Home/Technology/Page 7

Qaskme Latest Questions

daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 17/09/2025In: , ,

how should exams, projects, coursewor ...

criticalthinkingdigitalassessmenteducationfutureofexamsprojectbasedlearning
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    The Old Model and Why It's Under Pressure Essays and homework were long the stalwarts of assessment. They measure knowledge, writing skills, and critical thinking. But with the presence of AI, it is now easy to produce well-written essays, finish problem sets, or even codes in minutes. That does notRead more

    The Old Model and Why It’s Under Pressure

    Essays and homework were long the stalwarts of assessment. They measure knowledge, writing skills, and critical thinking. But with the presence of AI, it is now easy to produce well-written essays, finish problem sets, or even codes in minutes.

    That does not mean students are learning less—it’s just that the tools they use have changed. Relying on the old model without adapting is like asking students to write out multiplication tables manually once calculators are employed everywhere. It’s not getting it.

     Redesigning Exams

    Exams are designed to test individual knowledge. When AI is introduced, we may need to:

    • Shift from recall to reasoning: Instead of “What happened in 1857?” ask “How might the outcome of the 1857 revolt have changed if modern communication technology existed?” This tests creativity and analysis, not memorization.
    • Use open-book / open-AI exams: Allow students to use tools but focus on how well they apply, critique, and cross-check AI’s output. This mirrors real-life work environments where AI is available.
    • In-person oral or viva testing: Requiring students to orally discuss their answers tells you whether they actually understand, even if they had AI help.
    • Timed, real-world problem-solving: For math, science, or business, create scenarios that require quick, reasonable thinking—not just memorization of formulas.

    Testing is less “what do you know” and more “how you think.”

     Rethinking Projects & Coursework

    Projects are where AI may either replace effort or spark new creativity. To keep them current:

    • Process over product: Teachers need to grade the process—research notes, drafts, reflection, even the mistakes—not just the polished final product. AI can’t get away with that iterative process so easily.
    • AI within the assignment: Instead of banning it, design assignments that require students to show how they’ve used AI. For example: “Employ ChatGPT to generate three possible outlines for your paper. Compare them, and explain what you retained and what you eliminated.”
    • Collaborative assignments: Group work encourages skills AI finds it difficult to replicate well—negotiation, delegation, creativity in group work.
    • Hands-on or practical elements: A project assignment could be an interview of grandparents, a science project would be the making of a small prototype. AI must complement but not replace lived experiences.

    This reverses coursework from being outsourcing-oriented to reflection, uniqueness, and human effort.

     Reframing Coursework Purposes Altogether

    If AI is already capable of doing the “garden variety” work, maybe education can focus on more higher-order goals :

    • Critical thinking with AI: Are students able to recognize errors, biases, or gaps in AI-generated work? That’s a skill used in the real world today.
    • Authenticity and voice: AI can generate text, but it can’t replicate the lived experience, feeling, or creative individuality of a student. Assignments could emphasize personal connections or insights.
    • Interdisciplinary study: Promote projects that combine math, art, history, or ethics. AI is good at doing one thing, but human learning thrives at points of convergence.

    The Human Side

    This’s not about “catching cheaters.” It’s about recognizing that tools evolve, but learning doesn’t. Students want to be challenged, but also supported. When it all turns into a test of whether they can outsmart AI bans, motivation falters. When, on the other hand, they see AI as just one of several tools, and the question is how creatively, critically, and personally they employ it, then education comes alive again.

     Last Thought

    Just as calculators revolutionized math tests, so will AI revolutionize written work. Prohibiting homework or essays is not the answer, but rather reimagining them.

    The future of exams, project work, and coursework must:

    • Distrust memorization more than thinking, applying, and creating.
    • Welcome AI openly but insist on reflection and explanation.
    • Strive for process and individuality as much as product.
    • Retain the human touch—feelings, experiences, collaboration—at its center.

    In short: assessments shouldn’t try to compete with AI—they should measure what only humans can uniquely do.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 17/09/2025In: , ,

AI tools into teaching & assessme ...

aiforlearningaiineducationeducationstudentengagementteachingwithai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    The Core Dilemma: Assist or Damage? Learning isn't all about creating correct answers—it's about learning to think, to reason, to innovate. AI platforms such as ChatGPT are either: Learning enhancers: educators, guides, and assistants who introduce learners to new paths of exploration. Learning undeRead more

    The Core Dilemma: Assist or Damage?

    Learning isn’t all about creating correct answers—it’s about learning to think, to reason, to innovate. AI platforms such as ChatGPT are either:

    • Learning enhancers: educators, guides, and assistants who introduce learners to new paths of exploration.
    • Learning underminers: crutches that give students answers, with students having skimmed assignments but lacking depth of knowledge.

    The dilemma is how to incorporate AI so that it promotes curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking rather than replacing them.

