precious resource.
    • You’re often being judged not on how well you can manage memory or write a compiler, but rather on how quickly and cleanly you can turn ideas into working solutions.
    • Languages like Python, JavaScript, Java, and even PHP include huge standard libraries-pre-built functions, modules, and frameworks that do the heavy lifting for you: parsing JSON, managing dates, reading files, handling APIs, managing threads, and even connecting to databases.
    • When this kind of “toolbox” is available out of the box, you can spend your energy on the logic, algorithms, and structure of your solution, instead of reinventing the wheel.
    • That’s why a question like “Why did you choose this language?” often leads to this reasoning:

    “Because it lets me focus on business logic rather than boilerplate — the standard library already covers most of the plumbing I need.”

    Example: The difference in real life

    Now, imagine yourself in a technical interview and you are being asked to parse some JSON API, do some filtering, and print results in sorted order.

    In Python, that’s literally 4 lines:

    import requests, json
    data = requests.get(url).json()
    result = sorted([i for i in data if i[‘active’]], key=lambda x: x[‘name’])
    print(result)

    You didn’t have to worry about type definitions, HTTP clients, or manual memory cleanup — all standard modules took care of it.

    In a lower-level language like C++ or C, you’d be managing the HTTP requests manually or pulling in external libraries, writing data structures from scratch, and managing memory. That means more time spent, more possibility for bugs, and less energy for either logic or optimizations.

    The Broader Benefit: Community & Ecosystem

    Another huge factor is the breadth of usage and community support.

    If you choose languages like Python, JavaScript, or Java:

    • You work in an ecosystem where for almost every problem, there’s already a solution: well-maintained libraries, Stack Overflow threads, GitHub repos, and tutorials.
    • It’s easy to find debugging help, testing frameworks, deployment tools, and integration plugins for whatever you’re building.

    In interviews, it reflects positively because you demonstrate that you know the value of leveraging community knowledge — something every good engineer does in real-world work.

    The Interview Perspective

    From the interviewer’s perspective, when you select a high-level language that is well-supported, that says:

    • You know how to work smart, not just hard.
    • You can get to a working prototype fast.

    That’s why a person using Python, JavaScript, or even Java would tend to have smoother interviews: they can express the logic clearly and seldom get lost in syntax or boilerplate.

    Balancing with Lower-Level Skills

    Of course, this doesn’t mean that lower-level languages are irrelevant.

    Understanding C, C++, or Rust gives you foundational insight into how systems work under the hood: memory management, threading, performance optimization, etc.

    • Break down a problem
    • Optimize logic,
    • Write readable, maintainable code, and
    • Explain your reasoning.

    Choosing a language that allows you to do this efficiently and expressively gives you a major edge.

    In Short

    When people recommend using languages with rich standard libraries and broad adoption, they’re really saying:

    “Use a language that helps you think at the level of the problem not at the level of the machine.”

    • It’s about speed, clarity, and focus.

    In interviews, you want to demonstrate your thought process — not spend half your time writing helper functions or debugging syntax errors.

    And in real projects, you want maintainable, well-supported, community-backed code that keeps evolving.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 05/11/2025In:

schools integrate topics like climate ...

climateeducationcurriculumdesigndigitalliteracyeducationglobalcitizenshipmentalhealtheducation
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

    1. Climate Change: From Abstract Science to Lived Reality a) Integrate across subjects Climate change shouldn’t live only in geography or science. In math, students can analyze local temperature or rainfall data. In economics, they can debate green jobs and carbon pricing. In language or art, they cRead more

    1. Climate Change: From Abstract Science to Lived Reality

    a) Integrate across subjects

    Climate change shouldn’t live only in geography or science.

    • In math, students can analyze local temperature or rainfall data.

    • In economics, they can debate green jobs and carbon pricing.

    • In language or art, they can express climate anxiety, hope, or activism through writing and performance.

    This cross-disciplinary approach helps students see that environmental issues are everywhere, not a once-a-year event.

    b) Localize learning

    • Abstract global numbers mean less than what’s happening outside your window.
    • Encourage students to track local water usage, tree cover, or waste management in their communities.
    • Field projects  planting drives, school energy audits, composting clubs  transform “climate literacy” into climate agency.

    c) Model sustainable behavior

    Schools themselves can be living labs:

    • Solar panels on rooftops

    • No single-use plastics

    • Green transport initiatives

    • When children see sustainability in daily operations, it normalizes responsibility.

    2. Global Citizenship: Building Empathy and Awareness Beyond Borders

    a) Start with empathy and identity

    Global citizenship begins not with flags but with empathy  understanding that we’re part of one shared human story.

    Activities like cultural exchange projects, online pen-pal programs, and discussions on world events can nurture that worldview early.

    b) Link to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    Use the UN SDGs as a curriculum backbone. Each SDG (from gender equality to clean water) can inspire project-based learning:

    • SDG 3 → Health & Well-being projects

    • SDG 10 → Inequality discussions

    • SDG 13 → Climate action campaigns

    Students learn that global problems are interconnected, and they have a role in solving them.

    c) Teach ethical debate and civic action

    Empower students to question and engage:

    • What does fair trade mean for farmers?

    • How do digital borders affect migration?

    • What makes news trustworthy in different countries?

    Global citizenship isn’t about memorizing facts—it’s about learning how to think, act, and care globally.

     3. Digital Literacy: Beyond Screens, Toward Wisdom

    a) Start with awareness, not fear

    Instead of telling students “Don’t use your phone,” teach them how to use it wisely:

    • Evaluate sources, verify facts, and spot deepfakes.

    • Understand algorithms and data privacy.

    • Explore digital footprints and online ethics.

    This helps them become critical thinkers, not passive scrollers.

    b) Empower creation, not just consumption

    Encourage students to make things: blogs, podcasts, websites, coding projects.
    Digital literacy means creating value, not just scrolling through it.

    c) Teach AI literacy early

    With AI tools becoming ubiquitous, children must understand what’s human, what’s generated, and how to use technology responsibly.

