Home/deep learning
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 26/12/2025In:

generative AI models

artificial intelligencedeep learningfine-tuningmachine learningpre-trainingtransfer learning
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    Understanding the Two Model Types in Simple Terms Both generative and predictive AI models learn from data at the core. However, they are built for very different purposes. Generative AI models are designed to create content that had not existed prior to its creation. Predictive models are designedRead more

    Understanding the Two Model Types in Simple Terms

    Both generative and predictive AI models learn from data at the core. However, they are built for very different purposes.

    • Generative AI models are designed to create content that had not existed prior to its creation.
    • Predictive models are designed to forecast or classify outcomes based on existing data.

    Another simpler way of looking at this is:

    • Generative models generate something new.
    • Predictive models make decisions or estimates by deciding to do something or estimating something.

    What are Generative AI models?

    Generative AI models learn from the underlying patterns, structure, and relationships in data to produce realistic new outputs that resemble the data they have learned from.

    Instead of answering “What is likely to happen?”, they answer:

    • “What could be made possible?
    • What would be a realistic answer?
    • “How can I complete or extend this input?

    These models synthesize completely new information rather than simply retrieve already existing pieces.

    Common Examples of Generative AI

    • Text Generations and Conversational AI
    • Image and Video creation
    • Music and audio synthesis
    • Code generation
    • Document summarization, rewriting

    When you ask an AI to write an email for you, design a rough idea of the logo, or draft code, you are basically working with a generative model.

    What is Predictive Modeling?

    Predictive models rely on the analysis of available data to forecast an outcome or classification. They are trained on recognizing patterns that will generate a particular outcome.

    They are targeted at accuracy, consistency, and reliability, rather than creativity.

    Predictive models generally answer such questions as:

    • “Will this customer churn?”
    • Q: “Is this transaction fraudulent?
    • “What will sales be next month?”
    • “Does this image contain a tumor?”

    They do not create new content, but assess and decide based on learned correlations.

    Key Differences Explained Succinctly

    1. Output Type

    Generative models create new text, images, audio, or code. Predictive models output a label, score, probability, or numeric value.

    2. Aim

    Generative models aim at modeling the distribution of data and generating realistic samples. Predictive models aim at optimizing decision accuracy for a well-defined target.

    3. Creativity vs Precision

    Generative AI embraces variability and diversity, while predictive models are all about precision, reproducibility, and quantifiable performance.

    4. Assessment

    Evaluations of generative models are often subjective in nature-quality, coherence, usefulness-whereas predictive models are objectively evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and error rates.

    A Practical Example

    Let’s consider a sample insurance company.

    A generative model is able to:

    • Create draft summaries of claims
    • Generate customer responses
    • Explain policy details in plain language

    A predictive model can:

    • Predict claim fraud probability
    • Estimate claim settlement amounts
    • Risk classification of claims

    Both models use data, but they serve entirely different functions.

    How the Training Approach Differs

    • The generative models learn by trying to reconstruct data-sometimes instances of data, like an image, or parts of data, like the next word in a sentence.
    • Predictive models learn by mapping input features to a known output: predict yes/no, high/medium/low risk, or numeric value.
    • This difference in training objectives leads to very different behaviours in real-world systems.

    Why Generative AI is getting more attention

    Generative AI has gained much attention because it:

    • Allows for natural human–computer interaction
    • Automates content-heavy workflows
    • Creative, design, and communication support
    • Acts as an intelligence layer that is flexible across many tasks

    However, generative AI is mostly combined with predictive models that will make sure control, validation, and decision-making are in place.

    When Predictive Models Are Still Essential

    Predictive models remain fundamental when:

    • Decisions carry financial, legal, or medical consequences.
    • Outputs should be explainable and auditable.
    • It should operate consistently and deterministically.

    Compliance is strictly regulated. In many mature systems, generative models support humans, while predictive models make or confirm final decisions.

    Summary

    The end The generative AI models focus on the creation of new and meaningful content, while predictive models focus on outcome forecasting and decision-making. Generative models will bring flexibility and creativity, while predictive models will bring precision and reliability. Together, they provide the backbone of contemporary AI-driven systems, balancing innovation with control.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 26/12/2025In:

pre-training vs fine-tuning

artificial intelligencedeep learningfine-tuningmachine learningpre-trainingtransfer learning
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    “The Big Picture: Why Two Training Stages Exist” Nowadays, training of AI models is not done in one step. In most cases, two phases of learning take place. These two phases of learning are known as pre-training and fine-tuning. Both phases have different objectives. One can consider pre-training toRead more

    “The Big Picture: Why Two Training Stages Exist”

    Nowadays, training of AI models is not done in one step. In most cases, two phases of learning take place. These two phases of learning are known as pre-training and fine-tuning. Both phases have different objectives.

    One can consider pre-training to be general education, and fine-tuning to be job-specific training.

    Definition of Pre-Training

    This is the first and most computationally expensive phase of an AI system’s life cycle. In this phase, the system is trained on very large and diverse datasets so that it can infer general patterns about the world from them.

    For language models, it would mean learning:

    • Grammar and sentence structure
    • Lexical meaning relationships
    • Common facts

    Conversations and directions typically follow this pattern:

    Significantly, during pre-training, the training of the model does not focus on solving a particular task. Rather, it trains the model to predict either missing values or next values, such as the next word in an utterance, and in doing so, it acquires a general idea of language or data.

    This stage may require:

    • Large datasets (Terabytes of Data)
    • Strong GPUs or TPUs
    • Weeks or months of training time

    After the pre-training process, the result will be a general-purpose foundation model.

    Definition of Fine-Tuning

    Fine-tuning takes place after a pre-training process, aiming at adjusting a general model to a particular task, field, or behavior.

    Instead of having to learn from scratch, the model can begin with all of its pre-trained knowledge and then fine-tune its internal parameters ever so slightly using a far smaller dataset.

    • Fine-tuning is performed in
    • Enhance accuracy for a specific task
    • Assist alignment of the model’s output with business and ethical imperatives
    • Train for domain-specific language (medical, legal, financial, etc.)
    • Control tone, format, and/or response type

    For instance, a universal language understanding model may be trained to:

    • Answer medical questions more safely
    • Claims classification
    • Aid developers with code
    • Follow organizational policies

    This stage is quicker, more economical, and more controlled than the pre-training stage.

