Home/Technology/Page 3

Qaskme Latest Questions

daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 25/11/2025In:

multimodal LLMs replace traditional c ...

ai trendscomputer visiondeep learningmodel comparisonmultimodal llmsyolo / cnn / segmentation
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. The Core Shift: From Narrow Vision Models to General-Purpose Perception Models For most of the past decade, computer vision relied on highly specialized architectures: CNNs for classification YOLO/SSD/DETR for object detection U-Net/Mask R-CNN for segmentation RAFT/FlowNet for optical flow Swin/VRead more

    1. The Core Shift: From Narrow Vision Models to General-Purpose Perception Models

    For most of the past decade, computer vision relied on highly specialized architectures:

    • CNNs for classification

    • YOLO/SSD/DETR for object detection

    • U-Net/Mask R-CNN for segmentation

    • RAFT/FlowNet for optical flow

    • Swin/ViT variants for advanced features

    These systems solved one thing extremely well.

    But modern multimodal LLMs like GPT-5, Gemini Ultra, Claude 3.7, Llama 4-Vision, Qwen-VL, and research models such as V-Jepa or MM1 are trained on massive corpora of images, videos, text, and sometimes audio—giving them a much broader understanding of the world.

    This changes the game.

    Not because they “see” better than vision models, but because they “understand” more.

    2. Why Multimodal LLMs Are Gaining Ground

    A. They excel at reasoning, not just perceiving

    Traditional CV models tell you:

    • What object is present

    • Where it is located

    • What mask or box surrounds it

    But multimodal LLMs can tell you:

    • What the object means in context

    • How it might behave

    • What action you should take

    • Why something is occurring

    For example:

    A CNN can tell you:

    • “Person holding a bottle.”

    A multimodal LLM can add:

    • “The person is holding a medical vial, likely preparing for an injection.”

    This jump from perception to interpretation is where multimodal LLMs dominate.

    B. They unify multiple tasks that previously required separate models

    Instead of:

    • One model for detection

    • One for segmentation

    • One for OCR

    • One for visual QA

    • One for captioning

    • One for policy generation

    A modern multimodal LLM can perform all of them in a single forward pass.

    This drastically simplifies pipelines.

    C. They are easier to integrate into real applications

    Developers prefer:

    • natural language prompts

    • API-based workflows

    • agent-style reasoning

    • tool calls

    • chain-of-thought explanations

    Vision specialists will still train CNNs, but a product team shipping an app prefers something that “just works.”

    3. But Here’s the Catch: Traditional Computer Vision Isn’t Going Away

    There are several areas where classic CV still outperforms:

    A. Speed and latency

    YOLO can run at 100 300 FPS on 1080p video.

    Multimodal LLMs cannot match that for real-time tasks like:

    • autonomous driving

    • CCTV analytics

    • high-frequency manufacturing

    • robotics motion control

    • mobile deployment on low-power devices

    Traditional models are small, optimized, and hardware-friendly.

    B. Deterministic behavior

    Enterprise-grade use cases still require:

    • strict reproducibility

    • guaranteed accuracy thresholds

    • deterministic outputs

    Multimodal LLMs, although improving, still have some stochastic variation.

    C. Resource constraints

    LLMs require:

    • more VRAM

    • more compute

    • slower inference

    • advanced hardware (GPUs, TPUs, NPUs)

    Whereas CNNs run well on:

    • edge devices

    • microcontrollers

    • drones

    • embedded hardware

    • phones with NPUs

    D. Tasks requiring pixel-level precision

    For fine-grained tasks like:

    • medical image segmentation

    • surgical navigation

    • industrial defect detection

    • satellite imagery analysis

    • biomedical microscopy

    • radiology

    U-Net and specialized segmentation models still dominate in accuracy.

    LLMs are improving, but not at that deterministic pixel-wise granularity.

    4. The Future: A Hybrid Vision Stack

    What we’re likely to see is neither replacement nor coexistence, but fusion:

    A. Specialized vision model → LLM reasoning layer

    This is already common:

    • DETR/YOLO extracts objects

    • A vision encoder sends embeddings to the LLM

    • The LLM performs interpretation, planning, or decision-making

    This solves both latency and reasoning challenges.

    B. LLMs orchestrating traditional CV tools

    An AI agent might:

    1. Call YOLO for detection

    2. Call U-Net for segmentation

    3. Use OCR for text extraction

    4. Then integrate everything to produce a final reasoning outcome

    This orchestration is where multimodality shines.

    C. Vision engines inside LLMs become good enough for 80% of use cases

    For many consumer and enterprise applications, “good enough + reasoning” beats “pixel-perfect but narrow.”

    Examples where LLMs will dominate:

    • retail visual search

    • AR/VR understanding

    • document analysis

    • e-commerce product tagging

    • insurance claims

    • content moderation

    • image explanation for blind users

    • multimodal chatbots

    In these cases, the value is understanding, not precision.

    5. So Will Multimodal LLMs Replace Traditional CV?

    Yes for understanding-driven tasks.

    • Where interpretation, reasoning, dialogue, and context matter, multimodal LLMs will replace many legacy CV pipelines.

    No for real-time and precision-critical tasks.

    • Where speed, determinism, and pixel-level accuracy matter, traditional CV will remain essential.

    Most realistically they will combine.

    A hybrid model stack where:

    • CNNs do the seeing

    • LLMs do the thinking

    This is the direction nearly every major AI lab is taking.

    6. The Bottom Line

    • Traditional computer vision is not disappearing it’s being absorbed.

    The future is not “LLM vs CV” but:

    • Vision models + LLMs + multimodal reasoning ≈ the next generation of perception AI.
    • The change is less about replacing models and more about transforming workflows.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 23/11/2025In:

l AI agents reshape daily digital wor ...

agentic-systemsai-agentsdigital-productivityhuman-ai collaborationworkflow-automation
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. From “Do-it-yourself” to “Done-for-you” Workflows Today, we switch between: emails dashboards spreadsheets tools browsers documents APIs notifications It’s tiring mental juggling. AI agents promise something simpler: “Tell me what the outcome should be I’ll do the steps.” This is the shift from mRead more

    1. From “Do-it-yourself” to “Done-for-you” Workflows

    Today, we switch between:

    • emails

    • dashboards

    • spreadsheets

    • tools

    • browsers

    • documents

    • APIs

    • notifications

    It’s tiring mental juggling.

    AI agents promise something simpler:

    • “Tell me what the outcome should be I’ll do the steps.”

    This is the shift from

    manual workflows → autonomous workflows.

    For example:

    • Instead of logging into dashboards → you ask the agent for the final report.

    • Instead of searching emails → the agent summarizes and drafts responses.

    • Instead of checking 10 systems → the agent surfaces only the important tasks.

    Work becomes “intent-based,” not “click-based.”

    2. Email, Messaging & Communication Will Feel Automated

    Most white-collar jobs involve communication fatigue.

    AI agents will:

    • read your inbox

    • classify messages

    • prepare responses

    • translate tone

    • escalate urgent items

    • summarize long threads

    • schedule meetings

    • notify you of key changes

    And they’ll do this in the background, not just when prompted.

    Imagine waking up to:

    • “Here are the important emails you must act on.”

    • “I already drafted replies for 12 routine messages.”

    • “I scheduled your 3 meetings based on everyone’s availability.”

    No more drowning in communication.

     3. AI Agents Will Become Your Personal Project Managers

    Project management is full of:

    • reminders

    • updates

    • follow-ups

    • ticket creation

    • documentation

    • status checks

    • resource tracking

    AI agents are ideal for this.

    They can:

    • auto-update task boards

    • notify team members

    • detect delays

    • raise risks

    • generate progress summaries

    • build dashboards

    • even attend meetings on your behalf

    The mundane operational “glue work” disappears humans do the creative thinking, agents handle the logistics.

     4. Dashboards & Analytics Will Become “Conversations,” Not Interfaces

    Today you open a dashboard → filter → slice → export → interpret → report.

    In future:

    You simply ask the agent.

