Home/News/Page 16

Qaskme Latest Questions

daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 01/09/2025In: ,

emotional intelligence ever cross the ...

aitechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    The Affects of Emotional AI When interacting with machines, concerns tend to focus on effectiveness. People want a reminder or suggestion and would like to have it provided efficiently. However, the other side of the dream would be machines responding to people in a more sensitive way, such as an AIRead more

    The Affects of Emotional AI

    When interacting with machines, concerns tend to focus on effectiveness. People want a reminder or suggestion and would like to have it provided efficiently. However, the other side of the dream would be machines responding to people in a more sensitive way, such as an AI that when a person is anxious calms them, praises when they achieve something, or for that matter, recognizes the realist of a person even when it not conscious on their part. The more complexity to this vision is the AI, would have the capacity to empathize with the person or it would be an imitation of that?

    AI Ability

    Understanding the modern AI, it is able to interpret and distinguish emotions through tone of voice, facial expression, or even the sentiment of a text. For example:

    • AI in customer service is able to identify the aggravation in a caller and as a result, the AI routes the call to a person.
    • There are chatbots who identify themselves as a therapist who, to some degree, pulls themselves out of their struggles to be able to offer consolation.
    • Companionship AI’s are able to mimic the tone that a person would use to speak to them.

    AI’s that possess such capabilities are, in a sense, able to exhibit such human abilities. However, they are an AI pattern in the sense that there is no actual emotion from the AI.

    The Difference between Mimicry and Empathy

    When it comes head to another being, the empathic ability in people is what attachment and emotional bonding is felt.

    Machines do not have feelings other than simulating them. With that being said, there is no emotional connection to “I’m sorry you are going through this,” other than a robotic response to something caring.

    The deeper question is: does the difference matter? If a person feels comforted and supported or less alone because of AI, is there no empathy being applied?

    Humans face certain risks when adopting the belief in the illusion.

    • In many aspects, emotionally intelligent AI is beneficial, such as in mental health, caring for the elderly, or in education, but the risks are worrisome:
    • Emotional dependency: AI “friends” are unable to reciprocate, which leaves users in emotional bonds that are unbalanced.
    • Exploitation: Biased decisions made by users are disguised as manipulation, which an AI utilized shopping assistant could do to users.
    • Encapsulation: Users may replace actual reality with a simulated depiction.

    It is like seeing an actor crying on stage. While their display may evoke an emotional response, we all realize at the end of the day, there is no actual suffering. With AI, there is the potential to forget all of that, which isn’t a good thing.

    Do AI have feelings is the question?

    Some scientists argue that in the more advanced evolutionary stages of AI, empathy will be exhibited when the require sentience.

    Emotions are indeed part of the human condition because they pertain to biology and life experience, and biological vulnerability is the linchpin of existence. At what level the technology is now, AI does not feel and only responds.

    But here comes the twist; if to empathize is to empathize as to effect (how one feels after an action is done) and not as to cause (why an action is expressed), then perhaps AI does not need to feel to “be sufficiently empathetic.”

    The Middle Ground: Augmented Empathy

    • Perhaps the true potential of emotional AI is not to replace human empathy, but to augment it. For example:
    • An educator using AI to understand particular concept students are struggling with.
    • A physician with AI that knows the moment to intervene, and is able to detect, and mitigate, poor prognostic chances of anxiety that may not be apparent until much later.
    • An isolated person able to connect with an AI does not dispense with the obligation to attempt to connect with others.
    • AI is not overstepping boundaries; it is facilitating the appreciation and attainment of greater levels of empathic concern.

    Final Thought

    An example of emotional intelligent AI will never “feel empathy” as human beings do, and also, no matter how convincing it will likely be. But that does not mean it has no meaning. Emotional AI, if designed in intelligent ways, may serve also as a mirror, and a bridge, and a base that enables feeling of being cared for and listened to.

    The answer is not in whether AI can feel. What may base our utopia is how we choose to apply the artificial phenomenon it emulates.

    Will it help us strengthen connections with people, or replace them and leave us lonelier?

