Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In


Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here


Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

You must login to add post.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here
Sign InSign Up

Qaskme

Qaskme Logo Qaskme Logo

Qaskme Navigation

  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask A Question
  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog

Technology

Technology is the engine that drives today’s world, blending intelligence, creativity, and connection in everything we do. At its core, technology is about using tools and ideas—like artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and advanced gadgets—to solve real problems, improve lives, and spark new possibilities.

Share
  • Facebook
1 Follower
1k Answers
185 Questions
Home/Technology/Page 6

Qaskme Latest Questions

daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 18/10/2025In: Technology

What are the most advanced AI models in 2025, and how do they compare?

the most advanced AI models in 2025

2025ai modelscomparisonllmmultimodalreasoning
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 18/10/2025 at 4:54 pm

    Rapid overview — the headline stars (2025) OpenAI — GPT-5: best at agentic flows, coding, and lengthy tool-chains; extremely robust API and commercial environment. OpenAI Google — Gemini family (2.5 / 1.5 Pro / Ultra versions): strongest at built-in multimodal experiences and "adaptive thinking" capRead more

    Rapid overview — the headline stars (2025)

    • OpenAI — GPT-5: best at agentic flows, coding, and lengthy tool-chains; extremely robust API and commercial environment.
      OpenAI
    • Google — Gemini family (2.5 / 1.5 Pro / Ultra versions): strongest at built-in multimodal experiences and “adaptive thinking” capabilities for intricate tasks.
    • Anthropic — Claude family (including Haiku / Sonnet variants): safety-oriented; newer light and swift variants make agentic flows more affordable and faster.
    • Mistral — Medium 3 / Magistral / Devstral: high-level performance at significantly reduced inference cost; specialty reasoning and coding models by an European/indie disruptor.
    • Meta — Llama family (Llama 3/4 period): the open-ecosystem player — solid for teams that prefer on-prem or highly customized models.
      Here I explain in detail what these differences entail in reality.

    1) What “advanced” is in 2025

    “Most advanced” is not one dimension — consider at least four dimensions:

    • Multimodality — a model’s ability to process text+images+audio+video.
    • Agentic/Tool use — capability of invoking tools, executing multi-step procedures, and synchronizing sub-agents.
    • Reasoning & long context — performance on multi-step logic, and processing very long documents (tens of thousands of tokens).
    • Deployment & expense — latency, pricing, on-prem or cloud availability, and whether there’s an open license.

    Models trade off along different combinations of these. The remainder of this note pins models to these axes with examples and tradeoffs.

    2) OpenAI — GPT-5 (where it excels)

    • Strengths: designed and positioned as OpenAI’s most capable model for agentic tasks & coding. It excels at executing long chains of tool calls, producing front-end code from short prompts, and being steerable (personality/verbosity controls). Great for building assistants that must orchestrate other services reliably.
    • Multimodality: strong and improving in vision + text; an ecosystem built to integrate with toolchains and products.
    • Tradeoffs: typically a premium-priced commercial API; less on-prem/custom licensing flexibility than fully open models.

    Who should use it: product teams developing commercial agentic assistants, high-end code generation systems, or companies that need plug-and-play high end features.

    3) Google — Gemini (2.5 Pro / Ultra, etc.)

    • Strengths: Google emphasizes adaptive thinking and deeply ingrained multimodal experiences: richer thought in bringing together pictures, documents, and user history (e.g., on Chrome or Android). Gemini Pro/Ultra versions are aimed at power users and enterprise integrations (and Google has been integrating Gemini into apps and OS features).
    • Multimodality & integration: product integration advantage of Google — Gemini driving capabilities within Chrome, Android “Mind Space”, and workspace utilities. That makes it extremely convenient for consumer/business UX where the model must respond to device data and cloud services.
    • Tradeoffs: flexibility of licensing and fine-tuning are constrained compared to open models; cost and vendor lock-in are factors.

    Who to use it: teams developing deeply integrated consumer experiences, or organizations already within Google Cloud/Workspace that need close product integration.

    4) Anthropic — Claude family (safety + lighter agent models)

    • Strengths: Anthropic emphasizes alignment and safety practices (constitutional frameworks), while expanding their model family into faster, cheaper variants (e.g., Haiku 4.5) that make agentic workflows more affordable and responsive. Claude models are also being integrated into enterprise stacks (notably Microsoft/365 connectors).
    • Agentic capabilities: Claude’s architecture supports sub-agents and workflow orchestration, and recent releases prioritize speed and in-browser or low-latency uses.
    • Tradeoffs: performance on certain benchmarks will be slightly behind the absolute best in some very specific tasks, but the enterprise/safety features are usually well worth it.

    Who should use it: safety/privacy sensitive use cases, enterprises that prefer safer defaults, or teams looking for quick browser-based assistants.

    5) Mistral — cost-effective performance and reasoning experts

    • Strengths: Mistral’s Medium 3 was “frontier-class” yet significantly less expensive to operate, and they introduced a dedicated reasoning model, Magistral, and specialized coding models such as Devstral. Their value proposition: almost state-of-the-art performance at a fraction of the inference cost. This is attractive when cost/scale is an issue.
    • Open options: Mistral makes available models and tooling enabling more flexible deployment than closed cloud-only alternatives.
    • Tradeoffs: not as big of an ecosystem as Google/OpenAI, but fast-developing and acquiring enterprise distribution through flagship clouds.

    Who should use it: companies and startups that operate high-volume inference where budget is important, or groups that need precise reasoning/coding models.

    6) Meta — Llama family (open ecosystem)

    • Strengths: Llama (3/4 series) remains the default for open, on-prem, and deeply customizable deployments. Meta’s drops drove bigger context windows and multimodal forks for those who have to self-host and speed up quickly.
    • Tradeoffs: while extremely able, Llama tends to take more engineering to keep pace with turnkey product capabilities (tooling, safety guardrails) that the big cloud players ship out of the box.

    Who should use it: research labs, companies that must keep data on-prem, or teams that want to fine-tune and control every part of the stack.

    7) Practical comparison — side-by-side (short)

    • Best for agentic orchestration & ecosystem: GPT-5.
    • Best for device/OS integration & multimodal UX: Gemini family.
    • Best balance of safety + usable speed (enterprise): Claude family (Haiku/Sonnet).
    • Best price/perf & specialized reasoning/coding patterns: Mistral (Medium 3, Magistral, Devstral)
    • Best for open/custom on-prem deployments: Llama family.

    8) Real-world decision guide — how to choose

    Ask these before you select:

    • Do you need to host sensitive data on-prem? → prefer Llama or deployable Mistral variants.
    • Is cost per token an hard constraint? → try Mistral and lightweight Claude variants — they tend to win on cost.
    • Do you require deep, frictionless integration into a user’s OS/device or Google services? →
    • Are you developing a high-risk app where security is more important than brute capability? → The Claude family offers alignment-first tooling.
    • Are you developing sophisticated, agentic workflow and developer-facing toolchain work? → GPT-5 is designed for this.
      OpenAI

    9) Where capability gaps are filled in (so you don’t get surprised)

    • Truthfulness/strong reasoning still requires human validation in critical areas (medicine, law, safety-critical systems). Big models are improved, but not foolproof.
    • Cost & latency: most powerful models tend to be the most costly to execute at scale — think hybrid architectures (client light + cloud heavy model).

    Custom safety & guardrails: off-the-shelf models require detailed safety layers for domain-specific corporate policies.

    10) Last takeaways (humanized)

    If you consider models as specialist tools instead of one “best” AI, the scene comes into focus:

    • Need the quickest path to a mighty, refined assistant that can coordinate tools? Begin with GPT-5.
    • Need the smoothest multimodal experience on devices and Google services? Sample Gemini.
    • Concerned about alignment and need safer defaults, along with affordable fast variants? Claude offers strong contenders.