    • “Why are sales down this week?”
    • “Is our churn higher than usual?”
    • “Show me hospitals with high patient load in Punjab.”
    • “Prepare a presentation on this month’s performance.”

    Agents will:

    • query databases

    • analyze trends

    • fetch visuals

    • generate insights

    • detect anomalies

    • provide real explanations

    No dashboards. No SQL.

    Just intention → insight.

     5. Software Navigation Will Be Handled by the Agent, Not You

    Instead of learning every UI, every form, every menu…

    You talk to the agent:

    • “Upload this contract to DocuSign and send it to John.”

    • “Pull yesterday’s support tickets and group them by priority.”

    • “Reconcile these payments in the finance dashboard.”

    The agent:

    • clicks

    • fills forms

    • searches

    • uploads

    • retrieves

    • validates

    • submits

    All silently in the background.

    Software becomes invisible.

    6. Agents Will Collaborate With Each Other, Like Digital Teammates

    We won’t just have one agent.

    We’ll have ecosystems of agents:

    • a research agent

    • a scheduling agent

    • a compliance-check agent

    • a reporting agent

    • a content agent

    • a coding agent

    • a health analytics agent

    • a data-cleaning agent

    They’ll talk to each other:

    • “Reporting agent: I need updated numbers.”
    • “Data agent: Pull the latest database snapshot.”
    • “Schedule agent: Prepare tomorrow’s meeting notes.”

    Just like teams do except fully automated.

     7. Enterprise Workflows Will Become Faster & Error-Free

    In large organizations government, banks, hospitals, enterprises work involves:

    • repetitive forms

    • strict rules

    • long approval chains

    • documentation

    • compliance checks

    AI agents will:

    • autofill forms using rules

    • validate entries

    • flag mismatches

    • highlight missing documents

    • route files to the right officer

    • maintain audit logs

    • ensure policy compliance

    • generate reports automatically

    Errors drop.

    Turnaround time shrinks.

    Governance improves.

     8. For Healthcare & Public Sector Workflows, Agents Will Be Transformational

    AI agents will simplify work for:

    • nurses

    • doctors

    • administrators

    • district officers

    • field workers

    Agents will handle:

    • case summaries

    • eligibility checks

    • scheme comparisons

    • data entry

    • MIS reporting

    • district-wise performance dashboards

    • follow-up scheduling

    • KPI alerts

    You’ll simply ask:

    • “Show me the villages with overdue immunization data.”
    • “Generate an SOP for this new workflow.”
    • “Draft the district monthly health report.”

    This is game-changing for systems like PM-JAY, NHM, RCH, or Health Data Lakes.

     9. Consumer Apps Will Feel Like Talking To a Smart Personal Manager

    For everyday people:

    • booking travel

    • managing finances

    • learning

    • tracking goals

    • organizing home tasks

    • monitoring health

    • …will be guided by agents.

    Examples:

    • “Book me the cheapest flight next Wednesday.”

    • “Pay my bills before due date but optimize cash flow.”

    • “Tell me when my portfolio needs rebalancing.”

    • “Summarize my medical reports and upcoming tests.”

    • Agents become personal digital life managers.

    10. Developers Will Ship Features Faster & With Less Friction

    Coding agents will:

    • write boilerplate

    • fix bugs

    • generate tests

    • review PRs

    • optimize queries

    • update API docs

    • assist in deployments

    • predict production failures

    • Developers focus on logic & architecture, not repetitive code.

    In summary…

    • AI agents will reshape digital workflows by shifting humans away from clicking, searching, filtering, documenting, and navigating and toward thinking, deciding, and creating.

    They will turn:

    • dashboards → insights

    • interfaces → conversations

    • apps → ecosystems

    • workflows → autonomous loops

    • effort → outcomes

    In short,

    the future of digital work will feel less like “operating computers” and more like directing a highly capable digital team that understands context, intent, and goals.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 23/11/2025In:

rameworks exist for cost-optimized

deployment-frameworksdistributed-systemsefficient-inferenceinference-optimization model-servingllm-in-production
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

     1. TensorRT-LLM (NVIDIA) The Gold Standard for GPU Efficiency NVIDIA has designed TensorRT-LLM to make models run as efficiently as physically possible on modern GPUs. Why it's cost-effective: Kernel fusion reduces redundant operations. Quantization support FP8, INT8, INT4 reduces memory usage andRead more

     1. TensorRT-LLM (NVIDIA) The Gold Standard for GPU Efficiency

    NVIDIA has designed TensorRT-LLM to make models run as efficiently as physically possible on modern GPUs.

    Why it’s cost-effective:

    • Kernel fusion reduces redundant operations.
    • Quantization support FP8, INT8, INT4 reduces memory usage and speeds up inference.
    • Optimized GPU graph execution avoids idle GPU cycles.
    • High-performance batching & KV-cache management boosts throughput.

    In other words:

    • TensorRT-LLM helps your 70B model behave like a 30B model in cost.

    Best for:

    • Large organisations
    • High-throughput applications
    • GPU-rich inference clusters

    2. vLLM The Breakthrough for Fast Token Generation

    vLLM is open source and powerful.

    It introduced PagedAttention, which optimizes how KV-cache memory is handled at its core.

    Instead of fragmenting the GPU memory, vLLM handles it as virtual memory-in other words, like an OS paging system.

    Why it saves cost:

    • Better batching → higher throughput
    • Efficient KV cache → handle more users with same GPU
    • Huge speed-ups in multi-request concurrency
    • Drops GPU idle time to nearly zero

    VLLM has become the default choice for startups deploying LLM APIs onto their own GPUs.

    3. DeepSpeed Inference by Microsoft Extreme Optimizations for Large Models

    DeepSpeed is known for training big models, but its inference engine is equally powerful.

    Key features:

    • tensor parallelism
    • pipeline parallelism
    • quantization-aware optimizations
    • optimized attention kernels
    • CPU-offloading when VRAM is limited

    Why it’s cost-effective:

    • You can serve bigger models on smaller hardware, reducing the GPU footprint sharply.

    4. Hugging Face Text Generation Inference (TGI)

    • TGI is tuned for real-world server usage.

    Why enterprises love it:

    • highly efficient batching
    • multi-GPU & multi-node serving
    • automatic queueing
    • dynamic batching
    • supports quantized models
    • stable production server with APIs
    • TGI is the backbone of many model-serving deployments today.

    Its cost advantage comes from maximizing GPU utilization, especially with multiple concurrent users.

    ONNX Runtime : Cross-platform & quantization-friendly

    ONNX Runtime is extremely good for:

    • converting PyTorch models
    • running on CPUs, GPUs or mobile
    • Aggressive quantization: INT8, INT4

    Why it cuts cost:

    • You can offload the inference to cheap CPU clusters for smaller models.
    • Quantization reduces memory usage by 70 90%.
    • It optimizes models to run efficiently on non-NVIDIA hardware.
    • ORT is ideal for multi-platform, multi-environment deployments.

     6. FasterTransformer (NVIDIA) Legacy but still powerful

    Before TensorRT-LLM, FasterTransformer was NVIDIA’s Inference workhorse.

    Still, many companies use it because:

    • it’s lightweight
    • stable
    • fast
    • optimized for multi-head attention

    It’s being replaced slowly by TensorRT-LLM, but is still more efficient than naïve PyTorch inference for large models.

    7. AWS SageMaker LMI (Large Model Inference)

    If you want cost optimization on AWS without managing infrastructure, LMI is designed for exactly that.

    Features:

    • continuous batching
    • optimized kernels for GPUs
    • model loading sharding
    • multi-GPU serving
    • auto-scaling & spot-instance support

    Cost advantage:

    AWS automatically selects the most cost-effective instance and scaling configuration behind the scenes.

    Great for enterprise-scale deployments.

    8. Ray Serve: Built for Distributed LLM Systems

    Ray Serve isn’t an LLM-specific runtime; it’s actually a powerful orchestration system for scaling inference.