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 01/09/2025In: ,

learn, work, and create, or just make ...

aitechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    The Future of AI Co-Pilot Modes   Consider it as a useful friend by your side. Perhaps it's an AI that deconstructs a difficult math equation into smaller steps or presents fresh approaches to writing an essay. To business executives, it could be writing an email, condensing a 50-page report, oRead more

    The Future of AI Co-Pilot Modes

     

    Consider it as a useful friend by your side. Perhaps it’s an AI that deconstructs a difficult math equation into smaller steps or presents fresh approaches to writing an essay. To business executives, it could be writing an email, condensing a 50-page report, or generating ideas for marketing campaigns. It can help an artist with painting or designing and assist in writing a tune.

    In all these situations, the co-pilot does not need to act. It liberates the mind to attend to greater things. That’s the objective: AI co-pilots liberate mental effort and time so that learning, working and creating is much simpler.


    The Threat of Over-Dependence


    But there is a catch.     The more we are dependent on AI, the less practice we will have for being able to do things on our own. If a student utilizes their co-pilot to define difficult ideas instead of trying to learn them on their own, they won’t develop academically as much as they might. If an employee always has AI generate reports rather than doing it himself, his writing ability will deteriorate. And if a creator is consistently basing themselves on AI ideas, they may lose their creative voice.

    It is not just forgetting but also trusting. Do we get so used to accepting AI’s response at face value even when it’s incorrect? If we always go to the co-pilot first and last, we lose critical thinking, curiosity and the pleasure of “doing it ourselves.”


    Finding the Middle Ground

     

    The most effective way to view AI co-pilot modes is as a helper, not a substitute. Just as the calculator did not make math obsolete and the spellcheck did not assassinate writing, co-pilots will only shift where we spend our time. The trick is to employ them well—to offload mundane tasks while retaining interest in the things that count.

    It’s not dependency, it’s balance. We must create a culture where AI is employed as an accelerator, not an autopilot. It means demonstrating how to pose better questions, scrutinize outputs, and leverage AI as a springboard for their original work.


    Human Factor


    In the end, what makes learning, working and creating meaningful is the process, not just the outcome.     Struggling through a lesson, drafting and revising an idea, or being inspired in the middle of the night are all a part of the human experience. An AI co-pilot can assist, but it cannot replace the satisfaction derived from the hard work.

    So, will these modes of learning transform us? Yes. Whether they will make us more able or more needy will depend not on the tools themselves but on how we choose to use them.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 31/08/2025In: ,

hallucinations in legal or medical co ...

health
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    So, First, What Is an "AI Hallucination"? With artificial intelligence, an "hallucination" is when a model confidently generates information that's false, fabricated, or deceptive, yet sounds entirely reasonable. For example: In the law, the model might cite a bogus court decision. In medicine, it mRead more

    So, First, What Is an “AI Hallucination”?

    With artificial intelligence, an “hallucination” is when a model confidently generates information that’s false, fabricated, or deceptive, yet sounds entirely reasonable.

    For example:

    • In the law, the model might cite a bogus court decision.
    • In medicine, it might suggest an intervention from flawed symptoms or faulty studies.

    These aren’t typos. These are errors of factual truth, and when it comes to life and liberty, they’re unacceptable.

    Why Do LLMs Hallucinate?

    LLMs aren’t databases—They don’t “know” things like us.
    They generate text by predicting what comes next, based on patterns in the data they’ve been trained on.

    So when you ask:

    “What are the key points from Smith v. Johnson, 2011?”

    If no such case exists, the LLM can:
    Create a spurious summary
    Make up quotes
    Even generate a fake citation
    Since it’s not cheating—it’s filling in the blanks based on best guess based on patterns.

     In Legal Contexts: The Hazard of Authoritative Ridiculousness

    Attorneys rely on precedent, statutes, and accurate citations. But LLMs can:

    Make up fictional cases (already occurs in real courtrooms, actually!)
    Misquote real legal text
    Get jurisdictions confused (e.g., confusing US federal and UK law)
    Apply laws out of context

    Actual-Life Scenario:

    In 2023, a New York attorney employed ChatGPT to write a brief. The AI drew on a set of fake court cases. The judge discovered—and penalized the attorney. It was an international headline and a warning story.

    Why did it occur?

    • The attorney took it on faith that the AI was trustworthy.
    • The model sounded credible.
    • No one fact-checked until it was too late.

