Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In


Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here


Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

You must login to add post.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here
Sign InSign Up

Qaskme

Qaskme Logo Qaskme Logo

Qaskme Navigation

  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask A Question
  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog

Education

Share
  • Facebook
1 Follower
36 Answers
34 Questions
Home/Education/Page 2

Qaskme Latest Questions

mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 22/09/2025In: Education

How can schools better integrate mental well-being into daily learning, not just as an add-on?

mental well-being into daily learning ...

education and mental healthmental health integrationmental well-beingmindfulness in schoolsschool environmentstudent wellness
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful
    Added an answer on 22/09/2025 at 2:22 pm

    Why Mental Well-Being Can't Be Treated as "Extra" Schools have been treating mental health as an afterthought program—something that's dealt with during a special awareness week, or in an occasional counseling session. But students' emotional well-being isn't an afterthought when it comes to school.Read more

    Why Mental Well-Being Can’t Be Treated as “Extra”

    Schools have been treating mental health as an afterthought program—something that’s dealt with during a special awareness week, or in an occasional counseling session. But students’ emotional well-being isn’t an afterthought when it comes to school. Stress, anxiety, social stress, and burnout directly influence the way kids learn, concentrate, and relate.

    If we only consider mental health as an add-on, it’s like attempting to fix holes in a sinking ship rather than making the hull stronger to begin with. The reality is: mental health needs to be integrated into the very fabric of how schools operate.

    1. Introducing Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) into the curriculum

    Instead of being a standalone subject, SEL can be integrated throughout lessons. For instance:

    • In literature, students can learn about characters’ feelings and coping mechanisms.
    • In science, they can talk about how stress influences the body and brain.
    • In group work, conflict resolution and teamwork can be taught directly.

    By making it okay to talk about feelings, resilience, and empathy, schools include mental well-being in daily learning—not just something you deal with when a student is in crisis.

    2. Changing from Performance-Pressure to Growth Mindsets

    Most students are overwhelmed by grades and relentless comparison. Growth-oriented schools—acknowledging effort, improvement, and wonder—reduce unhealthy stress. Teachers can set the example by providing feedback that rewards learning over flawlessness, and by reassuring students that error is part of development, not failure.

    When children feel safe to fail, they also feel more at liberty to learn.

    3. Creating Classrooms and Schedules That Safeguard Mental Health

    • Breaks and moments of mindfulness: Regular brief breathing breaks, stretches, or moments of reflection throughout the day can refresh students’ attention.
    • Structured workloads: Rather than piling students up with perpetual assignments, schools can organize timetables that provide time for rest, leisure, and family activities.
    • Flexible learning environments: Natural-light classrooms with pleasant seating and spaces to reflect quietly have a tangible impact on mood and concentration.
    • These little design decisions convey a strong message: your well-being is important here.

    4. Empowering Teachers as First Responders of Well-Being

    Teachers are usually the first to observe differences in a student’s behavior. But many do not feel equipped to act. Schools can provide training in trauma-informed instruction, active listening, and recognizing warning signs of mental health issues.

    Most importantly, teachers are not required to be therapists. They simply require tools to respond with compassion and understand when to refer students to the appropriate help.

    5. Building Safe Spaces and Reducing Stigma

    Rather than a counseling office hidden away like a secret, schools can create mental health resources openly available and stigma-free. That could mean:

    • Trained student leaders leading peer support groups.
    • Open-door policies wherein students are able to discuss things with counselors without feeling shame.
    • Classroom lectures on stress management, self-care, and coping.

    When students realize help-seeking is part of normal life, they’re more likely to say something before it spirals.

    6. Engaging Families and Communities

    Mental wellness isn’t a school problem—it’s a community problem. Schools can give parents workshops on how to address kids’ emotional needs, partner with local health agencies, and invite guest experts who have real-world coping mechanisms.

    This provides a more robust safety net for every child, rather than relying on schools to do it alone.

    7. Using Technology Mindfully

    EdTech tends to put pressure on—perpetual online assignments, grades, and reminders. But technology can be on the side of well-being when used with intention:

    • Mindfulness or journaling apps.
    • Feedback platforms that don’t shame students.
    • Check-ins online where students can say how they’re feeling.

    The secret is balance: tech to assist, not drown.

    The Cultural Shift Schools Need

    In the end, embedding mental well-being isn’t about introducing additional programs—it’s about a culture. Schools need to convey that how valuable a student is isn’t based on their GPA, but on how they are growing, thriving, and being human.

    When well-being is valued, students don’t just perform better—they feel understood, nurtured, and set up for success outside of school.

     In brief: Schools must integrate well-being into curriculum, pedagogy, classroom layout, and community norms in order to break through “add-ons.” When mental health is made obligatory, not voluntary, schools build classrooms in which both minds and hearts can thrive.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 82
  • 0
Answer
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 22/09/2025In: Education

Skills for the Future – What skills will be most valuable for students in an AI-driven job market? (critical thinking, creativity, digital literacy, emotional intelligence?)

critical thinking, creativity, digita ...

ai challengesai in educationai toolsdigital literacyedtecheducation policystudent learning
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful
    Added an answer on 22/09/2025 at 2:09 pm

    The Future Isn't Just About Jobs, It's About Adaptability In a world ruled by AI, the greatest change is not so much what kind of jobs there are but how rapidly they shift. Occupations that were rock-solid for decades can become obsolete in a few short years. That means students don't merely need toRead more

    The Future Isn’t Just About Jobs, It’s About Adaptability

    In a world ruled by AI, the greatest change is not so much what kind of jobs there are but how rapidly they shift. Occupations that were rock-solid for decades can become obsolete in a few short years. That means students don’t merely need to train for one job—they need the flexibility to learn, unlearn, and remake themselves over their lifetime.

