trade, tariffs, regulation) impact ma ...
The backdrop: From rebound to euphoria Post-pandemic and resultant aggressive increase in interest rates, the general assumption was that global equities would be flat or lower. But something strange happened: markets roared back. The rebound was because of a variety of reasons: Relief in inflationRead more
The backdrop: From rebound to euphoria
Post-pandemic and resultant aggressive increase in interest rates, the general assumption was that global equities would be flat or lower. But something strange happened: markets roared back.
The rebound was because of a variety of reasons:
- Relief in inflation brought optimism to investors that at last, central banks will cut interest rates.
- The AI, green energy, and automation technology boom created a wave of excitement — and returns.
- Corporate bottom lines, although spotty, rode out the crisis better than expected.
And hence, benchmark indices like the S&P 500, NASDAQ, and Nifty 50 continued to touch record highs. This bull market, though, raised a very relevant question — are valuations reasonable or is it mania?
The valuation puzzle: Price vs. earnings
The traditional way of ascertaining whether shares are expensive is the price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple — roughly, the price that investors are willing to pay for every rupee (or dollar) of earnings in enterprise.
- Two or three generations ago, the American market was around 16–18x earnings. Now it’s somewhere around 22–25x, thanks mostly to the mega-cap technology giants.
- India’s Nifty 50 is also above its long-term average, with some of the hot sectors trading at 30x and higher.
Not always a bubble — but definitely investors are paying a premium for growth in the future. If earnings are not growing fast enough to justify these prices, there come rough corrections.
The AI and tech bubble: Speculation or innovation?
Just like the late 1990s dot-com bubble, the present AI boom too has two sides.
One side is that progress in generative AI, semiconductors, robotics, and cloud computing is real and revolutionary. Players like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Alphabet are getting true returns on their AI wager, not investment.
But simultaneously, AI is used as a buzzword dumped onto virtually every IPO, venture capital company, and startup. Various money-losing or just slightly profitable companies are watching their shares soar merely for describing themselves as “AI-powered.” That is the kind of speculative frenzy that is a market froth indicator — a red flag, a tried-and-true canary in a coal mine warning signal.
Beyond tech: Where valuations are stretching
It’s not only technology. Defensive sectors like consumer staples and health care are being fairly well valued, in part because investors are rotating into “safe growth” areas. Financials and real estate, in turn, are fairly more modestly valued, in keeping with less aggressive growth expectations.
The global rally has also taken small and mid-cap stocks well above historical norms. These are the ones that correct most severely when sentiment turns, so warning investors to stay disciplined.
Too high” does not equal “immediate crash”
Remember, high doesn’t always mean overvalued, and overvalued far from means bubble bursting is imminent.
A model bubble forms when:
- Prices rise way out of fundamental value,
- Investors buy on emotion and momentum, not profit,
- And nobody takes credit for prices falling.
The market isn’t squarely in that box — even though there are definitely enclaves of excess. Plenty of investors are optimistically hopeless, but not mindlessly euphoric. There is still healthy skepticism, which paradoxically keeps everything from being an outright bubble.
Global context: Diverging realities
Geographies tell different stories:
- U.S. markets are swayed by “the magnificent seven” technology companies, and hence indices are richer than otherwise.
- Europe valuations are decent, underpinned by slowing growth as well as fading overheating risk.
- India saw robust flows after domestic consumption, but valuations of midcaps and smallcaps are a concern.
- Emerging markets in broad are a mixed bag — some are reasonably priced, while others look stretched by spec flows.
The bottom line
So, are we in a bubble? — not yet, but the air feels thinner.
Stocks are not overvalued anywhere, but investors are paying premiums for growth and stability, especially in industries linked to AI, clean energy, and digitalization.
The key question isn’t whether valuations are high — they clearly are — but whether the underlying earnings can catch up. If corporate profits continue to expand and inflation stays moderate, markets can grow into these prices. But if earnings disappoint or economic conditions tighten again, a sharp correction is very possible.
In short
- We’re in an optimism phase, not pure mania — yet.
keen investors still exist, but cautiously, diversified, and with close monitoring of fundamentals.
See less
1) How trade policy and tariffs hit markets (the mechanics) Tariffs are effectively a tax on imports. They raise input costs for companies that rely on foreign components, reduce demand for exported goods, and change profit margins and pricing power. That translates into lower corporate earnings forRead more
1) How trade policy and tariffs hit markets (the mechanics)
Tariffs are effectively a tax on imports. They raise input costs for companies that rely on foreign components, reduce demand for exported goods, and change profit margins and pricing power. That translates into lower corporate earnings for affected firms and higher inflation for consumers — both of which move stocks, bonds and currencies. Research and market commentary over 2024–2025 show tariff announcements often trigger immediate volatility and can have persistent effects through supply-chain reconfiguration.
Concrete, recent example: luxury carmaker Aston Martin warned investors about profit damage caused by U.S. tariffs and supply disruptions — a direct company-level example of how trade policy flows into earnings and investor sentiment.
