Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In


Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here


Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

You must login to add post.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here
Sign InSign Up

Qaskme

Qaskme Logo Qaskme Logo

Qaskme Navigation

  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask A Question
  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog

News

Share
  • Facebook
1 Follower
1k Answers
215 Questions
Home/News/Page 11

Qaskme Latest Questions

mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 02/10/2025In: News

Will higher tariffs on electric vehicles and green tech slow down the energy transition?

electric vehicles and green tech slow ...

climate changeelectric vehiclesenergy transition xglobal tradegreen technology
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful
    Added an answer on 02/10/2025 at 11:03 am

    How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics) Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate. HighRead more

    How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics)

    1. Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate.

    2. Higher input costs and cascading effects. Many tariffs target intermediate goods (parts, components, machinery). That raises production costs for domestic manufacturers and raises prices across supply chains, not just the tariffed final products.

    3. Substitution and product mix effects. Consumers and firms may switch to more expensive domestic suppliers (trade diversion), which can keep prices elevated even if the tariffed product’s price falls later.

    4. Uncertainty and administrative costs. Frequent changes in tariff policy add uncertainty; firms pay to retool supply chains, hold extra inventory, or hire compliance staff — those costs can be passed on to consumers.

    5. Macro feedback and second-round effects. If tariffs push inflation higher and expectations become unanchored, wages and service prices can reprice, producing a more persistent inflationary effect rather than a one-time rise. 

    What the evidence and recent studies show (how big are the effects?)

    • Pass-through varies by product, but is often substantial. Micro-level studies of recent U.S. tariffs find nontrivial pass-through: some estimates put retail pass-through for affected goods in the range of tens of percent up to near full pass-through in the short run for certain categories. One well-known microstudy finds a 20% tariff linked with roughly a 0.7% retail price rise for affected products in its sample—pass-through is heterogeneous.

    • Recent policy episodes (2025 U.S. tariff episodes) provide real-time estimates. Multiple papers and central-bank notes looking at the 2025 tariff measures conclude the first-round effect is measurable but not massive overall — estimates range from a few tenths of a percentage point up to low single digits in headline/core inflation depending on which scenario is assumed (full pass-through vs partial, scope of tariffs, and whether monetary policy offsets). For example, recent Federal Reserve analysis and Boston Fed back-of-the-envelope work put short-run contributions to core inflation on the order of ~0.1–0.8 percentage points (varies by method and which tariffs are counted). Yale and other research groups that look at sectoral pass-through find higher short-run impacts in heavily affected categories. 

    • Tariffs on investment goods can have outsized effects. Studies highlight that tariffs on capital goods (machinery, semiconductors, tools) raise costs of producing other goods and can therefore have larger effects on investment and longer-term productivity; projected price effects for investment goods are often larger than for consumption goods. 

    One-time level shift vs persistent inflation — which is more likely?

    There are two useful ways to think about the impact:

    • One-time price level effect: If tariffs are a discrete shock and firms simply add the tax to prices, the general price level jumps but inflation (the rate of increase) reverts to trend — a one-off effect.

    • Persistent inflation effect: If tariffs raise firms’ costs, shift bargaining, or alter expectations such that wages and services reprice, the effect can persist. Which occurs depends on how long tariffs remain, whether central banks respond, and whether input costs feed into broad service wages. Recent policy debates (and Fed/central-bank analyses) focus on this distinction because it matters for monetary policy decisions.

    Who really pays — consumers or firms?

    • Short run: A large share of the tariff burden often falls on consumers through higher retail prices, especially for final goods with little cheap domestic supply or close substitutes. Microstudies of past tariff episodes show retailers do not fully absorb tariffs. 

    • Medium run: Firms that cannot pass through full costs may absorb some through lower margins, investment cuts, or shifting production. But if tariffs are prolonged, businesses may restructure supply chains (friend-shoring, reshoring), which involves costs that eventually show up in prices or wages.

    • Distributional note: Tariffs are regressive in practice: low-income households spend a higher share of income on traded goods (electronics, clothing, groceries), so price rises hit them proportionally harder.

    Recent real-world examples and context

    • U.S.–China tariffs (2018–2020): Research showed sectoral price increases and some consumer price impacts, but the overall macro inflationary effect was modest; distributional and sectoral effects were important. 

    • 2025 tariff escalations (selective large tariffs): Multiple U.S. measures in 2025 (and reactions by trading partners) have been estimated to add a measurable number of basis points to core inflation in the short run; some think-tank and Fed estimates put first-round impacts between ~0.1% and up to ~1.8% on consumer prices depending on scope and pass-through assumptions. Those numbers illustrate the concept: targeted tariffs can move aggregate prices when they hit big-ticket or widely used inputs. 

    Other consequences that amplify (or mute) the inflationary effect

    • Policy uncertainty raises costs. Firms’ inability to plan (frequent rate changes, threats of additional tariffs) increases inventories and compliance spending, which can raise prices even beyond the tariff itself. Recent business surveys report that tariff uncertainty is already increasing costs for many firms.

    • Trade diversion and higher-cost sourcing. If imports are redirected to higher-cost suppliers to avoid tariffs, consumers pay more even if the tariffed good itself isn’t sold at home.

    • Monetary policy reaction. If central banks tighten to offset tariff-driven inflation, the resulting slower demand can blunt price rises; if central banks look through one-off tariff effects, inflation may persist. That interaction is the crucial policy lever.

    Practical implications for consumers, businesses and policy

    • For consumers: Expect higher prices in targeted categories (appliances, furniture, specific branded goods, pharmaceuticals where applicable). Substitution (cheaper alternatives, used goods) will dampen some of the pain but not all. Low-income households are likely to feel the pinch more.

    • For firms: Short run — margin pressure or higher retail prices; medium run — supply-chain reconfiguration, higher capital costs if tariffs hit investment goods. Tariff uncertainty is itself costly.

    • For policymakers: Design matters. Narrow, temporary tariffs with clear objectives and sunset clauses reduce the risk of persistent inflation and political capture. Communication with central banks and trading partners helps reduce uncertainty. If tariffs are broad and long lasting, monetary authorities face harder choices to maintain price stability. 

    Bottom line

    Tariffs do raise consumer prices — sometimes only slightly and once, sometimes more significantly and persistently. Empirical work and recent episodes show the effect is heterogeneous: it depends on the tariffs’ size, coverage (final vs intermediate goods), pass-through rates in particular markets, supply-chain links, and how monetary and fiscal authorities respond. In short: tariffs are an inflationary tool when applied at scale, but the real economic pain depends on the details — and on whether those tariffs are temporary, targeted, and paired with policies that limit rent-seeking and supply-chain disruption.


