Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In


Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here


Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.


Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

You must login to add post.


Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here
Sign InSign Up

Qaskme

Qaskme Logo Qaskme Logo

Qaskme Navigation

  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask A Question
  • Home
  • Questions Feed
  • Communities
  • Blog
Home/machinelearning
  • Recent Questions
  • Most Answered
  • Answers
  • No Answers
  • Most Visited
  • Most Voted
  • Random
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 14/11/2025In: Technology

Are we moving towards smaller, faster, domain-specialized LLMs instead of giant trillion-parameter models?

we moving towards smaller, faster, do ...

aiaitrendsllmsmachinelearningmodeloptimizationsmallmodels
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 14/11/2025 at 4:54 pm

    1. The early years: Bigger meant better When GPT-3, PaLM, Gemini 1, Llama 2 and similar models came, they were huge.The assumption was: “The more parameters a model has, the more intelligent it becomes.” And honestly, it worked at first: Bigger models understood language better They solved tasks morRead more

    1. The early years: Bigger meant better

    When GPT-3, PaLM, Gemini 1, Llama 2 and similar models came, they were huge.
    The assumption was:

    “The more parameters a model has, the more intelligent it becomes.”

    And honestly, it worked at first:

    • Bigger models understood language better

    • They solved tasks more clearly

    • They could generalize across many domains

    So companies kept scaling from billions → hundreds of billions → trillions of parameters.

    But soon, cracks started to show.

    2. The problem: Giant models are amazing… but expensive and slow

    Large-scale models come with big headaches:

    High computational cost

    • You need data centers, GPUs, expensive clusters to run them.

    Cost of inference

    • Running one query can cost cents too expensive for mass use.

     Slow response times

    Bigger models → more compute → slower speed

    This is painful for:

    • real-time apps

    • mobile apps

    • robotics

    • AR/VR

    • autonomous workflows

    Privacy concerns

    • Enterprises don’t want to send private data to a huge central model.

    Environmental concerns

    • Training a trillion-parameter model consumes massive energy.
    • This pushed the industry to rethink the strategy.

    3. The shift: Smaller, faster, domain-focused LLMs

    Around 2023–2025, we saw a big change.

    Developers realised:

    “A smaller model, trained on the right data for a specific domain, can outperform a gigantic general-purpose model.”

    This led to the rise of:

     Small models (SMLLMs) 7B, 13B, 20B parameter range

    • Examples: Gemma, Llama 3.2, Phi, Mistral.

    Domain-specialized small models

    • These outperform even GPT-4/GPT-5-level models within their domain:
    • Medical AI models

    • Legal research LLMs

    • Financial trading models

    • Dev-tools coding models

    • Customer service agents

    • Product-catalog Q&A models

    Why?

    Because these models don’t try to know everything they specialize.

    Think of it like doctors:

    A general physician knows a bit of everything,but a cardiologist knows the heart far better.

    4. Why small LLMs are winning (in many cases)

    1) They run on laptops, mobiles & edge devices

    A 7B or 13B model can run locally without cloud.

    This means:

    • super fast

    • low latency

    • privacy-safe

    • cheap operations

    2) They are fine-tuned for specific tasks

    A 20B medical model can outperform a 1T general model in:

    • diagnosis-related reasoning

    • treatment recommendations

    • medical report summarization

    Because it is trained only on what matters.

    3) They are cheaper to train and maintain

    • Companies love this.
    • Instead of spending $100M+, they can train a small model for $50k–$200k.

    4) They are easier to deploy at scale

    • Millions of users can run them simultaneously without breaking servers.

    5) They allow “privacy by design”

    Industries like:

    • Healthcare

    • Banking

    • Government

    …prefer smaller models that run inside secure internal servers.

    5. But are big models going away?

    No — not at all.

    Massive frontier models (GPT-6, Gemini Ultra, Claude Next, Llama 4) still matter because:

    • They push scientific boundaries

    • They do complex reasoning

    • They integrate multiple modalities

    • They act as universal foundation models

    Think of them as:

    • “The brains of the AI ecosystem.”

    But they are not the only solution anymore.

    6. The new model ecosystem: Big + Small working together

    The future is hybrid:

     Big Model (Brain)

    • Deep reasoning, creativity, planning, multimodal understanding.

    Small Models (Workers)

    • Fast, specialized, local, privacy-safe, domain experts.