    In Medical Settings: Even Greater Risks

    • In medicine, a hallucination could be:
    • Prescribing the wrong medication
    • Interpreting test results in an incorrect manner
    • Omitting significant side effects
    • Mentioning non-existent studies or guidelines

    Think of a model that recommends a drug interaction between two drugs that does not occur—or worse, not recommending one that does. That’s terrible, but more terrible, it’s unsafe.

    And Yet.

    LLMs can perform some medical tasks:

    Abstracting patient records

    De-jargonizing jargonese

    Generating clinical reports
    Helping medical students learn
    But these are not decision-making roles.

     How Are We Tackling Hallucinations in These Fields?

    This is how researchers, developers, and professionals are pushing back:

     Human-in-the-loop

    • There should not be a single AI system deciding in law or medicine.
    • Judgment always needs to be from experts after they have been trained.

    Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)

    • LLMs are paired with databases (libraries of legal precedents or medical publications).
    • Instead of “guessing,” the model pulls in real documents and cites them properly.

    Example: An AI lawyer program using actual Westlaw or LexisNexis material.

    Model Fine-Tuning

    • Good-quality, domain-specific data are fine-tuned over domain-specific models.
    • E.g., a medical GPT fine-tuned on only peer-reviewed journals, up-to-date clinical guidelines, etc.
    • This reduces—but doesn’t eliminate—hallucinations.

    Prompt Engineering & Chain-of-Thought

    • Asking the model to “explain its thinking” in step-by-step fashion.
    • Helps humans catch fallacies of logic or fact errors before relying on it.

     Confirmation Layers

    • Models these days come with provisions to verify their own responses against official sources.
    • Tools in certain instances identify potential hallucinations or return confidence ratings.

     Anchoring the Effect

    Come on: It is easy to take the word of the AI when it talks as if it has years of experience. Particularly when it saves time, reduces expense, and appears to “know it all.”
    That certainty is a double-edged sword.

    Think:

    • A patient notified by a chatbot that their symptoms are “nothing to worry about,” when in fact, it is an emergent symptom of a stroke.
    • A defense attorney employing AI precedent, only to have it challenged because the model made up the cases.
    • An insurance company making robo-denials based on misread policies drafted by AI.
    • They are not science fiction stories. They’re actual issues.

    So, Where Does That Leave Us?

    • LLMs are fantastic assistants—but terrible counselors if not governed in medicine or law.
    • They don’t deliberately hallucinate, but they don’t discriminate and don’t know what they don’t know.

    That is:

    • We need transparency in AI, not performance alone.
    • We need auditability, such that we can check every assertion an AI makes.
    • And we need experts to employ AI as a tool—super tool—not magic tablet.

    Closing Thought

    LLMs can do some very impressive things. But not in medicine and law. “Impressive” just isn’t sufficient there.
    And they must be demonstrable, safe, andatable as well.

    Meanwhile, consider AI to be a very good intern—smart, speedy, and never fatigued…
    But not one you’d have perform surgery on you or present a case before a judge without your close guidance.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 30/08/2025In: ,

AI-generated content

aitechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

     What Do We Mean by "Creative"? Before we put words in our mouth, let us stop and ask: what is creativity? To human beings, it is most widely understood as the fusion of imagination, feeling, and lived experience to create something new and meaningful — a poem, a painting, a song, or maybe even a scRead more

     What Do We Mean by “Creative”?

    Before we put words in our mouth, let us stop and ask: what is creativity? To human beings, it is most widely understood as the fusion of imagination, feeling, and lived experience to create something new and meaningful — a poem, a painting, a song, or maybe even a scientific discovery.

    AI-generated content, meanwhile, is based on patterns. It learns from massive amounts of existing data — books, art, music, code — and produces outputs that look fresh, but are essentially recombinations of what already exists. So the big question is: if creativity is about “newness” and “meaning,” can something built on patterns ever be considered truly creative?

     AI’s Strength in Creativity

    • In so many ways, AI does surprise us with what it produces. Consider:
    • It can produce beautiful works of art in mere seconds.
    • It can produce music that sounds eerily beautiful.
    • It can produce stories or poems that sound emotionally authentic
    • .Occasionally, AI actually creates something that would not have been created by human beings — because it can recombine inspiration from one field, or one time period, or one culture in ways we would not even have thought of attempting to do. That level of recombinability really is indistinguishable from creativity, and it is a kind of it.