    Main Points Explained Clearly

    Conclusion

    General intelligence is cultivated using pre-training, while specialization in expert knowledge is achieved through

    Data

    It uses broad, unstructured, and diverse data for pre-training. Fine-tuning requires curated, labeled, or instruction-driven data.

    Cost and Effort

    The pre-training process involves very high costs and requires large AI labs. However, fine-tuning is relatively cheap and can be done by enterprises.

    Model Behavior

    After pre-training, it knows “a little about a lot.” Then, after fine-tuning, it knows “a lot about a little.”

    A Practical Analogy

    Think of a doctor.

    • “Pre-training” is medical school, wherein the doctor acquires education about anatomy, physiology, and general medicine.
    • Fine-tuning refers to specialization. It may include specialties such as cardiology or
    • Specialization is impossible without pre-training. Fine-tuning is necessary for the doctor to remain specialist.

    Why Fine-Tuning Is Significant for Real-World Systems

    Raw pre-trained models aren’t typically good enough in production contexts. There’s a benefit to fine-tuning a:

    • Decrease hallucinations in critical domains
    • Enhance consistency and reliability
    • synchronize results with legal stipulations
    • Adapt to local language, work flows, and terms

    It is even more critical within industries such as the medical sector, financial sectors, and government institutions that require accuracy and adherence.

    Fine-Tuning vs Prompt Engineering

    It should be noted that fine-tuning is not the same as prompt engineering.

    • Prompt engineering helps to steer the model’s conduct by providing more refined instructions, without modifying the model.
    • No, fine-tuning simply adjusts internal model parameters, making it behave in a predictable manner for all inputs.
    • Organizations begin their journey of machine learning tasks from prompt engineering to fine-tuning when greater control is needed.

    Whether a fine-tuning task can replace

    No. Fine-tuning is wholly reliant upon the knowledge derived during pre-trained models. There is no possibility of deriving general intelligence using fine-tuning with small data sets—it only molds and shapes what already exists or is already present.

    In Summary

    Pre-training represents the foundation of understanding in data and language that AI systems have, while fine-tuning allows them to apply this knowledge in task-, domain-, and expectation-specific ways. Both are essential for what constitutes the spine of the development of modern artificial intelligence.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 26/12/2025In:

foundation models differ from task-sp ...

ai modelsartificial intelligencedeep learningfoundation modelsmachine learningmodel architecture
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    The Meaning of Ground From a higher perspective, the distinction between foundation models and task-specific AI models is based on scope and purpose. In other words, foundation models constitute general intelligence engines, while task-specific models have a singular purpose accomplishing a single tRead more

    The Meaning of Ground

    From a higher perspective, the distinction between foundation models and task-specific AI models is based on scope and purpose. In other words, foundation models constitute general intelligence engines, while task-specific models have a singular purpose accomplishing a single task.

    Foundation models might be envisioned as highly educated generalists, while task-specific models might be considered specialists trained to serve only one role in society.

    What Are Foundation Models?

    Foundation models are large-scale AI models. They require vast and diverse data sets. These data sets involve various domains like language, images, code, audio, and structure. Foundation models are not trained on a fixed task. They learn universal patterns and then convert them into task-specific models.

    Once trained, the same foundation model can be applied to the following tasks:

    • Text generation
    • Question Answering
    • Summar
    • Translation
    • Image understanding
    • Code assistance
    • Data analysis

    “These models are ‘ foundational’ because a variety of applications are built upon these models using a prompt, fine-tuning, or a light-weight adapter. ”

    What Are Task-Specific AI Models?

    The models are trained using a specific, narrow objective. Models are built, trained, and tested based on one specific, narrowly defined task.

    These include:

    • An email spam classifier
    • A face recognition system.
    • Medical Image Tumor Detector
    • A credit default prediction model
    • A speech-to-text engine for a given language

    These models are not meant for generalization for a domain other than their use case. For any domain other than their trained tasks, their performance abruptly deteriorates.

    Differences Explained in Simple Terms

    1. Scope of Intelligence

    Foundation models generalize the learned knowledge and can perform a large number of tasks without needing additional training. Task-specific models specialize in a single task or a single specific function and cannot be readily adapted or applied to other tasks.

    2. Training Methodology

    Foundation models are trained once on large datasets and are computationally intensive. Task-specific models are trained on smaller datasets but are specific to the task they are meant to serve.

    3. Reusability & Adapt

    An existing foundation model can be easily applied to different teams, departments, or industries. In general, a task-specific model will have to be recreated or retrained for each new task.

    4. Cost and Infrastructure

    Nonetheless, training a foundation model is costly but efficient in the use of models since they accomplish multiple tasks. Training task-specific models is rather inexpensive but turns costly if multiple models have to be developed.

    5. Performance Characteristics

    Task-specific models usually perform better than foundation models on a specific task. But for numerous tasks, foundation models provide “good enough” solutions that are much more desirable in practical systems.

    Actual Example

    Consider a hospital network.

    A foundation model can:

    1. Generate

    • Summarize patient files
    • Respond to questions from clinicians.
    • Create discharge summaries
    • Translation of medical records
    • Provide help regarding coding and billing questions

    Task-specific models could:

    • Pneumonia identification from chest X-rays alone
    • Both are important, but they are quite different.

    Why Foundation Models Are Gaining Popularity

    Organisations have begun to favor foundation models because they:

    • Cut the need for handling scores of different models
    • Accelerate adoption of AI solutions by other departments in
    • Allow fast experimentation with prompts over having to retrain
    • Support multimodal workflows (text + image + data combined)

    This has particular importance in business, healthcare, finance, and e-governance applications, which need to adapt to changing demands.

    Even when task-specific models are still useful

    Although foundation models have become increasingly popular, task-specific models continue to be very important for:

    • Approvals need to be deterministic
    • Very high accuracy is required for one task
    • Latency and compute are very constrained.
    • The job deals with sensitive or controlled data

    In principle many existing mature systems would employ foundation models for general intelligence and task-specific models for critical decision-making.