    Have massive volume and want to manage cost or host on-prem? Mistral and Llama are the clear winners.

    If you’d like, I can:

    • map these models to a technical checklist for your project (data privacy, latency budget, cost per 1M tokens), or
    • do a quick pricing vs. capability comparison for a concrete use-case (e.g., a customer-support agent that needs 100k queries/day).
    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 204
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 16/10/2025In: Technology

How do AI models ensure privacy and trust in 2025?

AI models ensure privacy and trust in ...

aiethicsaiprivacydataprotectiondifferentialprivacyfederatedlearningtrustworthyai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 16/10/2025 at 1:12 pm

     1. Why Privacy and Trust Matter Now More Than Ever AI survives on data — our messages, habits, preferences, even voice and images. Each time we interact with a model, we're essentially entrusting part of ourselves. That's why increasingly, people ask themselves: "Where does my data go?" "Who sees iRead more

     1. Why Privacy and Trust Matter Now More Than Ever

    AI survives on data — our messages, habits, preferences, even voice and images.

    Each time we interact with a model, we’re essentially entrusting part of ourselves. That’s why increasingly, people ask themselves:

    • “Where does my data go?”
    • “Who sees it?”
    • “Is the AI capable of remembering what I said?”

    When AI was young, such issues were sidelined in the excitement of pioneering. But by 2025, privacy invasions, data misuse, and AI “hallucinations” compelled the industry to mature.

    Trust isn’t a moral nicety — it’s the currency of adoption.

    No one needs a competent AI they don’t trust.

     2. Data Privacy: The Foundation of Trust

    Current AI today employs privacy-by-design principles — privacy isn’t added, it’s part of the design from day one.

     a. Federated Learning

    Rather than taking all your data to a server, federated learning enables AI to learn on your device — locally.

    For example, the AI keyboard on your phone learns how you type without uploading your messages to the cloud. The model learns globally by exchanging patterns, not actual data.

     b. Differential Privacy

    It introduces mathematical “noise” to information so the AI can learn trends without knowing individuals. It’s similar to blurring an image: you can tell the overall picture, but no individual face is recognizable.

     c. On-Device Processing

    Most models — particularly phone, car, and wearables ones — will compute locally by 2025. That is, sensitive information such as voice records, heart rate, or pictures remains outside the cloud altogether.

    d. Data Minimization

    AI systems no longer take in more than they need. For instance, a health bot may compute symptoms without knowing your name or phone number. Less data = less risk.

     3. Transparent AI: Building User Trust

    Transparency is also needed in addition to privacy. People would like to know how and why an AI is choosing an alternative.

    Because of this, 2025’s AI environment is defined by tendencies toward explainable and responsible systems.

     a. Explainable AI (XAI)

    When an AI produces an answer, it provides a “reasoning trail” too. For example:

    “I recommended this stock because it aligns with your investment history and current market trend.”

    This openness helps users verify, query, and trust the AI output.

     b. Auditability

    Organizations nowadays carry out AI audits, just like accountancy audits, in order to detect bias, misuse, or security risks. Third-party auditors confirm compliance with law and ethics.

     c. Watermarking and Provenance

    Computer graphics, movies, and text are digitally watermarked so that it becomes easier to trace their origin. This deters deepfakes and disinformation and reestablishes a sense of digital truth.

    4. Moral Design and Human Alignment

    Trust isn’t technical — it’s emotional and moral.

    Humans trust systems that share the same values, treat information ethically, and act predictably.

    a. Constitutional AI

    Certain more recent AIs, such as Anthropic’s Claude, are trained on a “constitution” — ethical rules of behavior written by humans. This ensures the model acts predictably within moral constraints without requiring constant external correction.

    b. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)

    GPT-5 and other such models are trained on human feedback cycles. Humans review AI output and label it as positive or negative, allowing the model to learn empathy and moderation over time.

     c. Bias Detection

    Bias is such an invisible crack in AI — it wipes out trust.

    2025 models employ bias-scanning tools and inclusive datasets to minimize stereotypes in such areas as gender, race, and culture.

    5. Global AI Regulations: The New Safety Net

    Governments are now part of the privacy and trust ecosystem.

    From India’s Digital India AI Framework to the EU AI Act, regulators are implementing rules that require:

    • Data transparency
    • Explicit user consent
    • Human oversight for sensitive decisions (such as healthcare or hiring)
    • Transparent labeling of AI-generated content

    This is a historic turning point: AI governance has moved from optional to required.
    The outcome? A safer, more accountable world for AI.

     6. Personalization Through Trust — Without Intrusiveness

    Interestingly, personalization — the strongest suit of AI — can also be perceived as intrusive.

    That’s why next-generation AI systems employ privacy-preserving personalization:

    • Your data is stored securely and locally.
    • You can view and modify what the AI is aware of about you.
    • You are able to delete your data at any time.

    Think of your AI recalling you as veggie dinners or comforting words — but not recalling that deleted sensitive message last week. That’s considerate intelligence.

     7. Technical Innovations Fueling Trust

    Technology Trait Purpose Human Benefit

    • Zero-Knowledge Proofs internally verify data without exposing it. They ask systems to verify identity without exposing details.
    • Homomorphic Encryption
    • Leave encrypted data alone
    • Makes sensitive information safe even when it’s being calculated
    • Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC)
    • Shard data between servers so no one gets the complete picture
    • Preserves privacy in collaborative AI systems
    • AI Firewall
    • Prevents malicious output or action
    • Prevents policy breaches or exploitation

    These advances don’t only make AI strong, they make it inherently trustworthy.

    8. Building Emotional Trust: Beyond Code

    • The last level of trust is not technical — it’s emotional.
    • Humanity wants AI that is human-aware, empathic, and safe.

    They employ emotionally intelligent language — they recognize the limits of their knowledge, they articulate their limits, and inform us that they don’t know.
    That honesty creates a feel of authenticity that raw accuracy can’t.

    For instance:

    • “I might be wrong, but from what you’re describing, it does sound like an anxiety disorder. You might consider talking with a health professional.”
    • That kind of tone — humble, respectful, and open — is what truly creates trust.

    9. The Human Role in the Trust Equation

    • Even with all of these innovations, the human factor is still at the center.
    • AI. It can be transparent, private, and aligned — yet still a product of humans. Intention.
    • Firms and coders need to be values-driven, to reveal limits, and to harness users where AI falters.
    • Genuine confidence is not blind; it’s informed.

    The better we comprehend how AI works, the more confidently we can depend on it.

    Final Thought: Privacy as Power

    • Privacy in 2025 is not solitude — it’s mastery.
    • When AI respects your data, explains why it made a choice, and shares your values, it’s no longer an enigmatic black box — it’s a friend you can trust.

    AI privacy in the future isn’t about protecting secrets — it’s about upholding dignity.
    And the smarter technology gets, the more successful it will be judged on how much it gains — and keeps — our trust.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 174
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 16/10/2025In: Technology

What is “agentic AI,” and why is it the next big shift?

“agentic AI,”

agiai2025aialignmentaiplanningaiworkflowsautogpttoolusingai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 16/10/2025 at 12:06 pm

     1. Name-of-the-game meeting Agentic AI: Chatbots vs. Digital Doers Old-school AI models, such as those that spawned early chatbots, were reactive. You told them what to do, and they did. But agentic AI turns that on its head. An AI agent can: Get you what you want ("I'd like to plan a trip to JapanRead more

     1. Name-of-the-game meeting Agentic AI: Chatbots vs. Digital Doers

    Old-school AI models, such as those that spawned early chatbots, were reactive.

    You told them what to do, and they did.

    But agentic AI turns that on its head.

    An AI agent can:

    • Get you what you want (“I’d like to plan a trip to Japan”)
    • Break it down into steps (flights, hotel, organizing itinerary)Fill the gaps between apps and websites
    • Learn from the result, get better, and do better next time

    It’s not merely reacting — it’s thinking, deciding, and behaving.