    The Human Element That’s Hard to Replicate

    But that is where it varies: human imagination is not disentangled from our experiences, our feelings, and our sufferings. When the painter paints with heartbreak, when the novelist writes a novel out of loss, or when the singer sings a song out of happiness — there’s much lived reality that is impressed upon the work and gives it life.

    AI does not experience heartbreak, joy, or sadness. AI identifies patterns in images and words relating to heartbreak, joy, or sadness. It does not equate the result cannot move us, but it says that the reason behind them is different. A human makes something out of purpose; an AI makes something out of replication.

     Cooperation vs. Substitution

    Perhaps the more important question is not “Is AI creative?” but rather: “Can AI augment human creativity?” Already, many artists are employing AI as a tool — to generate ideas, overcome writer’s block, or discover what’s new and feasible. By doing so, AI is not substituting for creativity but augmenting it.

    Put it like this: when individuals learned of photography, everybody worried that photography would destroy painting. No such luck — painting changed — impressionism, surrealism, and abstract painting all emerged in part because photography was there. So too could AI make folks think differently, just because we’ll have to learn what specifically we can do.

     The Redefinition of Creativity

    Maybe our definition of what is creative is changing. If being novel and meaningful equals creativity, maybe works of art generated by AI that amuse, bring us to tears, or enrage us are, in fact, creative — despite the “artist” being a machine. Isn’t that the point of art and expression, to stir something within the masses?

    Conversely, if creativity is assumed to be uniquely human — a product of consciousness, emotion, and subjectivity — then AI is always short of being “truly” creative.

     Final Thought

    And then is content ever really creative when created by AI? The response maybe lies in the manner in which we finally define creativity. Indeed, one thing is certain: AI forces us to think differently. It reminds us that imagination is not wholly original but recombination, perspective, and expression too.

    Ultimately, perhaps the sorcery is not in AI replacing the work of human imagination, but in how human and AI can collectively generate more than is possible today. Creativity perhaps won’t be so much a question of who made it — but a question of what it does to those that view it.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 30/08/2025In: , ,

AI assistants replace traditional sea ...

aimanagementtechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

     Search Engines: The Old Reliable Traditional search engines such as Google have been our gateway to the internet for more than two decades. You type in a search, press enter, and within seconds, you have a list of links to drill down into. It's comforting, safe, and user-managed — you choose whichRead more

     Search Engines: The Old Reliable

    Traditional search engines such as Google have been our gateway to the internet for more than two decades. You type in a search, press enter, and within seconds, you have a list of links to drill down into. It’s comforting, safe, and user-managed — you choose which link to click on, which page to trust, and how far.

    But let’s be realistic: sometimes it gets too much too. We ask a straightforward question like “What is the healthiest breakfast?” and get millions of responses, scattered ads across the page, and an endless rabbit hole of conflicting views.

     AI Assistants: The Conversation Revolution

    AI assistants do change, though. Instead of being buried in pages of links, you can converse back and forth. They are able to:

    Condense complex information into plain language.

    Make responses more pertinent to your own circumstance.

    Store your choices and ideal responses as you progress.

    Even do things like purchasing tickets, sending letters, or scheduling appointments — tasks that search engines were never designed to do.

    All of this comes across much more naturally, like discussing with a clever pal who can save you from an hour of fossicking about.

     The Trust Problem

    But the issue is trust. With search engines, we have an idea of the sources — perhaps we would use a medical journal, a blog, or a news website. AI assistants cut out the list and just give you the “answer.” Conveniences perhaps, but it also raises these questions: Where did this take place? Is it accurate? Is it skewed?

    Until the sources and reasoning behind AI assistants are more transparent, people may be hesitant to solely depend on them — especially with sensitive topics like health, finances, or politics.

     Human Habits & Comfort Zones

    Human nature is yet another element. Millions of users have the habit of typing in Google and will take time to completely move to AI assistants. Just as online shopping did not destroy physical stores overnight, AI assistants will not necessarily destroy search engines overnight. Instead, the two might coexist, as people toggle between them depending on what they require:

    Need for instant summaries or help? → AI assistant.

    Massive research, fact-checking, or trolling around different perspectives? → Search engine.

    A Hybrid Future

    What we will likely end up with is some mix of both. We’re already getting it in advance: search engines are putting AI answers at the top of the list, and AI assistants are starting to cite sources and refer back to the web. There will come a time when the line between “search” and “assistant” is erased. You will just ask something, and your device will natively combine concise insights with authenticated sources for you to explore on your own.