    In Summary

    Foundation models add the ingredient of width or generic capability with scalability and adaptability. Task-specific models add the ingredient of depth or focused capability with efficiency. Contemporary AI models and applications increasingly incorporate the best aspects of the first two models.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 06/12/2025In:

you use parameter-efficient fine-tuni

deep learningfine-tuningllmmachine learningnlppeft
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. When You Have Limited Compute Resources This is the most common and most practical reason. Fine-tuning a model like Llama 70B or GPT-sized architectures is usually impossible for most developers or companies. You need: Multiple A100/H100 GPUs Large VRAM (80 GB+) Expensive distributed training infRead more

    1. When You Have Limited Compute Resources

    This is the most common and most practical reason.

    Fine-tuning a model like Llama 70B or GPT-sized architectures is usually impossible for most developers or companies.

    You need:

    • Multiple A100/H100 GPUs

    • Large VRAM (80 GB+)

    • Expensive distributed training infrastructure

    PEFT dramatically reduces the cost because:

    • You freeze the base model

    • You only train a tiny set of adapter weights

    • Training fits on cost-effective GPUs (sometimes even a single consumer GPU)

    So if you have:

    • One A100

    • A 4090 GPU

    • Cloud budget constraints

    • A hacked-together local setup

    PEFT is your best friend.

    2. When You Need to Fine-Tune Multiple Variants of the Same Model

    Imagine you have a base Llama 2 model, and you want:

    • A medical version

    • A financial version

    • A legal version

    • A customer-support version

    • A programming assistant version

    If you fully fine-tuned the model each time, you’d end up storing multiple large checkpoints, each hundreds of GB.

    With PEFT:

    • You keep the base model once

    • You store small LoRA or adapter weights (often just a few MB)

    • You can swap them in and out instantly

    This is incredibly useful when you want specialized versions of the same foundational model.

    3. When You Don’t Want to Risk Catastrophic Forgetting

    Full fine-tuning updates all the weights, which can easily cause the model to:

    • Forget general world knowledge

    • Become over-specialized

    • Lose reasoning abilities

    • Start hallucinating more

    PEFT avoids this because the base model stays frozen.

    The additional adapters simply nudge the model in the direction of the new domain, without overwriting its core abilities.

    If you’re fine-tuning a model on small or narrow datasets (e.g., a medical corpus, legal cases, customer support chat logs), PEFT is significantly safer.

    4. When Your Dataset Is Small

    PEFT is ideal when data is limited.

    Full fine-tuning thrives on huge datasets.

    But if you only have:

    • A few thousand domain-specific examples

    • A small conversation dataset

    • A limited instruction set

    • Proprietary business data

    Then training all parameters often leads to overfitting.

    PEFT helps because:

    • Training fewer parameters means fewer ways to overfit

    • LoRA layers generalize better on small datasets

    • Adapter layers let you add specialization without destroying general skills

    In practice, most enterprise and industry use cases fall into this category.

    5. When You Need Fast Experimentation

    PEFT enables extremely rapid iteration.

    You can try:

    • Different LoRA ranks

    • Different adapters

    • Different training datasets

    • Different data augmentations

    • Multiple experimental runs

    …all without retraining the full model.

    This is perfect for research teams, startups, or companies exploring many directions simultaneously.

    It turns model adaptation into fast, agile experimentation rather than multi-day training cycles.

    6. When You Want to Deploy Lightweight, Swappable, Modular Behaviors

    Enterprises often want LLMs that support different behaviors based on:

    • User persona

    • Department

    • Client

    • Use case

    • Language

    • Compliance requirement

    PEFT lets you load or unload small adapters on the fly.

    Example:

    • A bank loads its “compliance adapter” when interacting with regulated tasks

    • A SaaS platform loads a “customer-service tone adapter”

    • A medical app loads a “clinical reasoning adapter”

    The base model stays the same it’s the adapters that specialize it.

    This is cleaner and safer than running several fully fine-tuned models.

    7. When the Base Model Provider Restricts Full Fine-Tuning

    Many commercial models (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, Google models) do not allow full fine-tuning.

    Instead, they offer variations of PEFT through:

    • Adapters

    • SFT layers

    • Low-rank updates

    • Custom embeddings

    • Skill injection

    Even when you work with open-source models, using PEFT keeps you compliant with licensing limitations and safety restrictions.

    8. When You Want to Reduce Deployment Costs

    Fine-tuned full models require larger VRAM footprints.

    PEFT solutions especially QLoRA reduce:

    • Training memory

    • Inference cost

    • Model loading time

    • Storage footprint

    A typical LoRA adapter might be less than 100 MB compared to a 30 GB model.

    This cost-efficiency is a major reason PEFT has become standard in real-world applications.

    9. When You Want to Avoid Degrading General Performance

    In many use cases, you want the model to:

    • Maintain general knowledge

    • Keep its reasoning skills

    • Stay safe and aligned

    • Retain multilingual ability

    Full fine-tuning risks damaging these abilities.

    PEFT preserves the model’s general competence while adding domain specialization on top.

    This is especially critical in domains like:

    • Healthcare

    • Law

    • Finance

    • Government systems

    • Scientific research

    You want specialization, not distortion.

    10. When You Want to Future-Proof Your Model

    Because the base model is frozen, you can:

    • Move your adapters to a new version of the model

    • Update the base model without retraining everything

    • Apply adapters selectively across model generations

    This modularity dramatically improves long-term maintainability.

    A Human-Friendly Summary (Interview-Ready)

    You would use Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning when you need to adapt a large language model to a specific task, but don’t want the cost, risk, or resource demands of full fine-tuning. It’s ideal when compute is limited, datasets are small, multiple specialized versions are needed, or you want fast experimentation. PEFT lets you train a tiny set of additional parameters while keeping the base model intact, making it scalable, modular, cost-efficient, and safer than traditional fine-tuning.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 06/12/2025In:

a Transformer, and how does self-atte ...

artificial intelligenceattentiondeep learningmachine learningnatural language processingtransformer-model
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. The Big Idea Behind the Transformer Instead of reading a sentence word-by-word as in an RNN, the Transformer reads the whole sentence in parallel. This alone dramatically speeds up training. But then the natural question would be: How does the model know which words relate to each other if it isRead more

    1. The Big Idea Behind the Transformer

    Instead of reading a sentence word-by-word as in an RNN, the Transformer reads the whole sentence in parallel. This alone dramatically speeds up training.