     1. Working with AI as a Teaching Companion

    AI must not be framed as the enemy, but as a class teammate. A few approaches:

    • Explainers in plain terms: Students are afraid to admit that they did not understand something. AI can describe things at different levels (child-level, advanced, step-by-step), dispelling the fear of asking “dumb” questions.
    • Personalized examples: A mathematics teacher might instruct AI to generate practice questions tailored to each student’s level of understanding at the moment. For literature, it could give different endings to novels to talk about.
    • 24/7 study buddy: Students can “speak” with AI outside of class when teachers are not present, reaffirming learning without leaving them stranded.
    • Brainstorming prompts: In art, creative writing, or debate classes, AI can stimulate the brainstorming process by presenting students with scenarios or viewpoints they may not think of.

    Here, AI opens doors but doesn’t preclude the teacher’s role of directing, placing, and correcting.

     2. Redesigning Tests for the Age of AI

    The biggest worry is testing. If AI can execute essays or equations flawlessly, how do we measure what children really know? Some tweaks would suffice:

    • Move from recall to reasoning: Instead of “define this term” or “summarize this article,” have students compare, critique, or apply ideas—tasks AI can’t yet master alone.
    • In-class, process-oriented evaluation: Teachers can assess students’ thinking by looking at drafts, outlines, or a discussion of how they approached a task, not the final, finished product.
    • Oral defenses & presentations: After having composed an essay, students may defend orally their argument. This shows they actually know what is on the page.
    • AI-assisted assignments: Teachers just instruct, “Use AI to jot down three ideas, but write down why you added or dropped each one.” This maintains AI as a part of the process, not a hidden shortcut.

    This way, grading becomes measuring human thinking, judgment, and creativity, even if AI is used.

     3. Training & Supporting Teachers

    The majority of teachers are afraid of AI—they think it’s stealing their jobs. But successful integration occurs when teachers are empowered to utilize it:

    • Professional development: Hands-on training where teachers learn through doing AI tools, rather than only learning about them, so they truly comprehend the strengths and shortcomings.
    • Communities of practice: Teachers sharing examples of successful implementation of AI so that best practices naturally diffuse.
    • Transparency to students: Instead of banning AI out of fear, teachers can show them how to use it responsibly—showing that it’s a tool, not a cheat code.

    When teachers feel secure, they can guide students toward healthy use rather than fear-policing them.

     4. Setting Boundaries & Ethical Standards

    Students need transparency, not guesswork, to know what is an acceptable use of AI. Some guidelines may be enough:

    • Disclosure: Ask students to report if and how they employed AI (e.g., “I used ChatGPT to get ideas for outlines”). This incorporates integrity into the process.
    • Boundaries by skill level: Teachers can restrict the use of AI in lower grades to protect foundational skill acquisition. Autonomy can be provided in later levels.

    Talks of ethics: Instead of speaking in “don’t get caught” terms, schools can have open discussions regarding integrity, trust, and why learning continues even beyond grades.

    5. Keeping the Human at the Center

    Learning is not really about delivering information. It’s about developing thinkers, creators, and empathetic humans. AI can help with efficiency, access, and customization, but it can never substitute for:

    • The excitement of discovery when a student learns something on their own.
    • The guidance of a teacher who sees potential in a young person.
    • The chaos of collaboration, argument, and experimentation in learning.

    So the hope shouldn’t be “How do we keep AI from killing education?” but rather:
    “How do we rethink teaching and testing so AI can enhance humanity instead of erasing it?”

    Last Thought

    Think about calculators: once feared as machines that would destroy math skills, now everywhere because we remapped what we want students to learn (not just arithmetic, but mathematical problem-solving). AI can follow the same path—if we’re purposeful.

    The best integrations will:

    • Let AI perform repetitive, routine work.
    • Preserve human judgment, creativity, and ethics.
    • Teach students not only to use AI but to critique it, revise it, and in some instances, reject it.
    • That’s how AI transforms from a cheat into an amplifier of learning.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 17/09/2025In: , ,

cheating vs legitimate assistance

academichonestychatgptcheatinglegitimateassistancestudentethics
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

     Why the Line Blurs Before, "cheating" was simpler to define: copying answers, plagiarizing a work, sneaking illegitimate notes onto a test. But with computer AI, it's getting cloudy. A student will prompt ChatGPT with an essay question, receive a good outline, make some minor adaptations, and submiRead more

     Why the Line Blurs

    Before, “cheating” was simpler to define: copying answers, plagiarizing a work, sneaking illegitimate notes onto a test. But with computer AI, it’s getting cloudy. A student will prompt ChatGPT with an essay question, receive a good outline, make some minor adaptations, and submit it. It looks on paper as though it were their own work. But is it? Did they read, think, and write—or did the machine do it all?

    That’s the magic of it: AI can be a calculator, a tutor, or a ghostwriter. Which role it fills is left to what a student does with it.