    Large companies are already shifting to “Model Farms”:

    • 1 big foundation LLM

    • 20–200 small specialized LLMs

    • 50–500 even smaller micro-models

    Each does one job really well.

    7. The 2025 2027 trend: Agentic AI with lightweight models

    We’re entering a world where:

    Agents = many small models performing tasks autonomously

    Instead of one giant model:

    • one model reads your emails

    • one summarizes tasks

    • one checks market data

    • one writes code

    • one runs on your laptop

    • one handles security

    All coordinated by a central reasoning model.

    This distributed intelligence is more efficient than having one giant brain do everything.

    Conclusion (Humanized summary)

    Yes the industry is strongly moving toward smaller, faster, domain-specialized LLMs because they are:

    • cheaper

    • faster

    • accurate in specific domains

    • privacy-friendly

    • easier to deploy on devices

    • better for real businesses

    But big trillion-parameter models will still exist to provide:

    • world knowledge

    • long reasoning

    • universal coordination

    So the future isn’t about choosing big OR small.

    It’s about combining big + tailored small models to create an intelligent ecosystem just like how the human body uses both a brain and specialized organs.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 55
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 12/11/2025In: Technology

What’s the future of AI personalization and memory-based agents?

the future of AI personalization and ...

aiagentsaipersonalizationartificialintelligencefutureofaimachinelearningmemorybasedai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 12/11/2025 at 1:18 pm

    Personal vs. Generic Intelligence: The Shift Until recently, the majority of AI systems-from chatbots to recommendation engines, have all been designed to respond identically to everybody. You typed in your question, it processed it, and gave you an answer-without knowing who you are or what you likRead more

    Personal vs. Generic Intelligence: The Shift

    Until recently, the majority of AI systems-from chatbots to recommendation engines, have all been designed to respond identically to everybody. You typed in your question, it processed it, and gave you an answer-without knowing who you are or what you like.

    But that is changing fast, as the next generation of AI models will have persistent memory, allowing them to:

    • Remember the history, tone, and preferences.
    • Adapt the style, depth, and content to your personality.
    • Gain a long-term sense of your goals, values, and context.

    That is, AI will evolve from being a tool to something more akin to a personal cognitive companion, one that knows you better each day.

    WHAT ARE MEMORY-BASED AGENTS?

    A memory-based agent is an AI system that does not just process prompts in a stateless manner but stores and recalls the relevant experiences over time.

    For example:

    • A ChatGPT or Copilot with memory might recall your style of coding, preferred frameworks, or common mistakes.
    • Your health records, lists of medication preferences, and symptoms may be remembered by the healthcare AI assistant to offer you contextual advice.
    • Our business AI agent could remember project milestones, team updates, and even the tone of your communication. It would sound like responses from our colleague.
    1. This involves an organized memory system: short-term for immediate context and long-term for durable knowledge, much like the human brain.

    How it works: technical

    Modern memory-based agents are built using a combination of:

    • Vector databases enable semantic storage and the ability to retrieve past conversations.
    • Embeddings are what allow the AI to “understand” meaning and not just keywords.
    • Context management: A process of efficient filtering and summarization of memory so that it does not overload the model.
    • Preference learning: fine-tuning to respond to style, tone, or the needs of an individual.

    Taken together, these create continuity. Instead of starting fresh every time you talk, your AI can say, “Last time you were debugging a Spring Boot microservice — want me to resume where we left off?

    TM Human-Like Interaction and Empathy

    AI personalization will move from task efficiency to emotional alignment.

    Suppose:

    • Your AI tutor remembers where you struggle in math and adjusts the explanations accordingly.
    • Your writing assistant knows your tone and edits emails or blogs to make them sound more like you.
    • Your wellness app remembers your stressors and suggests breathing exercises a little before your next big meeting.

    This sort of empathy does not mean emotion; it means contextual understanding-the ability to align responses with your mood, situation, and goals.

     Privacy, Ethics & Boundaries

    • Personalization inevitably raises questions of data privacy and digital consent.

    If AI is remembering everything about you, then whose memory is it? You should be able to:

    • Review and delete your stored interactions.
    • Choose what’s remembered and what’s forgotten.
    • Control where your data is stored: locally, encrypted cloud, or device memory.

    Future regulations will surely include “Explainable Memory”-the need for AI to be transparent about what it knows about you and how it uses that information.