    You can consider agentic AI as granting initiative to machines.

     2. What’s Going On Behind the Scenes?

    Agentic AI relies on three fundamental capabilities that, when combined, create a whole lot more than a chatbot:

     1. Goal-Oriented Reasoning

    It doesn’t require step-by-step direction. It finds your goal and how to achieve it, the way a human would if given a multi-step process.

    2. Leverage of Tools and APIs

    Agentic systems can be connected into the web, databases, calendars, payment systems, or any third-party application. That is, they can act in the world — send mail, check facts, even buy things up to limit settings.

     3. Memory and Feedback Loops

    Static models forget. Agentic AIs don’t. They recall what they did, what worked, and what didn’t — constantly adapting.

    So if you say to your agent, “Book me a weekend break like last time but cheaper,” it knows what you like, what carrier you use, and how much you’re willing to pay.

    3. 2025 Real-World Applications of Agentic AI

     Personal Assistants

    Picture a more sarcastic Siri or ChatGPT who doesn’t simply answer — acts. You might say,”Show me a 3-bedroom flat in Delhi below ₹60,000 and book viewings.”
    In a matter of minutes, it’s searched listings, weeded through possibilities, and booked appointments on your schedule.

    Business Automation

    Firms now use agentic AIs as independent analysts and project managers.

    They can:

    • Automate marketing plans from customer insights
    • Track competitors
    • Send summary reports to teams automatically

    Software Development

    Developers use “coding agents” that can plan, write, test, and debug entire software modules with minimal oversight. Tools like OpenAI’s GPT-5 Agents and Cognition’s Devin are early examples.

    Healthcare and Research

    In the lab, agentic AIs conduct research cycles: reading new papers, suggesting experiments, interpreting results — and even writing interim reports for scientists.

    ???? Customer Support
    Agentic systems operate 24/7 automated customer service centers that answer questions, solve problems, or issue refunds without assistance.

     4. How Is Agentic AI Special Compared To Regular AI?

    Break it down:

    Evolution is from dialogue to collaboration. Rather than AI listening passively, it is an active engagement with your daily work life.

     5. The Enabling Environment

    Agentic AI does not take place in a vacuum. It is situated within an ever-more diverse AI universe comprised of:

    • Large Language Models (LLMs) for language and reasoning competence
    • Tool sets (e.g., APIs, databases, web access) for function
    • Memory modules for deep learning
    • Safety layers to avoid abuse or overreaching

    All together, these abilities build an AI that’s less of a program — more of a virtual companion.

     6. The Ethical and Safety Frontier

    Granting agency to AI, of course, gives rise to utterly serious questions:

    • What if an AI agent makes a mistake or deviates from script?
    • How do we make machines responsible for half-autonomous actions?
    • Can agents be humorously tricked into performing evil or evil-like actions?

    In order to address these, businesses are adopting “constitutional AI” principles — rules and ethical limits built into the system.

    There is also a focus on human-in-the-loop control, i.e., humans have ultimate control over significant actions.

    Agentic AI must be aligned, but not necessarily intelligent.

    7. Why It’s the Next Big Shift

    Agentic AI is to the 2020s what the internet was to the 1990s — game-changing enabler.

    It is the missing piece that allows AI to go from knowledge to action.

    Why it matters:

    • Productivity Revolution: Companies can automate end-to-end processes.
    • Personal Empowerment: People receive assistants that do day-to-day drudgery.
    • Smarter Learning Systems: AI instructors learn, prepare lessons, and monitor progress on their own.
    • Innovation at Scale: Co-operating networks of AI agents can be deployed by developers — digital teams.

    In short, Agentic AI turns “I can tell you how” into “I’ll do it for you.”

    8. Humanizing the Relationship

    Agentic AI humanizes the way we are collaborating with technology as well.

    We will no longer be typing in commands, but rather will be negotiating with our AIs — loading them up with purposes and feedback as if we are working with staff.

    It is a partnership model:

    • We give intent
    • The AI gives action
    • Together we co-create outcomes

    The best systems will possess initiative and respect for boundaries — such as excellent human aides.

     9. The Road Ahead

    Between and after 2026, look for:

    • Agent networks: Several AIs independently working together on sophisticated tasks.
    • Local agents: Device-bound AIs that respect your privacy and learn your habits.
    • Regulated AI actions: Governments imposing boundaries on what digital agents can do within legislation.
    • Emotional intelligence: Agents able to sense tone, mood, and change behavior empathetically.

    We’re moving toward a world where AI doesn’t just serve us — it understands and evolves with us.

     Final Thought

    • Agentic AI is a seminal moment in tech history — when AI becomes an agent.
    • No longer a passive brain waiting for guidance, but an active force assisting humans to dream, construct, and act more quickly.

    But with all this freedom comes enormous responsibility. The challenge of the future is to see that these computer agents continue to function with human values — cooperative, secure, and open.

    If we get it right, agentic AI will not substitute for human effort — it will enhance human ability.

    And lastly, the future is not man or machine — it’s man and machine thinking and acting together.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 165
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 16/10/2025In: Technology

. How are AI models becoming multimodal?

AI models becoming multimodal

ai2025aimodelscrossmodallearningdeeplearninggenerativeaimultimodalai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 16/10/2025 at 11:34 am

     1. What Does "Multimodal" Actually Mean? "Multimodal AI" is just a fancy way of saying that the model is designed to handle lots of different kinds of input and output. You could, for instance: Upload a photo of a broken engine and say, "What's going on here?" Send an audio message and have it tranRead more

     1. What Does “Multimodal” Actually Mean?

    “Multimodal AI” is just a fancy way of saying that the model is designed to handle lots of different kinds of input and output.

    You could, for instance:

    • Upload a photo of a broken engine and say, “What’s going on here?”
    • Send an audio message and have it translated, interpreted, and summarized.
    • Display a chart or a movie, and the AI can tell you what is going on inside it.
    • Request the AI to design a presentation in images, words, and charts.

    It’s almost like AI developed new “senses,” so it could visually perceive, hear, and speak instead of reading.

     2. How Did We Get Here?

    The path to multimodality started when scientists understood that human intelligence is not textual — humans experience the world in image, sound, and feeling. Then, engineers began to train artificial intelligence on hybrid datasets — images with text, video with subtitles, audio clips with captions.

    Neural networks have developed over time to:

    • Merge multiple streams of data (e.g., words + pixels + sound waves)
    • Make meaning consistent across modes (the word “dog” and the image of a dog become one “idea”)
    • Make new things out of multimodal combinations (e.g., telling what’s going on in an image in words)

    These advances resulted in models that translate the world as a whole in, non-linguistic fashion.

    3. The Magic Under the Hood — How Multimodal Models Work

    It’s centered around something known as a shared embedding space.
    Conceptualize it as an enormous mental canvas surface upon which words and pictures, and sounds all co-reside in the same space of meaning.

    This is basically how it works in a grossly oversimplified nutshell:

    • There are some encoders to which separate kinds of input are broken up and treated separately (words get a text encoder, pictures get a vision encoder, etc.).
    • These encoders take in information and convert it into some common “lingua franca” — math vectors.
    • One of the ways the engine works is by translating each of those vectors and combining them into smart, cross-modal output.

    So when you tell it, “Describe what’s going on in this video,” the model puts together:

    • The visual stream (frames, colors, things)
    • The audio stream (words, tone, ambient noise)
    • The language stream (your query and its answer)

    That’s what AI does: deep, context-sensitive understanding across modes.