    When AI Seemingly Feels Like Actual Assistance

    • Brainstorming ideas: Allowing ChatGPT to plant ideas when stuck is like asking a friend for ideas. The student still needs to decide where to go.
    • Dissolve complicated concepts: When a physics or history concept is complicated to understand, having AI dissolve it for them into easier terms is tutoring, not cheating.
    • Practice skills: Students can practice questioning themselves with AI, restating notes, or simulating debates. It’s active learning, not cheating.
    • Polishing words: Requesting AI to proofread for grammar or make language more fluent is no different from spellcheck and Grammarly. The student’s thoughts in the text are still his or hers.

    AI is a helper system here. The student is still the only author of his or her thoughts, logic, and conclusions.

     When AI Blurs into Cheating

    Plagiarizing whole assignments: If the entirety or almost the entire assignment is done by AI with little to no contribution from a human, then the student is really skipping the learning process entirely.

    • Making answers on tests/quizzes: That is no different from cheating with illicit notes—it sabotages the test assumption.
    • Disguising the voice of AI as one’s own: When a student uses AI to compose “in their own voice” and presents it as original work, it’s really plagiarism—whether they copied a human or not.
    • Too much reliance on automation: If AI does all the thinking all the time, the student isn’t working on problem-solving, creativity, or critical thinking—the things learning is supposed to develop.

    Here, AI isn’t an assistant. It’s a substitute. And that negates the purpose of learning.

    Why Context Matters

    Assignments vs. learning objectives: If the assignment is thinking practice, then AI-written essays are cheating. If it’s clear communication, then working with AI as a language tool is okay.

    • Teachers’ expectations: Teachers might explicitly invite AI use as a research aid or study aid. Others do not. Students need to honor that boundary, even if they themselves don’t care.
    • Skill-building phase: A 12-year-old learning to build arguments likely shouldn’t be offloading writing to computer code. A graduate student is using AI to obtain citations, but then doing so might involve using common sense with tools.

    The Human Side

    Finally, the question is not “Is AI cheating?” but “Am I still learning?” Discriminating students who use ChatGPT can enhance understanding, save time, and feel in the process. Those who allow it to do their thinking for them may exhaust their own potential.

    The gray area will always be there. That’s why integrity is important: honesty in the use of AI, and why. Learning is optimal when teachers and students have trust, and the attention remains on development rather than grades.

    AI is excellent support when it augments your learning, but it cheats when it substitutes.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 09/09/2025In: , ,

virtual replicas of businesses, facto ...

analyticscompanytechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

     What Are Digital Twins? A digital twin is a mirror replica — an imitation of something actual. It could be: A factory, where the machines, conveyor belts, and power meters are replicated digitally. A city, where traffic flow, water pipes, and electricity grids are simulated in real time. Even an orRead more

     What Are Digital Twins?

    A digital twin is a mirror replica — an imitation of something actual. It could be:

    • A factory, where the machines, conveyor belts, and power meters are replicated digitally.
    • A city, where traffic flow, water pipes, and electricity grids are simulated in real time.
    • Even an organ of your own body, where your heart might have a twin that doctors can utilize to experiment with treatments before they ever touch your body.
    • The brilliance of a digital twin is that it is tied back to real-world data. All sensors provide real-time data into the model, so it is not merely a snapshot replica, but a living simulation.

    Why Businesses and Governments Care

    Decision-making is always a risk: “What if we produce more?” “What if the traffic flows change?” “What if we cut emissions in this way?”

    Digital twins enable business leaders to try out decisions in simulations first, before they are real. It’s a crystal ball, but data-driven, not intuition.

    Examples:

    • Factories: Predict when machinery fails, cutting downtime in millions.
    • Cities: Simulate climate change flood risk to predict where new housing must be built.
    • Retail: Rebuild customer behavior in virtual shops before reconfiguring physical store layouts.

    The Benefits: Why They Feel Like the Future

    • Risk Reduction
      You can try out safely in virtual space before putting money in the physical space.
    • Efficiency & Cost Savings
      Companies can optimize supply chains, energy usage, and production schedules to perfection.
    • Faster Innovation
      Want to test a new car model? Instead of making prototypes, you can crash-test and test thousands of virtual ones overnight.
    • Sustainability
      Digital twins have the potential to reduce waste — fewer physical prototypes, better energy planning, efficient city infrastructure.

     The Challenges & Human Limits

    There’s also a downside:

    • Data Dependency
      The accuracy of a digital twin is a function of what it’s given. Poor data or skewed data equals poor results — and poor decisions at scale.
    • Complexity & Accessibility
      Developing a digital twin of a city or factory needs state-of-the-art technology and know-how. Poor and poor nations are likely to fall behind.
    • Over-Reliance on Simulation
      The twin can be used by the leader to over-rely upon it and overlook that human behavior is not predictable. A city simulation can forecast traffic patterns, but not precisely how humans will likely alter behavior overnight in a crisis scenario.
    • Privacy & Ethics
      If a city’s digital twin has people’s movement data, whose is it? May it become a surveillance tool rather than smart planning?

    The Human Side of the Story

    There are two different workers, let’s say.

    A factory maintenance engineer whose job previously involved fixing machines when they broke. With digital twins, she gets a warning instead, so her job is less reactive, more strategic. Her job is more intelligent and safer.