    But then the natural question would be:

    • How does the model know which words relate to each other if it is seeing everything at once?
    • This is where self-attention kicks in.
    • Self-attention allows the model to dynamically calculate the importance scores of other words in the sequence. For instance, in the sentence:

    “The cat which you saw yesterday was sleeping.”

    When predicting something about “cat”, the model can learn to pay stronger attention to “was sleeping” than to “yesterday”, because the relationship is more semantically relevant.

    Transformers do this kind of reasoning for each word at each layer.

    2. How Self-Attention Actually Works (Human Explanation)

    Self-attention sounds complex but the intuition is surprisingly simple:

    • Think of each token, which includes words, subwords, or other symbols, as a person sitting at a conference table.

    Everybody gets an opportunity to “look around the room” to decide:

    • To whom should I listen?
    • How much should I care about what they say?
    • How do their words influence what I will say next?

    Self-attention calculates these “listening strengths” mathematically.

    3. The Q, K, V Mechanism (Explained in Human Language)

    Each token creates three different vectors:

    • Query (Q) – What am I looking for?
    • Key (K) – what do I contain that others may search for?
    • Value.V- what information will I share if someone pays attention to me?

    Analogical is as follows:

    • Imagine a team meeting.
    • Your Query is what you are trying to comprehend, such as “Who has updates relevant to my task?”
    • Everyone’s Key represents whether they have something you should focus on (“I handle task X.”)
    • Everyone’s Value is the content (“Here’s my update.”)
    • It computes compatibility scores between every Query–Key pair.
    • These scores determine how much the Query token attends to each other token.

    Finally, it creates a weighted combination of the Values, and that becomes the token’s updated representation.

    4. Why This Is So Powerful

    Self-attention gives each token a global view of the sequence—not a limited window like RNNs.

    This enables the model to:

    • Capture long-range dependencies
    • Understand context more precisely
    • Parallelize training efficiently
    • Capture meaning in both directions – bidirectional context

    And because multiple attention heads run in parallel (multi-head attention), the model learns different kinds of relationships at once for example:

    • syntactic structure
    • Semantic Similarity
    • positional relationships
    • co-reference: linking pronouns to nouns

    Each head learns, through which to interpret the input in a different lens.

    5. Why Transformers Replaced RNNs and LSTMs

    • Performance: They simply have better accuracy on almost all NLP tasks.
    • Speed: They train on GPUs really well because of parallelism.
    • Scalability: Self-attention scales well as models grow from millions to billions of parameters.

    Flexibility Transformers are not limited to text anymore, they also power:

    • image models
    • Speech models
    • video understanding

    GPT-4o, Gemini 2.0, Claude 3.x-like multimodal systems

    agents, code models, scientific models

    Transformers are now the universal backbone of modern AI.

    6. A Quick Example to Tie It All Together

    Consider the sentence:

    • “I poured water into the bottle because it was empty.”
    • Humans know that “it” refers to “the bottle,” not the water.

    Self-attention allows the model to learn this by assigning a high attention weight between “it” and “bottle,” and a low weight between “it” and “water.”

    This dynamic relational understanding is exactly why Transformers can perform reasoning, translation, summarization, and even coding.

    Summary-Final (Interview-Friendly Version)

    A Transformer is a neural network architecture built entirely around the idea of self-attention, which allows each token in a sequence to weigh the importance of every other token. It processes sequences in parallel, making it faster, more scalable, and more accurate than previous models like RNNs and LSTMs.

    Self-attention works by generating Query, Key, and Value vectors for each token, computing relevance scores between every pair of tokens, and producing context-rich representations. This ability to model global relationships is the core reason why Transformers have become the foundation of modern AI, powering everything from language models to multimodal systems.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 01/12/2025In:

shifting from unimodal to cross-modal ...

cross-modal-reasoningdeep learningmachine learningmodel comparisonmultimodal-learning
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. Elevated Model Complexity, Heightened Computational Power, and Latency Costs Cross-modal models do not just operate on additional datatypes; they must fuse several forms of input into a unified reasoning pathway. This fusion requires more parameters, greater attention depth, and more considerableRead more

    1. Elevated Model Complexity, Heightened Computational Power, and Latency Costs

    Cross-modal models do not just operate on additional datatypes; they must fuse several forms of input into a unified reasoning pathway. This fusion requires more parameters, greater attention depth, and more considerable memory overhead.

    As such:

    • Inference lags in processing as multiple streams get balanced, like a vision encoder and a language decoder.
    • There are higher memory demands on the GPU, especially in the presence of images, PDFs, or video frames.
    • Cost per query increases at least, 2-fold from baseline and in some cases rises as high as 10-fold.

    For example, consider a text only question. The compute expenses of a model answering such a question are less than 20 milliseconds, However, asking such a model a multimodal question like, “Explain this chart and rewrite my email in a more polite tone,” would require the model to engage several advanced processes like image encoding, OCR-extraction, chart moderation, and structured reasoning.

    The greater the intelligence, the higher the compute demand.

    2. With greater reasoning capacity comes greater risk from failure modes.

    The new failure modes brought in by cross-modal reasoning do not exist in unimodal reasoning.

    For instance:

    • The model incorrectly and confidently explains the presence of an object, while it misidentifies the object.
    • The model erroneously alternates between the verbal and visual texts. The image may show 2020 at a text which states 2019.
    • The model over-relies on one input, disregarding that the other relevant input may be more informative.
    • In unimodal systems, failure is more detectable. As an instance, the text model may generate a permissive false text.
    • Anomalies like these can double in cross-modal systems, where the model could misrepresent the text, the image, or the connection between them.

    The reasoning chain, explaining, and debugging are harder for enterprise application.