    So the question is: which abilities will maintain their worth, as industries change and automation becomes more widespread?

    1. Critical Thinking – The Compass in a World of Noise

    AI can provide answers in seconds, but it doesn’t always provide good answers. Students will need the capacity to question, validate, and think through information. Critical thinking is the ability that allows you to distinguish fact from fiction, logic from prejudice, insight from noise.

    Envision a future workplace: an AI generates a business plan or science report. A seasoned professional won’t merely take it—they’ll question: Does this hold together? What’s omitted? What’s the implicit assumption? That critical thinking skill will be a student’s protection against uncritically adopting machine outputs.

    2. Creativity – The Human Edge Machines Struggle With

    Whereas machines may create art, code, or even music, they typically take from what already exists. Creativity lies in bridging ideas between fields, posing “What if?” questions, and being brave enough to venture into the unknown.

    Future professions—be they in design, engineering, medicine, or business—will require human beings who can envision possibilities that AI has not “seen” yet. Creativity is not only for painters; it’s for anyone who invents solutions in new ways.

    3. Digital Literacy – Adapting to the Language of AI

    As reading and math literacy became a way of life, digital literacy will be a requirement. Students won’t have to be master programmers, but they will need to comprehend the mechanisms of AI systems, their boundaries, and their moral issues.

    Just like learning to drive in a car-filled world: you don’t have to be a mechanic, but you need to understand the rules of the road. Graduating students ought to feel assured in applying AI tools ethically, and be aware of how data and algorithms influence the world.

    4. Emotional Intelligence – The “Human Glue” of Workplaces

    While machines assume repetitive and technical work, the uniquely human abilities of empathy, teamwork, and communication gain greater value. Emotional intelligence (EQ) is what enables individuals to deal with relationships, mediate conflicts, and lead with empathy.

    The workplaces of the future will depend hugely on collaboration between humans and AI, but also between humans. Individuals who are able to see from others’ points of view, inspire teams, and establish trust will be highly valued, regardless of industry.

    5. Adaptability & Lifelong Learning – The Skill. Under All Skills

    The reality is, however much schools may attempt, they cannot forecast. perfectly which specific hard skills will reign in 20 years. What they can provide is the mind. set. of learning itself—curiosity, tenacity, and flexibility.

    Students who recognize change not as a threat but as opportunity will be successful. They’ll reskill, explore new areas, keep up with technology rather than hating it. In many respects, the disposition of lifelong learning is more crucial than the acquisition of any one technical skill.

    Beyond the “Big Four”: Other Emerging Skills

    • Ethical reasoning → informing how AI and tech should be used responsibly.
    • Cross-cultural collaboration → operating in a globalized, remote, multicultural setting.
    • Storytelling & communication → being able to make difficult concepts clear and compelling.

    The Bigger Picture: Education Needs to Catch Up

    Schools tend to still follow 20th-century models—memorization, the standardized test, and rigid subject silos. But the world of AI requires a transition to interdisciplinary projects, real-world problem-solving, and room for creativity. It is not a matter of adding more into the curriculum, but reframing what it is to “be educated.”

    Briefly: the most prized skills will be those that make humans remain irreplaceable—critical thinking, creativity, digital literacy, and emotional intelligence—coupled with adaptability and lifelong learning. If students develop these, they’ll be prepared not only for the next job market, but for the next few.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 59
  • 0
Answer
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 22/09/2025In: Education, Technology

AI in Classrooms – How can schools balance AI tools that help students learn versus those that encourage shortcuts or plagiarism?

AI tools that help students learn ver ...

ai in educationai toolsclassroom technologyeducational technologystudent engagementstudent learning
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful
    Added an answer on 22/09/2025 at 1:56 pm

    The Double-Edged Sword of AI in Education AI in the classroom feels very much like providing every student with his or her own personal tutor—except that it also, when abused, will simply provide the answers. On the positive side, these technologies can unleash personalized learning, provide immediaRead more

    The Double-Edged Sword of AI in Education

    AI in the classroom feels very much like providing every student with his or her own personal tutor—except that it also, when abused, will simply provide the answers. On the positive side, these technologies can unleash personalized learning, provide immediate feedback, and even allow students to master difficult concepts in ways that even the best teachers cannot. On the other hand, they create prima facie concerns: students could forego the thought process altogether and use AI-provided answers, or incorporate them to plagiarize essays and assignments.

    The equilibrium schools must find isn’t one of prohibiting AI and the other of opening the arms to it—it’s one of regulating how it’s employed.

    Changing the Mindset from “Cheating” to “Learning Aid”

    Consider the calculators in mathematics education. When they first emerged, educators feared they would kill students’ ability to perform arithmetic. Now, we don’t debate whether or not to ban calculators—instead, we instruct on how and when to use them. The same philosophy should be applied to AI. If students are educated to know that AI isn’t there to get the job done for them but to better comprehend, it’s less about shortcuts and more about building skill.

    Teaching AI Literacy Alongside Subject Knowledge

    One practical solution is to actually teach students how AI works, where it’s strong, and where it fails. By learning to question AI outputs, students develop both digital literacy and critical thinking. For example:

    • A history teacher could ask students to fact-check an AI-generated essay for accuracy.
    • A science teacher could have students use AI to brainstorm hypotheses, but then require evidence-based testing in class.

    This manner, AI becomes integral to the lesson instead of an exploit.