    If you want, I can:

    • prepare a table of recent studies (estimate, scope, implied CPI effect) so you can compare numbers side-by-side, or

    • run a short sectoral deep-dive (e.g., electronics, autos, pharmaceuticals) to show which consumer categories are most likely to see price rises where you live, or

    • draft a two-page brief for a policymaker summarizing the tradeoffs and suggested guardrails.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 195
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 01/10/2025In: News

How are tariffs affecting inflation and consumer prices worldwide?

tariffs affecting inflation and consu ...

consumerpricesglobaleconomyinflationprotectionismsupplychainstariffstradepolicy
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 01/10/2025 at 4:35 pm

    How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics) Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate. HighRead more

    How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics)

    1. Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate.

    2. Higher input costs and cascading effects. Many tariffs target intermediate goods (parts, components, machinery). That raises production costs for domestic manufacturers and raises prices across supply chains, not just the tariffed final products.

    3. Substitution and product mix effects. Consumers and firms may switch to more expensive domestic suppliers (trade diversion), which can keep prices elevated even if the tariffed product’s price falls later.

    4. Uncertainty and administrative costs. Frequent changes in tariff policy add uncertainty; firms pay to retool supply chains, hold extra inventory, or hire compliance staff — those costs can be passed on to consumers.

    5. Macro feedback and second-round effects. If tariffs push inflation higher and expectations become unanchored, wages and service prices can reprice, producing a more persistent inflationary effect rather than a one-time rise.

      How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics)

      1. Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate.

      2. Higher input costs and cascading effects. Many tariffs target intermediate goods (parts, components, machinery). That raises production costs for domestic manufacturers and raises prices across supply chains, not just the tariffed final products.

      3. Substitution and product mix effects. Consumers and firms may switch to more expensive domestic suppliers (trade diversion), which can keep prices elevated even if the tariffed product’s price falls later.

      4. Uncertainty and administrative costs. Frequent changes in tariff policy add uncertainty; firms pay to retool supply chains, hold extra inventory, or hire compliance staff — those costs can be passed on to consumers.

      5. Macro feedback and second-round effects. If tariffs push inflation higher and expectations become unanchored, wages and service prices can reprice, producing a more persistent inflationary effect rather than a one-time rise. 

      What the evidence and recent studies show (how big are the effects?)

      • Pass-through varies by product, but is often substantial. Micro-level studies of recent U.S. tariffs find nontrivial pass-through: some estimates put retail pass-through for affected goods in the range of tens of percent up to near full pass-through in the short run for certain categories. One well-known microstudy finds a 20% tariff linked with roughly a 0.7% retail price rise for affected products in its sample—pass-through is heterogeneous. 

      • Recent policy episodes (2025 U.S. tariff episodes) provide real-time estimates. Multiple papers and central-bank notes looking at the 2025 tariff measures conclude the first-round effect is measurable but not massive overall — estimates range from a few tenths of a percentage point up to low single digits in headline/core inflation depending on which scenario is assumed (full pass-through vs partial, scope of tariffs, and whether monetary policy offsets). For example, recent Federal Reserve analysis and Boston Fed back-of-the-envelope work put short-run contributions to core inflation on the order of ~0.1–0.8 percentage points (varies by method and which tariffs are counted). Yale and other research groups that look at sectoral pass-through find higher short-run impacts in heavily affected categories. Federal Reserve+2Federal Reserve Bank of Boston+2

      • Tariffs on investment goods can have outsized effects. Studies highlight that tariffs on capital goods (machinery, semiconductors, tools) raise costs of producing other goods and can therefore have larger effects on investment and longer-term productivity; projected price effects for investment goods are often larger than for consumption goods. 

      One-time level shift vs persistent inflation — which is more likely?

      There are two useful ways to think about the impact:

      • One-time price level effect: If tariffs are a discrete shock and firms simply add the tax to prices, the general price level jumps but inflation (the rate of increase) reverts to trend — a one-off effect.

      • Persistent inflation effect: If tariffs raise firms’ costs, shift bargaining, or alter expectations such that wages and services reprice, the effect can persist. Which occurs depends on how long tariffs remain, whether central banks respond, and whether input costs feed into broad service wages. Recent policy debates (and Fed/central-bank analyses) focus on this distinction because it matters for monetary policy decisions.

      • Short run: A large share of the tariff burden often falls on consumers through higher retail prices, especially for final goods with little cheap domestic supply or close substitutes. Microstudies of past tariff episodes show retailers do not fully absorb tariffs. Medium run: Firms that cannot pass through full costs may absorb some through lower margins, investment cuts, or shifting production. But if tariffs are prolonged, businesses may restructure supply chains (friend-shoring, reshoring), which involves costs that eventually show up in prices or wages.

      • Distributional note: Tariffs are regressive in practice: low-income households spend a higher share of income on traded goods (electronics, clothing, groceries), so price rises hit them proportionally harder.

      Recent real-world examples and context

      • U.S.–China tariffs (2018–2020): Research showed sectoral price increases and some consumer price impacts, but the overall macro inflationary effect was modest; distributional and sectoral effects were important. 

      • 2025 tariff escalations (selective large tariffs): Multiple U.S. measures in 2025 (and reactions by trading partners) have been estimated to add a measurable number of basis points to core inflation in the short run; some think-tank and Fed estimates put first-round impacts between ~0.1% and up to ~1.8% on consumer prices depending on scope and pass-through assumptions. Those numbers illustrate the concept: targeted tariffs can move aggregate prices when they hit big-ticket or widely used inputs.

      Other consequences that amplify (or mute) the inflationary effect

      • Policy uncertainty raises costs. Firms’ inability to plan (frequent rate changes, threats of additional tariffs) increases inventories and compliance spending, which can raise prices even beyond the tariff itself. Recent business surveys report that tariff uncertainty is already increasing costs for many firms. 

      • Trade diversion and higher-cost sourcing. If imports are redirected to higher-cost suppliers to avoid tariffs, consumers pay more even if the tariffed good itself isn’t sold at home.

      • Monetary policy reaction. If central banks tighten to offset tariff-driven inflation, the resulting slower demand can blunt price rises; if central banks look through one-off tariff effects, inflation may persist. That interaction is the crucial policy lever. 

      Practical implications for consumers, businesses and policy

      • For consumers: Expect higher prices in targeted categories (appliances, furniture, specific branded goods, pharmaceuticals where applicable). Substitution (cheaper alternatives, used goods) will dampen some of the pain but not all. Low-income households are likely to feel the pinch more.

      • For firms: Short run — margin pressure or higher retail prices; medium run — supply-chain reconfiguration, higher capital costs if tariffs hit investment goods. Tariff uncertainty is itself costly.

      • For policymakers: Design matters. Narrow, temporary tariffs with clear objectives and sunset clauses reduce the risk of persistent inflation and political capture. Communication with central banks and trading partners helps reduce uncertainty. If tariffs are broad and long lasting, monetary authorities face harder choices to maintain price stability. 

      Bottom line

      Tariffs do raise consumer prices — sometimes only slightly and once, sometimes more significantly and persistently. Empirical work and recent episodes show the effect is heterogeneous: it depends on the tariffs’ size, coverage (final vs intermediate goods), pass-through rates in particular markets, supply-chain links, and how monetary and fiscal authorities respond. In short: tariffs are an inflationary tool when applied at scale, but the real economic pain depends on the details — and on whether those tariffs are temporary, targeted, and paired with policies that limit rent-seeking and supply-chain disruption.