    3. Demand for Enhancing Quality of Training Data, and More Effort in Data Curation

    Unimodal datasets, either pure text or images, are big, fascinatingly easy to acquire. Multimodal datasets, though, are not only smaller but also require more stringent alignment of different types of data.

    You have to make sure that the following data is aligned:

    • The caption on the image is correct.
    • The transcript aligns with the audio.
    • The bounding boxes or segmentation masks are accurate.
    • The video has a stable temporal structure.

    That means for businesses:

    • More manual curation.
    • Higher costs for labeling.
    • More domain expertise is required, like radiologists for medical imaging and clinical notes.

    The model depends greatly on the data alignment of the cross-modal model.

    4. Complexity of Assessment Along with Richer Understanding

    It is simple to evaluate a model that is unimodal, for example, you could check for precision, recall, BLEU score, or evaluate by simple accuracy. Multimodal reasoning is more difficult:

    • Does the model have accurate comprehension of the image?
    • Does it refer to the right section of the image for its text?
    • Does it use the right language to describe and account for the visual evidence?
    • Does it filter out irrelevant visual noise?
    • Can it keep spatial relations in mind?

    The need for new, modality-specific benchmarks generates further costs and delays in rolling out systems.

    In regulated fields, this is particularly challenging. How can you be sure a model rightly interprets medical images, safety documents, financial graphs, or identity documents?

    5. More Flexibility Equals More Engineering Dependencies

    To build cross-modal architectures, you also need the following:

    • Vision encoder.
    • Text encoder.
    • Audio encoder (if necessary).
    • Multi-head fused attention.
    • Joint representation space.
    • Multimodal runtime optimizers.

    This raises the complexity in engineering:

    • More components to upkeep.
    • More model parameters to control.
    • More pipelines for data flows to and from the model.

    Greater risk of disruptions from failures, like images not loading and causing invalid reasoning.

    In production systems, these dependencies need:

    • More robust CI/CD testing.
    • Multimodal observability.
    • More comprehensive observability practices.
    • Greater restrictions on file uploads for security.

    6. More Advanced Functionality Equals Less Control Over the Model

    Cross-modal models are often “smarter,” but can also be:

    • More likely to give what is called hallucinations, or fabricated, nonsensical responses.
    • More responsive to input manipulations, like modified images or misleading charts.
    • Less easy to constrain with basic controls.

    For example, you might be able to limit a text model by engineering complex prompt chains or by fine-tuning the model on a narrow data set.But machine-learning models can be easily baited with slight modifications to images.

    To counter this, several defenses must be employed, including:

    • Input sanitization.
    • Checking for neural watermarks
    • Anomaly detection in the vision system
    • Output controls based on policy
    • Red teaming for multiple modal attacks.
    • Safety becomes more difficult as the risk profile becomes more detailed.
    • Cross-Modal Intelligence, Higher Value but Slower to Roll Out

    The bottom line with respect to risk is simpler but still real:

    The vision system must be able to perform a wider variety of tasks with greater complexity, in a more human-like fashion while accepting that the system will also be more expensive to build, more expensive to run, and will increasing complexity to oversee from a governance standpoint.

    Cross-modal models deliver:

    • Document understanding
    • PDF and data table knowledge
    • Visual data analysis
    • Clinical reasoning with medical images and notes
    • Understanding of product catalogs
    • Participation in workflow automation
    • Voice interaction and video genera

    Building such models entails:

    • Stronger infrastructure
    • Stronger model control
    • Increased operational cost
    • Increased number of model runs
    • Increased complexity of the risk profile

    Increased value balanced by higher risk may be a fair trade-off.

    Humanized summary

    Cross modal reasoning is the point at which AI can be said to have multiple senses. It is more powerful and human-like at performing tasks but also requires greater resources to operate seamlessly and efficiently. Where data control and governance for the system will need to be more precise.

    The trade-off is more complex, but the end product is a greater intelligence for the system.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 25/11/2025In:

multimodal LLMs replace traditional c ...

ai trendscomputer visiondeep learningmodel comparisonmultimodal llmsyolo / cnn / segmentation
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. The Core Shift: From Narrow Vision Models to General-Purpose Perception Models For most of the past decade, computer vision relied on highly specialized architectures: CNNs for classification YOLO/SSD/DETR for object detection U-Net/Mask R-CNN for segmentation RAFT/FlowNet for optical flow Swin/VRead more

    1. The Core Shift: From Narrow Vision Models to General-Purpose Perception Models

    For most of the past decade, computer vision relied on highly specialized architectures:

    • CNNs for classification

    • YOLO/SSD/DETR for object detection

    • U-Net/Mask R-CNN for segmentation

    • RAFT/FlowNet for optical flow

    • Swin/ViT variants for advanced features

    These systems solved one thing extremely well.

    But modern multimodal LLMs like GPT-5, Gemini Ultra, Claude 3.7, Llama 4-Vision, Qwen-VL, and research models such as V-Jepa or MM1 are trained on massive corpora of images, videos, text, and sometimes audio—giving them a much broader understanding of the world.

    This changes the game.

    Not because they “see” better than vision models, but because they “understand” more.

    2. Why Multimodal LLMs Are Gaining Ground

    A. They excel at reasoning, not just perceiving

    Traditional CV models tell you:

    • What object is present

    • Where it is located

    • What mask or box surrounds it

    But multimodal LLMs can tell you:

    • What the object means in context

    • How it might behave

    • What action you should take

    • Why something is occurring

    For example:

    A CNN can tell you:

    • “Person holding a bottle.”

    A multimodal LLM can add:

    • “The person is holding a medical vial, likely preparing for an injection.”

    This jump from perception to interpretation is where multimodal LLMs dominate.

    B. They unify multiple tasks that previously required separate models

    Instead of:

    • One model for detection

    • One for segmentation

    • One for OCR

    • One for visual QA

    • One for captioning

    • One for policy generation

    A modern multimodal LLM can perform all of them in a single forward pass.

    This drastically simplifies pipelines.

    C. They are easier to integrate into real applications

    Developers prefer:

    • natural language prompts

    • API-based workflows

    • agent-style reasoning

    • tool calls

    • chain-of-thought explanations

    Vision specialists will still train CNNs, but a product team shipping an app prefers something that “just works.”