    Assessment Must Adapt

    Another wake-up call: if we continue to rely on standard homework essays or take-home tests as the primary tools for assessment, AI will forever be an invitation. Schools may need to reinvent assessments to place greater emphasis on:

    • In-class projects that demonstrate genuine comprehension.
    • Oral debates and presentations, where students describe concepts in their own words.
    • Challenge problems that lie beyond an AI’s neatly generated capabilities.

    It doesn’t mean homework vanishes—it just means we reimagine what we have students work on at home versus in class.

    Teachers as Guides, Not Gatekeepers

    The teacher’s role becomes less policing and more mentoring. A teacher could say: “Yes, you can use AI to come up with ideas for your essay—but you have to let me see your process, tell me why you accepted or discarded some of the suggestions, and you have to contribute your own original ideas.” That openness makes it less easy for students to cheat behind AI but still enables them to take advantage of it.

    Preparing Students for the Real World

    Maybe the best reason to include AI responsibly is that, outside school, AI will permeate everywhere—offices, labs, creative sectors, even daily life. Schools owe it to their students not to protect them from AI, but to prepare them to employ it morally and efficiently. That involves teaching boundaries: when it’s acceptable to rely on AI (such as summarizing complex text), and when it stifles development (such as copying an entire essay).

    The Human Core Still Matters

    Fundamentally, education is not just about obtaining the “right answer.” It’s about cultivating curiosity, grit, and independent thought. AI is a mighty tool, but it must never substitute for human qualities. The challenge—and opportunity—of this moment is to make AI an enabling partner, not a crutch.

    Briefly: Balance is integration with purpose. Rather than dreading AI as learning’s enemy, schools can make it an ally in teaching, and reshape tests and expectations so that learners continue to develop their own voices and thinking skills.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 60
  • 0
Answer
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 18/09/2025In: Education, News

How do educational reforms & tech affect students from different socio-economic backgrounds? Are they increasing or decreasing inequalities?

they increasing or decreasing inequal ...

accesstoeducationeducationalreformeducationequityeducationpolicysocioeconomicinequality
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful
    Added an answer on 18/09/2025 at 1:28 pm

     Education as a "Great Equalizer"… or Not? Decades have passed with people thinking that education is the great equalizer—the way that allows any individual, regardless of his/her background, to ascend to higher prospects. In reality, however, reforms and technologies tend to mimic the pre-existingRead more

     Education as a “Great Equalizer”… or Not?

    Decades have passed with people thinking that education is the great equalizer—the way that allows any individual, regardless of his/her background, to ascend to higher prospects. In reality, however, reforms and technologies tend to mimic the pre-existing inequalities in society.

    For affluent households: New reform and technology tend to function as boosters. Already, pupils who have established residences, private tutoring, decent internet, and good parents can utilize technology to speed up learning.

    For struggling families: The same reforms can become additional barriers. If a student lacks stable Wi-Fi, or parents are too busy holding down multiple jobs to facilitate learning at home, then technology becomes a barrier instead of a bridge.

    So the same policy or tool can be empowering for one child and suffocating for another.

    Technology: The Double-Edged Sword

    Educational technology is perhaps the most obvious instance of inequality unfolding.

    When it benefits:

    • Free online lectures (such as Khan Academy, Coursera, or YouTube tutorials) open up knowledge to beyond elite schools.
    • AI teachers and applications can provide customized guidance to students who do not have access to private tutors.
    • Virtual classrooms enable learning to keep going amidst crises (such as the pandemic).

    When it causes harm:

    • The digital divide—rural or low-income students might not have devices, reliable internet, or electricity at all.
    • Lots of tools rely on background knowledge or parental input, which isn’t distributed equally.
    • Better-resourced schools can afford newer tools, while others fall behind, establishing a “tech gap” that reflects wealth disparities.
    • This implies technology doesn’t necessarily democratize education—it is very dependent on access and context.

     Educational Reforms: Leveling or Layering?

    Changes such as curriculum revisions, changes to standardized testing, or competency-based learning tend to seek enhanced equity. But once more, effects can vary by socio-economic group.

    Positive impacts:

    • Policies that minimize memorization and encourage imagination/critical thinking help students who were otherwise stuck in the old ways of teaching.
    • Scholarships, lunches, and subsidized tablets benefit directly poorer students.
    • Inclusive policies (such as the use of several languages) benefit first-generation students.

    Unforeseen negative impacts:

    • Eliminating standardized tests with no substitutes at times advantages more affluent students who can use personal connections and extracurriculars to stand out.
    • “Progressive” instruction tends to need smaller classes, educated teachers, and resources—items not all equally shared.
    • Competitive reforms (such as performance-based school funding) have the potential to exacerbate gaps since low-performing schools continue to lag further behind.
    • Equity planning-less reforms have the potential to assist those already benefited first.
    • Apart from numbers, these disparities influence students’ attitudes toward themselves and their own futures.
    • An advantaged student might view technology as empowering: “I can explore, learn anything, go further.”
    • A disadvantaged student might find it alienating: “Everyone else has the tools I don’t. I’m falling behind, no matter how hard I try.”

    This gap in confidence, belonging, and self-worth is as significant as test scores. When reforms overlook the human factor, they inadvertently expand the emotional and psychological gap among students.

    How to Make It More Equal

    If we wish reforms and technology to narrow inequality, not exacerbate it, here are some people-first strategies:

    Access First, Then Innovation

    Prioritize that all students own devices, have internet access, and receive training before unveiling new tools. Otherwise, reforms merely reward the already privileged.