2) Supply chains rewire — and that changes sector winners and losers
When tariffs or export controls make sourcing from a particular country riskier or more expensive, firms shift suppliers, move factories, or redesign products. That raises near-term costs and capex but can create long-term winners (regional manufacturing hubs, local suppliers) and losers (low-margin global suppliers). Multiple studies and industry analyses in 2025 point to reduced supply-chain resilience and a sustained trend toward “friend-shoring” or regionalization. Expect higher costs for some goods, longer lead times, and more concentrated investment in safer supplier relationships.
Real-world effect: China rerouting apparel exports to the EU after U.S. tariff pressure shows how trade policy creates shifting competitive pressures across regions — which can depress margins in incumbents and boost exporters who gain new market share.
3) Regulation and export controls: the slow bleed into valuations
Beyond tariffs, export controls (semiconductors, AI chips, dual-use tech) and stricter regulatory requirements (data rules, forced-labor audits, environmental rules) can deny companies access to markets or inputs. That not only affects near-term revenue but can shorten the addressable market for entire industries — and markets price that risk differently across sectors. Policy uncertainty also raises the “risk premium” investors demand, pushing down valuations for exposed firms.
Recent policy moves and commentary from big asset managers show rising concern that trade policy and regulation will add another layer of uncertainty to corporate planning.
4) Geopolitical conflict → spikes in commodity prices and risk premia
Wars, sanctions and blockades quickly affect commodity markets (oil, gas, wheat) and shipping routes. Higher energy or food prices raise headline inflation, which can force central banks into a tighter stance and hurt risk assets globally. Research and risk briefings through 2025 emphasize that geopolitical conflicts are a material channel for higher volatility and inflation surprises.
5) Capital flows, currencies, and the “safe haven” effect
Trade and geopolitical risks shift capital flows. Investors flee perceived risky markets into safe-haven assets (U.S. Treasuries, gold, USD), which strengthens those assets and weakens the currencies/markets under stress. That can worsen local inflation (import bill rises) and complicate central bank decisions, amplifying market moves. Large institutional research shows this pattern repeated whenever trade or political shocks arrive.
6) Market-level consequences (what you actually see in portfolios)
Higher volatility: Tariff announcements, sanctions, and headlines cause fast intraday swings and episodic selloffs.
Sector dispersion: Some sectors (defense, domestic-oriented firms, local suppliers, commodity producers) can outperform; others (exporters dependent on affected markets, global supply chain captives) underperform.
Valuation repricing: Riskier future cash flows and higher costs raise discount rates and compress multiples for exposed firms.
Longer-term structural shifts: Re-onshoring, higher capex in automation, and new regional trade corridors change which countries and companies win over a decade.
Support for these points can be seen in market reactions and asset manager research through 2025, which repeatedly highlight volatility and sectoral winners/losers tied to trade and geopolitical moves.
7) A few practical examples investors can recognize
Autos & manufacturing: Tariffs on cars raise production costs for firms without local plants (Aston Martin example). Expect regions with local production to do relatively better.
Textiles & retail: Shifts in trade policy can redirect flows (China → EU) and pressure local producers through price competition.
Semiconductors & advanced tech: Export controls fragment supply and markets; chipmakers with diverse supply chains or local fabs get a premium.
8) How big is the macroeconomic damage likely to be?
Tariffs are rarely “free” — they raise costs for consumers and firms. Central bank and academic assessments since 2018 show measurable hits to growth, distortions in investment, and higher inflation when tariffs are large or widespread. That said, markets sometimes “shrug” at tariffs when investors believe the measures will be temporary or politically constrained; the final economic damage depends on duration, scale and retaliation. Recent Fed/Richmond Fed analysis and major asset manager writeups lay out this tradeoff.
9) What to do as an investor (practical, human advice)
Expect higher volatility and position accordingly: size positions so a headline doesn’t blow up your portfolio.
Diversify across regions and supply-chain exposure: don’t have all manufacturing exposure in a single country that could be targeted by tariffs.
Prefer high-quality balance sheets: firms with pricing power and low leverage can absorb cost shocks.
Seek “resilience” winners: local suppliers, automation/robotics firms, infrastructure and energy producers can gain from re-shoring and higher capex.
Consider hedges: commodity exposure (energy, agriculture), FX hedges, and defensive assets can blunt shocks.
Stay nimble and follow policy closely: a single policy announcement can reset expectations — so treat geopolitical risk as an active risk-management item, not a one-time event.
Think scenario-wise, not prediction-wise: build best/worst/likely cases and size investments for the scenario mix rather than relying on a single forecast.
10) Bottom line — what to watch next
Tariff and export-control announcements from large economies (U.S., EU, China) — they can immediately reprice risk.
Supply-chain re-routing and capex plans from big manufacturers (who they will near-shore to).
Commodity price moves tied to geopolitical flashpoints — energy and grain markets are especially important.
Regulatory enforcement (forced-labor rules, data/localization, AI controls) that can shrink addressable markets for certain firms.
Final human note
Geopolitics and trade policy don’t just change numbers — they change plans: where companies build factories, what products they sell, and how investors price future cash flows. That makes markets livelier and more complicated, but also creates opportunity for disciplined investors who can separate short-term headlines from long-term structural winners.
See less