    3. But Here’s the Catch: Traditional Computer Vision Isn’t Going Away

    There are several areas where classic CV still outperforms:

    A. Speed and latency

    YOLO can run at 100 300 FPS on 1080p video.

    Multimodal LLMs cannot match that for real-time tasks like:

    • autonomous driving

    • CCTV analytics

    • high-frequency manufacturing

    • robotics motion control

    • mobile deployment on low-power devices

    Traditional models are small, optimized, and hardware-friendly.

    B. Deterministic behavior

    Enterprise-grade use cases still require:

    • strict reproducibility

    • guaranteed accuracy thresholds

    • deterministic outputs

    Multimodal LLMs, although improving, still have some stochastic variation.

    C. Resource constraints

    LLMs require:

    • more VRAM

    • more compute

    • slower inference

    • advanced hardware (GPUs, TPUs, NPUs)

    Whereas CNNs run well on:

    • edge devices

    • microcontrollers

    • drones

    • embedded hardware

    • phones with NPUs

    D. Tasks requiring pixel-level precision

    For fine-grained tasks like:

    • medical image segmentation

    • surgical navigation

    • industrial defect detection

    • satellite imagery analysis

    • biomedical microscopy

    • radiology

    U-Net and specialized segmentation models still dominate in accuracy.

    LLMs are improving, but not at that deterministic pixel-wise granularity.

    4. The Future: A Hybrid Vision Stack

    What we’re likely to see is neither replacement nor coexistence, but fusion:

    A. Specialized vision model → LLM reasoning layer

    This is already common:

    • DETR/YOLO extracts objects

    • A vision encoder sends embeddings to the LLM

    • The LLM performs interpretation, planning, or decision-making

    This solves both latency and reasoning challenges.

    B. LLMs orchestrating traditional CV tools

    An AI agent might:

    1. Call YOLO for detection

    2. Call U-Net for segmentation

    3. Use OCR for text extraction

    4. Then integrate everything to produce a final reasoning outcome

    This orchestration is where multimodality shines.

    C. Vision engines inside LLMs become good enough for 80% of use cases

    For many consumer and enterprise applications, “good enough + reasoning” beats “pixel-perfect but narrow.”

    Examples where LLMs will dominate:

    • retail visual search

    • AR/VR understanding

    • document analysis

    • e-commerce product tagging

    • insurance claims

    • content moderation

    • image explanation for blind users

    • multimodal chatbots

    In these cases, the value is understanding, not precision.

    5. So Will Multimodal LLMs Replace Traditional CV?

    Yes for understanding-driven tasks.

    • Where interpretation, reasoning, dialogue, and context matter, multimodal LLMs will replace many legacy CV pipelines.

    No for real-time and precision-critical tasks.

    • Where speed, determinism, and pixel-level accuracy matter, traditional CV will remain essential.

    Most realistically they will combine.

    A hybrid model stack where:

    • CNNs do the seeing

    • LLMs do the thinking

    This is the direction nearly every major AI lab is taking.

    6. The Bottom Line

    • Traditional computer vision is not disappearing it’s being absorbed.

    The future is not “LLM vs CV” but:

    • Vision models + LLMs + multimodal reasoning ≈ the next generation of perception AI.
    • The change is less about replacing models and more about transforming workflows.
    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 23/11/2025In:

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture ...

deep learningdistributed-trainingllm-architecturemixture-of-expertsmodel-scalingsparse-models
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. MoE Makes Models "Smarter, Not Heavier" Traditional dense models are akin to a school in which every teacher teaches every student, regardless of subject. MoE models are different; they contain a large number of specialist experts, and only the relevant experts are activated for any one input. ItRead more

    1. MoE Makes Models “Smarter, Not Heavier”

    Traditional dense models are akin to a school in which every teacher teaches every student, regardless of subject.

    MoE models are different; they contain a large number of specialist experts, and only the relevant experts are activated for any one input.

    It’s like saying:

    • “Math question? E-mail it to Math expert.”
    • “Legal text? Activate the law expert.
    • Image caption? Use the multimodal expert.

    This means that the model becomes larger in capacity, while being cheaper in compute.

    2. MoE Allows Scaling Massively Without Large Increases in Cost

    A dense 1-trillion parameter model requires computing all 1T parameters for every token.

    But in an MoE model:

    • you can have, in total, 1T parameters.
    • but only 2–4% are active per token.

    So, each token activation is equal to:

    • a 30B or 60B dense model
    • at a fraction of the cost

    But with the intelligence of something far bigger,

    This reshapes scaling because you no longer pay the full price for model size.

    It’s like having 100 people in your team, but on every task, only 2 experts work at a time, keeping costs efficient.

     3. MoE Brings Specialization Models Learn Like Humans

    Dense models try to learn everything in every neuron.

    MoE allows for local specialization, hence:

    • experts in languages
    • experts in math & logic
    • Medical Coding Experts
    • specialists in medical text
    • experts in visual reasoning
    • experts for long-context patterns

    This parallels how human beings organize knowledge; we have neural circuits that specialize in vision, speech, motor actions, memory, etc.

    MoE transforms LLMs into modular cognitive systems and not into giant, undifferentiated blobs.

    4. Routing Networks: The “Brain Dispatcher”

    The router plays a major role in MoE, which decides:

    • “Which experts should answer this token?
    • This router is akin to the receptionist at a hospital.
    • it observes the symptoms
    • knows which specialist fits
    • sends the patient to the right doctor

    Modern routers are much better:

    • top-2 routing
    • soft gating
    • balanced load routing
    • expert capacity limits
    • noisy top-k routing

    These innovations prevent:

    expert collapse: only a few experts are used.

    • overloading
    • training instability

    And they make MoE models fast and reliable.

    5. MoE Enables Extreme Model Capacity

    The most powerful AI models today are leveraging MoE.

    Examples (conceptually, not citing specific tech):

    • In the training pipelines of Google’s Gemini, MoE layers are employed.
    • Open-source giants like LLaMA-3 MoE variants emerge.
    • DeepMind pioneered early MoE with sparsely activated Transformers.
    • Many production systems rely on MoE for scaling efficiently.