     4. Multimodal AI Applications in the Real World in 2025

    Now, multimodal AI is all around us — transforming life in quiet ways.

    a. Learning

    Students watch video lectures, and AI automatically summarizes lectures, highlights key points, and even creates quizzes. Teachers utilize it to build interactive multimedia learning environments.

    b. Medicine

    Physicians can input medical scans, lab work, and patient history into a single system. The AI cross-matches all of it to help make diagnoses — catching what human doctors may miss.

    c. Work and Productivity

    You have a meeting and AI provides a transcript, highlights key decisions, and suggests follow-up emails — all from sound, text, and context.

    d. Creativity and Design

    Multimodal AI is employed by marketers and artists to generate campaign imagery from text inputs, animate them, and even write music — all based on one idea.

    e. Accessibility

    For visually and hearing impaired individuals, multimodal AI will read images out or translate speech into text in real-time — bridging communication gaps.

     5. Top Multimodal Models of 2025

    Model Modalities Supported Unique Strengths:

    GPT-5 (OpenAI)Text, image, soundDeep reasoning with image & sound processing. Gemini 2 (Google DeepMind)Text, image, video, code. Real-time video insight, together with YouTube & WorkspaceClaude 3.5 (Anthropic)Text, imageEmpathetic contextual and ethical multimodal reasoningMistral Large + Vision Add-ons. Text, image. ixa. Open-source multimodal business capability LLaMA 3 + SeamlessM4TText, image, speechSpeech translation and understanding in multiple languages

    These models aren’t observing things happen — they’re making things happen. An input such as “Design a future city and tell its history” would now produce both the image and the words, simultaneously in harmony.

     6. Why Multimodality Feels So Human

    When you communicate with a multimodal AI, it’s no longer writing in a box. You can tell, show, and hear. The dialogue is richer, more realistic — like describing something to your friend who understands you.

    That’s what’s changing the AI experience from being interacted with to being collaborated with.

    You’re not providing instructions — you’re co-creating.

     7. The Challenges: Why It’s Still Hard

    Despite the progress, multimodal AI has its downsides:

    • Data bias: The AI can misinterpret cultures or images unless the training data is rich.
    • Computation cost: Resources are consumed by multimodal models — enormous processing and power are required to train them.
    • Interpretability: It is hard to know why the model linked a visual sign with a textual sign.
    • Privacy concerns: Processing videos and personal media introduces new ethical concerns.

    Researchers are working day and night to develop transparent reasoning and edge processing (executing AI on devices themselves) to circumvent8. The Future: AI That “Perceives” Like Us

    AI will be well on its way to real-time multimodal interaction by the end of 2025 — picture your assistant scanning your space with smart glasses, hearing your tone of voice, and reacting to what it senses.

    Multimodal AI will more and more:

    • Interprets facial expressions and emotional cues
    • Synthesizes sensor data from wearables
    • Creates fully interactive 3D simulations or videos
    • Works in collaboration with humans in design, healthcare, and learning

    In effect, AI is no longer so much a text reader but rather a perceiver of the world.

     Final Thought

    • Multimodality is not a technical achievement — it’s human.
    • It’s machines learning to value the richness of our world: sight, sound, emotion, and meaning.

    The more senses that AI can learn from, the more human it will become — not replacing us, but complementing what we can do, learn, create, and connect.

    Over the next few years, “show, don’t tell” will not only be a rule of storytelling, but how we’re going to talk to AI itself.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 189
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 16/10/2025In: Technology

. What are the most powerful AI models in 2025?

the most powerful AI models in 2025

aimodels2025airesearchfutureaigenerativeailanguagemodelspowerfulai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 16/10/2025 at 10:47 am

     1. OpenAI’s GPT-5 — The Benchmark of Intelligence OpenAI’s GPT-5 is widely seen as the flagship of large language models (LLMs). It’s a massive leap from GPT-4 — faster, sharper, and deeply context-aware. What is hybrid reasoning architecture that is strong in GPT-5 is that it is able to combine neRead more

     1. OpenAI’s GPT-5 — The Benchmark of Intelligence

    OpenAI’s GPT-5 is widely seen as the flagship of large language models (LLMs). It’s a massive leap from GPT-4 — faster, sharper, and deeply context-aware.
    What is hybrid reasoning architecture that is strong in GPT-5 is that it is able to combine neural creativity (narrating, brain-storming) with symbolic logic (structured reasoning, math, coding). It also has multi-turn memory, i.e., it remembers things from long conversations and adapts to user tone and style.

    What it is capable of:

    • Write or code entire computer programs
    • Parse papers or research papers in numerous languages
    • Understand and generate images, charts, diagrams
    • Talk to real-world applications with autonomous “AI agents”

    GPT-5 is not only a text model — it’s turning into a digital co-worker who can build your tastes, assist workflows, and even start projects.

     2. Anthropic Claude 3.5 — The Empathic Thinker

    Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 family is famous for ethics-driven alignment and human-like conversation. Claude responds in a voice that feels serene, emotionally smart, and thoughtful — built to avoid bias and misinformation.
    What the users love most is the way Claude “thinks out loud”: it exposes its thought process, so users believe in its conclusions.

    Strengths in its core:

    • Fantastic grasp of long, complicated texts (over 200K tokens)
    • Very subtle summarizing and research synthesis
    • Emotionally intelligent voice highly suitable for education, therapy, and HR use

    Claude 3.5 has made itself the “teacher” of AI models — intelligent, patient, and thoughtful.

    3. Google DeepMind Gemini 2 — The Multimodal Genius

    Google’s Gemini 2 (and Pro) is the future of multimodal AI. Trained on text, video, audio, and code, Gemini can look at a video, summarize it, explain what’s going on, and even offer suggestions for editing — all at once.

    It also works perfectly within Google’s ecosystem, driving YouTube analysis, Google Workspace, and Android AI assistants.

    Key features:

    • Real-time visual reasoning and voice comprehension
    • Integrated search and citation capabilities for accuracy of fact-checking
    • High-order math and programming strength through AlphaCode 3 foundation

    Gemini 2 breaks the barrier between search engine and thinking friend, arguably the most general-purpose model ever developed.

     4. Mistral Large — The Open-Source Giant

    Among open-source configurations, Mistral is the rockstar of today. Its Mistral Large model competes against closed-shop behemoths like GPT-5 in reason and speed but is open-source to be extended by developers.

    This openness has forced innovation for startups and research institutions that cannot afford the cost of Big Tech’s closed APIs.

    Why it matters:

    • Open weights enable transparency and customization
    • Lean and efficient — fits on local hardware
    • Used extensively all over Europe for sovereign data AI initiatives

    Mistral’s philosophy is simple: exchange intelligence, not behind corporate paywalls.

    5. Meta LLaMA 3 — Researcher Favorite

    Meta’s LLaMA 3 series (especially the 70B and 400B versions) has revolutionized open-source AI. It is heavily fine-tuned, so organizations can fine-tune private versions on their data.

    Much of the next-generation AI assistants and agents are developed on top of LLaMA 3 due to its scalability and open licensing.

    Standout features:

    • Better multilingual performance
    • Efficient reasoning and code generation
    • Huge open ecosystem sustained by Meta’s developer community

    LLaMA 3 symbolizes the democratization of intelligence — showing that open models can compete with giants.

     6. xAI’s Grok 3 — The Real-Time Social AI

    Elon Musk’s xAI is building up Grok further, now owned by X (formerly Twitter). Grok 3 can consume real-time streams of information and deliver responses with instant knowledge of news articles, social causes, and cultural phenomena.

    Less scholarly oriented than GPT-5 or Claude, the strength of Grok is the immediacy aspect — one of the rare AIs linked to the constantly moving heart of the internet.

    Why it excels:

    • Real-time access to the X platform
    • Brave, talkative nature
    • Xiexiexie for content creation, trending, and online conversation

     7. Yi Large & Qwen 2 — Asia’s AI Young Talents

    China has revolutionized AI with models like Yi Large (by 01.AI) and Qwen 2 (by Alibaba). They are multimodal and multilingual, and trained on immense differences in culture and language.

    They are revolutionizing the face of the Asian AI market by facilitating native language processing for Mandarin, Hindi, Japanese, and beyond.