    Simple exercises like comparing AI-written text with their own or discussing bias spark essential critical awareness.

     4. Mental Health: The Foundation of All Learning

    a) Normalize conversation

    The biggest barrier is stigma.

    Schools must model openness: daily check-ins, mindfulness breaks, and spaces for honest dialogue (“It’s okay not to be okay”).

    b) Train teachers as first responders

    • Teachers don’t have to be psychologists, but they can be listeners.
    • Basic training helps them recognize stress, anxiety, and burnout early.
    • A compassionate word from a trusted teacher can change a student’s trajectory.

    c) Rebalance pressure and performance

    • Grades and competition can drive anxiety.
    • Replacing some high-stakes exams with portfolios, projects, or reflections encourages growth over perfection.
    • Make well-being part of the report card — not just academics.

    d) Peer support and mental health clubs

    • Students listen to students.
    • Peer mentors and “buddy circles” can provide non-judgmental spaces for sharing and support, guided by trained counselors.

     5. Integrating All Four: The Holistic Model

    These aren’t separate themes they overlap beautifully:

    When integrated, they create “whole learners”  informed, empathetic, digitally wise, and emotionally balanced.

     6. Practical Implementation Strategies

    • Project-based learning: Create interdisciplinary projects combining these themes — e.g., “Design a Digital Campaign for Climate Awareness.”

    • Teacher training workshops: Build teacher comfort with sensitive topics like anxiety, sustainability, and misinformation.

    • Parent inclusion: Hold sessions to align school and home values on digital use, environment, and mental wellness.

    • Partnerships: Collaborate with NGOs, environmentalists, psychologists, and technologists to bring real-world voices into classrooms.

    • Policy embedding: Ministries of Education can integrate these into National Education Policy (NEP 2020) frameworks under life skills, environmental education, and social-emotional learning.

     7. The Bigger Picture: Education as Hope

    • When we teach a child about the planet, we teach them to care.
    • When we teach them to care, we teach them to act.
    • And when we teach them to act, we create citizens who won’t just adapt to the future  they’ll build it.
    • Education isn’t just about passing exams anymore.
      It’s about cultivating the next generation of thoughtful, ethical, resilient humans who can heal a stressed world  mind, body, and environment.
    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 05/11/2025In:

we manage issues like student motivat ...

academicintegrityaiethicsaiineducationdigitalequityeducationtechnologyhighereducation
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

    1. Understanding the Problem: The New Attention Economy Today's students aren't less capable; they're just overstimulated. Social media, games, and algorithmic feeds are constantly training their brains for quick rewards and short bursts of novelty. Meanwhile, most online classes are long, linear, aRead more

    1. Understanding the Problem: The New Attention Economy

    Today’s students aren’t less capable; they’re just overstimulated.

    Social media, games, and algorithmic feeds are constantly training their brains for quick rewards and short bursts of novelty. Meanwhile, most online classes are long, linear, and passive.

    Why it matters:

    • Today’s students measure engagement in seconds, not minutes.
    • Focus isn’t a default state anymore; it must be designed for.
    • Educators must compete against billion-dollar attention-grabbing platforms without losing the soul of real learning.

    2. Rethink Motivation: From Compliance to Meaning

    a) Move from “should” to “want”

    • Traditional motivation relied on compliance: “you should study for the exam”.
    • Modern learners respond to purpose and relevance-they have to see why something matters.

    Practical steps:

    • Start every module with a “Why this matters in real life” moment.
    • Relate lessons to current problems: climate change, AI ethics, entrepreneurship.
    • Allow choice—let students pick a project format: video, essay, code, infographic. Choice fuels ownership.

    b) Build micro-wins

    • Attention feeds on progress.
    • Break big assignments into small achievable milestones. Use progress bars or badges, but not for gamification gimmicks that beg for attention, instead for visible accomplishment.

    c) Create “challenge + support” balance

    • If tasks are too easy or impossibly hard, students disengage.
    • Adaptive systems, peer mentoring, and AI-tutoring tools can adjust difficulty and feedback to keep learners in the sweet spot of effort.

     3. Designing for Digital Attention

    a) Sessions should be short, interactive, and purposeful.

    • The average length of sustained attention online is 10–15 minutes for adults less for teens.

    So, think in learning sprints:

    • 10 minutes of teaching
    • 5 minutes of activity (quiz, poll, discussion)
    • 2 minutes reflection
    • Chunk content visually and rhythmically.

    b) Use multi-modal content

    • Mix text, visuals, video, and storytelling.
    • But avoid overload: one strong diagram beats ten GIFs.
    • Give the eyes rest, silence and pauses are part of design.

    c) Turn students from consumers into creators

    • The moment a student creates—a slide, code snippet, summary, or meme they shift from passive attention to active engagement.
    • Even short creation tasks (“summarize this in 3 emojis” or “teach back one concept in your words”) build ownership.

    Connection & Belonging:

    • Motivation is social: when students feel unseen or disconnected, their drive collapses.

    a) Personalizing the digital experience

    Name students when providing feedback; praise effort, not just results. Small acknowledgement leads to massive loyalty and persistence.

    b) Encourage peer presence

    Use breakout rooms, discussion boards, or collaborative notes.

    Hybrid learners perform best when they know others are learning with them, even virtually.

    c) Demonstrating teacher vulnerability

    • When educators admit tech hiccups or share their own struggles with focus, it humanizes the environment.
    • Authenticity beats perfection every time.
    • Distractions: How to manage them, rather than fight them.
    • You can’t eliminate distractions; you can design around them.

    a) Assist students in designing attention environments

    Teach metacognition:

    • “When and where do I focus best?”
    • “What distracts me most?”
    • “How can I batch notifications or set screen limits during study blocks?
    • Try to use frameworks like Pomodoro (25–5 rule) or Deep Work sessions (90 min focus + 15 min break).

    b) Reclaim the phone as a learning tool

    Instead of banning devices, use them:

    • Interactive polls (Mentimeter, Kahoot)
    • QR-based micro-lessons
    • Reflection journaling apps
    • Transform “distraction” into a platform of participation.