    Support Teachers, Not Just Students

    In schools with limited funds, teachers require training, mentorship, and encouragement to adjust to reforms and technology. Without them, changes remain superficial.

    Balance Online and Offline Solutions

    Not all solutions need to be online. Printed materials, public libraries, and neighborhood mentorship can offset the gaps for students without consistent connectivity.

    Equity-Focused Policies

    Subsidized phones, communally accessed village digital labs, or first-generation-friendly policies can equalize opportunities.

    Listen to Students’ Voices

    The best indicator of whether reforms are succeeding is to ask students about their experience. Are they energized or flooded? Included or excluded?

    Final Thought

    Technology and educational reforms aren’t good or bad in and of themselves—they’re mirrors. They will continue to reflect the existing inequalities, but they can be employed to challenge them as well. If done thoughtfully, with equity, access, and empathy as the priorities, they can provide options previously unimaginable to disadvantaged students. If done hastily, or biased towards the already-privileged, they could make education another platform on which the wealthy run further ahead and the poor are left farther behind.

    At the heart of the question is not merely tech or policy—it’s about justice. Who gets to learn, grow, and dream without obstacles? That’s what should inform all reform.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 62
  • 0
Answer
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 18/09/2025In: Education

How to chunk content, use spaced repetition, multimedia, interactive formats etc.?

use spaced repetition, multimedia, in ...

chunkingcontentinteractivelearninglearningtechniquesmultimedialearningspacedrepetition
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful
    Added an answer on 18/09/2025 at 10:41 am

    Why "Chunking" Matters (Dividing Knowledge into Bite-Sized Chunks) Our minds can only retain a finite amount of data in working memory at one time. When a teacher overwhelms students with a 40-minute dump of dense information, much of it goes out the window. But when you divide material into small,Read more

    Why “Chunking” Matters (Dividing Knowledge into Bite-Sized Chunks)

    Our minds can only retain a finite amount of data in working memory at one time. When a teacher overwhelms students with a 40-minute dump of dense information, much of it goes out the window. But when you divide material into small, meaningful “chunks,” the brain gets a chance to process and retain it.

    How it looks in practice:

    Rather than trying to teach all of photosynthesis at once, a science instructor might chunk it into:

    The process of sunlight

    • The purpose of chlorophyll
    • The chemical reaction
    • The significance for ecosystems
    • Stop after each piece and take an activity: a sketch, a question, a class explanation.
    • Chunking is less daunting and provides students with a feeling of continuous progress—climbing stairs rather than vaulting up a cliff.

    Spaced Repetition (The Science of Remembering)

    Our minds forget things very rapidly if we don’t go back over them. That’s why cramming for an exam seems to work but only lasts briefly. Spaced repetition—revisiting information at increasingly longer intervals—can aid in transferring knowledge into long-term memory.

    How teachers can apply it:

    • Day 1: Present new material.
    • Day 3: Brief 5-minute review game or summary.
    • Week 1: Brief quiz or discussion.
    • Week 3: Incorporate the concept into a larger project or relate it to new material.

    Example: A vocabulary introduction lesson by a language teacher could employ flashcards on Day 1, a conversation game on Day 3, a quick test the week after, and a role-play activity later in the month. Each revisit reinforces recall.

    This approach honors the way the human brain really learns—through repetition, rest, and re-engagement.

    Multimedia (Reaching Different Senses and Styles)

    Not all learn by words only. Some learn better through pictures, some through sound, and most through seeing and doing. Multimedia enriches learning, makes it more memorable and inclusive.

    How to use it:

    Use diagrams, brief videos, or animations to represent ideas that are too abstract to imagine easily.

    • Complement text with audio or live examples to make dry material come alive.
    • Encourage students to produce their own multimedia works (podcasts, slideshows, short movies).

    Example: In history, rather than merely reading about the Industrial Revolution, students may:

    • View a brief documentary clip.
    • Examine photographs of factories.
    • Hear a worker’s diary entry (either read out or dramatized).
    • Then discuss or write down reflections.
    • Each modality makes the concept in another way, building understanding.

    Interactive Formats (Make Learning Active, Not Passive)

    One of the greatest attention killers is passivity—when students simply sit and listen. Interaction triggers curiosity, ownership, and memory.

    Examples of interactive approaches:

    • Think-pair-share: Students think independently, discuss in pairs, then share with the class.
    • Polls and rapid quizzes: Immediate feedback keeps everyone engaged.
    • Role-play or simulations: Reenact a trial in civics class, or conduct a mock debate.
    • Hands-on projects: Build, create, experiment—abstract to concrete.

    Interaction turns learning from something that students read into something they do.

     The Human Touch Behind These Methods

    Chunking, spaced repetition, multimedia, and interactivity aren’t tactics—they are evidence of respect for the way human beings learn.

    • Chunking says : “I won’t bury you under too much at once. I’ll deliver knowledge in stages.”
    • Spaced repetition says: “I know you will need reminding. Forgetting is inevitable, not failure.”
    • Multimedia says: “I notice that you are an individual—here are multiple ways to learn.”
    • Interactive formats say: “Your voice, your movement, your thoughts count in this classroom.”

    That’s why students learn better. It’s not only cognitive science—it’s a more human approach to teaching.

     Last Thought

    In a busy, distracted world, instruction must be structured for attention, memory, and meaning. Chunking is learnable. Spaced repetition makes it stick. Multimedia makes it memorable. Interactivity makes it about me.