    Real-World Use Cases Finally Emerge

    • Health care: AI-powered personal coaches that monitor fitness, mental health, or chronic diseases.
    • Education: AI tutors who adapt to the pace, style, and emotional state of each student.
    • Enterprise: project memory assistants remembering deadlines, reports, and work culture.
    • E-commerce: Personal shoppers who actually know your taste and purchase history.
    • Smart homes: Voice assistants know the routine of a family and modify lighting, temperature, or reminders accordingly.

    These are not far-off dreams; early prototypes are already being tested by OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google DeepMind.

     The Long Term Vision: “Lifelong AI Companions”

    Over the course of the coming 3-5 years, memory-based AI will be combined with Agentic systems capable of taking action on your behalf autonomously.

    Your virtual assistant can:

    • Schedule meetings, book tickets, or automatically send follow-up e-mails.
    • Learn your career path and suggest upskilling courses.
    • Build personal dashboards to summarize your week and priorities.

    This “Lifelong AI Companion” may become a mirror to your professional and personal evolution, remembering not only facts but your journey.

    The Human Side: Connecting, Not Replacing

    The key challenge will be to design the systems to support and not replace human relationships. Memory-based AI has to magnify human potential, not cocoon us inside algorithmic bubbles. Undoubtedly, the healthiest future of all is one where AI understands context but respects human agency – helps us think better, not for us.

    Final Thoughts

    The future of AI personalization and memory-based agents is deeply human-centric. We are building contextual intelligence that learns your world, adapts to your rhythm, and grows with your purpose instead of cold algorithms. It’s the next great evolution: From “smart assistants” ➜ to “thinking partners” ➜ to “empathetic companions.” The difference won’t just be in what AI does but in how well it remembers who you are.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 48
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 09/11/2025In: Technology

What is the difference between traditional AI/ML and generative AI / large language models (LLMs)?

the difference between traditional AI ...

artificialintelligencedeeplearninggenerativeailargelanguagemodelsllmsmachinelearning
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 09/11/2025 at 4:27 pm

    The Big Picture Consider traditional AI/ML as systems learning patterns for predictions, whereas generative AI/LLMs learn representations of the world with which to generate novel things: text, images, code, music, or even steps in reasoning. In short: Traditional AI/ML → Predicts. Generative AI/LLMRead more

    The Big Picture

    Consider traditional AI/ML as systems learning patterns for predictions, whereas generative AI/LLMs learn representations of the world with which to generate novel things: text, images, code, music, or even steps in reasoning.

    In short:

    • Traditional AI/ML → Predicts.
    • Generative AI/LLMs → create and comprehend.

     Traditional AI/ Machine Learning — The Foundation

    1. Purpose

    Traditional AI and ML are mainly discriminative, meaning they classify, forecast, or rank things based on existing data.

    For example:

    • Predict whether an email is spam or not.
    • Detect a tumor in an MRI scan.
    • Estimate tomorrow’s temperature.
    • Recommend the product that a user is most likely to buy.

    Focus is placed on structured outputs obtained from structured or semi-structured data.

    2. How It Works

    Traditional ML follows a well-defined process:

    • Collect and clean labeled data (inputs + correct outputs).
    • Feature selection selects features-the variables that truly count.
    • Train a model, such as logistic regression, random forest, SVM, or gradient boosting.
    • Optimize metrics, whether accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, RMSE, etc.
    • Deploy and monitor for prediction quality.

    Each model is purpose-built, meaning you train one model per task.
    If you want to perform five tasks, say, detect fraud, recommend movies, predict churn, forecast demand, and classify sentiment, you build five different models.

    3. Examples of Traditional AI

    Application           Example              Type

    Classification, Span detection, image recognition, Supervised

    Forecasting Sales prediction, stock movement, and Regression

    Clustering\tMarket segmentation\tUnsupervised

    Recommendation: Product/content suggestions, collaborative filtering

    Optimization, Route planning, inventory control, Reinforcement learning (early)

    Many of them are narrow, specialized models that call for domain-specific expertise.

    Generative AI and Large Language Models: The Revolution

    1. Purpose

    Generative AI, particularly LLMs such as GPT, Claude, Gemini, and LLaMA, shifts from analysis to creation. It creates new content with a human look and feel.

    They can:

    • Generate text, code, stories, summaries, answers, and explanations.
    • Translation across languages and modalities, such as text → image, image → text, etc.
    • Reason across diverse tasks without explicit reprogramming.

    They’re multi-purpose, context-aware, and creative.