      If you want, I can:

      • prepare a table of recent studies (estimate, scope, implied CPI effect) so you can compare numbers side-by-side, or

      • run a short sectoral deep-dive (e.g., electronics, autos, pharmaceuticals) to show which consumer categories are most likely to see price rises where you live, or

      • draft a two-page brief for a policymaker summarizing the tradeoffs and suggested guardrails.

    What the evidence and recent studies show (how big are the effects?)

    • Pass-through varies by product, but is often substantial. Micro-level studies of recent U.S. tariffs find nontrivial pass-through: some estimates put retail pass-through for affected goods in the range of tens of percent up to near full pass-through in the short run for certain categories. One well-known microstudy finds a 20% tariff linked with roughly a 0.7% retail price rise for affected products in its sample—pass-through is heterogeneous.

    • Recent policy episodes (2025 U.S. tariff episodes) provide real-time estimates. Multiple papers and central-bank notes looking at the 2025 tariff measures conclude the first-round effect is measurable but not massive overall — estimates range from a few tenths of a percentage point up to low single digits in headline/core inflation depending on which scenario is assumed (full pass-through vs partial, scope of tariffs, and whether monetary policy offsets). For example, recent Federal Reserve analysis and Boston Fed back-of-the-envelope work put short-run contributions to core inflation on the order of ~0.1–0.8 percentage points (varies by method and which tariffs are counted). Yale and other research groups that look at sectoral pass-through find higher short-run impacts in heavily affected categories. 

    • Tariffs on investment goods can have outsized effects. Studies highlight that tariffs on capital goods (machinery, semiconductors, tools) raise costs of producing other goods and can therefore have larger effects on investment and longer-term productivity; projected price effects for investment goods are often larger than for consumption goods. 

    One-time level shift vs persistent inflation — which is more likely?

    There are two useful ways to think about the impact:

    • One-time price level effect: If tariffs are a discrete shock and firms simply add the tax to prices, the general price level jumps but inflation (the rate of increase) reverts to trend — a one-off effect.

    • Persistent inflation effect: If tariffs raise firms’ costs, shift bargaining, or alter expectations such that wages and services reprice, the effect can persist. Which occurs depends on how long tariffs remain, whether central banks respond, and whether input costs feed into broad service wages. Recent policy debates (and Fed/central-bank analyses) focus on this distinction because it matters for monetary policy decisions. 

    Who really pays — consumers or firms?

    • Short run: A large share of the tariff burden often falls on consumers through higher retail prices, especially for final goods with little cheap domestic supply or close substitutes. Microstudies of past tariff episodes show retailers do not fully absorb tariffs. 

    • Medium run: Firms that cannot pass through full costs may absorb some through lower margins, investment cuts, or shifting production. But if tariffs are prolonged, businesses may restructure supply chains (friend-shoring, reshoring), which involves costs that eventually show up in prices or wages.

    • Distributional note: Tariffs are regressive in practice: low-income households spend a higher share of income on traded goods (electronics, clothing, groceries), so price rises hit them proportionally harder.

    Recent real-world examples and context

    • U.S.–China tariffs (2018–2020): Research showed sectoral price increases and some consumer price impacts, but the overall macro inflationary effect was modest; distributional and sectoral effects were important.

    • 2025 tariff escalations (selective large tariffs): Multiple U.S. measures in 2025 (and reactions by trading partners) have been estimated to add a measurable number of basis points to core inflation in the short run; some think-tank and Fed estimates put first-round impacts between ~0.1% and up to ~1.8% on consumer prices depending on scope and pass-through assumptions. Those numbers illustrate the concept: targeted tariffs can move aggregate prices when they hit big-ticket or widely used inputs. 

    Other consequences that amplify (or mute) the inflationary effect

    • Policy uncertainty raises costs. Firms’ inability to plan (frequent rate changes, threats of additional tariffs) increases inventories and compliance spending, which can raise prices even beyond the tariff itself. Recent business surveys report that tariff uncertainty is already increasing costs for many firms. 

    • Trade diversion and higher-cost sourcing. If imports are redirected to higher-cost suppliers to avoid tariffs, consumers pay more even if the tariffed good itself isn’t sold at home.

    • Monetary policy reaction. If central banks tighten to offset tariff-driven inflation, the resulting slower demand can blunt price rises; if central banks look through one-off tariff effects, inflation may persist. That interaction is the crucial policy lever. 

    Practical implications for consumers, businesses and policy

    • For consumers: Expect higher prices in targeted categories (appliances, furniture, specific branded goods, pharmaceuticals where applicable). Substitution (cheaper alternatives, used goods) will dampen some of the pain but not all. Low-income households are likely to feel the pinch more.

    • For firms: Short run — margin pressure or higher retail prices; medium run — supply-chain reconfiguration, higher capital costs if tariffs hit investment goods. Tariff uncertainty is itself costly.

    • For policymakers: Design matters. Narrow, temporary tariffs with clear objectives and sunset clauses reduce the risk of persistent inflation and political capture. Communication with central banks and trading partners helps reduce uncertainty. If tariffs are broad and long lasting, monetary authorities face harder choices to maintain price stability. 

    Bottom line

    Tariffs do raise consumer prices — sometimes only slightly and once, sometimes more significantly and persistently. Empirical work and recent episodes show the effect is heterogeneous: it depends on the tariffs’ size, coverage (final vs intermediate goods), pass-through rates in particular markets, supply-chain links, and how monetary and fiscal authorities respond. In short: tariffs are an inflationary tool when applied at scale, but the real economic pain depends on the details — and on whether those tariffs are temporary, targeted, and paired with policies that limit rent-seeking and supply-chain disruption.


    If you want, I can:

    • prepare a table of recent studies (estimate, scope, implied CPI effect) so you can compare numbers side-by-side, or

    • run a short sectoral deep-dive (e.g., electronics, autos, pharmaceuticals) to show which consumer categories are most likely to see price rises where you live, or

    • draft a two-page brief for a policymaker summarizing the tradeoffs and suggested guardrails.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 205
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 01/10/2025In: News

Can developing countries use tariffs as a tool for industrial growth, or will it backfire?

developing countries use tariffs as a ...

developingeconomieseconomicgrowthindustrialdevelopmentprotectionismtariffstradepolicy
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 01/10/2025 at 4:01 pm

    Why people think tariffs can help The infant-industry argument is simple and intuitive: new industries may need temporary shelter from world competition while they learn, reach scale, adopt technology, and get more productive. If you expose them immediately to global rivals with mature factories andRead more

    Why people think tariffs can help

    The infant-industry argument is simple and intuitive: new industries may need temporary shelter from world competition while they learn, reach scale, adopt technology, and get more productive. If you expose them immediately to global rivals with mature factories and deeper pockets, they may never get off the ground. Tariffs can:

    • Give domestic firms breathing room to reach minimum efficient scale.