    A city dweller learns that local authorities are tracking real-time mobility patterns to feed into a digital twin. He wonders: am I being part of the solution, or part of an observation mechanism?

    Digital twins are emancipating but unsettling — people feel more watched and protected, but also more controlled and regulated.

     Are They the Future of Decision-Making?

    All the indications are positive — digital twins are gaining traction in sectors like aerospace, energy, construction, healthcare, and urban planning. Digital twins allow CEOs to transition from responding to being ahead, from “What happened?” to “What will happen if.”

    But — they will not replace human judgment. The future will resemble partnerships:

    • Digital twins provide data-driven information and simulations.
    • Humans provide context, ethics, empathy, and imagination.
    • The danger is that digital twins will not make the decisions for us, but that we will rely too heavily on the model and lose the messy, uncertain, deeply human quality of life.

    Bottom Line

    In fact, digital twins are already going to form the basis of business, city, even personal health decision-making. They work because they reduce risk, save money, and enable new opportunities.

    But the human problem will be:

    • Guaranteeing that everyone has equality and access (so corporations or rich nations aren’t just stealing the wealth).
    • Maintaining privacy and agency.
    • Keeping in mind no model can ever capture the human factor.
    • In short: digital twins can guide us, but not substitute us.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 09/09/2025In: , , ,

traditional finance and corporate go ...

analyticscompanytechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

     Setting the Stage: What Web3 Promises Web3 is most accurately described as the second web age, where control and ownership shift from centralized powers (banks, corps, governments) to distributed communities based on blockchain. In essence, it promises two big disruptions: Finance (DeFi — decentralRead more

     Setting the Stage: What Web3 Promises

    Web3 is most accurately described as the second web age, where control and ownership shift from centralized powers (banks, corps, governments) to distributed communities based on blockchain.

    In essence, it promises two big disruptions:

    • Finance (DeFi — decentralized finance): instead of conventional banking, lending, and payments with peer-to-peer, smart-contract-based systems.
    • Corporate Governance (DAOs — decentralized autonomous organizations): instead of boardrooms and hierarchies with open, community-driven decision-making.
    • The question is — will this actually shake up traditional finance and governance, or will it be a niche in addition to the existing system?

    How Web3 Could Shake Finance

    • Banking Without Banks
      Millions of individuals in the world’s developing countries are “unbanked.” Web3 wallets will allow them to send, save, and borrow without needing a traditional bank account. Consider a rural Kenyan farmer receiving foreign remittances directly via blockchain, bypassing middlemen and high fees.
    • Smart Contracts
      These are enforceable contracts which can be coded onto the blockchain — no lawyer, no banker, no wait. As a concrete example, an artist might get automatic royalties every time her digital artwork is resold, something that the existing system cannot do.
    • Tokenization of Assets
      Property, stocks, even copyrights to music can be tokenized and bought and sold on the planet. That makes possible fractional ownership — you don’t need $1 million to purchase property; you might own 0.01% of a New York skyscraper.
    • Eliminating Gatekeepers
      Finance is controlled today by huge institutions — credit card networks, clearing houses, regulators. Web3 builds a second world of finance where people do business directly with one another. Institutions no longer get to be the central authority.

    How It Might Remodel Corporate Governance

    • DAOs Rather Than Boards
      A DAO is a code + community-led company. Decisions (employment, investment, alliances) are token-holder voted, not ordered by a board or CEO.
    • Radical Openness
      Voting and expenditure is open to view on the blockchain in a DAO. Compare that to typical corporations where shareholder power is frail at best and decisions are often made behind closed doors.
    • Global Participation
      Anyone, anywhere in the world, with tokens talks. That makes corporate governance borderless, no longer controlled by Wall Street or Silicon Valley.

     The Challenges & Human Realities

    As exciting as this is, reality is more complex:

    • Volatility & Risk
      Cryptocurrencies remain very volatile. A farmer may appreciate new access to capital, but when the currency plunges overnight, his savings vanish.
    • Regulation vs. Freedom
      Governments fear losing money streams (to crime, tax evasion, money laundering) out of their control. Overregulation can trap or kill Web3’s revolutionary power.
    • Human Behavior Doesn’t Disappear
      Even in DAOs, dominant players can hold more tokens and hold votes — same traditional power dynamics. The utopian dream of pure democracy traditionally conflicts with the reality of wealth concentration.
    • Complexity Barrier
      To most everyday humans, Web3 is intimidating — wallets, gas prices, private keys. Unless user experiences become more intuitive, it’ll be in the hands of tech-savvy elites.

    The Human Impact

    To the average consumer: Web3 might bring increased access and economic empowerment, but higher risk for scams, volatility, and no consumer recourse.

    • For entrepreneurs: It creates new means of raising capital (token sales, NFTs) outside of the banks and venture capital deals.
    • For workers: DAOs can provide employment that is not tied to a company in a country, but to anyone being able to contribute to projects — boundary-less employment.
    • For governments: Either a nightmare (loss of control) or an eventual opportunity (if they mature, they can establish global digital standards).