     Last Thought

    So, will AI helpers replace traditional search engines altogether? Don’t count on it anytime soon. Rather, they will totally revolutionize the way we interact with information. Think of it as an evolution: from digging through endless links to being able to have intelligent conversations that guide us.

    Ultimately, human beings still want two things — confidence and convenience. The technology that best can balance the two will be the one we’ll accept most.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 30/08/2025In: ,

social media creating more loneliness

newstechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

     The Paradox of Feeling "Connected" but Alone Social media, in theory, was meant to unite us as a community — to connect distant locations, enable us to share our own narrative, and be less isolated. And, to some degree, it succeeds. We are able to reconnect with old friends, keep in touch with famiRead more

     The Paradox of Feeling “Connected” but Alone

    • Social media, in theory, was meant to unite us as a community — to connect distant locations, enable us to share our own narrative, and be less isolated. And, to some degree, it succeeds. We are able to reconnect with old friends, keep in touch with family members who are abroad, or connect with another human being based on an interest.
    • But the irony is this: the more time people spend swiping on endless streams, the lonelier people are getting. Why? Internet connectivity does not equate with human connection. A “like” is not a hug. A heart symbol is not a conversation in which someone is actually hearing you.
    • One of the largest culprits of loneliness on social media is the perception of perfection. We’re seeing people’s vacation shots, enjoying nice meals, or celebrating special events — and we’re in our bed at midnight swiping. We begin to wonder about the question: “Am I missing out? Why can’t my life be like theirs?”
    • With time, continuous comparison dulls self-confidence and gets individuals more apart from each other, ironically alone in the midst of interaction.

     The Erasure of Significant Conversation

    Consider it — how vacuous does most of our online communication get? A “happy birthday” ? on another person’s news feed or a two-word reply to a photo. They’re polite, but they never give the kind of closeness we have with real human touch, with shared laughter with folks around you, or even with quiet sitting together with someone in front of you.

    Face-to-face relationships are content and exposure-oriented — things that so many transitory, ephemeral electronic communications do not possess.

     Mental Health Perspective

    Social media overuse was found by researchers to be associated with more loneliness, anxiety, and depression. Ongoing beeps, fear of missing out (FOMO), and need to “stay in the know” online can drain a person and emotionally exhaust them. Instead of a sense of belongingness, it may give them a sense of “plugged in but alone.”

     But It’s Not All Bad

    • And finally, there is the advantage that can be gained. For some — particularly the lonely, the timid, or physically alone — social media is a life preserver. Support groups, Internet forums for mental illness, or simply being online in touch with old acquaintances can give them confidence. The secret is how we use them:
    • Are we participating in substantial discussions, or mere mindless scrolling?
    • Are we commenting to individuals we truly care about, or do we merely seek their approval.

    Balance

    • Social media is not required to be loneliness. The secret is balance. As an extra — not as a replacement — for human-to-human contact. Such as:
    • Call over comment: A voice or video call can be more powerful than a ” on a post.
    • Curate your feed: You have to be following individuals and accounts that inspire or motivate you, and not others that cause you to compare.
    • Moments of digital detox: Spend some time of being offline and hanging out with the folks around you in real life.
    • Social media isn’t good or bad — it’s a tool. But, just as with any tool, it is what we do with it. If we only use it as an intermediary to other human beings, then yes, it will certainly foster more loneliness. But if we use it smartly — to form genuine relationships, to communicate straight and straight and openly, and to keep in touch with others we can be intimate with too — then it will enrich our lives.
    • Ultimately, no million likes or million followers can ever equal the hollowness of not having gotten the thrill of being deeply seen and understood by the one who loves you.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 29/08/2025In: ,

 Education a globalized world

education
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

     The Emergence of Multilingualism in a Globalized World We are living in a time when borders seem shorter than ever. A kid in India can be in an online lecture with a teacher from Canada, shop online from Korea, or watch a Spanish film with subtitles—all within one day. In this world, being monolingRead more

     The Emergence of Multilingualism in a Globalized World

    We are living in a time when borders seem shorter than ever. A kid in India can be in an online lecture with a teacher from Canada, shop online from Korea, or watch a Spanish film with subtitles—all within one day. In this world, being monolingual sometimes seems like entering the global conversation with earplugs on. Multilingual education is not just a set of words on paper—it’s teaching young people how to transition between cultures, jobs, and relationships that span the world. Multilingual Children’s Cognitive Superpowers

    When children spend their childhood acquiring several languages, their brains don’t just add more words to the dictionary. They actually build stronger “mental muscles” for switching tasks, focusing in noisy environments, and resolving problems. It’s about like having a brain that has been trained for running marathons, not sprints. Even science attests that multilingualism turns back the clock for mental decline later in life—so it’s a gift that keeps on giving.