    Why?

    Because MoE allows models to break past the limits of dense scaling.

    Dense scaling hits:

    • memory limits
    • compute ceilings
    • training instability

    MoE bypasses this with sparse activation, allowing:

    • trillion+ parameter models
    • massive multimodal models
    • extreme context windows (500k–1M tokens)

    more reasoning depth

     6. MoE Cuts Costs Without Losing Accuracy

    Cost matters when companies are deploying models to millions of users.

    MoE significantly reduces:

    • inference cost
    • GPU requirement
    • energy consumption
    • time to train
    • time to fine-tune

    Specialization, in turn, enables MoE models to frequently outperform dense counterparts at the same compute budget.

    It’s a rare win-win:

    bigger capacity, lower cost, and better quality.

     7. MoE Improves Fine-Tuning & Domain Adaptation

    Because experts are specialized, fine-tuning can target specific experts without touching the whole model.

    For example:

    • Fine-tune only medical experts for a healthcare product.
    • Fine tune only the coding experts for an AI programming assistant.

    This enables:

    • cheaper domain adaptation
    • faster updates
    • modular deployments
    • better catastrophic forgetting resistance

    It’s like updating only one department in a company instead of retraining the whole organization.

    8.MoE Improves Multilingual Reasoning

    Dense models tend to “forget” smaller languages as new data is added.

    MoE solves this by dedicating:

    • experts for Hindi
    • Experts in Japanese
    • Experts in Arabic
    • experts on low-resource languages

    Each group of specialists becomes a small brain within the big model.

    This helps to preserve linguistic diversity and ensure better access to AI across different parts of the world.

    9. MoE Paves the Path Toward Modular AGI

    Finally, MoE is not simply a scaling trick; it’s actually one step toward AI systems with a cognitive structure.

    Humans do not use the entire brain for every task.

    • Vision cortex deals with images.
    • temporal lobe handles language
    • Prefrontal cortex handles planning.

    MoE reflects this:

    • modular architecture
    • sparse activation
    • experts
    • routing control

    It’s a building block for architectures where intelligence is distributed across many specialized units-a key idea in pathways toward future AGI.

    Conquer the challenge! In short…

    Mixture-of-Experts is shifting our scaling paradigm in AI models: It enables us to create huge, smart, and specialized models without blowing up compute costs.

    It enables:

    • massive capacity at a low compute
    • Specialization across domains
    • Human-like modular reasoning
    • efficient finetuning
    • better multilingual performance

    reduced hallucinations better reasoning quality A route toward really large, modular AI systems MoE transforms LLMs from giant monolithic brains into orchestrated networks of experts, a far more scalable and human-like way of doing intelligence.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 07/11/2025In:

CNN vs an RNN vs a transformer

cnndeep learningmachine learningneural-networksrnntransformers
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    Understanding the Core Differences That is, by choosing between CNNs, RNNs, and Transformers, you are choosing how a model sees patterns in data: whether they are spatial, temporal, or contextual relationships across long sequences. Let's break that down: 1. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) – BeRead more

    Understanding the Core Differences

    That is, by choosing between CNNs, RNNs, and Transformers, you are choosing how a model sees patterns in data: whether they are spatial, temporal, or contextual relationships across long sequences.

    Let’s break that down:

    1. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) – Best for spatial or grid-like data

    When to use:

    • Use a CNN when your data has a clear spatial structure, meaning that patterns depend on local neighborhoods.
    • Think images, videos, medical scans, satellite imagery, or even feature maps extracted from sensors.

    Why it works:

    • Convolutions used by CNNs are sliding filters that detect local features: edges, corners, colors.
    • As data passes through layers, the model builds up hierarchical feature representations from edges → textures → objects → scenes.

    Example use cases:

    • Image classification (e.g., diagnosing pneumonia from chest X-rays)

    • Object detection (e.g., identifying road signs in self-driving cars)

    • Facial recognition, medical segmentation, or anomaly detection in dashboards

    • Even some analysis of audio spectrograms-a way of viewing sound as a 2D map of frequencies in

    In short: It’s when “where something appears” is more crucial than “when it does.”

    2. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) – Best for sequential or time-series data

    When to use:

    • Use RNNs when order and temporal dependencies are important; current input depends on what has come before.

    Why it works:

    • RNNs have a persistent hidden state that gets updated at every step, which lets them “remember” previous inputs.
    • Variants include LSTM and GRU, which allow for longer dependencies to be captured and avoid vanishing gradients.

    Example use cases:

    • Natural language tasks like Sentiment Analysis, machine translation before transformers took over
    • Time-series forecasting: stock prices, patient vitals, weather data, etc.
    • Sequential data modeling: for example, monitoring hospital patients, ECG readings, anomaly detection in IoT streams.
    • Speech recognition or predictive text

    In other words: RNNs are great when “sequence and timing” is most important – you’re modeling how it unfolds.

    3. Transformers – Best for context-heavy data with long-range dependencies

    When to use:

    • Transformers are currently the state of the art for nearly every task that requires modeling complicated relationships on long sequences-text, images, audio, even structured data.

    Why it works:

    • Unlike RNNs, which process data one step at a time, transformers make use of self-attention — a mechanism that allows the model to look at all parts of the input at once and decide which parts are most relevant to each other.

    This gives transformers three big advantages:

    • Parallelization: Training is way faster because inputs are processed simultaneously.
    • Long-range understanding: They are global in capturing dependencies, for example, word 1 affecting word 100.
    • Adaptability: Works across multiple modalities, such as text, images, code, etc.

    Example use cases:

    • NLP: ChatGPT, BERT, T5, etc.
    • Vision: The ViT now competes with the CNN for image recognition.
    • Audio/Video: Speech-to-text, music generation, multimodal tasks.
    • Health & business: Predictive analytics using structured plus unstructured data such as clinical notes and sensor data.

    In other words, Transformers are ideal when global context and scalability are critical — when you need the model to understand relationships anywhere in the sequence.