    • Create incentives for local suppliers and upstream industries to develop.

    • Raise government revenue that can be ploughed into infrastructure, skills, or R&D that support industrialization.

    • Allow governments to pursue strategic goals (e.g., build an electronics base, heavy industry, or green manufacturing) rather than relying only on market signals.

    Historical narratives about late-industrializers like the U.S., Germany, Japan and — in the 20th century — the East Asian tigers emphasize selective protection plus active industrial policy as part of their success stories. But note: these countries rarely relied on blanket tariffs forever; they combined protection with export push, state coordination, and learning targets. 

    Why tariffs often backfire

    Empirical work and recent policy analysis show clear pitfalls. Tariffs can easily produce:

    • Inefficiency and higher prices. Protected firms face less competition and therefore have weaker incentives to innovate or cut costs; consumers pay more. Cross-country studies link long spells of protection to lower productivity growth. 

    • Rent-seeking and capture. Firms lobby to keep protection, political coalitions form, and temporary measures become permanent. That’s how import-substitution regimes in some Latin American countries became stagnation traps.

    • Retaliation and trade diversion. Higher tariffs invite counter-measures or shift trade toward higher-cost suppliers, hurting export competitiveness. Recent episodes show developing countries suffer heavily when big powers raise tariffs.

    • Macroeconomic harm. Tariffs can be inflationary and reduce the efficiency of labor allocation, sometimes contributing to slower overall growth. 

    What the evidence actually says

    The modern empirical literature is nuanced. Broad cross-country evidence warns that long-term, undisciplined protection tends to reduce growth and welfare. But careful industry-level and case-study research shows that time-bound, targeted industrial policy — sometimes including tariffs — plausibly helped South Korea and other East Asian economies build advanced manufacturing capabilities. The difference lies in design, complementary policies, and institutions. Recent IMF and academic work emphasize the conditional success of industrial policy rather than a blanket endorsement of protectionism. 

    Key conditions that make tariff-led industrial policy more likely to succeed

    If a developing country is thinking of using tariffs as one tool toward industrial growth, the following elements matter a lot:

    1. Clear, time-bound objective. Tariffs must be temporary with explicit sunset clauses and measurable performance benchmarks (productivity gains, export competitiveness, R&D targets).

    2. Selective and targeted application. Target sectors where learning-by-doing and scale economies are plausible, not broad protection of low-value activities.

    3. Complementary policies. Tariffs alone rarely build competitiveness. Pair them with subsidies for R&D, workforce training, infrastructure, export promotion, and access to finance.

    4. Strong governance and anti-capture mechanisms. Transparent rules, regular reviews, and independent evaluation reduce the risk of permanent rent extraction.

    5. Export orientation or credible exit strategy. Successful cases combined protection with an eventual push into exports; domestic protection that never leads to export competitiveness is a red flag.

    6. Macro and trade diplomacy awareness. Policymakers must manage exchange-rate, fiscal, and diplomatic implications to avoid harmful retaliation or loss of market access. 

    Practical checklist for policymakers (a short playbook)

    • Define which industries and why (technology challenge, scale, spillovers).

    • Set performance metrics (cost reductions, productivity, export share, R&D intensity) and a strict sunset (3–7 years, extendable only on clear evidence).

    • Offer graduated, conditional support (tariffs + matching R&D grants + export incentives), not unconditional lifelong tariffs.

    • Create an independent evaluation body to audit progress and publish results.

    • Keep trade partners informed and seek carve-outs or temporary arrangements in regional agreements where possible.

    • Combine with education, infrastructure, and competition policy so protection does not create permanent monopolies. 

    Realistic expectations

    Even when well designed, tariffs are only one piece of an industrial strategy. They can buy time and help create space to learn, but they do not automatically create globally competitive industries. Many successful modern industrializers combined a mix of: selective protection, state support for technology adoption, heavy investment in skills and infrastructure, and policies that pushed firms to export or otherwise face competition eventually.

    Bottom line

    Tariffs are a blunt tool: useful in carefully circumscribed, temporary, and well-governed cases where market failures block infant industries from developing. But used as a default policy, or without credible performance rules and complementary interventions, tariffs are much more likely to backfire — producing higher prices, stagnation, and political rents. History and recent research both warn: the how matters far more than the whether. 


    If you want, I can:

    • write a policy brief (2–3 pages) that applies this checklist to a specific country (pick one), or

    • prepare short case studies comparing South Korea, Argentina, and India to show contrasts, or

    • pull a readable list of the best academic/agency resources (WTO, UNCTAD, IMF, World Bank papers) so you can dig deeper.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 164
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 01/10/2025In: News

what is Donald Trump’s 20-point plan with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu aimed at ending the war in Gaza?

20-point plan with Israeli Prime Mini ...

gazaredevelopmentgazawarplanhostagereleaseisraelpalestineconflictpeaceproposal2025transitionalgovernance
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 01/10/2025 at 1:29 pm

    1. Immediate Ceasefire and Release of Hostages Central to the plan is a call for an immediate ceasefire. Hamas would be required to release all the hostages it still holds within 72 hours. To Israel, this was an absolute condition, and to Trump, it provided him with an argument that the plan is notRead more

    1. Immediate Ceasefire and Release of Hostages

    Central to the plan is a call for an immediate ceasefire. Hamas would be required to release all the hostages it still holds within 72 hours. To Israel, this was an absolute condition, and to Trump, it provided him with an argument that the plan is not merely about humanitarian relief, but also about Israeli security.

    2. Gradual Israeli Withdrawal from Gaza

    The proposal has Israel slowly withdrawing its military presence, but with assurances. It is linked to Hamas disarming and security being reorganized under an international umbrella. This is how Trump attempts to reassure Israel that Gaza will never again become a launching pad for attacks.

    3. Demilitarization of Hamas

    Hamas would be required to surrender heavy weapons, destroy its tunnel system, and agree to stop using armed resistance. Critics see this as the main flaw: it requires one side to effectively disarm without any evident path toward long-term political integration.

    4. A New Governance Model: The “Board of Peace”

    Among the most provocative aspects is Trump’s call to establish a “Board of Peace,” led by himself. According to this vision, Gaza would temporarily be ruled by Palestinian technocrats—above-party officials with managerial backgrounds—under international monitoring. Trump proposes being the mediator-in-chief, but critics contend it could end up treating Palestinians as foreigners in their own territory.

    5. Humanitarian and Reconstruction Push

    The package features billions of pledged investment to rebuild Gaza’s destroyed infrastructure—roads, hospitals, schools, homes, and electricity supply. Trump outlined his vision as making Gaza the “Riviera of the Middle East,” a repeat of his previous contentious vision to redevelop the strip as a tourist and economic center. Fans refer to this as bold; critics refer to it as unrealistic unless the underlying political grievances are addressed.

    6. Security Assurances for Israel

    Israel would still have the right to defend itself and control Gaza’s borders under international covenants. The plan basically gives priority to Israel’s security framework first, before Palestinian statehood.