    It helps you:

    • batch requests
    • route traffic
    • autoscale worker pods
    • split workloads across GPU/CPU
    • Deploy hybrid architectures

    Useful when your LLM system includes:

    • RAG
    • tool invocation
    • embeddings
    • vector search
    • multimodal tasks

    Ray ensures each component runs cost-optimized.

     9. OpenVINO (Intel) For CPU-Optimized Serving

    OpenVINO lets you execute LLMs on:

    • Intel processors
    • Intel iGPUs
    • VPU accelerators

    Why it’s cost-efficient:

    In general, running on CPU clusters is often 5–10x cheaper than GPUs for small/mid models.

    OpenVINO applies:

    • quantization
    • pruning
    • layer fusion
    • CPU vectorization

    This makes CPUs surprisingly fast for moderate workloads.

    10. MLC LLM: Bringing Cost-Optimized Local Inference

    MLC runs LLMs directly on:

    • Android
    • iOS
    • Laptops
    • Edge devices
    • Cost advantage:

    You completely avoid the GPU cloud costs for some tasks.

    This counts as cost-optimized inference because:

    • zero cloud cost
    • offline capability
    • ideal for mobile agents & small apps

     11. Custom Techniques Supported Across Frameworks

    Most frameworks support advanced cost-reducers such as:

     INT8 / INT4 quantization

    Reduces memory → cheaper GPUs → faster inference.

     Speculative decoding

    Small model drafts → big model verifies → massive speed gains.

     Distillation

    Train a smaller model with similar performance.

     KV Cache Sharing

    Greatly improves multi-user throughput.

     Hybrid Inference

    Run smaller steps on CPU, heavier steps on GPU.

    These techniques stack together for even more savings.

     In Summarizing…

    Cost-optimized inference frameworks exist because companies demand:

    • lower GPU bills
    • higher throughput
    • faster response times
    • scalable serving
    • using memory efficiently

    The top frameworks today include:

    • GPU-first high performance
    • TensorRT-LLM
    • vLLM
    • DeepSpeed Inference
    • FasterTransformer

    Enterprise-ready serving

    • HuggingFace TGI
    • AWS SageMaker LMI
    • Ray Serve

    Cross-platform optimization

    • ONNX Runtime
    • OpenVINO
    • MLC LLM

    Each plays a different role, depending on:

    • model size

    workload Latency requirements cost constraints deployment environment Together, they redefine how companies run LLMs in production seamlessly moving from “expensive research toys” to scalable and affordable AI infrastructure.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 23/11/2025In:

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture ...

deep learningdistributed-trainingllm-architecturemixture-of-expertsmodel-scalingsparse-models
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. MoE Makes Models "Smarter, Not Heavier" Traditional dense models are akin to a school in which every teacher teaches every student, regardless of subject. MoE models are different; they contain a large number of specialist experts, and only the relevant experts are activated for any one input. ItRead more

    1. MoE Makes Models “Smarter, Not Heavier”

    Traditional dense models are akin to a school in which every teacher teaches every student, regardless of subject.

    MoE models are different; they contain a large number of specialist experts, and only the relevant experts are activated for any one input.

    It’s like saying:

    • “Math question? E-mail it to Math expert.”
    • “Legal text? Activate the law expert.
    • Image caption? Use the multimodal expert.

    This means that the model becomes larger in capacity, while being cheaper in compute.

    2. MoE Allows Scaling Massively Without Large Increases in Cost

    A dense 1-trillion parameter model requires computing all 1T parameters for every token.

    But in an MoE model:

    • you can have, in total, 1T parameters.
    • but only 2–4% are active per token.

    So, each token activation is equal to:

    • a 30B or 60B dense model
    • at a fraction of the cost

    But with the intelligence of something far bigger,

    This reshapes scaling because you no longer pay the full price for model size.

    It’s like having 100 people in your team, but on every task, only 2 experts work at a time, keeping costs efficient.

     3. MoE Brings Specialization Models Learn Like Humans

    Dense models try to learn everything in every neuron.

    MoE allows for local specialization, hence:

    • experts in languages
    • experts in math & logic
    • Medical Coding Experts
    • specialists in medical text
    • experts in visual reasoning
    • experts for long-context patterns

    This parallels how human beings organize knowledge; we have neural circuits that specialize in vision, speech, motor actions, memory, etc.

    MoE transforms LLMs into modular cognitive systems and not into giant, undifferentiated blobs.

    4. Routing Networks: The “Brain Dispatcher”

    The router plays a major role in MoE, which decides:

    • “Which experts should answer this token?
    • This router is akin to the receptionist at a hospital.
    • it observes the symptoms
    • knows which specialist fits
    • sends the patient to the right doctor

    Modern routers are much better:

    • top-2 routing
    • soft gating
    • balanced load routing
    • expert capacity limits
    • noisy top-k routing

    These innovations prevent:

    expert collapse: only a few experts are used.

    • overloading
    • training instability

    And they make MoE models fast and reliable.

    5. MoE Enables Extreme Model Capacity

    The most powerful AI models today are leveraging MoE.

    Examples (conceptually, not citing specific tech):

    • In the training pipelines of Google’s Gemini, MoE layers are employed.
    • Open-source giants like LLaMA-3 MoE variants emerge.
    • DeepMind pioneered early MoE with sparsely activated Transformers.
    • Many production systems rely on MoE for scaling efficiently.

    Why?

    Because MoE allows models to break past the limits of dense scaling.

    Dense scaling hits:

    • memory limits
    • compute ceilings
    • training instability

    MoE bypasses this with sparse activation, allowing:

    • trillion+ parameter models
    • massive multimodal models
    • extreme context windows (500k–1M tokens)

    more reasoning depth

     6. MoE Cuts Costs Without Losing Accuracy

    Cost matters when companies are deploying models to millions of users.

    MoE significantly reduces:

    • inference cost
    • GPU requirement
    • energy consumption
    • time to train
    • time to fine-tune

    Specialization, in turn, enables MoE models to frequently outperform dense counterparts at the same compute budget.

    It’s a rare win-win:

    bigger capacity, lower cost, and better quality.

     7. MoE Improves Fine-Tuning & Domain Adaptation

    Because experts are specialized, fine-tuning can target specific experts without touching the whole model.

    For example:

    • Fine-tune only medical experts for a healthcare product.
    • Fine tune only the coding experts for an AI programming assistant.

    This enables:

    • cheaper domain adaptation
    • faster updates
    • modular deployments
    • better catastrophic forgetting resistance

    It’s like updating only one department in a company instead of retraining the whole organization.

    8.MoE Improves Multilingual Reasoning

    Dense models tend to “forget” smaller languages as new data is added.

    MoE solves this by dedicating:

    • experts for Hindi
    • Experts in Japanese
    • Experts in Arabic
    • experts on low-resource languages

    Each group of specialists becomes a small brain within the big model.

    This helps to preserve linguistic diversity and ensure better access to AI across different parts of the world.

    9. MoE Paves the Path Toward Modular AGI

    Finally, MoE is not simply a scaling trick; it’s actually one step toward AI systems with a cognitive structure.

    Humans do not use the entire brain for every task.

    • Vision cortex deals with images.
    • temporal lobe handles language
    • Prefrontal cortex handles planning.

    MoE reflects this:

    • modular architecture
    • sparse activation
    • experts
    • routing control

    It’s a building block for architectures where intelligence is distributed across many specialized units-a key idea in pathways toward future AGI.

    Conquer the challenge! In short…

    Mixture-of-Experts is shifting our scaling paradigm in AI models: It enables us to create huge, smart, and specialized models without blowing up compute costs.

    It enables:

    • massive capacity at a low compute
    • Specialization across domains
    • Human-like modular reasoning
    • efficient finetuning
    • better multilingual performance

    reduced hallucinations better reasoning quality A route toward really large, modular AI systems MoE transforms LLMs from giant monolithic brains into orchestrated networks of experts, a far more scalable and human-like way of doing intelligence.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 23/11/2025In:

the latest techniques used to reduce ...

hallucination-reductionknowledge-groundingllm-safetymodel-alignmentretrieval-augmentationrlhf
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

     1. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG 2.0) This is one of the most impactful ways to reduce hallucination. Older LLMs generated purely from memory. But memory sometimes lies. RAG gives the model access to: documents databases APIs knowledge bases before generating an answer. So instead of guessingRead more

     1. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG 2.0)

    This is one of the most impactful ways to reduce hallucination.