    Why they matter:

    • Conquering world language barriers
    • Enabling easier local application of AI
    • Competition on a global level with efficiency and affordability

    The Bigger Picture: Collaboration, Not Competition

    Competition to develop the most powerful AI is not dumb brute strength — it is all about trust, usability, and availability.

    Each model brings something different to the table:

    • GPT-5: reason and imagination
    • Claude 3.5: morals and empathy
    • Gemini 2: fact-checking anchorage and multimodality
    • Mistral/LLaMA: open-mindedness and adaptability

    Strength is not in a single model, but how they support and complement one another — building an ecosystem for AI whereby human beings are able to work with intelligence, not against it.

    Last Thought

    It’s not even “Which is the strongest model?” by 2025, but “Which model frees humans most?”

    From writers and teachers to doctors and writers, these AI applications are becoming partners of progress, not just drivers of automation.
    The greatest AI, ultimately, is one that makes us think harder, work smarter, and be human.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 166
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 15/10/2025In: Education, Technology

If students can “cheat” with AI, how should exams and assignments evolve?

students can “cheat” with AI,

academic integrityai and cheatingai in educationassessment designedtech ethicsfuture-of-education
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 15/10/2025 at 2:35 pm

    If Students Are Able to "Cheat" Using AI, How Should Exams and Assignments Adapt? Artificial Intelligence (AI) has disrupted schools in manners no one had envisioned a decade ago. From ChatGPT, QuillBot, Grammarly, and math solution tools powered by AI, one can write essays, summarize chapter contenRead more

    If Students Are Able to “Cheat” Using AI, How Should Exams and Assignments Adapt?

    Artificial Intelligence (AI) has disrupted schools in manners no one had envisioned a decade ago. From ChatGPT, QuillBot, Grammarly, and math solution tools powered by AI, one can write essays, summarize chapter content, solve equations, and even simulate critical thinking — all in mere seconds. No wonder educators everywhere are on edge: if one can “cheat” using AI, does testing even exist anymore?

    But the more profound question is not how to prevent students from using AI — it’s how to rethink learning and evaluation in a world where information is abundant, access is instantaneous, and automation is feasible. Rather than looking for AI-proof tests, educators can create AI-resistant, human-scale evaluations that demand reflection, imagination, and integrity.

    Let’s consider what assignments and tests need to be such that education still matters even with AI at your fingertips.

     1. Reinventing What’s “Cheating”

    Historically, cheating meant glancing over someone else’s work or getting unofficial help. But in 2025, AI technology has clouded the issue. When a student uses AI to get ideas, proofread for grammatical mistakes, or reword a piece of writing — is it cheating, or just taking advantage of smart technology?

    The answer lies in intention and awareness:

    • If AI is used to replace thinking, that’s cheating.
    • If AI is used to enhance thinking, that’s learning.

     Example: A student who gets AI to produce his essay isn’t learning. But a student employing AI to outline arguments, structure, then composing his own is showing progress.

    Teachers first need to begin by explaining — and not punishing — what looks like good use of AI.

    2. Beyond Memory Tests

    Rote memorization and fact-recall tests are old hat with AI. Anyone can have instant access to definitions, dates, or equations through AI. Tests must therefore change to test what machines cannot instantly fake: understanding, thinking, and imagination.

    • Healthy changes are:Open-book, open-AI tests: Permit the use of AI but pose questions requiring analysis, criticism, or application.
    • Higher-order thinking activities: Rather than “Describe photosynthesis,” consider “How could climate change influence the effectiveness of tropical ecosystems’ photosynthesis?”
    • Context questions: Design anchor questions about current or regional news AI will not have been trained on.

    The aim isn’t to trap students — it’s to let actual understanding come through.

     3. Building Tests That Respect Process Over Product

    If we can automate the final product to perfection, then we should begin grading on the path that we take to get there.

    Some robust transformations:

    • Reveal your work: Have students submit outlines, drafts, and thinking notes with their completed project.
    • Process portfolios: Have students document each step in their learning process — where and when they applied AI tools.
    • Version tracking: Employ tools (e.g., version history in Google Docs) to observe how a student evolves over time.

    By asking students to reflect on why they are using AI and what they are learning through it, cheating is self-reflection.

    4. Using Real-World, Authentic Tests

    Real life is not typically taken with closed-book tests. Real life does include us solving problems to ourselves, working with other people, and making choices — precisely the places where human beings and computers need to communicate.

    So tests need to reflect real-world issues:

    • Case studies and simulations: Students use knowledge to solve real-world-style problems (e.g., “Create an AI policy for your school”).
    • Group assignments: Organize the project so that everyone contributes something unique, so work accomplished by AI is more difficult to imitate.
    • Performance-based assignments: Presentations, prototypes, and debates show genuine understanding that can’t be done by AI.

     Example: Rather than “Analyze Shakespeare’s Hamlet,” ask a student of literature to pose the question, “How would an AI understand Hamlet’s indecisiveness — and what would it misunderstand?”

    That’s not a test of literature — that is a test of human perception.

     5. Designing AI-Integrated Assignments

    Rather than prohibit AI, let’s put it into the assignment. Not only does that recognize reality but also educates digital ethics and critical thinking.

    Examples are:

    • “Summarize this topic with AI, then check its facts and correct its errors.”
    • “Write two essays using AI and decide which is better in terms of understanding — and why.”
    • “Let AI provide ideas for your project, but make it very transparent what is AI-generated and what is yours.”

    Projects enable students to learn AI literacy — how to review, revise, and refine machine content.

    6. Building Trust Through Transparency

    Distrust of AI cheating comes from loss of trust between students and teachers. The trust must be rebuilt through openness.

    • AI disclosure statements: Have students compose an essay on whether and in what way they employed AI on assignments.
    • Ethics discussions: Utilize class time to discuss integrity, responsibility, and fairness.
    • Teacher modeling: Educators can just use AI themselves to model good, open use — demonstrating to students that it’s a tool, not an aid to cheating.

    If students observe honesty being practiced, they will be likely to imitate it.

    7. Rethinking Tests for the Networked World

    Old-fashioned time tests — silent rooms, no computers, no conversation — are no longer the way human brains function anymore. Future testing is adaptive, interactive, and human-facilitated testing.

    Potential models:

    • Verbal or viva-style examinations: Assess genuine understanding by dialogue, not memorization.
    • Capstone projects: Extended, interdisciplinary projects that assess depth, imagination, and persistent effort.
    • AI-driven adaptive quizzes: Software that adjusts difficulty to performance, ensuring genuine understanding.

    These models make cheating virtually impossible — not because they’re enforced rigidly, but because they demand real-time thinking.

     8. Maintaining the Human Heart of Education

    • Regardless of where AI can go, the purpose of education stays human: to form character, judgment, empathy, and imagination.
    • AI may perhaps emulate style but never originality. AI may perhaps replicate facts but never wisdom.

    So the teacher’s job now needs to transition from tester to guide and architect — assisting students in applying AI properly and developing the distinctively human abilities machines can’t: curiosity, courage, and compassion.

    As a teacher joked:

    • “If a student can use AI to cheat, perhaps the problem is not the student — perhaps the problem is the assignment.”
    • That realization encourages education to take further — to design activities that are worthy of achieving, not merely of getting done.

     Last Thought

    • AI is not the end of testing; it’s a call to redesign it.
    • Rather than anxiety that AI will render learning obsolete, we can leverage it to make learning more real than ever before.
    • In the era of AI, the finest assignments and tests no longer have to wonder:

    “What do you know?”

    but rather:

    • “What can you make, think, and do — AI can’t?”
    • That’s the type of assessment that breeds not only better learners, but wise human beings.
    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 162
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 15/10/2025In: Education, Technology

How to design assessments in the age of AI?

design assessments in the age of AI

academic integrityai in educationassessment designauthentic assessmentedtechfuture of assessment
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 15/10/2025 at 1:33 pm

    How to Design Tests in the Age of AI In this era of learning, everything has changed — not only the manner in which students learn but also the manner in which they prove that they have learned. Students today employ tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or math solution AI tools as an integral part ofRead more

    How to Design Tests in the Age of AI

    In this era of learning, everything has changed — not only the manner in which students learn but also the manner in which they prove that they have learned. Students today employ tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or math solution AI tools as an integral part of their daily chores. While technology enables learning, it also renders the conventional models of assessment through memorization, essays, or homework monotonous.