    7. Pathway to Palestinian Self-Determination (Conditional)

    For Palestinians, Trump’s plan leaves a very narrow window open: if Hamas agrees, if technocratic rule succeeds, and security holds firm, then talks about Palestinian autonomy might come. But many Palestinians regard this as pulling sovereignty many years into the future, with no actual promises.

    Why It Matters

    Trump’s 20-point plan matters because it reveals the ways in which he is attempting to redefine U.S. diplomacy in the Middle East. Unlike his predecessors, who relied on international coalitions or two-state negotiations, Trump wishes to take personal charge of the process, nearly as if peace could be “brokered like a business deal.”

    • Israel’s Perspective: Netanyahu accepted it conditionally, viewing it as a means to unify Israel’s military objectives and obtain U.S. support.
    • Hamas’s Predicament: Hamas has yet to acquiesce, but the ultimatum—”accept or meet a sad fate”—places them under tremendous pressure.
    • International Responses: A few Arab countries greeted the ceasefire aspect but deplored the “Board of Peace” concept as subversive of Palestinian autonomy. Human rights organizations fear it seeks geopolitics over justice.

    Humanized View

    Fundamentally, the plan is a manifestation of Trump’s transactional style. He’s proposing a deal—peace and investment—for bowing to Israel’s security conditions. To families in Gaza suffering under bombardment, any ceasefire sounds like promise. To Israeli families concerned about rockets and hostages, the plan sounds like security.

    But Middle East peace has never been so easy as writing a contract. Palestinians seek dignity, sovereignty, and liberation from occupation. Israelis seek security, acknowledgment, and a halt to terror. Trump’s initiative attempts to thread these needles—but whether it actually tackles the human suffering on both sides, or merely covers over more profound wounds, is the true test.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 2
  • 1
  • 139
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 30/09/2025In: News

How do I lower my blood pressure / cholesterol / reduce risk of heart disease?

blood pressure and cholesterol and re ...

cardiovascularhealthcholesterolcontrolhealthyheartheartdiseasepreventionlowerbloodpressure
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 30/09/2025 at 4:27 pm

    Step 1: Knowing the Numbers You can't make it different if you don't know what you have. Blood pressure: Ideally below 120/80 mmHg. Uncontrolled high blood pressure quietly crushes your heart and arteries over time. Cholesterol: LDL ("bad" cholesterol) chokes arteries; HDL ("good" cholesterol) washeRead more

    Step 1: Knowing the Numbers

    You can’t make it different if you don’t know what you have.

    • Blood pressure: Ideally below 120/80 mmHg. Uncontrolled high blood pressure quietly crushes your heart and arteries over time.
    • Cholesterol: LDL (“bad” cholesterol) chokes arteries; HDL (“good” cholesterol) washes it out. All about balance.
    • Risk of heart disease: Increases with smoking, diet, lack of activity, stress, and genetics.

    Knowing where you are starting makes progress easier—measurable—and real.

     Step 2: Redefine Food as Medicine

    Food doesn’t just fuel you; it actually determines the fate of your heart. Some self-evident modifications:

    • Boost plants: Vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains—these naturally lower cholesterol.
    • Healthy fats: Olive oil, nuts, seeds, fatty fish guard your arteries.
    • Less salt and sugar: Excessive salt increases blood pressure; excessive sugar leads to weight gain and inflammation.
    • Restrict processed foods: They tend to confine the worst culprits in one package—too much salt, trans fats, and added sugars.

    You don’t have to totally revolutionize your diet overnight. Even substituting one sweetened beverage with water or introducing an extra serving of vegetables daily builds momentum.

     Step 3: Move Your Body, Protect Your Heart

    Exercise is not just a calorie burner—it stretches blood vessels, conditions the heart muscle, and lowers blood pressure without drugs.

    Target: 150 minutes of moderate exercise every week (brisk walking, cycling, dancing).

    • Secret: You don’t need to go to a gym. Walk after meals, take the stairs, dance in your living room, garden—anything.”.
    • Bonus: Exercise also reduces stress since, similar to physical exercise, stress is also a heart risk factor.

    Step 4: Respect Rest and Sleep

    Restless sleep raises blood pressure and cholesterol levels. Sleep 7–9 hours well. Experiment:

    • Creating a regular sleep routine.
    • Limiting screen time before sleep.
    • Having a calming pre-sleep routine (reading, stretching, or meditation).

    Sleeping is not lazy—it’s how your body repairs itself, including your heart.

     Step 5: Cut Smoking and Alcohol

    Smoking destroys blood vessels and accelerates plaque accumulation. Stopping even in middle age cuts risk substantially.

    • Alcohol: Moderate quantities (a glass of red wine with the evening meal) might confer some protection but excess increases blood pressure and slows the heart. If you drink, drink moderately—no more than 1 drink a day for women, 2 for men.

    Step 6: Master Stress Before It Masters You

    Stress not only lives in your head but also raises blood pressure and powers unhealthy coping habits (such as too much eating or too much drinking). Methods that succeed are:

    • Deep breathing techniques.
    • Mindfulness or meditation.
    • Talking it out with friends or a counselor.
    • Playing at something you like every day—music, art, nature, or just play.
    • Think stress management emotional heart care.

     Step 7: Regular Check-Ups and Monitoring

    Even when you feel wonderful, high cholesterol and high blood pressure generally won’t have symptoms until after they’ve caused harm. Regular check-ups find them early. Your doctor might recommend:

    • Following your blood pressure.
    • Screening your lipid profile.
    • Counseling about changing your lifestyle—or, if needed, drugs.

    And if drugs are called for, view them not as defeat but another safety net while you continue developing good habits.

    Final Thought

    Lowering blood pressure, cholesterol, and heart disease risk isn’t about one heroic, fabulous move—it’s about tiny, achievable steps that add up year by year. It’s the difference between grilling fish instead of frying chicken on one night, walking for 10 minutes instead of scrolling aimlessly, saying no to one more stressful commitment, or going to bed a few minutes sooner.

    Every little decision is a contribution to your heart’s “health savings account.” And they accumulate over time to an ever-stronger, more resilient heart—and an ever-longer, fuller life.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 3
  • 1
  • 160
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 30/09/2025In: News, Technology

Perplexity AI launches Comet browser in India — a challenge to Google Chrome?

a challenge to Google Chrome

artificialintelligencebrowserwarschromealternativecometbrowsergooglechromeindialaunchperplexityaitechnews
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 30/09/2025 at 1:13 pm

     Setting the Stage Google Chrome ruled the Indian browser space for years. On laptops, desktops, and even mobile phones, Chrome was the first choice for millions. It was speedy, seamless integration with Google products, and omnipresent globally. But with the introduction of Comet browser by PerplexRead more

     Setting the Stage

    Google Chrome ruled the Indian browser space for years. On laptops, desktops, and even mobile phones, Chrome was the first choice for millions. It was speedy, seamless integration with Google products, and omnipresent globally. But with the introduction of Comet browser by Perplexity AI in India, that grip is loosening, so the question now: Can it hold a candle to Chrome?