    2. How It Works

    LLMs have been constructed using deep neural networks, especially the Transformer architecture introduced in 2017 by Google.

    Unlike traditional ML:

    • They train on massive unstructured data: books, articles, code, and websites.
    • They learn the patterns of language and thought, not explicit labels.
    • They predict the next token in a sequence, be it a word or a subword, and through this, they learn grammar, logic, facts, and how to reason implicitly.

    These are pre-trained on enormous corpora and then fine-tuned for specific tasks like chatting, coding, summarizing, etc.

    3. Example

    Let’s compare directly:

    Task, Traditional ML, Generative AI LLM

    Spam Detection Classifies a message as spam/not spam. Can write a realistic spam email or explain why it’s spam.

    Sentiment Analysis outputs “positive” or “negative.” Write a movie review, adjust the tone, or rewrite it neutrally.

    Translation rule-based/ statistical models, understand contextual meaning and idioms like a human.

    Chatbots: Pre-programmed, single responses, Conversational, contextually aware responses

    Data Science Predicts outcomes, generates insights, explains data, and even writes code.

    Key Differences — Side by Side

    Aspect      Traditional AI/ML      Generative AI/LLMs

    Objective – Predict or Classify from data; Create something entirely new

    Data Structured (tables, numeric), Unstructured (text, images, audio, code)

    Training Approach ×Task-specific ×General pretraining, fine-tuning later

    Architecture: Linear models, decision trees, CNNs, RNNs, Transformers, attention mechanisms

    Interpretability Easier to explain Harder to interpret (“black box”)

    Adaptability needs to be retrained for new tasks reachable via few-shot prompting

    Output Type: Fixed labels or numbers, Free-form text, code, media

    Human Interaction LinearGradientInput → OutputConversational, Iterative, Contextual

    Compute Scale\tRelatively small\tExtremely large (billions of parameters)

    Why Generative AI Feels “Intelligent”

    Generative models learn latent representations, meaning abstract relationships between concepts, not just statistical correlations.

    That’s why an LLM can:

    • Write a poem in Shakespearean style.
    • Debug your Python code.
    • Explain a legal clause.
    • Create an email based on mood and tone.

    Traditional AI could never do all that in one model; it would have to be dozens of specialized systems.

    Large language models are foundation models: enormous generalists that can be fine-tuned for many different applications.

    The Trade-offs

    Advantages      of Generative AI Bring        , But Be Careful About

    Creativity ↓ can produce human-like contextual output, can hallucinate, or generate false facts

    Efficiency: Handles many tasks with one model. Extremely resource-hungry compute, energy

    Accessibility: Anyone can prompt it – no coding required. Hard to control or explain inner reasoning

    Generalization Works across domains. May reflect biases or ethical issues in training data

    Traditional AI models are narrow but stable; LLMs are powerful but unpredictable.

    A Human Analogy

    Think of traditional AI as akin to a specialist, a person who can do one job extremely well if properly trained, whether that be an accountant or a radiologist.

    Think of Generative AI/LLMs as a curious polymath, someone who has read everything, can discuss anything, yet often makes confident mistakes.

    Both are valuable; it depends on the problem.

    Earth Impact

    • Traditional AI powers what is under the hood: credit scoring, demand forecasting, route optimization, and disease detection.
    • Generative AI powers human interfaces, including chatbots, writing assistants, code copilots, content creation, education tools, and creative design.

    Together, they are transformational.

    For example, in healthcare, traditional AI might analyze X-rays, while generative AI can explain the results to a doctor or patient in plain language.

     The Future — Convergence

    The future is hybrid AI:

    • Employ traditional models for accurate, data-driven predictions.
    • Use LLMs for reasoning, summarizing, and interacting with humans.
    • Connect both with APIs, agents, and workflow automation.

    This is where industries are going: “AI systems of systems” that put together prediction and generation, analytics and conversation, data science and storytelling.

    In a Nutshell,

    Dimension\tTraditional AI / ML\tGenerative AI / LLMs

    Core Idea: Learn patterns to predict outcomes. Learn representations to generate new content. Task Focus Narrow, single-purpose Broad, multi-purpose Input Labeled, structured data High-volume, unstructured data Example Predict loan default Write a financial summary Strengths\tAccuracy, control\tCreativity, adaptability Limitation Limited scope Risk of hallucination, bias.