    So the challenge that educators today are facing is:

    How do we create fair, substantial, and authentic tests in a world where AI can spew up “perfect” answers in seconds?

    The solution isn’t to prohibit AI — it’s to redefine the assessment process itself. Let’s start on how.

    1. Redefining What We’re Assessing

    For generations, education has questioned students about what they know — formulas, facts, definitions. But machines can memorize anything at the blink of an eye, so tests based on memorization are becoming increasingly irrelevant.

    In the AI era, we must test what AI does not do well:

    • Critical thinking — Do students understand AI-presents information?
    • Creativity — Can they leverage AI as a tool to make new things?
    • Ethical thinking — Do they know when and how to apply AI in an ethical manner?
    • Problem setting — Can they establish a problem first before looking for a solution?

    Attempt replacing the following questions: Rather than asking “Explain causes of World War I,” ask “If AI composed an essay on WWI causes, how would you analyze its argument or position?”

    This shifts the attention away from memorization.

     2. Creating “AI-Resilient” Tests

    An AI-resilient assessment is one where even if a student uses AI, the tool can’t fully answer the question — because the task requires human judgment, personal context, or live reasoning.

    Here are a few effective formats:

    • Oral and interactive assessments:Ask students to explain their thought process verbally. You’ll see instantly if they understand the concept or just relied on AI.
    •  Process-based assessment:Rather than grading the final product alone, grade the process — brainstorm, drafts, feedback, revisions.

    Have students record how they utilized AI tools ethically (e.g., “I used AI to grammar-check but wrote the analysis myself”).

    •  Scenario or situational activities:Provide real-world dilemmas that need interpretation, empathy, and ethical thinking — areas where AI is not yet there.

    Choose students for the competition based on how many tasks they have been able to accomplish.

    Example: “You are an instructor in a heterogeneously structured class. How do you use AI in helping learners of various backgrounds without infusing bias?”

    Thinking activities:

    Instruct students to compare or criticize AI responses with their own ideas. This compels students to think about thinking — an important metacognition activity.

     3. Designing Tests “AI-Inclusive” Not “AI-Proof”

    it’s a futile exercise trying to make everything “AI-proof.” Students will always find new methods of using the tools. What needs to happen instead is that tests need to accept AI as part of the process.

    • Teach AI literacy: Demonstrate how to use AI to research, summarize, or brainstorm — responsibly.
    • Request disclosure: Have students report when and how they utilized AI. It encourages honesty and introspection.

    Mark not only the result, but their thought process as well: Have students discuss why they accepted or rejected AI suggestions.

    Example prompt:

    • “Use AI to create three possible solutions to this problem. Then critique them and let me know which one you would use and why.”

    This makes AI a study buddy, and not a cheat code.

     4. Immersing Technology with Human Touch

    Teachers should not be driven away from students by AI — but drawn closer by making assessment more human-friendly and participatory.

    Ideas:

    • Blend virtual portfolios (AI-written writing, programmed coding, or designed design) with face-to-face discussion of the student’s process.
    • Tap into peer review sessions — students critique each other’s work, with human judgment set against AI-produced output.
    • Mix live, interactive quizzes — in which the questions change depending on what students answer, so the tests are lifelike and surprising.

    Human element: A student may use AI to redo his report, but a live presentation tells him how deep he really is.

     5. Justice and Integrity

    Academic integrity in the age of AI is novel. Cheating isn’t plagiarizing anymore but using crutches too much without comprehending them.

    Teachers can promote equity by:

    • Having clear AI policies: Establishing what is acceptable (e.g., grammar assistance) and not acceptable (e.g., writing entire essays).

    Employing AI-detecting software responsibly — not to sanction, but to encourage an open discussion.

    • Requesting reflection statements: “Tell us how you employed AI on the completion of this assignment.”

    It builds trust, not fear, and shows teachers care more about effort and integrity than being great.

     6. Remixing Feedback in the AI Era

    • AI can speed up grading, but feedback must be human. Students learn optimally when feedback is personal, empathetic, and constructive.
    • Teachers can use AI to produce first-draft feedback reports, then revise with empathy and personal insight.
    • Have students use AI to edit their work — but ask them to explain what they learned from the process.
    • Focus on growth feedback — learning skills, not grades.

     Example: Instead of a “AI plagiarism detected” alert, give a “Let’s discuss how you can responsibly use AI to enhance your writing instead of replacing it.” message.

     7. From Testing to Learning

    The most powerful change can be this one:

    • Testing no longer has to be a judgment — it can be an odyssey.

    AI eliminates the myth that tests are the sole measure of demonstrating what is learned. Tests, instead, become an act of self-discovery and learning skills.

    Teachers can:

    • Substitute high-stakes testing with continuous formative assessment.
    • Incentivize creativity, critical thinking, and ethical use of AI.
    • Students, rather than dreading AI, learn from it.

    Final Thought

    • The era of AI is not the end of actual learning — it’s the start of a new era of testing.
    • A time when students won’t be tested on what they’ve memorized, but how they think, question, and create.
    • An era where teachers are mentors and artists, leading students through a virtual world with sense and sensibility.
    • When exams encourage curiosity rather than relevance, thinking rather than repetition, judgment rather than imitation — then AI is not the enemy but the ally.

    Not to be smarter than AI. To make students smarter, more moral, and more human in a world of AI.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 160
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 15/10/2025In: Education, Technology

What are the privacy, bias, and transparency risks of using AI in student assessment and feedback?

the privacy, bias, and transparency r ...

ai transparencyalgorithmic biaseducational technology risksfairness in assessmentstudent data privacy
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 15/10/2025 at 12:59 pm

    1. Privacy Threats — "Who Owns the Student's Data?" AI tools tap into enormous reservoirs of student information — what they score on tests, their written assignments, their web searches, and even how rapidly they respond to a question. This teaches AI about students, but risks making possible to miRead more

    1. Privacy Threats — “Who Owns the Student’s Data?”

    AI tools tap into enormous reservoirs of student information — what they score on tests, their written assignments, their web searches, and even how rapidly they respond to a question. This teaches AI about students, but risks making possible to misuse information and monitoring.

     The problems:

    • Gathering data without specific consent: Few students (and parents, too) are aware of what data EdTech technology collects and for how long.
    • Surveillance and profiling: AI may create long-term “learning profiles” tracking students and labeling them as “slow,” “average,” or “gifted.” Such traits unfairly affect teachers’ or institutions’ decisions.
    • Third-party exploitation: EdTech companies could sell anonymized (or not anonymized) data for marketing, research, or gain, with inadequate safeguards.

     The human toll:

    Imagine a timid student who is slower to complete assignments. If an AI grading algorithm interprets that uncertainty as “low engagement,” it might mislabel their promise — a temporary struggle redefined as a lasting online epidemic.

     The remedy:

    • Control and transparency are essential.
    • Schools must inform parents and students what they are collecting and why.
    • Information must be encrypted, anonymized, and never applied except to enhance education.

    Users need to be able to opt out or delete their data, as adults in other online spaces.

    2. Threats of Bias — “When Algorithms Reflect Inequality”

    AI technology is biased. It is taught on data, and data is a reflection of society, with all its inequalities. At school, that can mean unequal tests that put some groups of children at a disadvantage.