    Older LLMs generated purely from memory.

    But memory sometimes lies.

    RAG gives the model access to:

    • documents

    • databases

    • APIs

    • knowledge bases

    before generating an answer.

    So instead of guessing, the model retrieves real information and reasons over it.

    Why it works:

    Because the model grounds its output in verified facts instead of relying on what it “thinks” it remembers.

    New improvements in RAG 2.0:

    • fusion reading

    • multi-hop retrieval

    • cross-encoder reranking

    • query rewriting

    • structured grounding

    • RAG with graphs (KG-RAG)

    • agentic retrieval loops

    These make grounding more accurate and context-aware.

    2. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) + Self-Consistency

    One major cause of hallucination is a lack of structured reasoning.

    Modern models use explicit reasoning steps:

    • step-by-step thoughts

    • logical decomposition

    • self-checking sequences

    This “slow thinking” dramatically improves factual reliability.

    Self-consistency takes it further by generating multiple reasoning paths internally and picking the most consistent answer.

    It’s like the model discussing with itself before answering.

     3. Internal Verification Models (Critic Models)

    This is an emerging technique inspired by human editing.

    It works like this:

    1. One model (the “writer”) generates an answer.

    2. A second model (the “critic”) checks it for errors.

    3. A final answer is produced after refinement.

    This reduces hallucinations by adding a review step like a proofreader.

    Examples:

    • OpenAI’s “validator models”

    • Anthropic’s critic-referee framework

    • Google’s verifier networks

    This mirrors how humans write → revise → proofread.

     4. Fact-Checking Tool Integration

    LLMs no longer have to be self-contained.

    They now call:

    • calculators

    • search engines

    • API endpoints

    • databases

    • citation generators

    to validate information.

    This is known as tool calling or agentic checking.

    Examples:

    • “Search the web before answering.”

    • “Call a medical dictionary API for drug info.”

    • “Use a calculator for numeric reasoning.”

    Fact-checking tools eliminate hallucinations for:

    • numbers

    • names

    • real-time events

    • sensitive domains like medicine and law

     5. Constrained Decoding and Knowledge Constraints

    A clever method to “force” models to stick to known facts.

    Examples:

    • limiting the model to output only from a verified list

    • grammar-based decoding

    • database-backed autocomplete

    • grounding outputs in structured schemas

    This prevents the model from inventing:

    • nonexistent APIs

    • made-up legal sections

    • fake scientific terms

    • imaginary references

    In enterprise systems, constrained generation is becoming essential.

     6. Citation Forcing

    Some LLMs now require themselves to produce citations and justify answers.

    When forced to cite:

    • they avoid fabrications

    • they avoid making up numbers

    • they avoid generating unverifiable claims

    This technique has dramatically improved reliability in:

    • research

    • healthcare

    • legal assistance

    • academic tutoring

    Because the model must “show its work.”

     7. Human Feedback: RLHF → RLAIF

    Originally, hallucination reduction relied on RLHF:

    Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback.

    But this is slow, expensive, and limited.

    Now we have:

    • RLAIF Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback
    • A judge AI evaluates answers and penalizes hallucinations.
    • This scales much faster than human-only feedback and improves factual adherence.

    Combined RLHF + RLAIF is becoming the gold standard.

     8. Better Pretraining Data + Data Filters

    A huge cause of hallucination is bad training data.

    Modern models use:

    • aggressive deduplication

    • factuality filters

    • citation-verified corpora

    • cleaning pipelines

    • high-quality synthetic datasets

    • expert-curated domain texts

    This prevents the model from learning:

    • contradictions

    • junk

    • low-quality websites

    • Reddit-style fictional content

    Cleaner data in = fewer hallucinations out.

     9. Specialized “Truthful” Fine-Tuning

    LLMs are now fine-tuned on:

    • contradiction datasets

    • fact-only corpora

    • truthfulness QA datasets

    • multi-turn fact-checking chains

    • synthetic adversarial examples

    Models learn to detect when they’re unsure.

    Some even respond:

    “I don’t know.”

    Instead of guessing, a big leap in realism.

     10. Uncertainty Estimation & Refusal Training

    Newer models are better at detecting when they might hallucinate.

    They are trained to:

    • refuse to answer

    • ask clarifying questions

    • express uncertainty

    Instead of fabricating something confidently.

    • This is similar to a human saying

     11. Multimodal Reasoning Reduces Hallucination

    When a model sees an image and text, or video and text, it grounds its response better.

    Example:

    If you show a model a chart, it’s less likely to invent numbers it reads them.

    Multimodal grounding reduces hallucination especially in:

    • OCR

    • data extraction

    • evidence-based reasoning

    • document QA

    • scientific diagrams

     In summary…

    Hallucination reduction is improving because LLMs are becoming more:

    • grounded

    • tool-aware

    • self-critical

    • citation-ready

    • reasoning-oriented

    • data-driven

    The most effective strategies right now include:

    • RAG 2.0

    • chain-of-thought + self-consistency

    • internal critic models

    • tool-powered verification

    • constrained decoding

    • uncertainty handling

    • better training data

    • multimodal grounding

    All these techniques work together to turn LLMs from “creative guessers” into reliable problem-solvers.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 23/11/2025In:

driving multimodal reasoning in curre ...

ai-breakthroughsllm-researchmultimodal-modelsreasoningtransformersvision-language models
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. Unified Transformer Architectures: One Brain, Many Senses The heart of modern multimodal models is a unified neural architecture, especially improved variants of the Transformer. Earlier systems in AI treated text and images as two entirely different worlds. Now, models use shared attention layerRead more

    1. Unified Transformer Architectures: One Brain, Many Senses

    The heart of modern multimodal models is a unified neural architecture, especially improved variants of the Transformer.

    Earlier systems in AI treated text and images as two entirely different worlds.

    Now, models use shared attention layers that treat:

    • words
    • pixels
    • audio waveforms
    • video frames

    when these are considered as merely various types of “tokens”.

    This implies that the model learns across modalities, not just within each.

    Think of it like teaching one brain to:

    • read,
    • see,
    • Listen,
    • and reason

    Instead of stitching together four different brains using duct tape.

    This unified design greatly enhances consistency of reasoning.

    2. Vision Encoders + Language Models Fusion

    Another critical breakthrough is how the model integrates visual understanding into text understanding.

    It typically consists of two elements:

    An Encoder for vision

    • Like ViT, ConvNext, or better, a custom multimodal encoder
    • → Converts images into embedding “tokens.”

    A Language Backbone

    • Like GPT, Gemini, Claude backbone models;
    • → Processes those tokens along with text.

    Where the real magic lies is in alignment: teaching the model how visual concepts relate to words.

    For example:

    • “a man holding a guitar”
    • must map to image features showing person + object + action.

    This alignment used to be brittle. Now it’s extremely robust.

    3. Larger Context Windows for Video & Spatial Reasoning

    A single image is the simplest as compared to videos and many-paged documents.

    Modern models have opened up the following:

    • long-context transformers,
    • attention compression,
    • blockwise streaming,
    • and hierarchical memory,

    This has allowed them to process tens of thousands of image tokens or minutes of video.

    This is the reason recent LLMs can:

    • summarize a full lecture video.
    • read a 50-page PDF.
    • perform OCR + reasoning in one go.
    • analyze medical scans across multiple images.
    • track objects frame by frame.

    Longer context = more coherent multimodal reasoning.

    4. Contrastive Learning for Better Cross-Modal Alignment

    One of the biggest enabling breakthroughs is in contrastive pretraining, popularized by CLIP.