     The Future: Disruption or Integration

    It’s unlikely Web3 will completely replace traditional finance or governance. Instead, we’re heading toward a hybrid future:

    • Banks may integrate blockchain for settlement and cross-border payments.
    • Companies may adopt DAO-like elements for shareholder engagement, while keeping traditional leadership.
    • Regulators will likely build bridges between old systems (central banks, stock markets) and new systems (DeFi, DAOs).
    • Imagine it more of an evolution — and less of a “revolution” — in which Web3 pressures current institutions to be more open, efficient, and inclusive.

     Bottom Line

    Yes, Web3 and blockchain-based ownership can revolutionize finance and governance — but not a clean sweep. They will pressure, disrupt, and reconstruct old systems rather than removing them entirely.

    The most human way to think about:

    • Web3 is an empowerment technology, putting people more in charge of money and decisions.
    • But given over to cynical design and unjustice, it will also recreate old injustices in new digital form.
    • The real test is not whether Web3 will splinter things — but whether it will remain true to its vision of democratization, or whether human greed and power plays will pervert it into the same old practices.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 09/09/2025In: , ,

AI co-founders or autonomous agents

aicommunicationnewstechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    The Emergence of the AI "Co-Founder" Startups these days start with two or three friends sharing talents: one knows tech, one knows money, someone else knows marketing. But now think that rather than having a human co-founder, you had an AI agent as your co-founder — working 24/7, analyzing data, crRead more

    The Emergence of the AI “Co-Founder”

    Startups these days start with two or three friends sharing talents: one knows tech, one knows money, someone else knows marketing. But now think that rather than having a human co-founder, you had an AI agent as your co-founder — working 24/7, analyzing data, creating websites, haggling prices, or even creating pitch decks to present to investors.

    Already, some founders are trying out autonomous AI agents that can:

    • Scout for business opportunities.
    • Automate customer service.
    • Program code or create prototypes.
    • Simulate forecasting market changes.

    It is no longer science fiction to say: an AI may assist in launching, running, and scaling a business.

     Where AI May Beat Humans

    • Speed & Scale
      An AI never sleeps. It can run 100 marketing campaigns during the night or review ten years of financial data within a few minutes. As far as execution speed is concerned, humans have no chance.
    • Bias Reduction (with caveats)
      Humans tend to allow emotion, ego, or personal prejudice to interfere with judgment. AI — properly trained — bases decisions on logic and data rather than pride or fear.
    • Cost Efficiency
      A startup with an AI “co-founder” may require fewer staff in the initial stages, reducing payroll expenses but continuing to perform at professional levels.
    • Knowledge Breadth
      An AI is capable of “knowing” law, programming, accounting, and design all at the same time — something no human can achieve.

     But Here’s the Catch: Humanity Still Matters

    Being a business isn’t all about spreadsheets and plans. It’s also about vision, trust, empathy, and creativity — aspects where humans still excel.

    • Emotional Intelligence
      Investors don’t finance an idea; they finance individuals. Employees don’t execute a plan; they execute leaders. AI can’t motivate, inspire, or console in the same manner.
    • Ethics & Responsibility
      Who is held accountable when an AI makes a dangerous choice? Humans continue to have the legal and moral responsibility — courts don’t have “AI CEOs” as entities.
    • Creativity & Intuition
      Many of the greatest innovations in business resulted from gut feelings or acts of imagination. AI can recombine historical patterns but has trouble with revolutionary uniqueness.
    • Relationship Building
      Partnerships, deals, and local goodwill are founded on human trust. AI can compose an email, but it can’t laugh, shake hands, or create lifelong loyalty.

    The Hybrid Future: Human + AI Teams

    The probable future is not AI replacing founders but AI complementing them. Consider an AI co-founder as:

    • The “super-analyst” who does the grunt work.
    • The “always-on partner” who never grumps.
    • The “data-driven conscience” that holds humans accountable.
    • While that happens, humans offer:
    • The imagination and narratives that draw in investors.
    • The emotional cement that binds the team together.
    • The moral compass that holds the business accountable.

    In this blended model, firms can operate leaner, smarter, and quicker, yet still require human leadership at the center.

    The Human Side of the Question

    Envision a young Lagos entrepreneur with a fantastic idea but a limited amount of money. With an AI agent managing logistics, fundraising tactics, and international reach, she now competes with Silicon Valley players.

    Or envision a mid-stage founder who leverages AI to validate 50 product concepts in a night, allowing him to spend mornings coaching employees and afternoons pitching investors.

    For employees, however, the news is bittersweet: AI co-founders can eliminate some early marketing, legal, or admin hires. That’s fewer entry-level positions, but perhaps more space for higher-value creative and strategic ones.