    What is Comet Browser?

    Comet isn’t a browser. It’s an AI-powered, productivity-focused tool that blends:

    • A web page summarizing, follow-up suggesting, and email autocomposing AI assistant integrated in.
    • Integration of Email Assistant to facilitate easier human writing, organizing, and cleaning inboxes.
    • Prioritizing privacy-first browsing over Chrome’s ad-dependent, user-data-based model.

    For a country like India, where the pace of digital adoption is soaring in the stratosphere, Comet presents a choice that is as simple as it is intelligent.

     Privacy vs. Personalization — The Core Debate

    Comet’s greatest feature is that it’s privacy-centric. Indian consumers are increasingly concerned about data security, especially after a string of cyber fraud and leakage cases. Chrome is wonderful, but its image is tarnished for being too intrusive in the information it accumulates in its efforts to provide the material for Google’s ad engine.

    Comet promises to flip that model on its side by:

    • Restricting data collection.
    • Offering users clear controls on what they’re tracking.
    • Offering AI-driven personalization without holding sensitive data for long periods.

    This may have the potential to appeal to an increasing number of individuals who hold digital performance and trust in equal regard.

    India’s Digital Landscape — A Tough Ground

    India is not a soft market to penetrate. While Chrome reigns supreme on the desktop, mobile phone browser leaders such as Samsung Internet, Safari (on iOS), and small browsers like UC Mini (previously when banned) have also had ginormous fan bases.

    Comet to be successful will need:

    • To seamlessly interoperate with popular apps Indians are already using (WhatsApp, Gmail, Paytm, UPI apps).
    • To function perfectly on low-cost phones with thin memory and processing.
    • Offer regional language assistance, as India’s net is not English-based.

    Could It Possibly Replace Chrome?

    Come on, be practical here: Chrome is not going to be replaced overnight. It’s had longer than a decade of well-ingrained dominance, pre-installs on Android, and extensive Google service integration.

    But Comet does have some tricks up its sleeve that could make it revolutionary:

    • AI integration: Chrome merely scratches the surface of generative AI; Comet knows it and makes it a brand-defining aspect.
    • Email Assistant: If it actually does save time for professionals and students, it can win over a loyal following overnight.
    • Trust factor: With some hype, the guarantee that it will not profiteer from user data can appeal to India’s growing middle class, which is increasingly privacy-conscious.

    Finally, browsers are not about lightening speed or bling—about making the user feel something when they use them. If Comet can make the user feel:

    • Smart (by accelerating long pages in a flash),
    • Safer (by allowing them to own their data),

    Simpler (by describing their online lives in plain English),then surely, it could quite possibly have a niche in Chrome. It may not immediately replace it, but it could plant seeds of competition in an already long ago won market.

     The Road Ahead

    Comet’s test of Chrome will be how fast it is able to:

    • Earn acceptance in urban and semi-urban India,
    • Build a trust and reliability community, and
    • Continuously innovate ahead of Chrome.

    If Perplexity ever manages to get its act together at last, then India might be the proving ground that forces Chrome to face for the first time its first serious challenger.

    Comet will not unseat Chrome overnight, but it can do the work of recharging Indians’ view of a browser—from simple surfing device to artificially intelligent personal digital assistant.

    See less
      • 2
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 178
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 29/09/2025In: News

In light of the “I Love Muhammad” controversy in Bareilly, how has Yogi framed the role of the state versus religious leaders in maintaining law and order?

“I Love Muhammad” controversy in Bare ...

ilovemuhammadrowpoliticalauthorityreligiousexpressionreligiousprotestsstatevsclergy
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 29/09/2025 at 4:39 pm

     What Happened: A Quick Recap The controversy began in Kanpur during a Barawafat procession (celebration of the Prophet Muhammad’s birth), when people put up banners reading “I Love Muhammad.” Some local groups objected, saying this was a new custom in that setting. Police got involved, FIRs were fiRead more

     What Happened: A Quick Recap

    • The controversy began in Kanpur during a Barawafat procession (celebration of the Prophet Muhammad’s birth), when people put up banners reading “I Love Muhammad.” Some local groups objected, saying this was a new custom in that setting. Police got involved, FIRs were filed for allegedly introducing new elements and disturbance of communal harmony.

    • The issue spread to other cities, including Bareilly, where protests erupted after cleric Maulana Tauqeer Raza Khan announced a procession (protest) in support of the campaign. The administration reportedly did not give permission, the procession was said to be postponed, and tensions escalated after Friday prayers—stone-pelting, clashes with police, detentions. 


     What Yogi Has Actually Said / Done

    From his public statements and policy actions in response to the Bareilly unrest, here’s how Yogi has framed things:

    1. Zero Tolerance for Disruption
      He stressed that disruptions to law and order won’t be tolerated. He has warned explicitly that habitual offenders will face consequences. In his words: people cannot “hold the system hostage” with street protests. He criticized a cleric (Maulana) for acting as though he can halt the system whenever he chooses. Reasserting State Authority
      Yogi made it clear that the mantle of authority belongs to the state, not religious leaders or protestors. His saying that someone “forgot who is in power in the state” implies that religious figures should not presume to act or mobilize as if they are above or parallel to the law. The state is emphasizing its primacy in governing public order. 

    2. Warning of Strong Measures (“Denting‐Painting”)
      One of his more pointed remarks was that for those who repeatedly violate law, corrective or punitive measures (colloquially expressed as “denting and painting must be done”) will be used. This suggests a hardline approach: not only reactive policing, but deterrence.

    3. Associated Administrative Actions

      • Arrests and FIRs against those identified as organizers or instigators. 

      • Heavy deployment of police forces in the sensitive areas, restrictions, and efforts to manage or preempt protests. 

      • Warnings from other administration ministers that religious or cultural gatherings must have permission; unauthorized processions are not acceptable. 


     Interpretation: State vs Religious Leaders as Per Yogi’s Framing

    From the above, we can extract several themes in how Yogi sees the roles and limits of religious leaders versus the state in maintaining order.

    Theme What Yogi’s Framing Suggests
    State Primacy/Monopoly on Legitimate Public Order The state has the final say on what is permissible in public spaces. Religious leaders do not have a “special exemption” to mobilize or act in ways that disrupt civic order.
    Conditional Religious Expression Religious sentiment (such as “I Love Muhammad”) is not automatically wrong, but when expression becomes public, especially via processions or assemblies, it must obey rules: permissions, not violating laws, not inciting unrest. So the state retains regulatory control.
    Religious Leaders as Responsible Actors Yogi’s statements imply religious leaders should act responsibly: obey administrative norms, seek permission, restrain their followers. A religious leader who organizes a procession without permission or who calls for protests despite denial is seen as overstepping.
    Law Enforcement as Necessary Deterrent He emphasizes that the state must respond not only to calm things after a disturbance, but also to punish or deter so that future disobedience is less likely. This includes arrests, FIRs, and public warnings.
    Transparency of State Authority By making public statements about who is in power, what is acceptable, Yogi is framing the narrative that the rule of law is not optional or negotiable based on religious or community identity.