    Human Takeaway

    Traditional AI taught machines how to think statistically. Generative AI is teaching them how to communicate, create, and reason like humans. Both are part of the same evolutionary journey-from automation to augmentation-where AI doesn’t just do work but helps us imagine new possibilities.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 71
  • 0
Answer
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 05/11/2025In: Technology

What is a Transformer architecture, and why is it foundational for modern generative models?

a Transformer architecture

aideeplearninggenerativemodelsmachinelearningneuralnetworkstransformers
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 06/11/2025 at 11:13 am

    Attention, Not Sequence: The major point is Before the advent of Transformers, most models would usually process language sequentially, word by word, just like one reads a sentence. This made them slow and forgetful over long distances. For example, in a long sentence like. "The book, suggested by tRead more

    Attention, Not Sequence: The major point is

    Before the advent of Transformers, most models would usually process language sequentially, word by word, just like one reads a sentence. This made them slow and forgetful over long distances. For example, in a long sentence like.

    • “The book, suggested by this professor who was speaking at the conference, was quite interesting.”
    • Earlier models often lost track of who or what the sentence was about because information from earlier words would fade as new ones arrived.
    • This was solved with Transformers, which utilize a mechanism called self-attention; it enables the model to view all words simultaneously and select those most relevant to each other.

    Now, imagine reading that sentence but not word by word; in an instant, one can see the whole sentence-your brain can connect “book” directly to “fascinating” and understand what is meant clearly. That’s what self-attention does for machines.

    How It Works (in Simple Terms)

    The Transformer model consists of two main blocks:

    • Encoder: This reads and understands the input for translation, summarization, and so on.
    • Decoder: This predicts or generates the next part of the output for text generation.

    Within these blocks are several layers comprising:

    • Self-Attention Mechanism: It enables each word to attend to every other word to capture the context.
    • Feed-Forward Neural Networks: These process the contextualized information.
    • Normalization and Residual Connections: These stabilize training, and information flows efficiently.

    With many layers stacked, Transformers are deep and powerful, able to learn very rich patterns in text, code, images, or even sound.

    Why It’s Foundational for Generative Models

    Generative models, including ChatGPT, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, and LLaMA, are all based on Transformer architecture. Here is why it is so foundational:

    1. Parallel Processing = Massive Speed and Scale

    Unlike RNNs, which process a single token at a time, Transformers process whole sequences in parallel. That made it possible to train on huge datasets using modern GPUs and accelerated the whole field of generative AI.

    2. Long-Term Comprehension

    Transformers do not “forget” what happened earlier in a sentence or paragraph. The attention mechanism lets them weigh relationships between any two points in text, resulting in a deep understanding of context, tone, and semantics so crucial for generating coherent long-form text.

    3. Transfer Learning and Pretraining

    Transformers enabled the concept of pretraining + fine-tuning.

    Take GPT models, for example: They first undergo training on massive text corpora (books, websites, research papers) to learn to understand general language. They are then fine-tuned with targeted tasks in mind, such as question-answering, summarization, or conversation.

    Modularity made them very versatile.

    4. Multimodality

    But transformers are not limited to text. The same architecture underlies Vision Transformers, or ViT, for image understanding; Audio Transformers for speech; and even multimodal models that mix and match text, image, video, and code, such as GPT-4V and Gemini.

    That universality comes from the Transformer being able to process sequences of tokens, whether those are words, pixels, sounds, or any kind of data representation.

    5. Scalability and Emergent Intelligence

    This is the magic that happens when you scale up Transformers, with more parameters, more training data, and more compute: emergent behavior.

    Models now begin to exhibit reasoning skills, creativity, translation, coding, and even abstract thinking that they were never taught. This scaling law forms one of the biggest discoveries of modern AI research.

    Earth Impact

    Because of Transformers:

    • It can write essays, poems, and even code.
    • Google Translate became dramatically more accurate.
    • Stable Diffusion and DALL-E generate photorealistic images influenced by words.
    • AlphaFold can predict 3D protein structures from genetic sequences.
    • Search engines and recommendation systems understand the user’s intent more than ever before.

    Or in other words, the Transformer turned AI from a niche area of research into a mainstream, world-changing technology.

     A Simple Analogy

    Think of the old assembly line where each worker passed a note down the line slow, and he’d lost some of the detail.

    Think of a modern sort of control room, Transformer, where every worker can view all the notes at one time, compare them, and decide on what is important; that is the attention mechanism. It understands more and is quicker, capable of grasping complex relationships in an instant.