     Language as a Bridge to Empathy

    Language carries culture with it.

    Learning French is not just learning verbs—it’s learning French sensibilities, values, and ways of thinking. A child who is raised being bilingual or multilingual will learn to see the world in multiple ways. They can better connect with people from different backgrounds and feel comfortable in multiple settings. In a time when misunderstandings between cultures have the potential to ignite polarization, multilingual education helps raise a generation that naturally drifts toward understanding and comprehension. ????? Careers Without Borders

    In practical terms, the global labor market increasingly rewards those able to switch between languages. A doctor who can speak both English and Spanish in America, a businessperson fluent in Mandarin and English, or a computer programmer who can work with groups in Germany and Japan—these are the experts who thrive. Multilingual education is, in a sense, giving children a passport that can be used anywhere.

     The Digital Age and Languages

    • Others argue that because English blankets the web, multilingual education is not “necessary.” But globalization is not about eradicating languages; it’s about accepting diversity while crossing over it.
    • Entertainment, apps, and AI software are now making it easier than ever to learn multiple languages. A child today may pick up Korean from K-dramas, pick up Japanese from anime, and pick up French on Duolingo—without ever stepping into the classroom. Schooling systems simply have to ride that interest and make learning multiple languages instinctively natural and not impose it. ⚖️ Achieving Balance between Identity and Global Skills
    • For most children, multilingual learning is not just about acquiring a world language like English—it’s also about preserving their native tongue.
    • In fact, studies confirm that children with a strong foundation in their mother language learn second or third languages more easily. So, multilingual education is not a matter of exchanging cultural heritage for “global English”—it’s a matter of providing children with the best of two worlds: pride in where they come from and the ability to communicate globally. ???? Human Takeaway
    • Finally, multilingual education is not merely about grammar drills but about the production of world citizens. Children who think, feel, and relate in more than one language will approach the future with a competitive advantage not just in the marketplace, but also in relationships, empathy, and creativity.
    • So yes—multilingual education is becoming the norm, not as an add-on or a luxury item, but as the key to success in a world where the next great opportunity—or friendship—might be in another language.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 28/08/2025In: ,

economy empowering workers or exploit

companynews
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

     The Promise of Empowerment At its best, the gig economy offers something traditional employment does not: independence. Workers get to choose their schedule, choose which work is best for them, and avoid strictures. For a working mom trying to balance parenting, or a college student trying to hustlRead more

     The Promise of Empowerment

    At its best, the gig economy offers something traditional employment does not: independence. Workers get to choose their schedule, choose which work is best for them, and avoid strictures. For a working mom trying to balance parenting, or a college student trying to hustle along with classes, that autonomy is liberty. Others use gig work as a stepping stone—to build a portfolio, try out being an entrepreneur, or supplement income without taking on a second job.

    There is also the psychological empowerment of being “your own boss.” Even as the platform imposes a lot of the structure, the decision-making on a day-to-day basis—whether to toil, how much to toil—belongs to the worker. That is extremely motivating for some and provides a feeling of control missing in the ancient nine-to-five.

     The Reality of Exploitation

    But here’s the other side: empowerment without security can be exploitation. Gig workers typically have little protections—health coverage, paid leave, job protection, or even a minimum wage guarantee. A driver may be logged on for 10 hours but earn only a fraction of what a traditional worker would because the wait time in between gigs is unpaid.

    Furthermore, the platforms are the ones that set the rules. Algorithms decide who gets the best gigs, how much employees are paid, and if they can even remain on the platform at all. Employees normally have little say in these terms, so the idea of “independence” rings hollow. An absence of transparency in pay schemes and sudden policy changes can leave gig workers vulnerable, often getting stuck in some kind of endless cycle of chasing the next small payoff.