    Potential & Real Implications

    This framing has multiple implications—some intended, some that critics raise, some that may unfold over time.

    • Reinforcing Order over Religious Autonomy: The message is: religious practices are allowed, but only within parameters set by the state. This can be seen as ensuring civic order, but may be perceived as shrinking space for communal religious expression.

    • Possible Chilling Effect: Religious leaders may hesitate to organize or allow public displays of religious sentiment, fearing that permits will be denied, or that protests will be suppressed, or that even expression could lead to legal trouble. This could generate tension with communities who feel their religious freedoms are being curtailed.

    • Political Messaging & Power Projection: Yogi’s remarks serve political purposes: projecting strength, asserting control, appealing to law-and-order voters. Saying that no one can “hold the system hostage” resonates with individuals who believe previous administrations were weak. It also sends warnings both to religious leaders and to protestors that the state is watching and will act.

    • Risk of Communal Polarization: When religious leaders are publicly addressed in this way—even when legal points are at issue—members of religious communities may feel targeted, especially if they perceive that similar behavior by other religious groups is treated differently. Accusations of bias or selective enforcement may deepen communal mistrust.

    • Precedent for Permissiveness / State Overreach: There’s a fine line: state power must be applied according to law (permission rules, public safety, constitutional guarantees). Critics will watch to see whether due process is followed, whether arrests are justified, whether measures are proportionate. If state overreach occurs, it may lead to legal challenges or social backlash.

    • Public Behavior Norms: On the positive side (or for supporters), this framing encourages religious voices to internalize norms of public safety, permissions, crowd control, avoiding unpermitted protests, reducing possibility of violence—which arguably contributes to smoother administration.


     Questions Raised / Criticism

    • Freedom of expression vs. Public order: What exactly counts as permissible religious expression? Is putting up a banner “I Love Muhammad” inherently provocative, or is it only when processions or gatherings use that as a flashpoint? Who decides that? Critics will argue that love of Prophet is a matter of personal belief/expression and should not be criminalized unless it violates other laws or incites violence. 

    • Role of Permission and Bureaucracy: The requirement for permission can itself become a bottleneck, especially if bureaucratic delays or subjective denials occur. Religious leaders may accuse the state of being selective or arbitrary in granting permissions.

    • What is “Habitual” Law‑Breaking? The phrase “habitual law-breaker” and strong warnings are open to interpretation—and possibly misuse. It raises concerns about how broadly enforcement is applied, and whether small infractions will also be punished harshly under the guise of “habitual” behavior.

    • Due Process and Civil Liberties: Arrests, FIRs, detentions—are suspects getting fair treatment? Are rights to assembly, protest, and speech being respected? There are civil society voices already pointing to concerns of “arbitrary detention” and lack of transparency.

    • Consistency: If the state claims it is enforcing rules—for permissions, for public safety—will it do so equally across communities and in non‑religious contexts? If similar gatherings (of others) are allowed or overlooked, perceptions of bias will intensify.


     What This Tells Us About Governance Under Yogi

    Putting all of this together, here’s a picture of how Yogi tends to see the dynamic between the state and religious leadership in his governance model, as observed through this controversy:

    • He views religious leaders as having influence and capability to mobilize people; but he insists that this influence must be channeled through rules, permissions, and with deference to state authority.

    • He considers the state’s role to preserve civic peace and public order as supreme—not subordinate to religious sentiment or leader-led mobilization.

    • He often casts disruptions by religious gatherings or processions as not just law-and-order issues but as challenges to governance: for him, allowing unpermitted gatherings or protests is a sign of weak administration.

    • He uses stern language and visible administrative actions (arrests, FIRs, police deployment) to enforce this frame, both practically and symbolically. The aim seems to be deterrence—not just punishing one event, but signaling what is in or not permitted for future reference.


    Final Thoughts: What It Means Going Forward

    • For religious leaders, this means they will need to be more mindful of administrative rules (permits, routes, times), especially in UP. Organizing public religious expression will probably involve more paperwork, negotiation with state authorities, and potentially more pushback.

    • For citizens, especially those from minority religious communities, there may be uncertainty: what counts as permissible expression? Will benign acts be viewed suspiciously? Trust in police or administration may become fragile if people feel they are being unfairly targeted.

    • For the state, implementing this frame consistently and fairly will be important. The line between maintaining order and suppressing dissent is thin. How well the state respects due process, transparency, and distinguishes between peaceful expression and incitement will be under scrutiny.

    • For communal relations, this controversy could deepen divides. But if handled sensitively—if the state engages dialogue, clarifies rules, respects rights—it could also become an occasion for reaffirming norms of peaceful co‑existence and lawful religious expression.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 184
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 29/09/2025In: News

When did Falaq Naaz speak up about the type of language being used in the Bigg Boss house?

Falaq Naaz speak up about the type of ...

2025biggboss19falaqnaaztoxiclanguage
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 29/09/2025 at 3:48 pm

     The Trigger: A Verbal Toxicity Pattern A pattern of hostile and aggressive communication had been observable between the housemates by Falaq for a few weeks. But actually, it did boil over when there were multiple arguments back-to-back where some contestants used very derogatory words, shouting ovRead more

     The Trigger: A Verbal Toxicity Pattern

    A pattern of hostile and aggressive communication had been observable between the housemates by Falaq for a few weeks. But actually, it did boil over when there were multiple arguments back-to-back where some contestants used very derogatory words, shouting over each other, and not desiring to have respectful or calm discussions.

    In the midst of all the theatrics, Falaq — who is usually even-tempered and stoic — hit the boiling point where she just had to talk back. She wasn’t going along for the ride — she stopped and called it out.

     Her Statement: Calm but Firm

    During her confrontation, Falaq did not scream, threaten, or use similar language to retort. Instead, she delivered a biting and acidic criticism of the overall ambiance in the house. She told:

    • “People’s way of communicating in this house is not just disrespectful, it’s poisonous. This isn’t entertainment — it’s word bullying. This show needs to be titled Gandi Zubaan, not Bigg Boss.”
    • That line — “Gandi Zubaan” — subsequently went viral and was quoted on social media sites, fan pages, and entertainment news websites. It struck a chord because it wasn’t just witty; it was factual, observational, and to the point about the mood of what the audience had been going through.

     Why It Mattered

    Falaq’s statement was not concerning one or two contestants — it was referring to a deeper issue that always comes up in reality shows: to what extent is too much for the purposes of entertainment? Her statement was a mirror to contestants and show producers alike. It reminded everyone that while there is conflict and drama in the Bigg Boss show, non-stop verbal abuse, character assassination, and using abusive language should not be the new norm. By speaking up, Falaq also broke free from the negative vibes, showing maturity and self-respect. That gesture earned her appreciation both inside and outside the house.