     6. Emotional & Psychological Safety = Sustained Attention

    • Cognitive science is clear: the anxious brain cannot learn effectively.
    • Hybrid and remote setups can be isolating, so mental health matters as much as syllabus design.
    • Start sessions with 1-minute check-ins: “How’s your energy today?”
    • Normalize struggle and confusion as part of learning.
    • Include some optional well-being breaks: mindfulness, stretching, or simple breathing.
    • Attention improves when stress reduces.

     7. Using Technology Wisely (and Ethically)

    Technology can scaffold attention-or scatter it.

    Do’s:

    • Use analytics dashboards to identify early disengagement, for example, to determine who hasn’t logged in or submitted work.
    • Offer AI-powered feedback to keep progress visible.
    • Use gamified dashboards to motivate, not manipulate.

    Don’ts:

    • Avoid overwhelming with multiple platforms. Don’t replace human encouragement with auto-emails. Don’t equate “screen time” with “learning time.”

     8. The Teacher’s Role: From Lecturer to Attention Architect

    The teacher in hybrid contexts is less a “broadcaster” and more a designer of focus:

    • Curate pace and rhythm.
    • Mix silence and stimulus.
    • Balance challenge with clarity.
    • Model curiosity and mindful tech use.

    A teacher’s energy and empathy are still the most powerful motivators; no tool replaces that.

     Summary

    • Motivation isn’t magic. It’s architecture.
    • You build it daily through trust, design, relevance, and rhythm.
    • Students don’t need fewer distractions; they need more reasons to care.

    Once they see the purpose, feel belonging, and experience success, focus naturally follows.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 05/11/2025In:

AI use in classrooms and higher ed

academicintegrityaiethicsaiineducationdataprivacydigitalequityhighereducation
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

    1) Ethics: what’s at stake when we plug AI into learning? a) Human-centered learning vs. outsourcing thinkingGenerative AI can brainstorm, draft, translate, summarize, and even code. That’s powerful but it can also blur where learning happens. UNESCO’s guidance for generative AI in education stresseRead more

    1) Ethics: what’s at stake when we plug AI into learning?

    a) Human-centered learning vs. outsourcing thinking
    Generative AI can brainstorm, draft, translate, summarize, and even code. That’s powerful but it can also blur where learning happens. UNESCO’s guidance for generative AI in education stresses a human-centered approach: keep teachers in the loop, build capacity, and don’t let tools displace core cognitive work or teacher judgment. 

    b) Truth, accuracy, and “hallucinations”
    Models confidently make up facts (“hallucinations”). If students treat outputs as ground truth, you can end up with polished nonsense in papers, labs, and even clinical or policy exercises. Universities (MIT, among others) call out hallucinations and built-in bias as inherent risks that require explicit mitigation and critical reading habits. 

    c) Transparency and explainability
    When AI supports feedback, grading, or recommendation systems, students deserve to know when AI is involved and how decisions are made. OECD work on AI in education highlights transparency, contestability, and human oversight as ethical pillars.

    d) Privacy and consent
    Feeding student work or identifiers into third-party tools invokes data-protection duties (e.g., FERPA in the U.S.; GDPR in the EU; DPDP Act 2023 in India). Institutions must minimize data, get consent where required, and ensure vendors meet legal obligations. 

    e) Intellectual property & authorship
    Who owns AI-assisted work? Current signals: US authorities say purely AI-generated works (without meaningful human creativity) cannot be copyrighted, while AI-assisted works can be if there’s sufficient human authorship. That matters for theses, artistic work, and research outputs.

    2) Equity: who benefits and who gets left behind?

    a) The access gap
    Students with reliable devices, fast internet, and paid AI tools get a productivity boost; others don’t. Without institutional access (campus licenses, labs, device loans), AI can widen existing gaps (socio-economic, language, disability). UNESCO’s human-centered guidance and OECD’s inclusivity framing both push institutions to resource access equitably. 

    b) Bias in outputs and systems
    AI reflects its training data. That can encode historical and linguistic bias into writing help, grading aids, admissions tools, or “risk” flags if carelessly applied disproportionately affecting under-represented or multilingual learners. Ethical guardrails call for bias testing, human review, and continuous monitoring. 

    c) Disability & language inclusion (the upside)
    AI can lower barriers: real-time captions, simpler rephrasings, translation, study companions, and personalized pacing. Equity policy should therefore be two-sided: prevent harm and proactively fund these supports so benefits aren’t paywalled. (This priority appears across UNESCO/OECD guidance.)

    3) Integrity: what does “honest work” mean now?

    a) Cheating vs. collaboration
    If a model drafts an essay, is that assistance or plagiarism? Detectors exist, but accuracy is contested; multiple reviews warn of false positives and negatives especially risky for multilingual students. Even Turnitin’s own communications frame AI flags as a conversation starter, not a verdict. Policies should define permitted vs. prohibited AI use by task. 

    b) Surveillance creep in assessments
    AI-driven remote proctoring (webcams, room scans, biometrics, gaze tracking) raises privacy, bias, and due-process concerns—and can harm student trust. Systematic reviews and HCI research note significant privacy and equity issues. Prefer assessment redesign over heavy surveillance where possible. 

    c) Assessment redesign
    Shift toward authentic tasks (oral vivas, in-class creation, project logs, iterative drafts, data diaries, applied labs) that reward understanding, process, and reflection—things harder to outsource to a tool. UNESCO pushes for assessment innovation alongside AI adoption.

    4) Practical guardrails that actually work

    Institution-level (governance & policy)

    • Publish a campus AI policy: What uses are allowed by course type? What’s banned? What requires citation? Keep it simple, living, and visible. (Model policies align with UNESCO/OECD principles: human oversight, transparency, equity, accountability.)