     Example Analogy (for Human Touch)

    Imagine you are analyzing a film:

    • A CNN focuses on every frame; the visuals, the color patterns, who’s where on screen.
    • An RNN focuses on how scenes flow over time the storyline, one moment leading to another.
    • A Transformer reads the whole script at once: character relationships, themes, and how the ending relates to the beginning.

    So, it depends on whether you are analyzing visuals, sequence, or context.

    Summary Answer for an Interview

    I will choose a CNN if my data is spatially correlated, such as images or medical scans, since it does a better job of modeling local features. But if there is some strong temporal dependence in my data, such as time-series or language, I will select an RNN or an LSTM, which does the processing sequentially. If the task, however, calls for an understanding of long-range dependencies or relationships, especially for large and complex datasets, then I would use a Transformer. Recently, Transformers have generalized across vision, text, and audio and therefore have become the default solution for most recent deep learning applications.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 19/10/2025In:

AI model to use (for a given task)

ai model selectiondeep learningmachine learningmodel choicemodel performancetask-specific models
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice

    1. Start with the Problem — Not the Model Specify what you actually require even before you look at models. Ask yourself: What am I trying to do — classify, predict, generate content, recommend, or reason? What is the input and output we have — text, images, numbers, sound, or more than one (multimoRead more

    1. Start with the Problem — Not the Model

    Specify what you actually require even before you look at models.

    Ask yourself:

    • What am I trying to do — classify, predict, generate content, recommend, or reason?
    • What is the input and output we have — text, images, numbers, sound, or more than one (multimodal)?
    • How accurate or original should the system be?

    For example:

    • If you want to summarize patient reports → use a large language model (LLM) fine-tuned for summarization.
    • If you want to diagnose pneumonia on X-rays → use a vision model fine-tuned on medical images (e.g., EfficientNet or ViT).
    • If you want to answer business questions in natural language → use a reasoning model like GPT-4, Claude 3, or Gemini 1.5.

    When you are aware of the task type, you’ve already completed half the job.

     2. Match the Model Type to the Task

    With this information, you can narrow it down:

    Task Type\tModel Family\tExample Models
    Text generation / summarization\tLarge Language Models (LLMs)\tGPT-4, Claude 3, Gemini 1.5
    Image generation\tDiffusion / Transformer-based\tDALL-E 3, Stable Diffusion, Midjourney
    Speech to text\tASR (Automatic Speech Recognition)\tWhisper, Deepgram
    Text to speech\tTTS (Text-to-Speech)\tElevenLabs, Play.ht
    Image recognition\tCNNs / Vision Transformers\tEfficientNet, ResNet, ViT
    Multi-modal reasoning
    Unified multimodal transformers
    GPT-4o, Gemini 1.5 Pro
    Recommendation / personalization
    Collaborative filtering, Graph Neural Nets
    DeepFM, GraphSage

    If your app uses modalities combined (like text + image), multimodal models are the way to go.

     3. Consider Scale, Cost, and Latency

    Not every problem requires a 500-billion-parameter model.

    Ask:

    • Do I require state-of-the-art accuracy or good-enough speed?
    • How much am I willing to pay per query or per inference?

    Example:

    • Customer support chatbots → smaller, lower-cost models like GPT-3.5, Llama 3 8B, or Mistral 7B.
    • Scientific reasoning or code writing → larger models like GPT-4-Turbo or Claude 3 Opus.
    • On-device AI (like in mobile apps) → quantized or distilled models (Gemma 2, Phi-3, Llama 3 Instruct).

    The rule of thumb:

    • “Use the smallest model that’s good enough for your use case.”
    • This is budget-friendly and makes systems responsive.

     4. Evaluate Data Privacy and Deployment Needs

    • Your data is sensitive (health, finance, government), and you want to control where and how the model runs.
    • Cloud-hosted proprietary models (e.g., GPT-4, Gemini) give excellent performance but little data control.
    • Self-hosted or open-source models (e.g., Llama 3, Mistral, Falcon) can be securely deployed on your servers.

    If your business requires ABDM/HIPAA/GDPR compliance, self-hosting or API use of models is generally the preferred option.

     5. Verify on Actual Data

    The benchmark score of a model does not ensure it will work best for your data.
    Always pilot test it on a very small pilot dataset or pilot task first.

    Measure:

    • Accuracy or relevance (depending on task)
    • Speed and cost per request
    • Robustness (does it crash on hard inputs?)
    • Bias or fairness (any demographic bias?)

    Sometimes a little fine-tuned model trumps a giant general one because it “knows your data better.”

    6. Contrast “Reasoning Depth” with “Knowledge Breadth”

    Some models are great reasoners (they can perform deep logic chains), while others are good knowledge retrievers (they recall facts quickly).

    Example:

    • Reasoning-intensive tasks: GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, Gemini 1.5 Pro
    • Knowledge-based Q&A or embeddings: Llama 3 70B, Mistral Large, Cohere R+

    If your task concerns step-by-step reasoning (such as medical diagnosis or legal examination), use reasoning models.

    If it’s a matter of getting information back quickly, retrieval-augmented smaller models could be a better option.

     7. Think Integration & Tooling

    Your chosen model will have to integrate with your tech stack.

    Ask:

    • Does it support an easy API or SDK?
    • Will it integrate with your existing stack (React, Node.js, Laravel, Python)?
    • Does it support plug-ins or direct function call?

    If you plan to deploy AI-driven workflows or microservices, choose models that are API-friendly, reliable, and provide consistent availability.

     8. Try and Refine

    No choice is irreversible. The AI landscape evolves rapidly — every month, there are new models.

    A good practice is to:

    • Start with a baseline (e.g., GPT-3.5 or Llama 3 8B).
    • Collect performance and feedback metrics.
    • Scale up to more powerful or more specialized models as needed.
    • Have fall-back logic — i.e., if one API will not do, another can take over.

    In Short: Selecting the Right Model Is Selecting the Right Tool

    It’s technical fit, pragmatism, and ethics.

    Don’t go for the biggest model; go for the most stable, economical, and appropriate one for your application.

    “A great AI product is not about leveraging the latest model — it’s about making the best decision with the model that works for your users, your data, and your purpose.”

    See less
Load More Questions