    Bottom Line

    • Do AI co-founders make better companies? Yes, in some respects — but not in the respects that really count.
    • They’ll beat us at efficiency, accuracy, and sheer scope.
    • But no matter how powerful they are, they can’t substitute for vision, empathy, trust, and ethics — the beat of what makes a business excel.
    • The entrepreneurial future is not about the human or AI choice. It’s about building collaborations between human creativity and machine consciousness. The successful companies will be those that approach AI as the ultimate collaborator, not a boss or a menace.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 09/09/2025In: , , ,

reshape labor markets in developing ...

aianalyticspeopletechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    Setting the Scene: A Double-Edged Sword Third-world nations have long relied on industries of sweatshops — textiles in Bangladesh, call centres in the Philippines, or manufacturing in Vietnam — as stepping stones to wealth. Such workaday employment is not glamorous, but it pays millions of individuaRead more

    Setting the Scene: A Double-Edged Sword

    Third-world nations have long relied on industries of sweatshops — textiles in Bangladesh, call centres in the Philippines, or manufacturing in Vietnam — as stepping stones to wealth. Such workaday employment is not glamorous, but it pays millions of individuals secure incomes, mobility, and respect.

    Enter artificial intelligence automation: robots in the assembly plant, customer service agents replaced by chatbots, AI accounting software for bookkeeping, logistics, and even diagnosing medical conditions. To developing countries, this is a threat and an opportunity.

     The Threat: Disruption of Existing Jobs

    • Manufacturing Jobs in Jeopardy
      Asian or African plants became a magnet for global firms because of low labor. But if devices can assemble things better in the U.S. or Europe, why offshoring? This would be counter to the cost benefit of low-wage nations.
    • Service Sector Vulnerability
      Customer service, data entry, and even accounting or legal work are already being automated. Countries like India or the Philippines, which built huge outsourcing industries, may see jobs vanish.
    • Widening Inequality
      Least likely to retain their jobs are low-skilled workers. Unless retrained, this could exacerbate inequality in developing nations — a few technology elites thrive, while millions of low-skilled workers are left behind.

     The Opportunity: Leapfrogging with AI

    But here’s the other side. Just like some developing nations skipped landlines and went directly to mobile phones, AI can help them skip industrial development phases.

    • Empowering Small Businesses
      Translation, design, accounting, marketing AI tools are now free or even on a shoestring budget. This levels the playing field for small entrepreneurs — a Kenyan tailor, an Indian farmer.
    • Agriculture Revolution
      In the majority of developing nations, farming continues to be the primary source of employment. Weather forecasting AI-based technology, soil analysis, and logistics supply chains could make farmers more efficient, boost yields, and reduce waste.
    • New Industries Forming
      As AI continues to grow, entirely new industries — from drone delivery to telemedicine — could create new jobs that have yet to be invented, providing opportunity for young professionals in developing nations to create rather than merely imitate.

    The Human Side: Choices That Matter

    • Governments must decide: Do they invest in reskilling workers, or stick with dying industries?
    • Businesses must decide: Do they automate just for cost savings, or build models that still have human work where it is necessary?
    • Workers have no promise: Some will be forced to shift from monotonous work to work that demands imagination, problem-solving, and human connection — sectors that AI is still not able to crack.

    The shift won’t come easily. A factory worker in Dhaka who loses his job to a robot isn’t going to become a software engineer overnight. The gap between displacement and opportunity is where most societies will find it hardest.

    Looking Ahead

    AI-driven automation in developing economies will not be a simple story of job loss. Instead, it will:

    • Kill some jobs (especially low-skill, repetitive ones),
    • Transform others (farming, medicine, logistics), and
    • Create new ones (digital services, local innovation, AI maintenance).

    The question is if developing nations will adopt the forward-looking approach of embracing AI as a growth accelerator, or get caught in the painful stage of disruption without building cushions of protection.

     Bottom Line

    AI is not destiny. It’s a tool. For the developing world, it might undermine decades of effort by wiping out history industries, or it could bring a new path to prosperity by empowering workers, entrepreneurs, and communities to surge ahead.

    The decision is in the hands of policy, education, and leadership — but foremost, whether societies consider AI as a replacement for humans or an addition to humans.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 07/09/2025In: ,

“AI kid modes,” or will it harm socia ...

aidigital healthtechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    What Are "AI Kid Modes"? Think of AI kid modes as friendly, child-oriented versions of artificial intelligence. They are designed to block objectionable material, talk in an age-appropriate manner, and provide education in an interactive format. For example: A bedtime story companion that generatesRead more

    What Are “AI Kid Modes”?

    Think of AI kid modes as friendly, child-oriented versions of artificial intelligence. They are designed to block objectionable material, talk in an age-appropriate manner, and provide education in an interactive format. For example:

    • A bedtime story companion that generates made-up bedtime stories on the fly.
    • A math aid that works through it step by step at a child’s own pace.
    • A query sidekick able to answer “why is the sky blue?” 100 times and still keep their sanity.
    • As far as appearances go, AI kid modes look like the ultimate parent dream secure, instructive, and ever-at-hand.