    • Adopt privacy-by-design: Minimize data; prefer on-prem or vetted vendors; sign DPAs; map legal bases (FERPA/GDPR/DPDP); offer opt-outs where appropriate. 

    • Equitable access: Provide institution-wide AI access (with usage logs and guardrails), device lending, and multilingual support so advantages aren’t concentrated among the most resourced students.

    • Faculty development: Train staff on prompt design, assignment redesign, bias checks, and how to talk to students about appropriate AI use (and misuse). UNESCO emphasizes capacity-building. 

    Course-level (teaching & assessment)

    • Declare your rules on the syllabus—for each assignment: “AI not allowed,” “AI allowed for brainstorming only,” or “AI encouraged with citation.” Provide a 1–2 line AI citation format.

    • Design “show-your-work” processes: require outlines, drafts, revision notes, or brief viva questions to evidence learning, not just final polish.

    • Use structured reflection: Ask students to paste prompts used, evaluate model outputs, identify errors/bias, and explain what they kept/changed and why. This turns AI from shortcut into a thinking partner.

    • Prefer robust evidence over detectors: If misconduct is suspected, use process artifacts (draft history, interviews, code notebooks) rather than relying solely on AI detectors with known reliability limits. 

    Student-level (skills & ethics)

    • Model skepticism: Cross-check facts; request citations; verify numbers; ask the model to list uncertainties; never paste private data. (Hallucinations are normal, not rare.)

    • Credit assistance: If an assignment allows AI, cite it (tool, version/date, what it did).

    • Own the output: You’re accountable for errors, bias, and plagiarism in AI-assisted work—just as with any source you consult.

    5) Special notes for India (and similar contexts)

    • DPDP Act 2023 applies to student personal data. Institutions should appoint a data fiduciary lead, map processing of student data in AI tools, and ensure vendor compliance; exemptions for government functions exist but don’t erase good-practice duties.

    • Access & language equity matter: budget for campus-provided AI access and multilingual support so students in low-connectivity regions aren’t penalized. Align with UNESCO’s human-centered approach. 

    Bottom line

    AI can expand inclusion (assistive tech, translation, personalized feedback) and accelerate learning—if we build the guardrails: clear use policies, privacy-by-design, equitable access, human-centered assessment, and critical AI literacy for everyone. If we skip those, we risk amplifying inequity, normalizing surveillance, and outsourcing thinking.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 21/10/2025In: ,

AI video generators tools that automa ...

ai-video-generatorgenerative-aisearch-trendsvideo-content-creation
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

    What Are AI Video Generators? AI video generators are software and platforms utilizing machine learning and generative AI models to produce videos by themselves frequently from a basic text prompt, script, or simple storyboard. Rather than requiring cameras, editing tools, and a production crew, useRead more

    What Are AI Video Generators?

    AI video generators are software and platforms utilizing machine learning and generative AI models to produce videos by themselves frequently from a basic text prompt, script, or simple storyboard.

    Rather than requiring cameras, editing tools, and a production crew, users enter a description of a scene or message (“a short ad for a fitness brand” or “a tutorial explaining blockchain”), and the AI does the rest generating professional-looking imagery, voiceovers, and animations.

    Some prominent instances include:

    • Synthesia, which turns text into videos with AI avatars that look realistic.
    • Runway ML and Pika Labs, which leverage generative diffusion models to animate scenes.
    • HeyGen and Colossyan, video automation learning and business experts.

     Why So Popular All of a Sudden?

    1. Democratization of Video Production

    Years ago, creating a great video required costly cameras, editors, lighting, and post-production equipment. AI video creators break those limits today. One person can produce what would formerly require a whole team all through a web browser.

    2. Blowing Up Video Content Demand

    • Social media sites like Instagram, TikTok, YouTube Shorts, and LinkedIn are all video-first.
    • Today’s marketers require an ongoing supply of engaging, focused video material, and AI provides a scalable means of filling that requirement.

    3. AI Breakthroughs with Text-to-Video Models

    • New AI designs, particularly diffusion and transformer models, can reverse text, sound, and images to produce stable and life-like frames.
    • This technological advancement combined with massive GPU compute resources is getting cheaper while delivering more.

    4. Localization & Personalization

    With AI, businesses are now able to make the same video in any language within seconds with the same face and lip-synchronized movement. This world-scale ability is priceless for training, marketing, and e-learning.

    5. Connection with Marketing & CRM Tools

    The majority of video AI tools used today communicate with HubSpot, Salesforce, Canva, and ChatGPT directly, enabling companies to incorporate video creation into everyday functioning bringing automation to sales, HR, and marketing.

    The Human Touch: Creativity Maximized, Not Replaced

    • Even though there has been concern that AI would replace human creativity, what is really occurring is an increase in creative ability.
    • Writers, designers, teachers, and architects are using these tools as co-creators  accelerating routine tasks such as writing, translation, and editing and keeping more time for imagination and storytelling.

    Consider this:

    • Instead of stealing the director’s chair, AI is the camera crew quick, lean, and waiting in the wings around the clock.

     Real-World Impact

    • Marketing: Brands are producing hundreds of customized video ads aimed at audience segments.
    • Education: Teachers can create multilingual explainer videos or virtual lectures without needing to record themselves.
    • E-commerce: Sellers can introduce products with AI-created models or voiceovers.
    • Corporate Training: HR departments can render compliance training and onboarding compliant through AI avatars.

    Challenges & Ethical Considerations

    Of course, the expansion creates new questions:

    • Authenticity: How do we differentiate AI-created videos from real recordings?
    • Bias: If trained with biased data, representations will be biased.
    • Copyright & Deepfake Risks: Abuse of celebrity likenesses and copyrighted imagery is a new concern.

    Regulations like the EU AI Act and upcoming US content disclosure rules are expected to set clearer boundaries.