    It teaches the models how to understand how images and text relate by showing:

    • matching image caption pairs
    • non-matching pairs
    • millions of times
    • This improves:
    • grounding (connecting words to visuals)
    • commonsense visual reasoning
    • robustness to noisy data
    • object recognition in cluttered scenes

    Contrastive learning = the “glue” that binds vision and language.

     5. World Models and Latent Representations

    Modern models do not merely detect objects.

    They create internal, mental maps of scenes.

    This comes from:

    • 3D-aware encoders
    • latent diffusion models
    • Improved representation learning
    • These allow LLMs to understand:
    • spatial relationships: “the cup is left of the laptop.”
    • physics (“the ball will roll down the slope”)
    • intentions (“the person looks confused”)
    • Emotions in tone/speech

    This is the beginning of “cognitive multimodality.”

    6. Large, High-Quality, Multimodal Datasets

    Another quiet but powerful breakthrough is data.

    Models today are trained on:

    • image-text pairs
    • video-text alignments
    • audio transcripts
    • screen recordings
    • Synthetic multimodal datasets are generated by AI itself.

    Better data = better reasoning.

    And nowadays, synthetic data helps cover rare edge cases:

    • medical imaging
    • satellite imagery
    • Industrial machine failures
    • multilingual multimodal scenarios

    This dramatically accelerates model capability.

    7. Tool Use + Multimodality

    Current AI models aren’t just “multimodal observers”; they’re becoming multimodal agents.

    They can:

    • look at an image
    • extract text
    • call a calculator
    • perform OCR or face recognition modules
    • inspect a document
    • reason step-by-step
    • Write output in text or images.

    This coordination of tools dramatically improves practical reasoning.

    Imagine giving an assistant:

    • eyes
    • ears
    • memory
    • and a toolbox.

    That’s modern multimodal AI.

    8. Fine-tuning Breakthroughs: LoRA, QLoRA, & Vision Adapters

    Fine-tuning multimodal models used to be prohibitively expensive.

    Now techniques like:

    • LoRA
    • QLoRA
    • vision adapters
    • lightweight projection layers

    The framework shall enable companies-even individual developers-to fine-tune multimodal LLMs for:

    • retail product tagging
    • Medical image classification
    • document reading
    • compliance checks
    • e-commerce workflows

    This democratized multimodal AI.

     9. Multimodal Reasoning Benchmarks Pushing Innovation

    Benchmarks such as:

    • Mmmu
    • VideoQA
    • DocVQA
    • MMBench
    • MathVista

    Forcing the models to move from “seeing” to really reasoning.

    These benchmarks measure:

    • logic
    • understanding
    • Inference
    • multi-step visual reasoning
    • and have pushed model design significantly forward.

    In a nutshell.

    Multimodal reasoning is improving because AI models are no longer just text engines, they are true perceptual systems.

    The breakthroughs making this possible include:

    • unified transformer architectures
    • robust vision–language alignment
    • longer context windows

    Contrastive learning (CLIP-style) world models better multimodal datasets tool-enabled agents efficient fine-tuning methods Taken together, these improvements mean that modern models possess something much like a multi-sensory view of the world: they reason deeply, coherently, and contextually.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 20/11/2025In:

best practices around data privacy

audit trailsdata privacydata retentionenterprise aillm governancelogging
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. The Mindset: LLMs Are Not “Just Another API” They’re a Data Gravity Engine When enterprises adopt LLMs, the biggest mistake is treating them like simple stateless microservices. In reality, an LLM’s “context window” becomes a temporary memory, and prompt/response logs become high-value, high-riskRead more

    1. The Mindset: LLMs Are Not “Just Another API” They’re a Data Gravity Engine

    When enterprises adopt LLMs, the biggest mistake is treating them like simple stateless microservices. In reality, an LLM’s “context window” becomes a temporary memory, and prompt/response logs become high-value, high-risk data.

    So the mindset is:

    • Treat everything you send into a model as potentially sensitive.

    • Assume prompts may contain personal data, corporate secrets, or operational context you did not intend to share.

    • Build the system with zero trust principles and privacy-by-design, not as an afterthought.

    2. Data Privacy Best Practices: Protect the User, Protect the Org

    a. Strong input sanitization

    Before sending text to an LLM:

    • Automatically redact or tokenize PII (names, phone numbers, employee IDs, Aadhaar numbers, financial IDs).

    • Remove or anonymize customer-sensitive content (account numbers, addresses, medical data).

    • Use regex + ML-based PII detectors.

    Goal: The LLM should “understand” the query, not consume raw sensitive data.

    b. Context minimization

    LLMs don’t need everything. Provide only:

    • The minimum necessary fields

    • The shortest context

    • The least sensitive details

    Don’t dump entire CRM records, logs, or customer histories into prompts unless required.

    c. Segregation of environments

    • Use separate model instances for dev, staging, and production.

    • Production LLMs should only accept sanitized requests.

    • Block all test prompts containing real user data.

    d. Encryption everywhere

    • Encrypt prompts-in-transit (TLS 1.2+)

    • Encrypt stored logs, embeddings, and vector databases at rest

    • Use KMS-managed keys (AWS KMS, Azure KeyVault, GCP KMS)

    • Rotate keys regularly

    e. RBAC & least privilege

    • Strict role-based access controls for who can read logs, prompts, or model responses.

    • No developers should see raw user prompts unless explicitly authorized.

    • Split admin privileges (model config vs log access vs infrastructure).

    f. Don’t train on customer data unless explicitly permitted

    Many enterprises:

    • Disable training on user inputs entirely

    • Or build permission-based secure training pipelines for fine-tuning

    • Or use synthetic data instead of production inputs

    Always document:

    • What data can be used for retraining

    • Who approved

    • Data lineage and deletion guarantees

    3. Data Retention Best Practices: Keep Less, Keep It Short, Keep It Structured

    a. Purpose-driven retention

    Define why you’re keeping LLM logs:

    • Troubleshooting?

    • Quality monitoring?

    • Abuse detection?

    • Metric tuning?

    Retention time depends on purpose.

    b. Extremely short retention windows

    Most enterprises keep raw prompt logs for:

    • 24 hours

    • 72 hours

    • 7 days maximum

    For mission-critical systems, even shorter windows (a few minutes) are possible if you rely on aggregated metrics instead of raw logs.

    c. Tokenization instead of raw storage

    Instead of storing whole prompts:

    • Store hashed/encoded references

    • Avoid storing user text

    • Store only derived metrics (confidence, toxicity score, class label)

    d. Automatic deletion policies

    Use scheduled jobs or cloud retention policies:

    • S3 lifecycle rules

    • Log retention max-age

    • Vector DB TTLs

    • Database row expiration

    Every deletion must be:

    • Automatic

    • Immutable

    • Auditable

    e. Separation of “user memory” and “system memory”

    If the system has personalization:

    • Store it separately from raw logs

    • Use explicit user consent

    • Allow “Forget me” options

    4. Logging Best Practices: Log Smart, Not Everything

    Logging LLM activity requires a balancing act between observability and privacy.

    a. Capture model behavior, not user identity

    Good logs capture:

    • Model version

    • Prompt category (not full text)

    • Input shape/size

    • Token count

    • Latency

    • Error messages

    • Response toxicity score

    • Confidence score

    • Safety filter triggers

    Avoid:

    • Full prompts

    • Full responses

    • IDs that connect the prompt to a specific user

    • Raw PII

    b. Logging noise / abuse separately

    If a user submits harmful content (hate speech, harmful intent), log it in an isolated secure vault used exclusively by trust & safety teams.

    c. Structured logs

    Use structured JSON or protobuf logs with:

    • timestamp

    • model-version

    • request-id

    • anonymized user-id or session-id

    • output category

    Makes audits, filtering, and analytics easier.

    d. Log redaction pipeline

    Even if developers accidentally log raw prompts, a redaction layer scrubs:

    • names

    • emails

    • phone numbers

    • payment IDs

    • API keys

    • secrets

    before writing to disk.