    Transformers Glimpse into the Future

    Transformers are still evolving. Research is pushing its boundaries through:

    • Sparse and efficient attention mechanisms for handling very long documents.
    • Retrieval-augmented models, such as ChatGPT with memory or web access.
    • Mixture of Experts architectures to make models more efficient.
    • Neuromorphic and adaptive computation for reasoning and personalization.

    The Transformer is more than just a model; it is the blueprint for scaling up intelligence. It has redefined how machines learn, reason, and create, and in all likelihood, this is going to remain at the heart of AI innovation for many years ahead.

    In brief,

    What matters about the Transformer architecture is that it taught machines how to pay attention to weigh, relate, and understand information holistically. That single idea opened the door to generative AI-making systems like ChatGPT possible. It’s not just a technical leap; it is a conceptual revolution in how we teach machines to think.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 75
  • 0
Answer
daniyasiddiquiEditor’s Choice
Asked: 01/10/2025In: Technology

What is “multimodal AI,” and how is it different from traditional AI models?

multimodal AI and traditional AI mode

aiexplainedaivstraditionalmodelsartificialintelligencedeeplearningmachinelearningmultimodalai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Editor’s Choice
    Added an answer on 01/10/2025 at 2:16 pm

    What is "Multimodal AI," and How Does it Differ from Classic AI Models? Artificial Intelligence has been moving at lightening speed, but one of the greatest advancements has been the emergence of multimodal AI. Simply put, multimodal AI is akin to endowing a machine with sight, hearing, reading, andRead more

    What is “Multimodal AI,” and How Does it Differ from Classic AI Models?

    Artificial Intelligence has been moving at lightening speed, but one of the greatest advancements has been the emergence of multimodal AI. Simply put, multimodal AI is akin to endowing a machine with sight, hearing, reading, and even responding in a manner that weaves together all of those senses in a single coherent response—just like humans.

     Classic AI: One Track Mind

    Classic AI models were typically constructed to deal with only one kind of data at a time:

    • A text model could read and write only text.
    • An image recognition model could only recognize images.
    • A speech recognition model could only recognize audio.

    This made them very strong in a single lane, but could not merge various forms of input by themselves. Like, an old-fashioned AI would say you what is in a photo (e.g., “this is a cat”), but it wouldn’t be able to hear you ask about the cat and then respond back with a description—all in one shot.

     Welcome Multimodal AI: The Human-Like Merge

    Multimodal AI topples those walls. It can process multiple information modes simultaneously—text, images, audio, video, and sometimes even sensory input such as gestures or environmental signals.

    For instance:

    You can display a picture of your refrigerator and type in: “What recipe can I prepare using these ingredients?” The AI can “look” at the ingredients and respond in text afterwards.

    • You might write a scene in words, and it will create an image or video to match.
    • You might upload an audio recording, and it may transcribe it, examine the speaker’s tone, and suggest a response—all in the same exchange.
    • This capability gets us so much closer to the way we, as humans, experience the world. We don’t simply experience life in words—we experience it through sight, sound, and language all at once.

     Key Differences at a Glance

    Input Diversity

    • Traditional AI behavior → one input (text-only, image-only).
    • Multimodal AI behavior → more than one input (text + image + audio, etc.).

    Contextual Comprehension

    • Traditional AI behavior → performs poorly when context spans different types of information.
    • Multimodal AI behavior → combines sources of information to build richer, more human-like understanding.

    Functional Applications

    • Traditional AI behavior → chatbots, spam filters, simple image recognition.
    • Multimodal AI → medical diagnosis (scans + patient records), creative tools (text-to-image/video/music), accessibility aids (describing scenes to visually impaired).

    Why This Matters for the Future

    Multimodal AI isn’t just about making cooler apps. It’s about making AI more natural and useful in daily Consider:

    • Education → Teachers might use AI to teach a science conceplife.  with text, diagrams, and spoken examples in one fluent lesson.
    • Healthcare → A physician would upload an MRI scan, patient history, and lab work, and the AI would put them together to make recommendations of possible diagnoses.
    • Accessibility → Individuals with disabilities would gain from AI that “sees” and “speaks,” advancing digital life to be more inclusive.

     The Human Angle

    The most dramatic change is this: multimodal AI doesn’t feel so much like a “tool” anymore, but rather more like a collaborator. Rather than switching between multiple apps (one for speech-to-text, one for image edit, one for writing), you might have one AI partner who gets you across all formats.