     The Future of AI Video Generation

    In the next 2–3 years, we’ll likely see:

    • Text-to-Full-Film systems capable of producing short films with coherent storylines.
    • Interactive video production, in which scenes can be edited using natural language (“make sunset,” “change clothes to formal”).
    • Personalizable digital twins to enable creators to sell their own avatars as a part of branded content.
    • As the technology matures, AI video making will go from novelty to inevitability  just like Canva did for design or WordPress for websites.

    Actually, AI video makers are totally thriving — not only in query volume, but in actual use and creative impact.

    They’re rewriting the book on how to “make a video” and making it an art form that people can craft for themselves.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 21/10/2025In: ,

your application relies heavily on re ...

awscloud-architecturedisaster-recoverydisaster-recovery hybrid-cloudhigh-availabilitymulti-region
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

     Actually  Multi-Region and Hybrid Cloud Are No Longer Nice-to-Haves, but Strategic Imperatives If your application depends on region-specific AWS endpoints to a very significant degree, then a multi-region or hybrid-cloud approach is not a "nice-to-have"  it's a central component of uptime, resilieRead more

     Actually  Multi-Region and Hybrid Cloud Are No Longer Nice-to-Haves, but Strategic Imperatives

    If your application depends on region-specific AWS endpoints to a very significant degree, then a multi-region or hybrid-cloud approach is not a “nice-to-have”  it’s a central component of uptime, resiliency, and business continuity.

    The recent AWS outages have taught us that even the advanced cloud infrastructure of the world is not invulnerable to failure. When a single AWS region such as US-EAST-1  is disrupted, the effects ripple through thousands of reliant applications worldwide.

    Understanding the Problem: Region Dependence

    • AWS services like EC2, S3, RDS, DynamoDB, Lambda, and even API Gateway are region-scoped, i.e., their resources and endpoints are bound to a geographical location.

    By having applications execute with a single region only:

    • You’ve got speed and ease because all of them stay proximate to each other.
    • But you’re sacrificing a complete service outage in the event of the region going down.

    For example, if your entire backend of your app your load balancers, databases, and queues is in US-EAST-1, then a failure in that region would take down your entire system, no matter where your users are.

    What Happens During a Region Outage

    When a major AWS region fails, the following happens:

    • DNS resolution for your services’ endpoints doesn’t work.
    • API calls start to timeout due to network routing problems.
    • Dependent services like DynamoDB, S3, or CloudFront may not sync data.
    • User-facing applications freeze regardless of the health of other AWS regions.

    The reality is simple: single-region usage creates a single point of failure, which defeats the whole purpose of cloud resilience.

     How Multi-Region Deployment Helps

    • A multi-region deployment is hosting your resources in more than one AWS region and configuring them for redundancy or failover.

    This is how it does it:

    • Redundancy: When Region A is down, Region B will handle the requests.
    • Performance: Send users to the nearest region (through Route 53 or CloudFront).
    • Compliance: Some countries require local data storage multi-region configurations assist with that.
    • Business Continuity: Your app is up even during a disaster outage.

    Example

    • Let’s say your primary stack is in Mumbai (ap-south-1) and your secondary in Singapore (ap-southeast-1).
    • In case Mumbai goes down, your DNS routing can re-route traffic to Singapore seamlessly with minimal disruption.

     Beyond AWS: The Hybrid Cloud Argument

    • Multi-region setups are fault-tolerant, but hybrid cloud does fault tolerance better.
    • This is a combination of on-prem/in-house servers or other cloud solutions such as Azure or Google Cloud with public cloud (AWS).

    Benefits of Hybrid Cloud:

    • Infrastructure Diversity: No vendor lock-in through workload distribution.
    • Regulatory Control: Sensitive information remain on-prem or in private clouds.
    • Performance Optimization: Execute latency-sensitive workloads locally and scale-heavy workloads in the cloud.
    • Disaster Recovery: Your secondary environment can take over automatically if AWS fails.

    For mission-critical or compliance-applications writers (e.g., healthcare, finance, or government), hybrid configurations offer a second fail-safe from downtime and data-sovereignty threats.

     Implementation Considerations

    When planning a multi-region or hybrid configuration, remember:

    • Database Replication: Use Amazon Aurora Global Database or cross-region replication for RDS, S3, or DynamoDB Global Tables.
    • Networking: Use Route 53 for geo-based routing and failover.
    • Infrastructure as Code: Use Terraform or AWS CDK to have the same configuration in all regions.
    • Cost Management: More regions = more cost plan based on business-critical priorities.
    • Automation: Use CI/CD pipelines which can deploy to many regions with ease.

     Real-World Example: Netflix and AWS

    • Netflix is AWS’s largest customer, but even they don’t put everything in one region.
    • Their infrastructure is multi-region, multi-availability zone, so that even if a complete AWS region fails, there is no interruption of the service.
    • This is called “Chaos Engineering”, stress testing failure modes in an effort to ensure real-world resiliency.
    • Small businesses can borrow the same paradigm (even downsized) to minimize outage impact significantly.

     Developer Takeaway

    In case you are dependent on region-based endpoints:

    • Don’t wait for the next outage to start thinking about multi-region or hybrid-cloud setups.
    • Begin with read replicas or failover copies in a different region.
    • Progress to automated cross-region deployments and traffic failover functionality over time.
    • Your mission should not be to avoid all failures that is impossible.
    • Design systems that keep on running when things go wrong instead.