    5. Audit Trail Best Practices: Make Every Step Traceable

    Audit trails are essential for:

    • Compliance

    • Investigations

    • Incident response

    • Safety

    a. Immutable audit logs

    • Store audit logs in write-once systems (WORM).

    • Enable tamper-evident logging with hash chains (e.g., AWS CloudTrail + CloudWatch).

    b. Full model lineage

    Every prediction must know:

    • Which model version

    • Which dataset version

    • Which preprocessing version

    • What configuration

    This is crucial for root-cause analysis after incidents.

    c. Access logging

    Track:

    • Who accessed logs

    • When

    • What fields they viewed

    • What actions they performed

    Store this in an immutable trail.

    d. Model update auditability

    Track:

    • Who approved deployments

    • Validation results

    • A/B testing metrics

    • Canary rollout logs

    • Rollback events

    e. Explainability logs

    For regulated sectors (health, finance):

    • Log decision rationale

    • Log confidence levels

    • Log feature importance

    • Log risk levels

    This helps with compliance, transparency, and post-mortem analysis.

    6. Compliance & Governance (Summary)

    Broad mandatory principles across jurisdictions:

    GDPR / India DPDP / HIPAA / PCI-like approach:

    • Lawful + transparent data use

    • Data minimization

    • Purpose limitation

    • User consent

    • Right to deletion

    • Privacy by design

    • Strict access control

    • Breach notification

    Organizational responsibilities:

    • Data protection officer

    • Risk assessment before model deployment

    • Vendor contract clauses for AI

    • Signed use-case definitions

    • Documentation for auditors

    7. Human-Believable Explanation: Why These Practices Actually Matter

    Imagine a typical enterprise scenario:

    A customer support agent pastes an email thread into an “AI summarizer.”

    Inside that email might be:

    • customer phone numbers

    • past transactions

    • health complaints

    • bank card issues

    • internal escalation notes

    If logs store that raw text, suddenly:

    • It’s searchable internally

    • Developers or analysts can see it

    • Data retention rules may violate compliance

    • A breach exposes sensitive content

    • The AI may accidentally learn customer-specific details

    • Legal liability skyrockets

    Good privacy design prevents this entire chain of risk.

    The goal is not to stop people from using LLMs it’s to let them use AI safely, responsibly, and confidently, without creating shadow data or uncontrolled risk.

    8. A Practical Best Practices Checklist (Copy/Paste)

    Privacy

    •  Automatic PII removal before prompts

    •  No real customer data in dev environments

    •  Encryption in-transit and at-rest

    •  RBAC with least privilege

    •  Consent and purpose limitation for training

    Retention

    •  Minimal prompt retention

    •  24–72 hour log retention max

    •  Automatic log deletion policies

    •  Tokenized logs instead of raw text

    Logging

    •  Structured logs with anonymized metadata

    • No raw prompts in logs

    •  Redaction layer for accidental logs

    •  Toxicity and safety logs stored separately

    Audit Trails

    • Immutable audit logs (WORM)

    • Full model lineage recorded

    •  Access logs for sensitive data

    •  Documented model deployment history

    •  Explainability logs for regulated sectors

    9. Final Human Takeaway One Strong Paragraph

    Using LLMs in the enterprise isn’t just about accuracy or fancy features it’s about protecting people, protecting the business, and proving that your AI behaves safely and predictably. Strong privacy controls, strict retention policies, redacted logs, and transparent audit trails aren’t bureaucratic hurdles; they are what make enterprise AI trustworthy and scalable. In practice, this means sending the minimum data necessary, retaining almost nothing, encrypting everything, logging only metadata, and making every access and action traceable. When done right, you enable innovation without risking your customers, your employees, or your company.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 20/11/2025In:

handle model updates (versioning, rol ...

a/b testingmicroservicesmlopsmodel deploymentmodel versioningrollback strategies
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. Mindset: consider models as software services A model is a first-class deployable artifact. It gets treated as a microservice binary: it has versions, contracts in the form of inputs and outputs, tests, CI/CD, observability, and a rollback path. Safe update design is adding automated verificationRead more

    1. Mindset: consider models as software services

    A model is a first-class deployable artifact. It gets treated as a microservice binary: it has versions, contracts in the form of inputs and outputs, tests, CI/CD, observability, and a rollback path. Safe update design is adding automated verification gates at every stage so that human reviewers do not have to catch subtle regressions by hand.

    2) Versioning: how to name and record models

    Semantic model versioning (recommended):

    • MAJOR: breaking changes (input schema changes, new architecture).
    • MINOR: new capabilities that are backwards compatible (adds outputs, better performance).
    • PATCH: retrained weights, bug fixes without a contract change.

    Artifact naming and metadata:

    • Artifact name: my-model:v1.3.0 or my-model-2025-11-20-commitabcd1234

    Store metadata in a model registry/metadata store:

    • training dataset hash/version, commit hash, training code tag, hyperparams, evaluation metrics (AUC, latency), quantization applied, pre/post processors, input/ output schema, owner, risk level, compliance notes.
    • Tools: MLflow, BentoML, S3+JSON manifest, or a dedicated model registry: Databricks Model Registry, AWS SageMaker Model Registry.

    Compatibility contracts:

    • Clearly define input and output schemas (types, shapes, ranges). If the input schema changes, bump MAJOR and include a migration plan for callers.

    3. Pre-deploy checks and continuous validation

    Automate checks in CI/CD before marking a model as “deployable”.

    Unit & smoke tests 

    • Small synthetic inputs to check the model returns correctly-shaped outputs and no exceptions.

    Data drift/distribution tests

    • Check the training and validation distributions against the expected production distributions-statistical divergence thresholds.

    Performance tests

    • Latency, memory use, CPU, and GPU use under realistic load: p95/p99 latency targets.

    Quality/regression tests

    • Evaluate on the holdout dataset + production shadow dataset if available. Compare core metrics to baseline model; e.g., accuracy, F1, business metrics: conversion, false positives.

    Safety checks

    • Sanity checks: no toxic text, no personal data leakage. Fairness checks were applicable.

    Contract tests

    • Ensure preprocessors/postprocessors match exactly what the serving infra expects.

    Only models that pass these gates go to deployment.

    4) Deployment patterns in a microservices ecosystem

    Choose one, or combine several, depending on your level of risk tolerance:

    Blue-Green / Red-Black

    • Deploy new model to the “green” cluster while the “blue” continues serving. Switch traffic atomically when ready. Easy rollback (switch back).

    Canary releases

    • Send a small % of live traffic to the new model, monitor key metrics (1–5%), then progressively increase (10% → 50% → 100%). This is the most common safe pattern.

    Shadow (aka mirror) deployments

    • New model receives the copy of live requests, but its outputs are not returned to users. Great for offline validation on production traffic w/o user impact.

    A/B testing

    • New model actively serves a fraction of users and their responses are used to evaluate business metrics: CTR, revenue, and conversion. Requires experiment tracking and statistical significance planning.

    Split / Ensemble routing

    • Route different types of requests to different models, by user cohort, feature flag, geography; use ensemble voting for high-stakes decisions.

    Sidecar model server

    Attach model-serving sidecar to microservice pods so that the app and the model are co-located, reducing network latency.

    Model-as-a-service

    • Host model behind an internal API: Triton, TorchServe, FastAPI + gunicorn. Microservices call the model endpoint as an external dependency. This centralizes model serving and scaling.

    5) A/B testing & experimentation: design + metrics

    Experimental design

    • Define business KPI and guardrail metrics, such as latency, error rate, or false positive rate.
    • Choose cohort size to achieve statistical power and decide experiment duration accordingly.
    • Randomize at the user or session level to avoid contamination.

    Safety first

    • Always monitor guardrail metrics-if latency or error rates cross thresholds, automatically terminate the experiment.

    Evaluation

    • Collect offline ML metrics: AUC, F1, calibration, and product metrics: conversion lift, retention, support load.
    • Use attribution windows aligned with product behavior; for instance, a 7-day conversion window for e-commerce.

    Roll forward rules

    • If the experiment shows that the primary metric statistically improved and the guardrails were not violated, promote the model.