    Together, these strategies do more than battle attention deficits—they make classrooms the sort of place where students feel competent, motivated, and curious. And that’s the sort of learning that endures long after test day.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 78
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 17/09/2025In: Education

With shorter attention spans (digital distractions etc.), what teaching methods work best?

digital distractions etc.what teachin ...

attentionspanbrainbreaksdigitaldistractionflippedclassroomstudentengagement
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 17/09/2025 at 4:30 pm

     The Reality of Digital Distraction The human brain is programmed to seek out novelty. Social media, video games, and apps give out little dollops of dopamine for each scroll, like, and buzz. Compared with a 45-minute lecture or dense reading, these things take forever. Students aren't "lazy"—they aRead more

     The Reality of Digital Distraction

    The human brain is programmed to seek out novelty. Social media, video games, and apps give out little dollops of dopamine for each scroll, like, and buzz. Compared with a 45-minute lecture or dense reading, these things take forever. Students aren’t “lazy”—they are combatting an environment designed to hook attention.

    And then the question is no longer, “How do you get children to stay focused longer,” but, “How do you organize learning that is worth and holds attention during this age?”

    Principles That Work With Shorter Span Of Attention

    1. Chunking & Microlearning

    Break lessons into short, manageable pieces (5–10 minutes of input then activity).

    Use “mini checkpoints” instead of waiting until the end of class.

    • Example: Instead of 40 minutes of lecture on climate change, break it into 4 bites—causes, effects, case study, solutions—and introduce each with a quick question or activity.

    That’s how students are used to consuming content online—short, crisp, mixed bites.

    2. Active Learning Rather Than Passive Listening

    Eventually sooner than later, focus will wander when students listen but don’t otherwise engage.

    Activities such as discussion, polls, short problem-solving activities, or “think-pair-share” rewire the brain.

    • Example: Instead of reading Shakespeare for hours in a literature class, have them re-stage a scene using modern slang and then compare.

    The longer attention is sustained when students are working or learning, rather than sitting passively.

    3. Gamification & Challenge

    The brain remembers better when there is a sense of advancement, reward, or play.

    Use small obstacles, point systems, or class competition.

    • Example: Turn review questions into a Kahoot game or a group puzzle challenge.

    This isn’t superficializing—it’s depth in presenting engagement.

    4. Multisensory & Varied Delivery

    Changing between sights, sounds, action, and text keeps attention well-tuned.

    • Example: Show a short video, then discuss, then have students sketch a diagram.

    Variety creates excitement; sameness creates somnolence.

    5. Real-World Relevance

    Students tune out when content feels remote or irrelevant.

    Link ideas to something they care about—newsworthy topics, tech, their community.

    • Example: Instead of a generic lecture on economics, define it as: “Why does your favorite streaming platform raise prices? Let’s untangle supply and demand.”

    If learning is functional and meaningful, attention will follow automatically.

    6. Mindfulness & Focus Training

    No fate that includes brief attention spans; concentration can be trained.

    Starting

    Kiddos get settled with 1–2 minutes of breathing, journaling, or quiet time.

    Example: A simple “two-minute stillness” prior to math can defog minds.

    Reference
    It is not just a case of adapting to less time, but also of learning to stretch their capacity to focus.

    7. Technology as Tool, Not Just as Distraction

    Instead of banning technologies outright, use them mindfully.

    • Example: Use phones to live research, interactive polls, or short video self-reflection.

    This demonstrates healthy technology use rather than demonizing it as the only villain.

     The Human Aspect of Attention

    What students need most often is not flashy tricks but belonging. A teacher who understands the names of her or his students, greets them on their level, and cares can command attention more effectively than any software. Students are engaged when they feel heard, respected, and can afford to take a risk and contribute.

    And attention spans vary: some kids are starved for speed, others are starving for content. The best classrooms achieve a balance between rapid activities and room for more enduring attention, slowing and stretching the capacity of students over time.

     Final Thought

    Shorter attention spans are not the kiss of death for learning—they’re a sign that the world has changed. The solution is not to lament “kids these days” but to redefine teaching: shorter intervals, active engagement, relevance-to-meaning, and connection with humans.

    While we ought indeed to meet them where they are, we should also teach students to develop the muscles of deep focus, reflection, and patience. To learn is not as much about meeting them where they are, but about pushing them toward where they might become.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 70
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 17/09/2025In: Education, News, Technology

How to assess deeper learning, critical thinking, creativity rather than rote or recall?

deeper learning, critical thinking, c ...

creativethinkingcriticalthinkingdeeperlearningmetacognitionprojectbasedlearning
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 17/09/2025 at 4:03 pm

    Why Old-Fashioned Tests Come Up Short Assignments and tests were built on the model of recall for years: reciting definitions, remembering dates from history, calculating standard math problems. These were easy to grade and standardize. But the danger is self-evident: a pupil can memorize just enougRead more

    Why Old-Fashioned Tests Come Up Short

    Assignments and tests were built on the model of recall for years: reciting definitions, remembering dates from history, calculating standard math problems. These were easy to grade and standardize. But the danger is self-evident: a pupil can memorize just enough to get through a test but exit without true understanding. Worse, they can “forget” everything in weeks.

    If we only measure what can be memorized, we are likely to reward short-term cramming instead of lifelong learning. And with all the AI around us, remembering is no longer the key skill.

    What Deeper Learning Looks Like

    Deeper learning is *transfer*—the capacity to apply knowledge to *new, unfamiliar* contexts. It takes the form of:

    • Critical thinking: Asking “why,” examining sources, challenging assumptions.
    • Creativity: Coming up with new ideas, seeing connections between subjects.
    • Problem-solving: Applying concepts in creative ways to understand actual situations.
    • Collaboration: Standing on one another’s shoulders, figuring out meaning collaboratively.
    • Self-reflection: Knowing one’s own strengths, weaknesses, and areas of improvement.