    Final Thought

    • Yes you should definitely consider a hybrid or multi-region cloud strategy if your application relies upon region-specific AWS endpoints.
    • Business continuity in 2025 is not about preventing downtime it’s about limiting the blast radius when something inevitably does fail.
    • Resilient design, redundant know-how, and distributed deployment are the characteristics of systems that recover from an outage rather than crumbling under one.
    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 21/10/2025In: ,

how reliant so many businesses are on ...

business-continuitycloud-computingcloud-outagedigital-resilienceinternet-infrastructuretech-dependency
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

     Yes — The AWS Outage Has Sparked a Global Debate About Internet Fragility The colossal AWS outage in October 2025 did more than remove sites from the internet; it revealed how reliant contemporary life is on a few cloud providers. From small businesses up through the Fortune 500s, all but every sinRead more

     Yes — The AWS Outage Has Sparked a Global Debate About Internet Fragility

    The colossal AWS outage in October 2025 did more than remove sites from the internet; it revealed how reliant contemporary life is on a few cloud providers. From small businesses up through the Fortune 500s, all but every single digital service relies on AWS, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud to compute, store, and process information.

    When AWS crashed, the domino effects were immediate and global  and that’s why it is being referred to as a “wake-up call” for the entire internet.

    What Actually Happened

    • Amazon Web Services’ US-EAST-1 region (located in Northern Virginia) witnessed a total collapse of DynamoDB, Elastic Load Balancers, and DNS resolution networks.
    • Consequently, tens of thousands of applications from Fortnite and Snapchat to corporate intranets crashed or slowed to crawl.
    • The world’s most robust cloud infrastructure was brought down for half a day, demonstrating that giants can fall. The failure demonstrated a modest fact:
    • The internet is only as robust as its weakest central node.

     Why the Internet Is So Dependent on a Few Providers

    • Over the past decade, businesses have rapidly moved from on-premise servers to cloud infrastructure. The reason is obvious  it’s faster, cheaper, scalable, and easier to manage.
    • But this convenience has brought with it hyper-centralization.

    Today:

    • AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud together power more than 70% of cloud workloads across the globe.
    • Thousands of smaller hosting providers and SaaS tools operate on top of these clouds.
    • Even competitors depend on the same backbone connections or data centers.

    So when something in one area or service crashes, it doesn’t impact just one company  it spreads to the digital economy.

     What Experts Are Saying

    • Network administrators and cybersecurity experts have cautioned that the internet is now perilously centralized.

    Some of the thread-like links in the debate are as follows:

    • “We constructed the cloud to make the web resilient but through doing so, we simply focused risk.”
    • “One failure in an AWS data center brings down half of the world’s applications.”
    • “Resilience should mean decentralization, not redundancy.”

    That is, business resilience is now controlled by a handful of corporate networks, rather than the open web culture the web was first founded on.

     Business Consequences: Cloud Monoculture Risks

    • To enterprises, this incident served as a wake-up call to the ‘cloud monoculture’ issue  depending on one for everything.

    When AWS is out:

    • Web stores lose sales.
    • Healthcare systems are unable to retrieve patient information.
    • Payment gateways and transport networks go dark.
    • Remote teams can no longer use tools.

    In a realm wheOthers are rethinking their multi-cloud or hybrid-cloud strategies to hedge risk.

     Engineers and IT Organizations’ Lessons

    This event provided the following important lessons to architects and engineers like you:

    • Steer Clear of Single-Region Deployments
    • Utilize multiple regions or Availability Zones, and failover design.
    • Go Multi-Cloud
    • Have backups or primary services hosted on a secondary provider (Azure, GCP, or even on-prem).
    • Enhance Observability
    • Use alert and monitoring measures that can identify partial failures, as well as complete outages.
    • Plan for Graceful Degradation

    In the event that your API or database fail, make sure your app keeps on delivering diminished functionality instead of complete failure.

    The Bigger Picture: Rethinking Internet Resilience

    • It’s not only about AWS  it’s about the way digital infrastructure is constructed in the modern day and era.
    • Most traffic today goes through gargantuan hyperscalers. Effective but single point of systemic vulnerability.

    To really secure the internet, experts recommend:

    • Decentralized hosting (via edge computing or distributed networks)
    • Independent backup routing systems
    • Greater transparency in cloud operations
    • Global collaboration to establish cloud reliability standards

     Looking Ahead: A Call for Smarter Cloud Strategy

    • The AWS outage will have no doubt nudged companies and governments towards more resilient, distributed architecture.

    Businesses can begin investing in:

    • Edge computing nodes on the periphery of users.
    • Predictive maintenance of network equipment based on artificial intelligence.
    • Hybrid clouds that consist of cloud, on-premises, and private servers.

    It’s not about giving up on the cloud  it’s about making it smart, secure, and decentralized.

    Last Thought

    In fact, this incident has pushed us closer to a new, global dialogue regarding the instability of the web’s underpinnings.

    It is a reminder that “the cloud” is not a force of nature  it is an aggregation of physical boxes, routers, and wire, controlled by human hands.

    When one hand falters, the entire digital world shakes.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 14/10/2025In:

a global tariff truce help stabilize ...

globaleconomyinflationcontrolinternationaltradepostpandemicrecoverytarifftrucetradepolicy
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

     Can a Global Tariff Truce Stabilize Post-Pandemic Inflation? Since the pandemic, the world economy has been balancing on the tightrope of convalescence — staggering with high inflation, supply chain meltdown, and geopolitics. One idea that is slowly gaining traction among policymakers and economistRead more

     Can a Global Tariff Truce Stabilize Post-Pandemic Inflation?

    Since the pandemic, the world economy has been balancing on the tightrope of convalescence — staggering with high inflation, supply chain meltdown, and geopolitics. One idea that is slowly gaining traction among policymakers and economists is that of a “global tariff truce.” The hypothesis is beautiful and powerful: If countries were to desist from raising or even roll back trade tariffs, might that be to curb inflation and bring order to global prices?

    Let’s break down this concept in humanized, real-world terms.

    The Inflation Aftershock

    When COVID-19 struck, factories closed, shipping was halted, and industries were shut down altogether. When economies reopened, demand bounced back — but supply couldn’t match it. Prices for basics such as fuel, food, and metals skyrocketed.

    And then, just as things were settling into a new normal, trade barriers and tariffs fueled the inflationary flames.