    Public Reaction

    After the telecast:

    • Fans took to Twitter/X and Instagram and celebrated her as “the voice of reason.”
    • She was even being called the “conscience of the house” by some.
    • Memes and reels were made from her “Gandi Zubaan” line — using it to go viral, not for drama, but to call out the drama.

    Final Thoughts

    Falaq Naaz’s decision to speak up wasn’t just timely — it was long overdue. In a culture where shouting dominates time slots and gaslighting gets applauded, her poise to confront the viciousness with equal force demonstrated her emotional intelligence and integrity.

    She brought home the reality that words create mood, and if we allow toxic words to dominate, then the entire environment becomes toxic — even in a house constructed for entertainment.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 164
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 29/09/2025In: News

Was Awez Darbar eliminated because of low votes?

The Bigg Boss Season 19

awezdarbarbiggboss19eliminationrealitytvvoting
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 29/09/2025 at 3:21 pm

    Awez's Journey: A Short but Emotional Ride Social media sensation and dancer Awez Darbar entered the Bigg Boss house with a lot of hopes among fans. From the very beginning, he was seen as a person who had good energy, stayed detached from unnecessary drama, and tried to maintain real relationshipsRead more

    Awez’s Journey: A Short but Emotional Ride

    Social media sensation and dancer Awez Darbar entered the Bigg Boss house with a lot of hopes among fans. From the very beginning, he was seen as a person who had good energy, stayed detached from unnecessary drama, and tried to maintain real relationships with other contestants.

    But ironically, that relaxed and cool attitude could have ultimately done him in in a reality show like Bigg Boss, where bluster, uncompromising views, and fight scenes are known to drive screen time and popularity among the public. In contrast to louder, more aggressive housemates, Awez appeared too withdrawn, “playing it safe,” or even “invisible” to segments of the audience.

    The Eviction: What Led to It?

    In eviction week, several contestants were nominated, among them people who had been involved in hot fight scenes or developed enormous fan bases during the weeks. Awez maintained himself and did not become negative, though he unfortunately never created much hype in the house.

    As a result:

    • He was given little screen time.
    • He was not involved in strong friendships or rivalry.
    • The public vote, who many of them hadn’t seen or heard much of him for quite a while now, may not have been inclined to do so at a large scale.

    In the end, the public vote is largely presence and not personality — and Awez just did not have as much of that in the competitive cutthroat arena that is Bigg Boss.

    His Exit: Graceful & Emotional

    On eviction, Awez left the house with his head held high, recounting that despite it being a brief stay, it was introspective and reflective. He said that Bigg Boss enabled him to realize a new facet of his personality and learn how perception is constantly under 24/7 watch.

    Following his eviction, he was showered with affection from other contestants and fans. Even inside the house, there were some contestants — more so Abhishek Bajaj — who were seen getting emotional about his eviction, a rare display of genuine human bonding in the otherwise cutthroat atmosphere.

    Final Thoughts

    So yes, Awez Darbar was voted out for low votes, but it does not mean he lost. In a series like Bigg Boss, where fun matters over integrity or finesse, his calming presence, emotional quotient, and positive vibes impressed — even if it failed to win the contest.

    Sometimes it is advisable to leave a reality show with dignity rather than survive at the cost of your character.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 156
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 29/09/2025In: News

Has India retained the Asia Cup 2025 title?

the Asia Cup 2025

2025asiacupcricketindiasportsnewstitledefense
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 29/09/2025 at 2:17 pm

    The Big Picture: What "retained" means When we use "retained," it implies that India had won the last edition of the Asia Cup and then proceeded to win again in 2025. Actually: India came into the 2025 Asia Cup as defending champions, having won the last edition. India beat Pakistan in the 2025 finaRead more

    The Big Picture: What “retained” means

    When we use “retained,” it implies that India had won the last edition of the Asia Cup and then proceeded to win again in 2025. Actually:

    • India came into the 2025 Asia Cup as defending champions, having won the last edition.
    • India beat Pakistan in the 2025 final and won the title again — thereby defending (retaining) their crown.

    So yes — they did hold on to it.

    The 2025 Final: Drama, Rivalry & Redemption

    The final took place on 28 September 2025 at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium in Dubai.

    Key moments & stats

    • Pakistan batted first and were bowled out for 146 in 19.1 overs.
    • India chased that down, getting to 150/5 in 19.4 overs.

    Tilak Varma was declared Man of the Match, courtesy an undefeated 69 of 53 balls.
    A match-winning 60-run stand between Varma and Shivam Dube (33) changed the dynamics after a nervous beginning.

    The game concluded in dramatic style — with two balls remaining, Rinku Singh struck the winning boundary (a four) of the tournament from his lone ball.

     Off the Field: Controversy & Political Undertones

    This was not a cricket game — politics and emotions were high.

    • India declined to receive the trophy (and winners’ medals) from Mohsin Naqvi, who is not only President of the Pakistan Cricket Board but also Interior Minister of Pakistan, and also holds the ACC (Asian Cricket Council) role.
    • The ceremony of presentation was postponed, then abbreviated, and no proper trophy handover was done in front of media in the end.
    • No handshakes between the two sides anywhere during the tournament.
    • While India’s on-field supremacy was evident, the off-field story added layers to tension.

    Legacy & Records

    • India has now won the Asia Cup nine times overall with this victory.
    • The 2025 win sees India still ahead in Asia Cup titles among all competing countries.
    • They were also unbeaten during the 2025 tournament.

    So briefly: yes, India won the Asia Cup again in 2025, defeating Pakistan in a high‑stakes, emotionally intense final. If you’d like, I can also provide you with player ratings, scorecards, or a ball‑by‑ball account—do you want me to dig that up?

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 160
  • 0
Answer
Load More Questions

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 548
  • Answers 1k
  • Posts 25
  • Best Answers 21
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • mohdanas

    Are AI video generat

    • 940 Answers
  • daniyasiddiqui

    How is prompt engine

    • 126 Answers
  • daniyasiddiqui

    “What lifestyle habi

    • 27 Answers
  • avtonovosti_ktKl
    avtonovosti_ktKl added an answer автомобильная газета [url=https://avtonovosti-3.ru/]avtonovosti-3.ru[/url] . 03/02/2026 at 12:16 pm
  • BryanBix
    BryanBix added an answer ДВС и КПП https://vavtomotor.ru автозапчасти для автомобилей с гарантией и проверенным состоянием. В наличии двигатели и коробки передач для популярных… 03/02/2026 at 11:22 am
  • throneofglasspdfBuh
    throneofglasspdfBuh added an answer The bond between a girl and her dog. Throne of Glass features a heartwarming subplot with Fleetfoot. Celaena's love for… 03/02/2026 at 11:02 am

Top Members

Trending Tags

ai aiineducation ai in education analytics artificialintelligence artificial intelligence company deep learning digital health edtech education health investing machine learning machinelearning news people tariffs technology trade policy

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help

© 2025 Qaskme. All Rights Reserved