    The question is: how do we measure these?

    1. Open-Ended Performance Tasks

    Rather than multiple-choice, give students messy problems with no single best solution.

    • Example: Replace “What caused the French Revolution?” with “If you were a political leader in 1789, what reforms would you suggest to avoid revolution, and why?

    In this way, the student is asked to synthesize information, reconcile perspectives, and justify choices—thinking, not recalling.

     2. Portfolios & Iterative Work

    One essay illustrates a final product, but not the learning process. Portfolios allow students to illustrate drafts, revisions, reflections, and growth.

    • Example: A student of art submits sketches, experiments, mistakes, and complete pieces with notes on what they learned along the way.

    This is all about process, not perfection—of crucial importance to creativity.

    3. Real-World, Applied Assessments

    Inject reality into assessment.

    • Science: Instead of memorizing the water cycle, students develop a community plan to reduce waste of water.
    • Business: Instead of solving abstract formulas in school, students pitch a mini start-up idea, budget, marketing, and ethical limitations.

    These exercises reveal whether students can translate theory into practice.

    4. Socratic Seminars & Oral Defenses

    When students explain their thought process verbally and respond to questions, it reflects depth of understanding.

    • Example: Following in a research paper, the student has 10 minutes of Q&A with peers or teacher.

    If they can hold their ground in defending their argument, adapt when challenged, and expound under fire, it is a sign of actual mastery.

    5  Reflection & Metacognition

    Asking students to reflect on their own learning makes them more self-aware thinkers.

    Example questions:

    • “What area of this project challenged you most, and how did you cope?”
    • “If you were to begin again, what would you do differently?”

    This is not right or wrong—it’s developing self-knowledge, a critical lock to lifelong learning.

    6. Collaborative & Peer Assessment

    Learning is a social process. Permitting students to evaluate or draw on each other’s work reveals how they think in dialogue.

    • Example: In a group project, each student writes a short memo on their piece and how they wove others’ ideas together.

    Collaboration skills are harder to fake, but critically necessary for work and civic life.

    The Human Side

    Assessing deeper learning is more time-consuming, labor-intensive, and occasionally subjective. It’s not just a matter of grading a multiple-choice test. But it also respects students as human beings, rather than test-takers.

    It tells students:

    • We value your thoughts, not just your recall.
    • Mistakes and revisions are part of the process of getting better.
    • Your own opinion matters.

    This makes testing less of a trap and more of an honest reflection of real learning.

     Last Reflection

    While recall tests shout, “What do you know?”, deeper tests whisper, “What can you do with what you know?” That’s all the difference in an AI age. Machines can recall facts instantly—but only humans can balance ethics, see futures, design relationships, and make sense.

    The future of assessment has to be less about efficiency and more about authenticity. Because what’s on the line is not grades—it’s preparing students for a chaotic, uncertain world.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 77
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 17/09/2025In: Education, News, Technology

As AI makes essays/homework easier, how should exams, projects, coursework change?

how should exams, projects, coursewor ...

criticalthinkingdigitalassessmenteducationfutureofexamsprojectbasedlearning
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 17/09/2025 at 3:29 pm

    The Old Model and Why It's Under Pressure Essays and homework were long the stalwarts of assessment. They measure knowledge, writing skills, and critical thinking. But with the presence of AI, it is now easy to produce well-written essays, finish problem sets, or even codes in minutes. That does notRead more

    The Old Model and Why It’s Under Pressure

    Essays and homework were long the stalwarts of assessment. They measure knowledge, writing skills, and critical thinking. But with the presence of AI, it is now easy to produce well-written essays, finish problem sets, or even codes in minutes.

    That does not mean students are learning less—it’s just that the tools they use have changed. Relying on the old model without adapting is like asking students to write out multiplication tables manually once calculators are employed everywhere. It’s not getting it.

     Redesigning Exams

    Exams are designed to test individual knowledge. When AI is introduced, we may need to:

    • Shift from recall to reasoning: Instead of “What happened in 1857?” ask “How might the outcome of the 1857 revolt have changed if modern communication technology existed?” This tests creativity and analysis, not memorization.
    • Use open-book / open-AI exams: Allow students to use tools but focus on how well they apply, critique, and cross-check AI’s output. This mirrors real-life work environments where AI is available.
    • In-person oral or viva testing: Requiring students to orally discuss their answers tells you whether they actually understand, even if they had AI help.
    • Timed, real-world problem-solving: For math, science, or business, create scenarios that require quick, reasonable thinking—not just memorization of formulas.

    Testing is less “what do you know” and more “how you think.”

     Rethinking Projects & Coursework

    Projects are where AI may either replace effort or spark new creativity. To keep them current:

    • Process over product: Teachers need to grade the process—research notes, drafts, reflection, even the mistakes—not just the polished final product. AI can’t get away with that iterative process so easily.
    • AI within the assignment: Instead of banning it, design assignments that require students to show how they’ve used AI. For example: “Employ ChatGPT to generate three possible outlines for your paper. Compare them, and explain what you retained and what you eliminated.”
    • Collaborative assignments: Group work encourages skills AI finds it difficult to replicate well—negotiation, delegation, creativity in group work.
    • Hands-on or practical elements: A project assignment could be an interview of grandparents, a science project would be the making of a small prototype. AI must complement but not replace lived experiences.

    This reverses coursework from being outsourcing-oriented to reflection, uniqueness, and human effort.