    For example, tariffs on imported steel, semiconductors, or fertilizers increased the price of producing everything from cars to crops. Those costs didn’t stay theoretical — they seeped into citizens.

    In short, tariffs were sneaky inflation multipliers, higher prices on regular stuff that virtually no one even noticed.

    What a “Global Tariff Truce” Means

    Tariff truce is not replacing tariffs overnight. Instead, it’s a collective agreement among the world’s biggest economies — say, the U.S., China, EU, and India — to put new tariffs on ice and gradually eliminate existing tariffs on priority items that affect inflation, including:

    • Foodstuffs and farm produce
    • Energy sources
    • Industrial inputs (e.g., steel, aluminum, microchips)
    • Pharmaceuticals and medical devices

    The idea takes inspiration from the post-war period of trade harmony when international cooperation gave a push to rebuild economies. Removing trade barriers, the truce will increase supply, lower prices, and ease pressure on prices worldwide.

    Why It Might Stabilize Inflation

    Cheaper Imports → Lower Prices

    Tariffs are a sneaky tax. Reducing or eliminating them lowers import costs for businesses immediately, which they can then pass on to consumers. For instance, a 10% reduction in tariffs on imported food or gasoline immediately lowers grocery and transportation costs.

    Boosted Supply Chain Flow

    A truce would clear the cross-border commerce in goods of fewer bureaucratic or tariff-related hurdles. This would take pressure off production bottlenecks and shortages — prime drivers of post-pandemic inflation.

    Business Confidence Boost

    Companies prefer predictability. A tariff truce sends the message that the principles of global commerce are returning to business as usual, and companies can invest, restock, and hire again — without fear of surprise cost surprises.

    Restoring Global Cooperation

    Trade tensions, especially between major economies, have kept markets on edge. A show of peace would calm financial nervousness and peg emerging markets’ currencies, indirectly tempering inflationary pressure in the process.

     The Skepticism and Challenges

    Of course, a tariff truce isn’t a magic wand. Others contend that there are numerous drivers of inflation — energy shocks, climate shocks, and increasing wages to list a few. Reducing tariffs might only shave a few percentage points — not cure the issue.

    And politics. Governments still largely view tariffs as ways of protecting home jobs and industries. Rescinding foreign steel tariffs that save manufacturers money but anger local manufacturers would be an example. With populist politics, politicians will find it easier to blame “foreign competition” than making appeals for international cooperation.

    Moreover, geopolitical tensions — i.e., U.S.-China rivalry or Russia sanctions — are a brake on blanket trade truces. Confidence among great powers is at a record low, and trade policy has emerged as a strategic competition tool.

    The Big Picture: Economic Cooperation vs. Fragmentation

    Despite these issues, most economists have confidence that sector-specific or partial tariff truce would be possible. For example, countries can start with reducing tariffs on:

    • Agricultural goods (to stem food inflation)
    • Renewable energy equipment (to minimize transition costs)
    • Semiconductors and materials (to ease manufacturing inflation)

    Such coordinated assistance would restore confidence and pave the way for greater trade normalization — a step toward re-globalization, not the economic fragmentation of recent years.

     Why It’s About More Than Just Prices

    A tariff truce is not just a means of slowing inflation — it’s a means of imposing a sense of global collective responsibility. The pandemic demonstrated how linked our economies are. A ban on exports from one nation or a tariff increase can cascade across the globe, harming farmers in Kenya, factory workers in Vietnam, and New York shoppers.

    Reducing these barriers can allow the world to heal not only economically, but psychologically — by restoring trust that cooperation, not separation, fuels progress.

    Conclusion: A Truce Worth Trying

    • A global tariff truce won’t snap inflation into remission overnight, but it could take the edge off and send a powerful message: that countries can still unite for the good of all in a more divided world.
    • By opening doors, lifting supply, and calming price whipsaws, such a move could stabilize economies and expectations — the two most important ingredients to long-term recovery.
    • In the end, the issue is less whether or not a tariff truce can reduce inflation, but whether or not nations have the political will to place cooperation ahead of competition.

    For for although tariffs build walls, a ceasefire builds bridges — and bridges are what the post-pandemic world most requires.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 14/10/2025In:

digital tariffs represent the next fr ...

digitaltariffsdigitaltradeglobaltradeinternationaleconomicstechpolicytradeconflict
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

     Are Digital Tariffs The Next Frontier of Global Trade War? In a world where data is the new oil and digital products move more freely than their physical equivalents, digital tariffs are fast becoming the next big battleground of global trade. Where economies competed over steel, petroleum, and vehRead more

     Are Digital Tariffs The Next Frontier of Global Trade War?

    In a world where data is the new oil and digital products move more freely than their physical equivalents, digital tariffs are fast becoming the next big battleground of global trade. Where economies competed over steel, petroleum, and vehicles in the 20th century, the 21st century is witnessing competition over software, data, AI, and cloud computing. The question now is — are governments able to tax these flows of digital goods without choking off innovation and global cooperation?

     The Rise of the Digital Economy

    Global trade has steered quietly, over the past decade, away from cargo ships and containers to cloud servers and code. Online marketplaces, remote work programs, and streaming services are now top export earners.

    For example, a U.S. company can sell software subscriptions in India or the EU without shipping anything physically — but that sale creates real economic value.

    Governments, with their own tax bases dwindling on traditional commodities, are attempting to seize revenue from digital transactions that tend to escape local taxation. That born the idea of “digital tariffs” — cross-border digital services and products taxes or levies.

     Why Digital Tariffs Are Controversial

    The concept is simple-sounding — if Google, Amazon, or Netflix makes money off a country’s users, they must pay taxes within the country. But it is not that simple.