    Of course, this power raises important questions about ethics, privacy, and misuse. If an AI can watch, listen, and talk all at once, who controls what it does with that information? That’s the conversation society is only just beginning to have.

    Briefly: Classic AI was similar to a specialist. Multimodal AI is similar to a balanced generalist—capable of seeing, hearing, talking, and reasoning between various kinds of input, getting us one step closer to human-level intelligence.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 1
  • 1
  • 102
  • 0
Answer
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 24/09/2025In: Technology

How do multimodal AI systems (text, image, video, voice) change the way we interact with machines compared to single-mode AI?

text, image, video, voice change the ...

computervisionfutureofaihumancomputerinteractionmachinelearningmultimodalainaturallanguageprocessing
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful
    Added an answer on 24/09/2025 at 10:37 am

    From Single-Mode to Multimodal: A Giant Leap All these years, our interactions with AI have been generally single-mode. You wrote text, the AI came back with text. That was single-mode. Handy, but a bit like talking with someone who could only answer in written notes. And then, behold, multimodal AIRead more

    From Single-Mode to Multimodal: A Giant Leap

    All these years, our interactions with AI have been generally single-mode. You wrote text, the AI came back with text. That was single-mode. Handy, but a bit like talking with someone who could only answer in written notes.

    And then, behold, multimodal AI — computers capable of understanding and producing in text, image, sound, and even video. Suddenly, the dialogue no longer seems so robo-like but more like talking to a colleague who can “see,” “hear,” and “talk” in different modes of communication.

    Daily Life Example: From Stilted to Natural

    Ask a single-mode AI: “What’s wrong with my bike chain?”

    • With text-only AI, you’d be forced to describe the chain in its entirety — rusty, loose, maybe broken. It’s awkward.
    • With multimodal AI, you just take a picture, upload it, and the AI not only identifies the issue but maybe even shows a short video of how to fix it.

    It’s staggering: one is like playing guessing game, the other like having a friend with you.

    Breaking Down the Changes in Interaction

    • From Explaining to Showing

    Instead of describing a problem in words, we can show it. That brings the barrier down for language, typing, or technology-phobic individuals.

    • From Text to Simulation

    A text recipe is useful, but an auditory, step-by-step video recipe with voice instruction comes close to having a cooking coach. Multimodal AI makes learning more interesting.

    • From Tutorials to Conversationalists

    With voice and video, you don’t just “command” an AI — you can have a fluid, back-and-forth conversation. It’s less transactional, more cooperative.

    • From Universal to Personalized

    A multimodal system can hear you out (are you upset?), see your gestures, or the pictures you post. That leaves room for empathy, or at least the feeling of being “seen.”

    Accessibility: A Human Touch

    • One of the most powerful is the way that this shift makes AI more accessible.
    • A blind person can listen to image description.
    • A dyslexic person can speak their request instead of typing.
    • A non-native speaker can show a product or symbol instead of wrestling with word choice.
    • It knocks down walls that text-only AI all too often left standing.

    The Double-Edged Sword

    Of course, it is not without its problems. With image, voice, and video-processing AI, privacy concerns skyrocket. Do we want to have devices interpret the look on our face or the tone of anxiety in our voice? The more engaged the interaction, the more vulnerable the data.

    The Humanized Takeaway

    Multimodal AI makes the engagement more of a relationship than a transaction. Instead of telling a machine to “bring back an answer,” we start working with something which can speak in our native modes — talk, display, listen, show.

    It’s the contrast between reading a directions manual and sitting alongside a seasoned teacher who teaches you one step at a time. Machines no longer feel like impersonal machines and start to feel like friends who understand us in fuller, more human ways.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 99
  • 0
Answer
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 24/09/2025In: Technology

Can AI models really shift between “fast” instinctive responses and “slow” deliberate reasoning like humans do?

Fast Vs Slow

artificialintelligencecognitivesciencefastvsslowthinkinghumancognitionmachinelearningneuralnetworks
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful
    Added an answer on 24/09/2025 at 10:11 am

    The Human Parallel: Fast vs. Slow Thinking Psychologist Daniel Kahneman popularly explained two modes of human thinking: System 1 (fast, intuitive, emotional) and System 2 (slow, mindful, rational). System 1 is the reason why you react by jumping back when a ball rolls into the street unexpectedly.Read more

    The Human Parallel: Fast vs. Slow Thinking

    Psychologist Daniel Kahneman popularly explained two modes of human thinking:

    • System 1 (fast, intuitive, emotional) and System 2 (slow, mindful, rational).
    • System 1 is the reason why you react by jumping back when a ball rolls into the street unexpectedly.
    • System 2 is the reason why you slowly consider the advantages and disadvantages before deciding to make a career change.

