a multimodal model or a lightweight t ...
1. Start with the Problem — Not the Model Specify what you actually require even before you look at models. Ask yourself: What am I trying to do — classify, predict, generate content, recommend, or reason? What is the input and output we have — text, images, numbers, sound, or more than one (multimoRead more
1. Start with the Problem — Not the Model
Specify what you actually require even before you look at models.
Ask yourself:
- What am I trying to do — classify, predict, generate content, recommend, or reason?
- What is the input and output we have — text, images, numbers, sound, or more than one (multimodal)?
- How accurate or original should the system be?
For example:
- If you want to summarize patient reports → use a large language model (LLM) fine-tuned for summarization.
- If you want to diagnose pneumonia on X-rays → use a vision model fine-tuned on medical images (e.g., EfficientNet or ViT).
- If you want to answer business questions in natural language → use a reasoning model like GPT-4, Claude 3, or Gemini 1.5.
When you are aware of the task type, you’ve already completed half the job.
2. Match the Model Type to the Task
With this information, you can narrow it down:
Task Type\tModel Family\tExample Models
Text generation / summarization\tLarge Language Models (LLMs)\tGPT-4, Claude 3, Gemini 1.5
Image generation\tDiffusion / Transformer-based\tDALL-E 3, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney
Speech to text\tASR (Automatic Speech Recognition)\tWhisper, Deepgram
Text to speech\tTTS (Text-to-Speech)\tElevenLabs, Play.ht
Image recognition\tCNNs / Vision Transformers\tEfficientNet, ResNet, ViT
Multi-modal reasoning
Unified multimodal transformers
GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro
Recommendation / personalization
Collaborative filtering, Graph Neural Nets
DeepFM, GraphSage
If your app uses modalities combined (like text + image), multimodal models are the way to go.
3. Consider Scale, Cost, and Latency
Not every problem requires a 500-billion-parameter model.
Ask:
- Do I require state-of-the-art accuracy or good-enough speed?
- How much am I willing to pay per query or per inference?
Example:
- Customer support chatbots → smaller, lower-cost models like GPT-3.5, Llama 3 8B, or Mistral 7B.
- Scientific reasoning or code writing → larger models like GPT-4-Turbo or Claude 3 Opus.
- On-device AI (like in mobile apps) → quantized or distilled models (Gemma 2, Phi-3, Llama 3 Instruct).
The rule of thumb:
- “Use the smallest model that’s good enough for your use case.”
- This is budget-friendly and makes systems responsive.
4. Evaluate Data Privacy and Deployment Needs
- Your data is sensitive (health, finance, government), and you want to control where and how the model runs.
- Cloud-hosted proprietary models (e.g., GPT-4, Gemini) give excellent performance but little data control.
- Self-hosted or open-source models (e.g., Llama 3, Mistral, Falcon) can be securely deployed on your servers.
If your business requires ABDM/HIPAA/GDPR compliance, self-hosting or API use of models is generally the preferred option.
5. Verify on Actual Data
The benchmark score of a model does not ensure it will work best for your data.
Always pilot test it on a very small pilot dataset or pilot task first.
Measure:
- Accuracy or relevance (depending on task)
- Speed and cost per request
- Robustness (does it crash on hard inputs?)
- Bias or fairness (any demographic bias?)
Sometimes a little fine-tuned model trumps a giant general one because it “knows your data better.”
6. Contrast “Reasoning Depth” with “Knowledge Breadth”
Some models are great reasoners (they can perform deep logic chains), while others are good knowledge retrievers (they recall facts quickly).
Example:
- Reasoning-intensive tasks: GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, Gemini 1.5 Pro
- Knowledge-based Q&A or embeddings: Llama 3 70B, Mistral Large, Cohere R+
If your task concerns step-by-step reasoning (such as medical diagnosis or legal examination), use reasoning models.
If it’s a matter of getting information back quickly, retrieval-augmented smaller models could be a better option.
7. Think Integration & Tooling
Your chosen model will have to integrate with your tech stack.
Ask:
- Does it support an easy API or SDK?
- Will it integrate with your existing stack (React, Node.js, Laravel, Python)?
- Does it support plug-ins or direct function call?
If you plan to deploy AI-driven workflows or microservices, choose models that are API-friendly, reliable, and provide consistent availability.
8. Try and Refine
No choice is irreversible. The AI landscape evolves rapidly — every month, there are new models.
A good practice is to:
- Start with a baseline (e.g., GPT-3.5 or Llama 3 8B).
- Collect performance and feedback metrics.
- Scale up to more powerful or more specialized models as needed.
- Have fall-back logic — i.e., if one API will not do, another can take over.
In Short: Selecting the Right Model Is Selecting the Right Tool
It’s technical fit, pragmatism, and ethics.
Don’t go for the biggest model; go for the most stable, economical, and appropriate one for your application.
“A great AI product is not about leveraging the latest model — it’s about making the best decision with the model that works for your users, your data, and your purpose.”
See less
1. Understand the nature of the inputs: What information does the task actually depend on? The first question is brutally simple: Does this workout involve anything other than text? This would suffice in cases where the input signals are purely textual in nature, such as e-mails, logs, patient notesRead more
1. Understand the nature of the inputs: What information does the task actually depend on?
The first question is brutally simple:
Does this workout involve anything other than text?
This would suffice in cases where the input signals are purely textual in nature, such as e-mails, logs, patient notes, invoices, support queries, or medical guidelines.
Text-only models are ideal for:
Consequently, multimodal models are applied when:
Example:
Symptoms the doctor is describing are doable with text-based AI.
The use case here-an AI reading MRI scans in addition to the doctor’s notes-would be a multimodal one.
2. Complexity of Decision: Would we require visual or contextual grounding?
Some tasks need more than words; they require real-world grounding.
Choose text-only when:
Choose Multimodal when:
Example:
Check for compliance within a contract; text only is fine.
Key field extraction from a photographed purchase bill; multimodal is required.
3. Operational Constraints: How important are speed, cost, and scalability?
While powerful, multimodal models are intrinsically heavier, more expensive, and slower.
Text should be used only when:
Use ‘multimodal’ only when:
Example:
Classification of customer support tickets → text only, inexpensive, scalable
Detection of manufacturing defects from camera feeds → Multimodal, but worth it.
4. Risk profile: Would an incorrect answer cause harm if the visual data were ignored?
Sometimes, it is not a matter of convenience; it’s a matter of risk.
Only Text If:
Choose multimodal if:
Example:
A symptom-based chatbot can operate on text.
A dermatology lesion detection system should, under no circumstances
5. ROI & Sustainability: What is the long-term business value of multimodality?
Multimodal AI is often seen as attractive but organizations must ask:
Do we truly need this, or do we want it because it feels advanced?
Text-only is best when:
Multimodal makes sense when:
Example:
Chat-based knowledge assistants → text only.
Digital health triage app for reading of patient images plus vitals → Multimodal, strategically valuable.
A Simple Decision Framework
Ask these four questions:
Does the critical information exist only in images/ audio/ video?
Will text-only lead to incomplete or risky decisions?
Is the cost/latency budget acceptable for heavier models?
Will multimodality meaningfully improve accuracy or outcomes?
Humanized Closing Thought
It’s not a question of which model is newer or more sophisticated but one of understanding the real problem.
If the text itself contains everything the AI needs to know, then a lightweight model of text provides simplicity, speed, explainability, and cost efficiency.
But if the meaning lives in the images, the signals, or the physical world, then multimodality becomes not just helpful-but essential.
See less