    • Blurry Borders: Where exactly does a digital product “reside”? On the vendor’s server? The purchaser’s monitor?
    • Double Taxation Risk: Absent global standards, the same service could be taxed twice by two countries.
    • Innovation Chill: Tariffs have the power to increase the cost of tech and startups, dampening the rate of digital innovation.
    • France, India, and Italy have already implemented Digital Services Taxes (DSTs) on big tech firms. America claims that the taxes are discriminatory against its firms — issuing threats of retaliatory tariffs.

    So, digital tariffs aren’t simply fiscal tools — they’re geopolitcal weapons.

    • The U.S. is invoking its tech champions’ defense that online services represent global public goods and cannot be taxed in a piecemeal manner. Europe and emerging economies contend that foreign tech companies get to enjoy local markets without paying their fair share.
    • This confrontation has turned into one of the most contentious issues in global trade negotiations.
    • The OECD global digital tax template, designed to render the system more equitable, is bogged down with international approval. In the absence of a deal, governments are turning to tit-for-tat tariffs — leaving investors in turmoil and testing the boundaries with allies.

    The Economic Stakes

    Tariffs on the digital economy would redefine the technology industry business model:

    • Increased Costs: If cloud services or app selling is tariffed, customers would have to pay extra for online products and subscription-based services.
    • Splintered Internet: Companies may keep data at home to evade tariffs, resulting in a more splintered, “regionalized” internet.
    • Less Innovation: Smaller companies and artists may not be capable of competing with giants who can absorb additional costs.

    But the critics counter that something has to be taxed or regulated in order to achieve equity — particularly when AI platforms overwhelm markets and steer economies across the globe.

    The AI and Data Angle

    As digital platforms and artificial intelligence become the basis of commerce, digital tariffs can subsequently seep over from e-commerce and media into data flows and algorithms. Nations can soon begin imposing “data access fees” or “AI training levies” on foreign firms to make use of citizens’ data for training algorithms.

    This will usher in a new age of digital protectionism, where nations will protect their digital wealth as zealously as they protect oil or minerals.

     The Road Ahead

    There needs to be cooperation between nations to prevent a digital trade war. The future hangs in the balance:

    • A Universal Digital Tax Arrangement – an integrated system under the OECD or WTO that avoids double taxation and contributes equitably.
    • Data-Sharing Standards – open standards for where data can live and how profits are taxed.
    • Balancing Innovation and Fairness – pushing tech growth while making sure governments can afford to fund public services.

     Conclusion: The Digital Frontier Is Political, Not Just Technological

    Digital tariffs are just a symptom of a larger issue — who has the power over value in the digital world?

    If countries cannot even agree on shared principles, the open internet that powered global growth will splinter into distinct digital domains, with tariffs of their own and data regimes.

    In practice, digital tariffs are not taxes — they’re the leading edge of a larger struggle over digital sovereignty, corporate power, and the design of global trade.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 14/10/2025In:

value of 15 grams of 22K gold

22kgold24kgoldgoldinvestmentgoldpricegoldrateindiagoldvalue
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

    Understanding the Problem We know: What is the worth of 15 grams of 22K gold if 24K gold is currently priced at ₹5,000 a gram? The following is what we know: 24K gold is 100% gold. 22K gold is 22 parts of gold out of 24 parts. The other 2 parts are typically other metals like silver or copper. We haRead more

    Understanding the Problem

    We know:

    What is the worth of 15 grams of 22K gold if 24K gold is currently priced at ₹5,000 a gram?

    The following is what we know:

    • 24K gold is 100% gold.
    • 22K gold is 22 parts of gold out of 24 parts. The other 2 parts are typically other metals like silver or copper.
    • We have 15 grams of 22K gold.
    • The market price is ₹5,000 for a gram of gold (24K) pure.

    The goal is to figure out the worth now of 15 grams of 22K gold at the current rate.

    Step 1: Calculate the Purity Factor

    Gold is described in terms of “karats,” with 24K = 100% pure. To calculate the effective purity of 22K gold, we use the following formula:

    Purity (%)
    =
    Karat Value
    24
    ×
    100
    Purity (%)=
    24
    Karat Value

    ×100

    Substitute the numbers:

    Purity (%)
    =
    22
    24
    ×
    100
    Purity (%)=
    24
    22

    ×100
    Purity (%)
    =
    0.9167
    ×
    100
    ≈
    91.67
    %
    Purity (=)0.9167×100≈91.67

    Therefore 22K gold is 91.67% pure. That is, each gram of 22K gold is 0.9167 grams pure gold.

    Step 2: Calculate the Value of 1 Gram of 22K Gold

    Since 24K gold is priced ₹5,000 a gram, the true value of 1 gram of 22K gold is:

    Price per gram of 22K
    =
    5000
    ×
    0.9167
    Price per gram of 22K=5000×0.9167
    Price per gram of 22K
    ≈
    4583.5

    ₹/gram
    Price per gram of 22K≈4583.5₹/gram

    Therefore 1 gram of 22K gold is about worth ₹4,583.50.

    Step 3: Calculate the Value of 15 Grams

    Now, multiply this rate times the total weight:

    Value of 15 grams
    =
    15
    ×
    4583.5
    Value of 15 grams=15×4583.5

    Let’s do it step by step:

    15 × 4,583 = 68,745

    15 × 0.5 ≈ 7.5

    Add both: 68,745 + 7.5 ≈ 68,752.5 ₹

    We can approximate it to ₹68,753.

    Step 4: Final Answer

    The amount of 15 grams of 22K gold at ₹5,000 per gram for 24K gold is about:

    ₹
    68,
    753
    ₹68,753

    Extra Insights

    • As the price of gold increases or decreases, the amount of 22K gold increases or decreases proportionally.
    • The difference between 24K and 22K gold is not gigantic, yet in quantities, it does count.
    • Jewellers generally add an addition of making charges on top of this amount for custom jewellery, which can prove to be heavy.

    If you prefer, I can also show you an unimaginably easy shortcut formula for finding 22K, 18K, or any other percentage of gold instantly without so many steps—it is a gold mental maths trick!

    See less
Load More Questions