    6. Monitoring and observability (the heart of safe rollback)

    Key metrics to instrument

    • Model quality metrics: AUC, precision/recall, calibration drift, per-class errors.
    • Business metrics: conversion, click-through, revenue, retention.
    • Performance metrics: p50/p90/p99 latency, memory, CPU/GPU utilisation, QPS.
    • Reliability: error rates, exceptions, timeouts.
    • Data input statistics: null ratios, categorical cardinality changes, feature distribution shifts.

    Tracing & logs

    • Correlate predictions with request IDs. Store input hashes and model outputs for a sampling window (preserving privacy) so you are able to reproduce issues.

    Alerts & automated triggers

    • Define SLOs and alert thresholds. Example: If the p99 latency increases >30% or the false positive rate jumps >2x, trigger an automated rollback.

    Drift detection

    • Continuously test incoming data vs. training distribution. If drift goes over some threshold, trigger a notification and possibly divert traffic to the baseline model.

    7) Rollback strategies and automation

    Fast rollback rules

    • Always have a fast path to revert to the previous model: DNS switch, LB weight change, feature flag toggle, or Kubernetes deployment rollback.

    Automated rollback

    • Automate rollback if guardrail metrics are breached during canary/ A/B, for example, via 48-hour rolling window rules. Example triggers:
    • p99 latency > SLO by X% for Y minutes
    • Error rate > baseline + Z for Y minutes
    • Business metric negative delta beyond the allowed limit and statistically significant

    Graceful fallback

    • If the model fails, revert to a more simplistic, deterministic rule-based system or older model version to prevent user-facing outages.

    Postmortem

    • After rollback, capture request logs, sampled inputs, and model outputs to debug. Add findings to the incident report and model registry.

    8) Practical CI/CD pipeline for model deployments-an example

    Code & data commit

    • Push training code and training-data manifest (hash) to repo.

    Train & build artifact.

    • CI triggers training job or new weights are generated. Produce model artefact and manifest.

    Automated evaluation

    • Run the pre-deploy checks: unit tests, regression tests, perf tests, drift checks.

    Model registration

    • Store artifact + metadata in model registry, mark as staging.

    Deploy to staging

    • Deploy model to staging environment behind the same infra – same pre/post processors.

    Shadow running in production (optional)

    • Mirror traffic and compute metrics offline.

    Canary deployment

    • Release to a small % of production traffic. Then monitor for N hours/days.

    Automatic gates

    • If metrics pass, gradually increase traffic. If metrics fail, automated rollback.

    Promote to production

    • Model becomes production in the registry.

    Post-deploy monitoring

    Continuous monitoring, scheduled re-evaluations – weekly/monthly.

    Tools: GitOps – ArgoCD, CI: GitHub Actions / GitLab CI, Kubernetes + Istio/Linkerd to traffic shift, model servers – Triton/BentoML/TorchServe, monitoring: Prometheus + Grafana + Sentry + OpenTelemetry, model registry – MLflow/Bento, experiment platform – Optimizely, Growthbook, or custom.

    9) Governance, reproducibility, and audits

    Audit trail

    • Every model that is ever deployed should have an immutable record – model version, dataset versions, training code commit, who approved its release, and evaluation metrics.

    Reproducibility

    • Use containerized training and serving images. Tag and store them; for example, my-model:v1.2.0-serving.

    Approvals

    • High-risk models require human approvals, security review, and a sign-off step in the pipeline.

    Compliance

    • Keep masked/sanitized logs, define retention policies for input/output logs, and store PII separately with encryption.

    10) Practical examples & thresholds – playbook snippets

    Canary rollout example

    • 0% → 2% for 1 hour → 10% for 6 hours → 50% for 24 hours → 100% if all checks green.
    • Abort if: p99 latency increase > 30%, OR model error rate is greater than baseline + 2%, OR primary business metric drop with p < 0.05.

    A/B test rules

    • Minimum sample: 10k unique users or until precomputed statistical power reached.
    • Duration: at least as long as the behavior cycle, or for example, 7 days for weekly purchase cycles.

    Rollback automation

    • If more than 3 guardrail alerts in 1 hour, trigger auto-rollback and alert on-call.

    11) A short checklist that you can copy into your team playbook

    • Model artifact + manifest stored in registry, with metadata.
    • Input/Output schemas documented and validated.
    • CI tests: unit, regression, performance, safety passed.
    • Shadow run validation on real traffic, completed if possible.
    • Canary rollout configured with traffic percentages & durations.
    • Monitoring dashboards set up with quality & business metrics.
    • Alerting rules and automated rollback configured.
    • Postmortem procedure and reproduction logs enabled.
    • Compliance and audit logs stored, access-controlled.
    • Owner and escalation path documented.

    12) Final human takeaways

    • Automate as much of the validation & rollback as possible. Humans should be in the loop for approvals and judgment calls, not slow manual checks.
    • Treat models as services: explicit versioning, contracts, and telemetry are a must.
    • Start small. Use shadow testing and tiny canaries before full rollouts.
    • Measure product impact instead of offline ML metrics. A better AUC does not always mean better business outcomes.
    • Plan for fast fallback and make rollback a one-click or automated action that’s the difference between a controlled experiment and a production incident.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 20/11/2025In:

model inference change (on-device, ed ...

cloud-computingedge computingfederated learninglatency-sensitive appsmodel inferenceon-device ai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

     1. On-Device Inference: "Your Phone Is Becoming the New AI Server" The biggest shift is that it's now possible to run surprisingly powerful models on devices: phones, laptops, even IoT sensors. Why this matters: No round-trip to the cloud means millisecond-level latency. Offline intelligence: NavigRead more

     1. On-Device Inference: “Your Phone Is Becoming the New AI Server”

    The biggest shift is that it’s now possible to run surprisingly powerful models on devices: phones, laptops, even IoT sensors.

    Why this matters:

    No round-trip to the cloud means millisecond-level latency.

    • Offline intelligence: Navigation, text correction, summarization, and voice commands work without an Internet connection.
    • Comfort: data never leaves the device, which is huge for health, finance, and personal assistant apps.

    What’s enabling it?

    • Smaller, efficient models–1B to 8B parameter ranges.
    • Hardware accelerators: Neural Engines, NPUs on Snapdragon/Xiaomi/Samsung chips.
    • Quantisation: (8-bit, 4-bit, 2-bit weights).
    • New runtimes: CoreML, ONNX Runtime Mobile, ExecuTorch, WebGPU.

    Where it best fits:

    • Personal AI assistants
    • Predictive typing
    • Gesture/voice detection
    • AR/VR overlays
    • Real-time biometrics

    Human example:

    Rather than Siri sending your voice to Apple servers for transcription, your iPhone simply listens, interprets, and responds locally. The “AI in your pocket” isn’t theoretical; it’s practical and fast.

     2. Edge Inference: “A Middle Layer for Heavy, Real-Time AI”

    Where “on-device” is “personal,” edge computing is “local but shared.”

    Think of routers, base stations, hospital servers, local industrial gateways, or 5G MEC (multi-access edge computing).

    Why edge matters:

    • Ultra-low latencies (<10 ms) required for critical operations.
    • Consistent power and cooling for slightly larger models.
    • Network offloading – only final results go to the cloud.
    • Better data control may help in compliance.

    Typical use cases:

    • Smart factories: defect detection, robotic arm control
    • Autonomous Vehicles (Sensor Fusion)
    • IoT Hubs in Healthcare (Local monitoring + alerts)
    • Retail stores: real-time video analytics

    Example:

    The nurse monitoring system of a hospital may run preliminary ECG anomaly detection at the ward-level server. Only flagged abnormalities would escalate to the cloud AI for higher-order analysis.

    3. Federated Inference: “Distributed AI Without Centrally Owning the Data”

    Federated methods let devices compute locally but learn globally, without centralizing raw data.

