EVs and solar panels
On the upside, tariff income puts money in local governments' pockets. Tariff income can amount to billions of dollars for countries heavily involved in trade, and that money can be allocated to infrastructure, subsidies, or some form of social program. Politically, it is a way to make "foreign busiRead more
On the upside, tariff income puts money in local governments’ pockets. Tariff income can amount to billions of dollars for countries heavily involved in trade, and that money can be allocated to infrastructure, subsidies, or some form of social program. Politically, it is a way to make “foreign businesses pay taxes” when a tariff is added.
However, that cost is usually not borne by the foreign exporter. The cost is borne by the importer, and then it is passed on throughout the chain, meaning that typically businesses and consumers are paying more. This can be an issue when thinking about the impact on inflation—food, electronics, and even raw inputs must be compensated for, which will also add to inflation (and/or costs), which ultimately reduces profits for small businesses and creates an increased cost of living for families. Frequently, inflation can negate or surpass the gain of tariff income.
So, the reality is that when the government thinks about tariff income, it is great to consider individually, but it tends to be money taken from one pocket to be put into another. The lingering question is whether or not the government is allocating the money wisely, e.g., investing in the impacted sector or providing protections to vulnerable sectors, rather than just patching a hole in their budget.
See less
On the one hand, governments claim that tariffs defend their local green industries. For instance, imposing tariffs on foreign solar panels or electric cars can provide local producers with some space for expansion, generate employment, and cut reliance on the supply chain of a single nation. In theRead more
On the one hand, governments claim that tariffs defend their local green industries. For instance, imposing tariffs on foreign solar panels or electric cars can provide local producers with some space for expansion, generate employment, and cut reliance on the supply chain of a single nation. In theory, that improves long-term resilience.
But there is a downside:
higher tariffs tend to translate into higher prices for consumers and slower deployment of clean technologies. If solar panels become more costly, fewer families or companies will install them. If EVs are more expensive, individuals delay buying gas cars longer. That pushes emissions reductions we cannot afford to delay. For developing nations in particular, where cost is everything, tariffs make sustainability even more out of reach.
So in human language, green tech tariffs can seem like a tug-of-war: save jobs here and now, or accelerate climate progress later. The actual challenge is being balanced—protecting domestic industries and making green solutions cheap enough so folks can switch.
See less