    The Potential Advantages

    AI kid modes could unleash some positives in young minds:

    • Personalized Learning – As AI is not limited by the class size, it will learn according to a child’s own pace, style, and interest. When a child is struggling with fractions, the AI will explain it in dozens of ways for as long as it takes until there is the “lightbulb” moment.
    • Endless Curiosity Partner – Children are question-machines by nature. An AI that never gets tired of “why” questions can nurture curiosity instead of crushing it.
    • Accessibility – Disabled or language-impaired children can be greatly assisted by customized AI support.
    • Safe Digital Spaces – A properly designed kid mode may be able to shield children from seeing internet material that is not suitable for their age level, rendering the digital space enjoyable and secure.

    In these manners, AI kid modes would become less toy-like and more facilitative companion-like.

    The Risks and Red Flags

    But there is another half to the tale of parents, teachers, and therapists.

    • More Human Interdependence – Children acquire people skills—empathy, compromise, tolerance—through dirty, messy interactions with people, not ideal algorithms. Relying on AI could substitute mothers and fathers, siblings, friends with screens.
    • Creativity in Jeopardy – A child who is always having an AI generate stories, pictures, or thoughts loses contact with being able to dream on their own. With responses readily presented at the push of a question, the frustration that powers creativity starts to weaken.
    • Emotional Dependence – Kids will start to depend upon AI as an object of comfort, self-verifying influence, or friend. It might be comforting but destroys the ability to build deep human relationships.
    • Innate Biases – Even “safe” AI is built using human information. Imagine whatever stories it tells always reflect some cultural bias or reinforce stereotypes?

    So while AI kid modes are enchanted, they can subtly redefine how kids grow up.

    The Middle Path: Balance and Boundaries

    Perhaps the answer lies not in banning or completely embracing AI kid modes, but in putting boundaries in place.

    • As a Resource, Not a Substitute: AI can be used to help with homework explanations, but can never replace playdates, teachers, or family stories.
    • Co-Use with Adults: AI may be shared between children and parents or educators, converting screen time into collaborative activities rather than solitary viewing.
    • Creative Spurts, Not Endpoints: Instead of giving pre-completed answers, AI could pose a question like, “What do you imagine happens next in the story?”

    In this manner, AI is a trampoline that opens up imagination, not a couch that tempts sloth.

    The Human Dimension

    Imagine two childhoods:

    In another, a child spends hours a day chatting with an AI friend, creating AI-assisted art, and listening to AI-generated stories. They’re safe, educated, and entertained—but their social life is anaemic.

    In the first, a child spends some time with AI to perform story idea generation, read every day, or complete puzzles but otherwise is playing with other kids, parents, and teachers. AI here is a tool, not a replacement.

    Which of these children feels more complete? Most likely, the second.

    Last Thoughts

    AI kid modes are neither magic nor threat—no matter whether they’re a choice about how we use them. As a tool to complement childhood, instead of replace it, they can ignite awe, provide safeguarding, and open up new possibilities. Let loose, however, they may disintegrate the very qualities—creativity, empathy, resilience—that define us as human.

    The real test is not whether or not kids will have access to AI kid modes, but whether or not grown-ups can use that access responsibly. Ultimately, it is less a question about what we can offer children through AI, and more a question of what we want their childhood to be.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 07/09/2025In:

give people more privacy and control ...

aitechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    The Cloud Convenience That We're Grown Accustomed To Most artificial intelligence systems for decades have relied on the cloud. If you ask a voice assistant a question, send a photo to be examined, or converse with an AI chatbot, data typically flows through distant servers. That's what drives theseRead more

    The Cloud Convenience That We’re Grown Accustomed To

    Most artificial intelligence systems for decades have relied on the cloud. If you ask a voice assistant a question, send a photo to be examined, or converse with an AI chatbot, data typically flows through distant servers. That’s what drives these services—colossal models computing on massive computers somewhere in the distance.

    But it has a price tag. Every search, every voice query, every photo uploaded creates a data trail. And once our data’s on a stranger’s servers, we’re at their mercy—who’s got it, who’s studying it, and how it’s being used.

    Why Offline AI Feels Liberating

    Offline AI modes flip that math on its side. Instead of uploading data to the cloud, the AI works locally—on your laptop, phone, or even a little box in your living room.

    That shift might mean:

    • Privacy by default: Your voice clips, messages, or photos stay with you, not with some other person’s data center.
    • Control in your hands: You get to decide what you want to share and what you don’t.
    • No constant internet reliance: The AI functions even in rural regions, dead zones, or areas where connectivity is spotty.

    Whispering your secrets to a trusted friend as compared to screaming them into a public stadium.

    The Trade-Offs: Power vs. Freedom

    There is no free lunch. Offline AI comes with limitations.

    • Smaller models: The cloud can host enormous AI brains. Your phone or computer can only handle smaller ones, which will not be as creative or precise.
    • Updates and learning: Cloud AI keeps on learning and updating. Offline AI will fall behind if you do not update it manually.
    • Battery and storage strain: Using advanced AI locally can drain devices faster and take up memory.