    Why this matters:

    • Strong privacy protection
    • Complying with data sovereignty laws
    • Collaborative learning across hospitals, banks, telecoms
    • Avoiding sensitive data centralization-no single breach point

    Typical patterns:

    • Hospitals are training various medical models across different sites
    • Keyboard input models learning from users without capturing actual text
    • Global analytics, such as diabetes patterns, while keeping patient data local
    • Yet inference is changing too:

    Most federated learning is about training, while federated inference is growing to handle:

    • split computing, e.g., first 3 layers on device, remaining on server
    • collaboratively serving models across decentralized nodes
    • smart caching where predictions improve locally

    Human example:

    Your phone keyboard suggests “meeting tomorrow?” based on your style, but the model improves globally without sending your private chats to a central server.

    4. Cloud Inference: “Still the Brain for Heavy AI, But Less Dominant Than Before”

    The cloud isn’t going away, but its role is shifting.

    Where cloud still dominates:

    • Large-scale foundation models (70B–400B+ parameters)
    • Multi-modal reasoning: video, long-document analysis
    • Central analytics dashboards
    • Training and continuous fine-tuning of models
    • Distributed agents orchestrating complex tasks

    Limitations:

    • High latency: 80 200 ms, depending on region
    • Expensive inference
    • network dependency
    • Privacy concerns
    • Regulatory boundaries

    The new reality:

    Instead of the cloud doing ALL computations, it’ll be the aggregator, coordinator, and heavy lifter just not the only model runner.

    5. The Hybrid Future: “AI Will Be Fluid, Running Wherever It Makes the Most Sense”

    The real trend is not “on-device vs cloud” but dynamic inference orchestration:

    • Perform fast, lightweight tasks on-device
    • Handle moderately heavy reasoning at the edge
    • Send complex, compute-heavy tasks to the cloud
    • Synchronize parameters through federated methods
    • Use caching, distillation, and quantized sub-models to smooth transitions.
    • Think of it like how CDNs changed the web.
    • Content moved closer to the user for speed.

    Now, AI is doing the same.

     6. For Latency-Sensitive Apps, This Shift Is a Game Changer

    Systems that are sensitive to latency include:

    • Autonomous driving
    • Real-time video analysis
    • Live translation
    • AR glasses
    • Health alerts (ICU/ward monitoring)
    • Fraud detection in payments
    • AI gaming
    • Robotics
    • Live customer support

    These apps cannot abide:

    • Cloud round-trips
    • Internet fluctuations
    • Cold starts
    • Congestion delays

    So what happens?

    • Inference moves closer to where the user/action is.
    • Models shrink or split strategically.
    • Devices get onboard accelerators.
    • Edge becomes the new “near-cloud.”

    The result:

    AI is instant, personal, persistent, and reliable even when the internet wobbles.

     7. Final Human Takeaway

    The future of AI inference is not centralized.

    It’s localized, distributed, collaborative, and hybrid.

    Apps that rely on speed, privacy, and reliability will increasingly run their intelligence:

    • first on the device for responsiveness,
    • then on nearby edge systems – for heavier logic.
    • And only when needed, escalate to the cloud for deep reasoning.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 17/11/2025In:

text + image + audio + video

ai models xartificial intelligenceeveryday computinghuman-computer interactionmultimodal aitechnology trends
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    How Multimodal Models Will Change Everyday Computing Over the last decade, we have seen technology get smaller, quicker, and more intuitive. But multimodal AI-computer systems that grasp text, images, audio, video, and actions together-is more than the next update; it's the leap that will change comRead more

    How Multimodal Models Will Change Everyday Computing

    Over the last decade, we have seen technology get smaller, quicker, and more intuitive. But multimodal AI-computer systems that grasp text, images, audio, video, and actions together-is more than the next update; it’s the leap that will change computers from tools with which we operate to partners with whom we will collaborate.

    Today, you tell a computer what to do.

    Tomorrow, you will show it, tell it, demonstrate it or even let it observe – and it will understand.

    Let’s see how this changes everyday life.

    1. Computers will finally understand context like humans do.

    At the moment, your laptop or phone only understands typed or spoken commands. It doesn’t “see” your screen or “hear” the environment in a meaningful way.

    Multimodal AI changes that.

    Imagine saying:

    • “Fix this error” while pointing your camera at a screen.

    Error The AI will read the error message, understand your voice tone, analyze the background noise, and reply:

    • “This is a Java null pointer issue. Let me rewrite the method so it handles the edge case.”
    • This is the first time computers gain real sensory understanding.
    • They won’t simply process information, but actively perceive.

    2. Software will become invisible tasks will flow through conversation + demonstration

    Today you switch between apps: Google, WhatsApp, Excel, VS Code, Camera…

    In the multimodal world, you’ll be interacting with tasks, not apps.

    You might say:

    • “Generate a summary of this video call and send it to my team.
    • “Crop me out from this photo and put me on a white background.”
    • “Watch this YouTube tutorial and create a script based on it.”
    • No need to open editing tools or switch windows.

    The AI becomes the layer that controls your tools for you-sort of like having a personal operating system inside your operating system.

    3. The New Generation of Personal Assistants: Thoughtfully Observant rather than Just Reactive

    Siri and Alexa feel robotic because they are single-modal; they understand speech alone.

    Future assistants will:

    • See what you’re working on
    • Hear your environment
    • Read what’s on your screen
    • Watch your workflow
    • Predict what you want next

    Imagine doing night shifts, and your assistant politely says:

    • “You’ve been coding for 3 hours. Want me to draft tomorrow’s meeting notes while you finish this function?
    • It will feel like a real teammate organizing, reminding, optimizing, and learning your patterns.

    4. Workflows will become faster, more natural and less technical.

    Multimodal AI will turn the most complicated tasks into a single request.

    Examples:

    • Documents

    “Convert this handwritten page into a formatted Word doc and highlight the action points.

    • Design

    “Here’s a wireframe; make it into an attractive UI mockup with three color themes.

    •  Learning

    “Watch this physics video and give me a summary for beginners with examples.

    •  Creative

    “Use my voice and this melody to create a clean studio-level version.”

    We will move from doing the task to describing the result.

    This reduces the technical skill barrier for everyone.

    5. Education and training will become more interactive and personalized.

    Instead of just reading text or watching a video, a multimodal tutor can:

    • Grade assignments by reading handwriting
    • Explain concepts while looking at what the student is solving.
    • Watch students practice skills-music, sports, drawing-and give feedback in real-time
    • Analyze tone, expressions, and understanding levels
    • Learning develops into a dynamic, two-way conversation rather than a one-way lecture.

    6. Healthcare, Fitness, and Lifestyle Will Benefit Immensely

    • Imagine this:
    • It watches your form while you work out and corrects it.
    • It listens to your cough and analyses it.
    • It studies your plate of food and calculates nutrition.
    • It reads your expression and detects stress or burnout.
    • It processes diagnostic medical images or videos.
    • This is proactive, everyday health support-not just diagnostics.

    7. The Creative Industries Will Explode With New Possibilities

    • AI will not replace creativity; it’ll supercharge it.
    • Film editors can tell: “Trim the awkward pauses from this interview.”
    • Musicians can hum a tune and generate a full composition.
    • Users can upload a video scene and request AI to write dialogues.
    • Designers can turn sketches, voice notes, and references into full visuals.

    Being creative then becomes more about imagination and less about mastering tools.

    8. Computing Will Feel More Human, Less Mechanical

    The most profound change?

    We won’t have to “learn computers” anymore; rather, computers will learn us.

    We’ll be communicating with machines using:

    • Voice
    • Gestures
    • Screenshots
    • Photos
    • Real-world objects
    • Videos
    • Physical context

    That’s precisely how human beings communicate with one another.

    Computing becomes intuitive almost invisible.

    Overview: Multimodal AI makes the computer an intelligent companion.

    They shall see, listen, read, and make sense of the world as we do. They will help us at work, home, school, and in creative fields. They will make digital tasks natural and human-friendly. They will reduce the need for complex software skills. They will shift computing from “operating apps” to “achieving outcomes.” The next wave of AI is not about bigger models; it’s about smarter interaction.

    See less
Load More Questions