     A Middle Way Coming?

    Globally, governments and the courts are starting to struggle with this balance. A few countries are recasting gig workers as employees, granting them protections but retaining flexibility. Others are calling for a new category of worker—somewhere between contractor and employee—more commensurate with this new reality.

    At the same time, workers are also organizing. From the delivery riders in Europe to the ride-share drivers in India, collective voices are being raised. These movements are re-writing the narrative: gig work does not have to be exploitative if there are reasonable rules and protections.

     The Human Layer

    At a human level, it is simply this: gig economy can empower or exploit depending on context. For someone who would choose it as an addition to other forms of support, it might feel empowering. But for someone who is reliant on it as the sole source of support, a lack of protections might feel suffocating. The “freedom” it offers can easily descend into precarity.

    In other words, the gig economy is a bit of a double-edged sword: convenient and agile, but lethal if not shielded. What workers, politicians, and platforms do over the next few years will determine whether it is a passport to freedom or a below-the-radar regime of exploitation.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 27/08/2025In: , ,

traditional banking systems

companynews
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    What's Behind the Frenzy for Cryptocurrencies? At its core, cryptocurrencies are a new idea: money that doesn't belong to governments, central banks, or large financial institutions. It's peer-to-peer, digital, worldwide, and decentralized. To others, this isn't technology—it's a philosophy of freedRead more

    What’s Behind the Frenzy for Cryptocurrencies?

    • At its core, cryptocurrencies are a new idea: money that doesn’t belong to governments, central banks, or large financial institutions. It’s peer-to-peer, digital, worldwide, and decentralized. To others, this isn’t technology—it’s a philosophy of freedom in finance.
    • People who live in corrupt regimes or hyperinflationary countries see cryptocurrency as a lifeline. For instance, in Venezuela or Zimbabwe, Bitcoin has sometimes been more stable than the local currency. It enables people to keep value, send remittances, or receive payment without having to resort to unstable or predatory financial systems.
    • Then there are the unbanked—some 1.4 billion people around the world who have no access to a bank account. For these, all you need is a smartphone and an internet connection, and voilà, crypto is a ticket to the global economy.
    • So, yes, the idea of crypto as a banker’s replacement is tuned to an actual desire for more just, transparent, and equitable financial systems.

    But Let’s Not Oversimplify Things

    • When people ask if crypto can “replace” traditional banking, we must be realistic as to what that entails. Banks are not simply repositories of money. They give credit, facilitate trade, administer credit, invest in public works, and even stabilize economies during financial crises. They’re deeply embedded with governments and play a massive role in operating national and world economies.
    • So, to “replace” traditional banks, crypto networks would need to provide all of those services reliably, safely, and at scale. That’s an awful tall order.
    • Today, the majority of crypto platforms are teenagers. Sure, they’re incredibly innovative, but they have some serious issues:
    • Volatility: Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are notoriously volatile. Their prices go wildly up and down in a single day, making them unsuitable for everyday transactions or savings.
    • Scalability: Ethereum-type networks are grapple with scaling but still grapple with high costs and slow processing during congestion.
    • Security: Hacks, scams, and fraud are the norm in crypto-land. Billions lost. With no central authority, if your wallet gets hacked, nobody to call.
    • Regulation: Governments do not do nothing. Many of them are shutting down crypto because of fear of money laundering, tax evasion, and economic instability. In others, crypto is flat out illegal.
    • User Experience: The everyday user still finds crypto intimidating. Private keys, gas fees, wallets—it’s not as easy to use as tapping a credit card or tapping a banking app.
    • So while crypto is exciting, it’s far from being able to fully replace the deeply integrated infrastructure of traditional finance.

    A More Realistic Future: Coexistence, Not Replacement

    • Instead of a full-on replacement, a more realistic vision is integration and coexistence. We’re already seeing this happen:
    • Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): Many governments are exploring or developing digital currencies that use blockchain-inspired tech but remain under central control.
    • Stablecoins: Stablecoins are stable assets-pegged cryptocurrencies (e.g., the US dollar) and are attempting to bridge the gap between fiat and crypto. They’re being used in remittances, cross-border commerce, and even savings apps.
    • Decentralized Finance (DeFi): This is an area in crypto that’s trying to mirror banking services—like lending and borrowing—on the blockchain. It’s still experimental, but it shows how mainstream functions might differ in decentralized versions.
    • Traditional Banks Playing Catch-Up: Big banks already offer crypto services. JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, et al are dipping their toes in the water with cryptos, meaning that rather than fighting crypto, they’re trying to find ways to work with it.