     The problems

    • Cultural and linguistic bias: Essay-grading AI may penalize students who use non-native English or ethnically diverse sentences, confusing them with grammatical mistakes.
    • Socioeconomic bias: Students from poorer backgrounds can be lower graded by algorithms merely because they reflect “lower-performing” populations of the past in the training set.
    • Historical bias in training data: AI trained on old standardized tests or teacher ratings that were historically biased will be able to enact it.

     The human cost

    Consider a student from a rural school who uses regional slang or nonstandard grammar. A biased assumption AI system can flag their work as poor or ambiguous, and choke creativity and self-expression. The foundation of this can undermine confidence and reify stereotypes in the long term.

    The solution:

    • AI systems used in schools need to be audited for bias before deployment.
    • Multi-disciplinary teachers, linguists, and cultural experts must be involved in the process.

    Feedback mechanisms should provide human validation — giving teachers the ultimate decision, not the algorithm.

    3. Risks of Openness — “The Black Box Problem”

    Almost all AI systems operate like a black box — they decide, but even developers cannot always understand how and why. This opacity raises gigantic ethical and learning issues.

     The issues:

    • Transparent grading: If a student is assigned a low grade by an AI essay grader, can anyone precisely inform what was wrong or why?
    • Limited accountability: When an AI makes a mistake — misreading tone, ignoring context, or being biased — who’s responsible: the teacher, school, or tech company?
    • Lack of explainability: When AI models won’t explain themselves, students don’t trust the criticism. It’s a directive to follow, not a teachable moment.

     The human cost

    Picture being told, “The AI considers your essay incoherent,” with no explanation or detail. The student is still frustrated and perplexed, not educated. Education relies on dialogue, not solo edicts.

    The solution:

    • Schools can utilize AI software providing explicable outputs — e.g., marking up what in a piece of work has affected the grade.
    • Teachers must contextualize AI commentary, summarizing its peaks and troughs.

    Policymakers may require “AI transparency standards” in schools so that automated processes can be made accountable.

    4. The Trust Factor — “Students Must Feel Seen, Not Scanned”

    • Learning is, by definition, a trust- and empathy-based relationship. Those students who are constantly put in a situation where they feel monitored, judged, or surveilled by machines will likely be hesitant to learn.
    • Feedback from machines or robots that is impersonal can render students invisible — reducing their individual voices to data points. It is especially dangerous with topics like literature, art, or philosophy, where subtlety and creativity are most important.

    Human instructors have gigantic empathy — they know when to guide, when to incite, and when to simply listen. AI cannot replace that emotional quotient.

    5. Finding the Balance — “AI as a Tool, Not a Judge”

    AI in education is not a bad thing. Used properly, it can add equity and efficiency. It can catch up on learning gaps early, prevent grading bias from overworked teachers, and provide consistent feedback.

    But only if that is done safely:

    • Teachers must stay in the loop — pre-approving AI feedback before the students’ eyes lay eyes on it.
    • AI must assist and not control. It must aid teachers, not replace them.
    • Policies must guarantee privacy and equity, setting rigorous ethical boundaries for EdTech companies.

     Final Thought

    AI can analyze data, but it cannot feel the human emotion of learning — fear of failure, thrill of discovery, pride of achievement. When AI software is introduced into classrooms without guardrails, it will make students data subjects, not learners.

    The answer, therefore, isn’t to stop AI — it’s to make it human.

    To design systems that respect student dignity, celebrate diversity, and work alongside teachers, not instead of them.

    •  AI can flag data — but teachers must flag humanity.
    • Technology can only then truly serve education, not the other way around.
    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 144
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 15/10/2025In: Education, Technology

How can AI assist rather than replace teachers?

AI assist rather than replace teacher

ai in educationclassroom innovationedtecheducaion technologyhuman-ai collaborationteacher support
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 15/10/2025 at 12:24 pm

    What can the AI do instead of replacing teachers? The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has sparked both excitement and fear. Teachers wonder — will AI replace teachers? But the truth is, AI has its greatest potential not in replacing human teachers, but assisting them. When used sRead more

    What can the AI do instead of replacing teachers?

    The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has sparked both excitement and fear. Teachers wonder — will AI replace teachers? But the truth is, AI has its greatest potential not in replacing human teachers, but assisting them. When used strategically, AI can make teachers more effective, more customized, and more creative in their work, so that they can focus on the things computers can’t do — empathy, motivation, and relating to individuals.

    Let us observe how AI can assist rather than substitute teachers in the new classrooms of today.

     1. Personalized Instruction for All Pupils

    • Every pupil has a distinct learning style — some learn fast, while others need more time or instructions. With AI, teachers can know such differences in learning in real time.
    • Adaptive learning software reviews the way in which students interact with content — how long on a question, what they get wrong, or what they’re having difficulty with.
    • Based on that, the system slows down or suggests more practice.
    • For instance, AI systems like Khanmigo (the artificial intelligence tutor from Khan Academy) or Century Tech allow teachers to track individual progress and view who needs additional support or challenge.

     Human edge: Educators then use this data to guide interventions, provide emotional support, or adjust strategy — stuff AI doesn’t understand or feel.

    2. Reducing Administrative Tasks

    Teachers waste their time grading assignments, creating materials, or composing reports — activities that steal time from teaching.

    AI can handle the drudgework:

    • Grading assistance: AI automatically grades objective tests (e.g., multiple choice or short answer).
    • Lesson planning: AI apps can create sample lesson plans or quizzes for a topic or skill.
    • Progress tracking: AI dashboards roll together attendance, grades, and progress in learning, so instructors can focus on strategy and not spreadsheets.
    • Teacher benefit: Saving paperwork time, instructors have more one-on-one time with students — listening, advising, and encouraging inquiry.

     3. Differentiated Instruction Facilitation

    • In a single classroom, there can be advanced students, average students, and struggling students with basic skills. AI can offer differentiated instruction automatically by offering customized materials to every learner.
    • For example, AI can recommend reading passages of different difficulty levels but on a related topic to ensure all of them contribute to class discussions.
    • For language learning, AI is able to personalize practice exercises in pronunciation or grammar practice to the level of fluency of the student.

     Human benefit: Teachers are able to use these learnings to put students in groups so they can learn from each other, get group assignments, or deliver one-on-one instruction where necessary.

     4. Overcoming Language and Accessibility Barriers

    • Artificially intelligent speech recognition and translation software (e.g., Microsoft’s Immersive Reader or Google’s Live Transcribe) aid multilingual or special-needs students to fully participate in class.
    • Text-to-speech and speech-to-text software helps hearing loss or dyslexia students.
    • AI translation allows non-native speakers to hear classes in real-time.

     Human strength: Educators are still the bridge — not only translating words, but also context, tone, and feeling — and making it work for inclusion and belonging.

    5. Data-Driven Insights for Better Teaching

    • Computer systems can look across patterns of learning over the course of a class — perhaps seeing that the majority of students had trouble with a certain concept. Teachers can then respond promptly by adjusting lessons or re-teaching to stop misunderstandings from spreading.
    • AI doesn’t return grades — it returns patterns.
    • Teachers can use them to guide teaching approach, pace, and even classroom layout.

    Human edge: AI gives us data, but only educators can take that and turn it into knowledge — when to hold, when to move forward, and when to just stop and talk.

     6. Innovative Co-Teaching Collaborator

    • AI can serve as a creative brainstorming collaborator for instructors.
    • Generative AI (Google Gemini or ChatGPT) can be leveraged by educators to come up with examples, analogies, or ideas for a project within seconds.
    • AI can replicate debate opponents or generate practice essays for class testing.

    Human strength: Teachers infuse learning with imagination, moral understanding, and a sense of humor — all out of the reach of algorithms.

     7. Emotional Intelligence and Mentorship — The Human Core

    • The most significant difference, perhaps, is this one: AI lacks empathy. It can simulate feeling in voice or words but never feels compassion, enthusiasm, or concern.
    • Teachers don’t just teach facts — they also give confidence, character, and curiosity. They notice when a child looks blue, when a student is off task, or when a class needs to laugh at more than one more worksheet.