    For a while now, AI looked to be mired only in the “System 1” track—churning out fast forecasts, pattern recognition, and completions without profound contemplation. But all of that is changing.

    Where AI Exhibits “Fast” Thinking

    Most contemporary AI systems are virtuosos of the rapid response. Pose a straightforward fact question to a chatbot, and it will likely respond in milliseconds. That speed is a result of training methods: models are trained to output the “most probable next word” from sheer volumes of data. It is reflexive because it is — the model does not stop, hesitate, or calculate unless it has been explicitly programmed to.

    Examples:

    • Autocomplete in your email.
    • Rapid translations in language apps.
    • Instant responses such as “What is the capital of France?”
    • Such tasks take minimal “deliberation.”

    Where AI Struggles with “Slow” Thinking

    The more difficult challenge is purposeful reasoning—where the model needs to slow down, think ahead, and reflect. Programmers have been trying techniques such as:

    • Chain-of-thought prompting – prompting the model to “show its work” by describing reasoning steps.
    • Self-reflection loops – where the AI creates an answer, criticizes it, and then refines it.
    • Hybrid approaches – using AI with symbolic logic or external aids (such as calculators, databases, or search engines) to enhance accuracy.

    This simulates System 2 reasoning: rather than blurring out the initial guess, the AI tries several options and assesses what works best.

    The Catch: Is It Actually the Same as Human Reasoning?

    Here’s where it gets tricky. Humans have feelings, intuition, and stakes when they deliberate. AI doesn’t. When a model slows down, it isn’t because it’s “nervous” about being wrong or “weighing consequences.” It’s just following patterns and instructions we’ve baked into it.

    So although AI can mimic quick vs. slow thinking modes, it does not feel them. It’s like seeing a magician practice — the illusion is the same, but the motivation behind it is entirely different.

    Why This Matters

    If AI can shift trustably between fast instinct and slow reasoning, it transforms how we trust and utilize it:

    • Healthcare: Fast pattern recognition for medical imaging, but slow reasoning for medical treatment.
    • Education: Brief answers for practice exercises, but in-depth explanations for important concepts.
    • Business: Brief market overviews, but sound analysis when millions of dollars are at stake.

    The ideal is an AI that knows when to take it easy—just like a good physician won’t rush a diagnosis, or a good driver won’t drive fast in the storm.

    The Humanized Takeaway

    AI is beginning to learn both caps—sprinter and marathoner, gut-reactor and philosopher. But the caps are still disguises, not actual experience. The true breakthrough won’t be in getting AI to slow down so that it can reason, but in getting AI to understand when to change gears responsibly.

    Until now, the responsibility is partially ours—users, developers, and regulators—to provide the guardrails. Just because AI can respond quickly doesn’t mean that it must.

    See less
      • 0
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
  • 0
  • 1
  • 97
  • 0
Answer

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 501
  • Answers 493
  • Posts 4
  • Best Answers 21
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • daniyasiddiqui

    “What lifestyle habi

    • 6 Answers
  • Anonymous

    Bluestone IPO vs Kal

    • 5 Answers
  • mohdanas

    Are AI video generat

    • 4 Answers
  • James
    James added an answer Play-to-earn crypto games. No registration hassles, no KYC verification, transparent blockchain gaming. Start playing https://tinyurl.com/anon-gaming 04/12/2025 at 2:05 am
  • daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui added an answer 1. The first obvious ROI dimension to consider is direct cost savings gained from training and computing. With PEFT, you… 01/12/2025 at 4:09 pm
  • daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui added an answer 1. Elevated Model Complexity, Heightened Computational Power, and Latency Costs Cross-modal models do not just operate on additional datatypes; they… 01/12/2025 at 2:28 pm

Top Members

Trending Tags

ai aiethics aiineducation analytics artificialintelligence company digital health edtech education generativeai geopolitics health language news nutrition people tariffs technology trade policy tradepolicy

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help

© 2025 Qaskme. All Rights Reserved