“agentic AI” or AI agents,
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
What are AI Agents / Agentic AI? At the heart: An AI Agent (in this context) is an autonomous software entity that can perform tasks, make decisions, use tools/APIs, and act in an environment with some degree of independence (rather than just producing a prediction. Agentic AI, then, is the broaderRead more
What are AI Agents / Agentic AI?
At the heart:
An AI Agent (in this context) is an autonomous software entity that can perform tasks, make decisions, use tools/APIs, and act in an environment with some degree of independence (rather than just producing a prediction.
Agentic AI, then, is the broader paradigm of systems built from or orchestrating such agents — with goal-driven behaviour, planning, memory, tool use, and minimal human supervision.
In plain language:
Imagine a virtual assistant that doesn’t just answer your questions, but chooses goals, breaks them into subtasks, picks tools/APIs to use, monitors progress and the environment, adapts if something changes — all with far less direct prompting. That’s the idea of an agentic AI system.
Why this is a big deal / Why it’s trending
Expanding from “respond” to “act”
Traditional AI (even the latest generative models) is often reactive: you ask, it answers. Agentic AI can be proactive it anticipates, plans, acts. For example, not just summarising an article but noticing a related opportunity and triggering further actions.
Tooling + orchestration + reasoning
When you combine powerful foundation models (LLMs) with ways to call external APIs, manipulate memory/context, and plan multi-step workflows, you get agentic behaviours. Many companies are recognising this as the next wave beyond “just generate text/image”.
Enterprise/Operational use-cases
Because you’re moving into systems that can integrate with business processes, act on your behalf, reduce human‐bottlenecks, the appeal is huge (in customer service, IT operations, finance, logistics).
Research & product momentum
The terms “agentic AI” and “AI agents” are popping up as major themes in 2024-25 research and industry announcements — this means more tooling, frameworks, experimentation. For example.
How this applies to your developer worldview (especially given your full-stack / API / integration role)
Since you work with PHP, Laravel, Node.js, Webflow, API integration, dashboards etc., here’s how you might think in practice about agentic AI:
Integration: An agent could use an LLM “brain” + API clients (your backend) + tools (database queries, dashboard updates) to perform an end-to-end “task”. For example: For your health-data dashboard work (PM-JAY etc), an agentic system might monitor data inflows, detect anomalies, trigger alerts, generate a summary report, and even dispatch to stakeholders instead of manual checks + scripts.
Orchestration: You might build micro-services for “fetch data”, “run analytics”, “generate narrative summary”, “push to PowerBI/Superset”. An agent orchestration layer could coordinate those dynamically based on context.
Memory/context: The agent may keep “state” (what has been done, what was found, what remains) and use it for next steps — e.g., in a health dashboard system, remembering prior decisions or interventions.
Goal-driven workflows: Instead of running a dashboard ad-hoc, define a goal like “Ensure X state agencies have updated dashboards by EOD”. The agent sets subtasks, uses your APIs, updates, reports completion.
Risk & governance: Since you’ve touched many projects with compliance/data aspects (health data), using agentic AI raises visibility of risks (autonomous actions in sensitive domains). So architecture must include logging, oversight layers, fallback to humans.
What are the challenges / what to watch out for
Even though agentic AI is exciting, it’s not without caveats:
Maturity & hype: Many systems are still experimental. For example, a recent report suggests many agentic AI projects may be scrapped due to unclear ROI.
Trust & transparency: If agents act autonomously, you need clear audit logs, explainability, controls. Without this, you risk unpredictable behaviour.
Integration complexity: Connecting LLMs, tools, memory, orchestration is non-trivial — especially in enterprise/legacy systems.
Safety & governance: When agents have power to act (e.g., change data, execute workflows), you need guardrails for ethical, secure decision-making.
Resource/Operational cost: Running multiple agents, accessing external systems, maintaining memory/context can be expensive and heavy compared to “just run a model”.
Skill gaps: Developers need to think in terms of agent architecture (goals, subtasks, memory, tool invocation) not just “build a model”. The talent market is still maturing.
Why this matters in 2025+ and for your work
Because you’re deep into building systems (web/mobile/API, dashboards, data integration), agentic AI offers a natural next-level moving from “data in → dashboard out” to “agent monitors data → detects a pattern → triggers new data flow → updates dashboards → notifies stakeholders”. It represents a shift from reactive to proactive, from manual orchestration to autonomous workflow.
In domains like health-data analytics (which you’re working in with PM-JAY, immunization dashboards) it’s especially relevant you could build agentic layers that watch for anomalies, initiate investigation, generate stakeholder reports, coordinate cross-system workflows (e.g., state-to-central convergence). That helps turn dashboards from passive insight tools into active, operational systems.
Looking ahead what’s the trend path?
-
-
-
-
-
See lessFrameworks & tooling will become more mature: More libraries, standards (for agent memory, tool invocation, orchestration) will emerge.
Multi-agent systems: Not just one agent, but many agents collaborating, handing off tasks, sharing memory.
Better integration with foundation models: Agents will leverage LLMs not just for generation, but for reasoning/planning across workflows.
Governance & auditability will be baked in: As these systems move into mission-critical uses (finance, healthcare), regulation and governance will follow.
From “assistant” to “operator”: Instead of “help me write a message”, the agent will “handle this entire workflow” with supervision.