     Reframing Coursework Purposes Altogether

    If AI is already capable of doing the “garden variety” work, maybe education can focus on more higher-order goals :

    • Critical thinking with AI: Are students able to recognize errors, biases, or gaps in AI-generated work? That’s a skill used in the real world today.
    • Authenticity and voice: AI can generate text, but it can’t replicate the lived experience, feeling, or creative individuality of a student. Assignments could emphasize personal connections or insights.
    • Interdisciplinary study: Promote projects that combine math, art, history, or ethics. AI is good at doing one thing, but human learning thrives at points of convergence.

    The Human Side

    This’s not about “catching cheaters.” It’s about recognizing that tools evolve, but learning doesn’t. Students want to be challenged, but also supported. When it all turns into a test of whether they can outsmart AI bans, motivation falters. When, on the other hand, they see AI as just one of several tools, and the question is how creatively, critically, and personally they employ it, then education comes alive again.

     Last Thought

    Just as calculators revolutionized math tests, so will AI revolutionize written work. Prohibiting homework or essays is not the answer, but rather reimagining them.

    The future of exams, project work, and coursework must:

    • Distrust memorization more than thinking, applying, and creating.
    • Welcome AI openly but insist on reflection and explanation.
    • Strive for process and individuality as much as product.
    • Retain the human touch—feelings, experiences, collaboration—at its center.

    In short: assessments shouldn’t try to compete with AI—they should measure what only humans can uniquely do.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 78
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 17/09/2025In: Education, News, Technology

How to integrate AI tools into teaching & assessments to enhance learning rather than undermine it?

AI tools into teaching & assessme ...

aiforlearningaiineducationeducationstudentengagementteachingwithai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 17/09/2025 at 2:28 pm

    The Core Dilemma: Assist or Damage? Learning isn't all about creating correct answers—it's about learning to think, to reason, to innovate. AI platforms such as ChatGPT are either: Learning enhancers: educators, guides, and assistants who introduce learners to new paths of exploration. Learning undeRead more

    The Core Dilemma: Assist or Damage?

    Learning isn’t all about creating correct answers—it’s about learning to think, to reason, to innovate. AI platforms such as ChatGPT are either:

    • Learning enhancers: educators, guides, and assistants who introduce learners to new paths of exploration.
    • Learning underminers: crutches that give students answers, with students having skimmed assignments but lacking depth of knowledge.

    The dilemma is how to incorporate AI so that it promotes curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking rather than replacing them.

     1. Working with AI as a Teaching Companion

    AI must not be framed as the enemy, but as a class teammate. A few approaches:

    • Explainers in plain terms: Students are afraid to admit that they did not understand something. AI can describe things at different levels (child-level, advanced, step-by-step), dispelling the fear of asking “dumb” questions.
    • Personalized examples: A mathematics teacher might instruct AI to generate practice questions tailored to each student’s level of understanding at the moment. For literature, it could give different endings to novels to talk about.
    • 24/7 study buddy: Students can “speak” with AI outside of class when teachers are not present, reaffirming learning without leaving them stranded.
    • Brainstorming prompts: In art, creative writing, or debate classes, AI can stimulate the brainstorming process by presenting students with scenarios or viewpoints they may not think of.

    Here, AI opens doors but doesn’t preclude the teacher’s role of directing, placing, and correcting.

     2. Redesigning Tests for the Age of AI

    The biggest worry is testing. If AI can execute essays or equations flawlessly, how do we measure what children really know? Some tweaks would suffice:

    • Move from recall to reasoning: Instead of “define this term” or “summarize this article,” have students compare, critique, or apply ideas—tasks AI can’t yet master alone.
    • In-class, process-oriented evaluation: Teachers can assess students’ thinking by looking at drafts, outlines, or a discussion of how they approached a task, not the final, finished product.
    • Oral defenses & presentations: After having composed an essay, students may defend orally their argument. This shows they actually know what is on the page.
    • AI-assisted assignments: Teachers just instruct, “Use AI to jot down three ideas, but write down why you added or dropped each one.” This maintains AI as a part of the process, not a hidden shortcut.

    This way, grading becomes measuring human thinking, judgment, and creativity, even if AI is used.

     3. Training & Supporting Teachers

    The majority of teachers are afraid of AI—they think it’s stealing their jobs. But successful integration occurs when teachers are empowered to utilize it:

    • Professional development: Hands-on training where teachers learn through doing AI tools, rather than only learning about them, so they truly comprehend the strengths and shortcomings.
    • Communities of practice: Teachers sharing examples of successful implementation of AI so that best practices naturally diffuse.
    • Transparency to students: Instead of banning AI out of fear, teachers can show them how to use it responsibly—showing that it’s a tool, not a cheat code.

    When teachers feel secure, they can guide students toward healthy use rather than fear-policing them.

     4. Setting Boundaries & Ethical Standards

    Students need transparency, not guesswork, to know what is an acceptable use of AI. Some guidelines may be enough:

    • Disclosure: Ask students to report if and how they employed AI (e.g., “I used ChatGPT to get ideas for outlines”). This incorporates integrity into the process.
    • Boundaries by skill level: Teachers can restrict the use of AI in lower grades to protect foundational skill acquisition. Autonomy can be provided in later levels.

    Talks of ethics: Instead of speaking in “don’t get caught” terms, schools can have open discussions regarding integrity, trust, and why learning continues even beyond grades.

    5. Keeping the Human at the Center

    Learning is not really about delivering information. It’s about developing thinkers, creators, and empathetic humans. AI can help with efficiency, access, and customization, but it can never substitute for:

    • The excitement of discovery when a student learns something on their own.
    • The guidance of a teacher who sees potential in a young person.
    • The chaos of collaboration, argument, and experimentation in learning.

