AI tools that help students learn ver ...
Why Old-Fashioned Tests Come Up Short Assignments and tests were built on the model of recall for years: reciting definitions, remembering dates from history, calculating standard math problems. These were easy to grade and standardize. But the danger is self-evident: a pupil can memorize just enougRead more
Why Old-Fashioned Tests Come Up Short
Assignments and tests were built on the model of recall for years: reciting definitions, remembering dates from history, calculating standard math problems. These were easy to grade and standardize. But the danger is self-evident: a pupil can memorize just enough to get through a test but exit without true understanding. Worse, they can “forget” everything in weeks.
If we only measure what can be memorized, we are likely to reward short-term cramming instead of lifelong learning. And with all the AI around us, remembering is no longer the key skill.
What Deeper Learning Looks Like
Deeper learning is *transfer*—the capacity to apply knowledge to *new, unfamiliar* contexts. It takes the form of:
- Critical thinking: Asking “why,” examining sources, challenging assumptions.
- Creativity: Coming up with new ideas, seeing connections between subjects.
- Problem-solving: Applying concepts in creative ways to understand actual situations.
- Collaboration: Standing on one another’s shoulders, figuring out meaning collaboratively.
- Self-reflection: Knowing one’s own strengths, weaknesses, and areas of improvement.
The question is: how do we measure these?
1. Open-Ended Performance Tasks
Rather than multiple-choice, give students messy problems with no single best solution.
- Example: Replace “What caused the French Revolution?” with “If you were a political leader in 1789, what reforms would you suggest to avoid revolution, and why?
In this way, the student is asked to synthesize information, reconcile perspectives, and justify choices—thinking, not recalling.
2. Portfolios & Iterative Work
One essay illustrates a final product, but not the learning process. Portfolios allow students to illustrate drafts, revisions, reflections, and growth.
- Example: A student of art submits sketches, experiments, mistakes, and complete pieces with notes on what they learned along the way.
This is all about process, not perfection—of crucial importance to creativity.
3. Real-World, Applied Assessments
Inject reality into assessment.
- Science: Instead of memorizing the water cycle, students develop a community plan to reduce waste of water.
- Business: Instead of solving abstract formulas in school, students pitch a mini start-up idea, budget, marketing, and ethical limitations.
These exercises reveal whether students can translate theory into practice.
4. Socratic Seminars & Oral Defenses
When students explain their thought process verbally and respond to questions, it reflects depth of understanding.
- Example: Following in a research paper, the student has 10 minutes of Q&A with peers or teacher.
If they can hold their ground in defending their argument, adapt when challenged, and expound under fire, it is a sign of actual mastery.
5 Reflection & Metacognition
Asking students to reflect on their own learning makes them more self-aware thinkers.
Example questions:
- “What area of this project challenged you most, and how did you cope?”
- “If you were to begin again, what would you do differently?”
This is not right or wrong—it’s developing self-knowledge, a critical lock to lifelong learning.
6. Collaborative & Peer Assessment
Learning is a social process. Permitting students to evaluate or draw on each other’s work reveals how they think in dialogue.
- Example: In a group project, each student writes a short memo on their piece and how they wove others’ ideas together.
Collaboration skills are harder to fake, but critically necessary for work and civic life.
The Human Side
Assessing deeper learning is more time-consuming, labor-intensive, and occasionally subjective. It’s not just a matter of grading a multiple-choice test. But it also respects students as human beings, rather than test-takers.
It tells students:
- We value your thoughts, not just your recall.
- Mistakes and revisions are part of the process of getting better.
- Your own opinion matters.
This makes testing less of a trap and more of an honest reflection of real learning.
Last Reflection
While recall tests shout, “What do you know?”, deeper tests whisper, “What can you do with what you know?” That’s all the difference in an AI age. Machines can recall facts instantly—but only humans can balance ethics, see futures, design relationships, and make sense.
The future of assessment has to be less about efficiency and more about authenticity. Because what’s on the line is not grades—it’s preparing students for a chaotic, uncertain world.
See less
The Double-Edged Sword of AI in Education AI in the classroom feels very much like providing every student with his or her own personal tutor—except that it also, when abused, will simply provide the answers. On the positive side, these technologies can unleash personalized learning, provide immediaRead more
The Double-Edged Sword of AI in Education
AI in the classroom feels very much like providing every student with his or her own personal tutor—except that it also, when abused, will simply provide the answers. On the positive side, these technologies can unleash personalized learning, provide immediate feedback, and even allow students to master difficult concepts in ways that even the best teachers cannot. On the other hand, they create prima facie concerns: students could forego the thought process altogether and use AI-provided answers, or incorporate them to plagiarize essays and assignments.
The equilibrium schools must find isn’t one of prohibiting AI and the other of opening the arms to it—it’s one of regulating how it’s employed.
Changing the Mindset from “Cheating” to “Learning Aid”
Consider the calculators in mathematics education. When they first emerged, educators feared they would kill students’ ability to perform arithmetic. Now, we don’t debate whether or not to ban calculators—instead, we instruct on how and when to use them. The same philosophy should be applied to AI. If students are educated to know that AI isn’t there to get the job done for them but to better comprehend, it’s less about shortcuts and more about building skill.
Teaching AI Literacy Alongside Subject Knowledge
One practical solution is to actually teach students how AI works, where it’s strong, and where it fails. By learning to question AI outputs, students develop both digital literacy and critical thinking. For example:
This manner, AI becomes integral to the lesson instead of an exploit.
Assessment Must Adapt
Another wake-up call: if we continue to rely on standard homework essays or take-home tests as the primary tools for assessment, AI will forever be an invitation. Schools may need to reinvent assessments to place greater emphasis on:
It doesn’t mean homework vanishes—it just means we reimagine what we have students work on at home versus in class.
Teachers as Guides, Not Gatekeepers
The teacher’s role becomes less policing and more mentoring. A teacher could say: “Yes, you can use AI to come up with ideas for your essay—but you have to let me see your process, tell me why you accepted or discarded some of the suggestions, and you have to contribute your own original ideas.” That openness makes it less easy for students to cheat behind AI but still enables them to take advantage of it.
Preparing Students for the Real World
Maybe the best reason to include AI responsibly is that, outside school, AI will permeate everywhere—offices, labs, creative sectors, even daily life. Schools owe it to their students not to protect them from AI, but to prepare them to employ it morally and efficiently. That involves teaching boundaries: when it’s acceptable to rely on AI (such as summarizing complex text), and when it stifles development (such as copying an entire essay).
The Human Core Still Matters
Fundamentally, education is not just about obtaining the “right answer.” It’s about cultivating curiosity, grit, and independent thought. AI is a mighty tool, but it must never substitute for human qualities. The challenge—and opportunity—of this moment is to make AI an enabling partner, not a crutch.
Briefly: Balance is integration with purpose. Rather than dreading AI as learning’s enemy, schools can make it an ally in teaching, and reshape tests and expectations so that learners continue to develop their own voices and thinking skills.
See less