    AI can’t replace that. But it can amplify it — releasing teachers from soul-crushing drudgery and giving them real-time feedback, it allows them to remain laser-sharp on what matters most: being human with children.

    8. The Right Balance: Human–AI Collaboration

    The optimal classroom of the future will likely be hybrid — where data, repetition, and adaptation are handled by AI, but conversation, empathy, and imagination are crafted by teachers.

    In balance:

    • AI is a tool, and not an educator.
    • Teachers are designers of learning, utilizing AI as a clever assistant, and not a competitor.

     Last Thought

    • AI does not substitute for teachers; it needs them.
    • Without the hand of a human to steer it, AI can be biased, uninformed, or emotionally numb.
    • But with a teacher in charge, AI is a force multiplier — enabling each student to learn more effectively, more efficiently, and more profoundly.

    AI shouldn’t be replacing the teacher in the classroom. It needs to make the teacher more human — less.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 171
  • 0
Answer
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 14/10/2025In: Technology

How do streaming vision-language models work for long video input?

streaming vision-language models

long video understandingmultimodal aistreaming modelstemporal attentionvideo processingvision-language models
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful
    Added an answer on 14/10/2025 at 12:17 pm

     Static Frames to Continuous Understanding Historically, AI models that "see" and "read" — vision-language models — were created for handling static inputs: one image and some accompanying text, maybe a short pre-processed video. That was fine for image captioning ("A cat on a chair") or short-formRead more

     Static Frames to Continuous Understanding

    Historically, AI models that “see” and “read” — vision-language models — were created for handling static inputs: one image and some accompanying text, maybe a short pre-processed video.

    That was fine for image captioning (“A cat on a chair”) or short-form understanding (“Describe this 10-second video”). But the world doesn’t work that way — video is streaming — things are happening over minutes or hours, with context building up.

    And this is where streaming VLMs come in handy: they are taught to process, memorize, and reason through live or prolonged video input, similar to how a human would perceive a movie, a livestream, or a security feed.

    What does it take for a Model to be      “Streaming”?

    A streaming vision-language model is taught to consume video as a stream of frames over time, as opposed to one chunk at a time.

    Here’s what that looks like technically:

    Frame-by-Frame Ingestion

    • The model consumes a stream of frames (images), usually 24–60 per second.
      Instead of re-starting, it accumulates its internal understanding with every new frame.

    Temporal Memory

    • The model uses memory modules or state caching to store what has happened before — who appeared on stage, what objects moved, or what actions were completed.

    Think of a short-term buffer: the AI doesn’t forget the last few minutes.

    Incremental Reasoning

    • As new frames come in, the model refines its reasoning — sensing changes, monitoring movement, and even making predictions about what will come next.

    Example: When someone grabs a ball and brings their arm back, the model predicts they’re getting ready to throw it.

    Language Alignment

    • Along the way, vision data is merged with linguistic embeddings so that the model can comment, respond to questions, or carry out commands on what it’s seeing — all in real time.

     A Simple Analogy

    Let’s say you’re watching an ongoing soccer match.

    • You don’t analyze each frame in isolation; you remember what just happened, speculate about what’s likely to happen next, and dynamically adjust your attention.
    • If someone asks you, “Who’s winning?” or “Why did the referee blow the whistle?”, you string together recent visual memory with contextual reasoning.
    • Streaming VLMs are being trained to do something very much the same — at computer speed.

     How They’re Built

    Streaming VLMs combine a number of AI modules:

    1.Vision Encoder (e.g., ViT or CLIP backbone)

    • Converts each frame into compact visual tokens or embeddings.

    2.Temporal Modeling Layer

    • Catches motion, temporal relations, and sequence between frames — normally through temporal attention using transformers or recurrent state caching.

    3.Language Model Integration

    • Connects the video understanding with a language model (e.g., a reduced GPT-like transformer) to enable question answering, summaries, or commentary.

    4.State Memory System

    • Maintains context over time — sometimes for hours — without computational cost explosion. This is through:
    • Sliding window attention (keeping only recent frames in attention).
    • Keyframe compression (saving summary frames at intervals).
    • Hierarchical memory (short term and long term store, e.g. a brain).

    5.Streaming Inference Pipeline

    • Instead of batch processing an entire video file, the system processes new frames in real-time, continuously updating outputs.

    Real-World Applications

    Surveillance & Safety Monitoring

    • Streaming VLMs can detect unusual patterns or activities (e.g. a person collapsing or a fire starting) as they happen.

    Autonomous Vehicles

    • Cars utilize streaming perception to scan live street scenes — detect pedestrians, predict movement, and act in real time.

    Sports & Entertainment

    • Artificial intelligence commentators that “observe” real-time games, highlight significant moments, and comment on plays in real-time.

    Assistive Technologies

    • Assisting blind users by narrating live surroundings through wearable technology or smart glasses.

    Video Search & Analytics

    • Instead of scrubbing through hours of video, you can request: “Show me where the individual wearing the red jacket arrived.”

    The Challenges

    Even though sounding magical, this region is still developing — and there are real technical and ethical challenges:

    Memory vs. Efficiency

    • Keeping up with long sequences is computationally expensive. Synchronization between real-time performance and accessible memory is difficult.

    Information Decay

    • What to forget and what to retain in the course of hours of footage remains a central research problem.

    Annotation and Training Data

    • Long, unbroken video datasets with good labels are rare and expensive to build.

    Bias and Privacy

    • Real-time video understanding raises privacy issues — especially for surveillance or body-cam use cases.

    Context Drift

    • The AI may forget who is who or what is important if the video is too long or rambling.

    A Glimpse into the Future

    Streaming VLMs are the bridge between perception and knowledge — the foundation of true embodied intelligence.

    In the near future, we may see:

    • AI copilots for everyday life, interpreting live camera feeds and acting to assist users contextually.
    • Teamwork robots perceiving their environment in real time rather than snapshots.
    • Digital memory systems that write and summarize your day in real time, constructing searchable “lifelogs.”

    Lastly, these models are a step toward AI that can live in the moment — not just respond to static information, but observe, remember, and reason dynamically, just like humans.

    In Summary

    Streaming vision-language models mark the shift from static image recognition to continuous, real-time understanding of the visual world.

    They merge perception, memory, and reasoning to allow AI to stay current on what’s going on in the here and now — second by second, frame by frame — and narrate it in human language.

    It’s not so much a question of viewing videos anymore but of thinking about them.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 160
  • 0
Answer
Load More Questions

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 548
  • Answers 1k
  • Posts 25
  • Best Answers 21
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • mohdanas

    Are AI video generat

    • 940 Answers
  • daniyasiddiqui

    How is prompt engine

    • 122 Answers
  • daniyasiddiqui

    “What lifestyle habi

    • 25 Answers
  • lordofthefliespdfBuh
    lordofthefliespdfBuh added an answer The novel is a masterclass in building suspense. Students searching for the Lord of the Flies PDF will feel the… 03/02/2026 at 7:56 am
  • top_onlajn_twKr
    top_onlajn_twKr added an answer t.me/s/top_onlajn_kazino_rossii [url=https://t.me/s/top_onlajn_kazino_rossii/]t.me/s/top_onlajn_kazino_rossii[/url] . 03/02/2026 at 7:56 am
  • dostavka alkogolya_obpl
    dostavka alkogolya_obpl added an answer купить алкоголь с доставкой [url=https://alcoygoloc3.ru/]купить алкоголь с доставкой[/url] . 03/02/2026 at 7:49 am

Top Members

Trending Tags

ai aiineducation ai in education analytics artificialintelligence artificial intelligence company deep learning digital health edtech education health investing machine learning machinelearning news people tariffs technology trade policy

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help

© 2025 Qaskme. All Rights Reserved