    So the hope shouldn’t be “How do we keep AI from killing education?” but rather:
    “How do we rethink teaching and testing so AI can enhance humanity instead of erasing it?”

    Last Thought

    Think about calculators: once feared as machines that would destroy math skills, now everywhere because we remapped what we want students to learn (not just arithmetic, but mathematical problem-solving). AI can follow the same path—if we’re purposeful.

    The best integrations will:

    • Let AI perform repetitive, routine work.
    • Preserve human judgment, creativity, and ethics.
    • Teach students not only to use AI but to critique it, revise it, and in some instances, reject it.
    • That’s how AI transforms from a cheat into an amplifier of learning.
    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 70
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 17/09/2025In: Education, News, Technology

What counts as cheating vs legitimate assistance when students use tools like ChatGPT?

cheating vs legitimate assistance

academichonestychatgptcheatinglegitimateassistancestudentethics
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained
    Added an answer on 17/09/2025 at 2:08 pm

     Why the Line Blurs Before, "cheating" was simpler to define: copying answers, plagiarizing a work, sneaking illegitimate notes onto a test. But with computer AI, it's getting cloudy. A student will prompt ChatGPT with an essay question, receive a good outline, make some minor adaptations, and submiRead more

     Why the Line Blurs

    Before, “cheating” was simpler to define: copying answers, plagiarizing a work, sneaking illegitimate notes onto a test. But with computer AI, it’s getting cloudy. A student will prompt ChatGPT with an essay question, receive a good outline, make some minor adaptations, and submit it. It looks on paper as though it were their own work. But is it? Did they read, think, and write—or did the machine do it all?

    That’s the magic of it: AI can be a calculator, a tutor, or a ghostwriter. Which role it fills is left to what a student does with it.

    When AI Seemingly Feels Like Actual Assistance

    • Brainstorming ideas: Allowing ChatGPT to plant ideas when stuck is like asking a friend for ideas. The student still needs to decide where to go.
    • Dissolve complicated concepts: When a physics or history concept is complicated to understand, having AI dissolve it for them into easier terms is tutoring, not cheating.
    • Practice skills: Students can practice questioning themselves with AI, restating notes, or simulating debates. It’s active learning, not cheating.
    • Polishing words: Requesting AI to proofread for grammar or make language more fluent is no different from spellcheck and Grammarly. The student’s thoughts in the text are still his or hers.

    AI is a helper system here. The student is still the only author of his or her thoughts, logic, and conclusions.

     When AI Blurs into Cheating

    Plagiarizing whole assignments: If the entirety or almost the entire assignment is done by AI with little to no contribution from a human, then the student is really skipping the learning process entirely.

    • Making answers on tests/quizzes: That is no different from cheating with illicit notes—it sabotages the test assumption.
    • Disguising the voice of AI as one’s own: When a student uses AI to compose “in their own voice” and presents it as original work, it’s really plagiarism—whether they copied a human or not.
    • Too much reliance on automation: If AI does all the thinking all the time, the student isn’t working on problem-solving, creativity, or critical thinking—the things learning is supposed to develop.

    Here, AI isn’t an assistant. It’s a substitute. And that negates the purpose of learning.

    Why Context Matters

    Assignments vs. learning objectives: If the assignment is thinking practice, then AI-written essays are cheating. If it’s clear communication, then working with AI as a language tool is okay.

    • Teachers’ expectations: Teachers might explicitly invite AI use as a research aid or study aid. Others do not. Students need to honor that boundary, even if they themselves don’t care.
    • Skill-building phase: A 12-year-old learning to build arguments likely shouldn’t be offloading writing to computer code. A graduate student is using AI to obtain citations, but then doing so might involve using common sense with tools.

    The Human Side

    Finally, the question is not “Is AI cheating?” but “Am I still learning?” Discriminating students who use ChatGPT can enhance understanding, save time, and feel in the process. Those who allow it to do their thinking for them may exhaust their own potential.

    The gray area will always be there. That’s why integrity is important: honesty in the use of AI, and why. Learning is optimal when teachers and students have trust, and the attention remains on development rather than grades.

    AI is excellent support when it augments your learning, but it cheats when it substitutes.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 66
  • 0
Answer
Load More Questions

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 398
  • Answers 386
  • Posts 4
  • Best Answers 21
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Anonymous

    Bluestone IPO vs Kal

    • 5 Answers
  • mohdanas

    Are AI video generat

    • 3 Answers
  • Anonymous

    Which industries are

    • 3 Answers
  • 888starz_vdmn
    888starz_vdmn added an answer 888starz uz, O'zbekistondagi online o'yinlar uchun afzal sayt qimor o'ynash uchun ideal imkoniyatlar taqdim etadi. Bu saytda turli xil o'yinlar,… 28/10/2025 at 10:31 pm
  • 1win_haMr
    1win_haMr added an answer The 1win app is a popular choice among online bettors. 1win aviator game download [url=https://1win-app-apk.com]https://1win-app-apk.com/[/url] 26/10/2025 at 1:56 am
  • mohdanas
    mohdanas added an answer What Are AI Video Generators? AI video generators are software and platforms utilizing machine learning and generative AI models to… 21/10/2025 at 4:54 pm

Top Members

Trending Tags

ai aiineducation ai in education analytics company digital health edtech education geopolitics global trade health language languagelearning mindfulness multimodalai news people tariffs technology trade policy

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help

© 2025 Qaskme. All Rights Reserved