    So, Can Crypto Replace Banks?

    • If you’re asking yourself whether crypto will make banks obsolete in the next 5, 10, or 20 years—honestly, it doesn’t appear likely.
    • But are you wondering whether crypto will change the world of money, induce banks to change their stripes, and give individuals access to new forms of storing and moving funds—absolutely yes. That’s already happening.
    • No more than email didn’t kill physical mail but completely altered how we communicated, crypto is not going to kill banks—but is already reshaping the face of finance and who has access to it.

    The Human Side of the Story

    • Finance, in the end, is not code and figures—it’s stability, trust, and access. It’s about an individual being able to put aside money for his child to study, to buy his first house, or send remittances to distant family members.
    • It may come through a branch of a local bank or a wallet on your mobile based on blockchain, but the intent remains the same: make individuals financially enabled.
    • Perhaps then the real promise of cryptocurrencies is not about toppling the traditional banking establishment—but in changing it, making it more democratic, more efficient, and responsive to everyone.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 27/08/2025In: , ,

politics than trade balance

companynews
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    Tariffs: From Economics to Politics Tariffs, in themselves, are relatively straightforward: they're levies on imports. Governments have employed them for centuries to defend domestic industry, balance trade books, or gain revenue. But now, in the modern age, tariffs are something entirely different—Read more

    Tariffs: From Economics to Politics

    Tariffs, in themselves, are relatively straightforward: they’re levies on imports. Governments have employed them for centuries to defend domestic industry, balance trade books, or gain revenue. But now, in the modern age, tariffs are something entirely different—they’re political statements and economic actions.

    If a country imposes tariffs on another country, it’s not just about moving numbers around on a trade sheet. It’s about sending a message: “We’re standing up for our workers, we’re making America great again, we won’t be pushed around.” That is why tariffs are likely to appear first in impassioned political speeches and then perhaps an economics textbook.

     Why Politicians Love Tariffs

    • Simplicity: Tariffs are easy to explain to voters. It’s much simpler to say, “We’re protecting our steelworkers by taxing foreign steel” than to explain the complexities of global supply chains.
    • Symbolism: They make leaders look tough. Tariffs say, “We’re fighting back against unfair trade,” even if the economic reality is more nuanced.
    • Short-term wins: Tariffs can boost certain industries or regions in the short run—important in an election year.
    • So even if economists argue about whether tariffs actually cure trade deficits, politicians employ them because they feel good.

     Real-World Examples

    • The U.S.–China trade war: Tariffs were less about balanced imports and exports. They were about controlling technology, national pride, and showing political muscle.
    • Tariffs on green technologies: Politicians typically justify them on economic terms, but they’re also motivated by domestic politics—courting local manufacturers, protecting jobs, or showing gravitas in relation to national security.
    • Election cycles: Tariffs often spike in election years, because they’re an easy way to show voters: “I’m fighting for you.”

    The Human Cost

    • Here’s the irony: while tariffs are sold as protecting workers, the everyday impact often lands on regular people.
    • Foreign products become pricier—be it phones, cars, or greens.
    • Other nations retaliate through tariffs, penalizing local farmers and exporters.
    • Small and medium enterprises that are dependent on international supply chains suffer the most.
    • So tariffs may be great in politics but can boomerang economically against the very people whom they’re intended to help.

    Trade Balance vs. Politics: What’s Winning?

    • The bad news is that politics is winning.
    • Trade deficits are driven by enormous forces such as consumer appetite, international supply chains, and exchange rates—tariffs tend not to “fix” them by themselves.
    • But as instruments of politics, tariffs are potent symbols of potency, sovereignty, and strength.
    • That is why governments continue to return to them, even when economists advise them they do not always work.

     Briefly: tariffs now are less to equalize trade and more to equalize narratives—the narrative that leaders spin for their citizens on behalf of whom they’re fighting and against whom they’re fighting back. For citizens, the fight is to see beyond slogans and demand: Is this about developing the economy—or merely to grab political advantage?

    See less
Load More Questions