    So, offline AI does sound safer, but sometimes it feels like swapping a sports car for a bike—you achieve freedom, but you lose a bit of power.

    A Middle Ground: Hybrid AI

    The most practical solution would be hybrids. Think about an AI that does local operation for sensitive tasks (e.g., scanning your health data, personal emails, or financial data), but accesses the cloud for bigger and more complex work (e.g., generating long reports or advanced translations).

    That way, you have the intimacy and privacy of local AI, along with the power and flexibility of cloud AI—a “best of both worlds” solution.

    Why Privacy Is More Important Than Ever

    The call for offline AI isn’t technology-driven—it’s driven by trust. Many simply don’t like the idea of their own personal information being stored, sold, or even hacked out on far-flung servers. Local AI operation provides a feeling of mastery of your digital life.

    It is a matter of taking power back in a world where information appears to be under perpetual observation. Offline forms of AI could put the power back into the possession of people, not companies.

    The Human Nature of the Issue

    Essentially, it is not a matter of devices—it is about people.

    • A parent may prefer an offline AI tutor for their youngster, so that conversations are not overheard.
    • An on-the-ground war correspondent journalist can employ offline translation AI without fear of being monitored by the government.
    • A regular consumer could want to have assurance his or her own personal voice recordings never leave his or her phone.
    • These aren’t geek arguments—they’re human needs for dignity, security, and autonomy.

    Conclusion

    Offline AI can be potential game-changers for privacy and autonomy. They may not always be as powerful or as seamless as their cloud-based counterparts, but they offer something that theirs do not: peace of mind.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 07/09/2025In:

machines more empathetic, or just bet ...

aitechnology
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    The Promise of Emotion-Aware AI Picture an AI that answers your questions not only, but one that senses your feelings too. It senses frustration in the tone of a customer service call, senses sadness in your emails, or senses uncertainty in your facial expressions. Technologically, the equipment canRead more

    The Promise of Emotion-Aware AI

    Picture an AI that answers your questions not only, but one that senses your feelings too. It senses frustration in the tone of a customer service call, senses sadness in your emails, or senses uncertainty in your facial expressions. Technologically, the equipment can render computers as empathetic, friendly, and sympathetic.

    • A therapy robot can respond sympathetically when it senses tension in your voice.
    • A tutorial robot can prod you forward when it detects uncertainty, instead of dumping more information into you.
    • Customer service robots could defuse anger by calming angry customers rather than reading off rehearsed responses.
    • At its best, affect-aware AI could render technology interactions less transactional and robotic, and more personal.

    The Risk of Manipulation

    • But in that coin comes a dark twin. That we can recognize that we’re experiencing something also implies that AI can fool us—sometimes even secretly.
    • Advertising & Marketing: A mood-detecting AI that knows you’re lonely may push you towards comfort purchases.
    • Politics & Propaganda: Emotion-recognizing algorithms can present the news in a manner that pulls on fear, anger, or hope in an effort to sway opinions.
    • Social Media: Feeds can be crafted to engage you more by sensing your current mood and responding thereto.

    Instead of being empathized with, people will start to feel manipulated. Machines will not necessarily be more empathetic—perhaps they’re simply better at “reading the room” in trying to further someone else’s agenda.

    Do Machines Really Feel Empathy

    Here’s the tough truth: AI doesn’t “feel” anything. It doesn’t know what sadness, joy, or empathy actually mean. What it can do is recognize patterns in data—like the tremble in your voice, the frown on your face, or the choice of words in your text—and respond in ways that seem caring.

    That still leaves us to question: Is false empathy enough? For some, maybe so. If a sense of security is provided by an AI teacher or an anxiety app quiets an individual who lives in anxiety, the effect is real—regardless of whether the machine “feels” it or not.

    The Human Dilemma: Power or Dependence

    Emotion-sensing AI can enable us:

    • It could help in mental health when there are few human resources to do so.
    • It can reduce miscommunication in customer service.
    • It can bridge cultural and communication gaps.

    It can, however, make us more dependent on machines for comfort. As soon as we start depending on AI to make us feel more cozy in lieu of family, friends, and society, society breaks apart and gets isolated.

    Guardrails for the Future

    So that affective AI is not a tool of domination but empathy, we need guardrails:

    • Transparency: People should be able to always know if they are speaking to an AI or another person.
    • Ethical Design: AI can be designed to be resistant to employing affective information to drive people into their vulnerabilities.
    • Boundaries: There are some areas—like political persuasion—on which strong boundaries can be put on affective systems.

    Final Reflection

    Emotion-sensitive modes of AI are at a crossroads. They might make machines seem like friends who genuinely “get” us, rendering people who feel heard and understood. Or they can be the masters of subtlety and manipulate decisions we have no awareness of being manipulated.

    Ultimately, the outcome will depend less on the technology itself, and more on how humans choose to build, regulate, and use it. The big question isn’t whether AI can understand our emotions—it’s whether we’ll allow that understanding to serve our well-being or someone else’s agenda.

    See less
Load More Questions