like NVIDIA, AMD, or Microsoft
What we do know Microsoft and Nvidia announced an investment deal in Anthropic totalling up to US $15 billion. Specifically, Nvidia committed up to US $10 billion, and Microsoft up to US $5 billion. Some reports tied this investment to a valuation estimate of around US $350 billion for Anthropic. FRead more
What we do know
-
Microsoft and Nvidia announced an investment deal in Anthropic totalling up to US $15 billion. Specifically, Nvidia committed up to US $10 billion, and Microsoft up to US $5 billion.
-
Some reports tied this investment to a valuation estimate of around US $350 billion for Anthropic. For example: “Sources told CNBC that the fresh investment valued Anthropic at US$350 billion, making it one of the world’s most valuable companies.”
-
Other, earlier credible data show that in September 2025, after a US$13 billion fundraise, Anthropic’s valuation was around US$183 billion.
Did it reach US$350 billion right now?
Not definitively. The situation is nuanced:
-
The US$350 billion figure is reported by some sources, but appears to be an estimate or preliminary valuation discussion, rather than a publicly confirmed post-money valuation.
-
The more concretely verified figure is US$183 billion (post-money) following the US$13 billion raise in September 2025. That is official.
-
Because high valuations for private companies can vary wildly (depending on assumptions about future growth, investor commitments, options, etc.), the “US$350 billion” mark may reflect a valuation expectation or potential cap rather than the formally stated result of the latest transaction.
Why the discrepancy?
Several factors explain why one figure is widely cited (US$350 billion) and another (US$183 billion) is more concretely documented:
-
Timing of valuation announcements: Valuations can shift rapidly in the AI-startup boom. The US$183 billion figure corresponds with the September 2025 round, which is the most recent clearly disclosed. The US$350 billion number may anticipate a future round or reflect investor commitments at conditional levels.
-
Nature of the investment deal: The Microsoft/Nvidia deal (US $15 billion) includes up to certain amounts (“up to US $10 billion from Nvidia”, “up to US $5 billion from Microsoft”). “Up to” indicates contingent parts, not necessarily all deployed yet.
-
Valuation calculations differ: Some valuations include not just equity but also commitments to purchase infrastructure, cloud credits, chip purchases, etc. For example, Anthropic reportedly committed to purchase up to US $30 billion of Microsoft’s cloud capacity as part of the deal.
-
Media reports vs company-disclosed numbers: Media outlets often publish “sources say” valuations; companies may not yet confirm them. So the US$350 billion number may be circulating before formal confirmation.
My best summary answer
In plain terms: While there are reports that Anthropic is valued at around US $350 billion in connection with the Microsoft/Nvidia investment deal, the only firm, publicly disclosed firm valuation as of now is around US $183 billion (after the US $13 billion funding round). Therefore, it is not yet definitively confirmed that the valuation “reached” US$350 billion in a fully closed deal.
Why this matters
-
For you (and for the industry): If this valuation is accurate or soon to be, it signals how intensely the AI race is priced. Startups are being valued not on current earnings but on massive future expectations.
-
It raises questions about sustainability: When valuations jump so fast (and to such large numbers), it makes sense to ask: Are earnings keeping up? Are business models proven? Are these valuations realistic or inflated by hype?
-
The deal with Microsoft and Nvidia has deeper implications: It’s not just about money, it’s about infrastructure (cloud, chips), long-term partnerships, and strategic control in the AI stack.
1. Why these companies still genuinely deserve investor attention Let’s first remove the idea that this rally is all smoke and mirrors. It isn’t. 1. NVIDIA is not just a “hot stock”; it is a critical infrastructure company now NVIDIA is no longer just a gaming GPU company. It has become: The backbonRead more
1. Why these companies still genuinely deserve investor attention
Let’s first remove the idea that this rally is all smoke and mirrors. It isn’t.
1. NVIDIA is not just a “hot stock”; it is a critical infrastructure company now
NVIDIA is no longer just a gaming GPU company. It has become:
The backbone of:
A company with:
In simple terms:
NVIDIA is now closer to what Intel was to PCs in the 1990s, except the AI wave is potentially broader and deeper.
The business momentum is real.
2. AMD is no longer the “cheap alternative”
AMD today is:
A serious competitor in:
Increasing share in:
It is no longer just:
It is a real strategic player in the computing arms race.
3. Microsoft is not a tech stock anymore it’s a global digital utility
Microsoft now sits at the center of:
Cloud infrastructure (Azure)
Enterprise software
Operating systems
Cybersecurity
AI integration into everyday business workflows (Copilot, enterprise AI tools)
If NVIDIA is “the hardware brain of AI,”
Microsoft is becoming the daily interface through which the world actually uses AI.
That gives it:
Predictable cash flows
Deep enterprise lock-in
Massive distribution power
This is not speculative tech anymore.
This is digital infrastructure.
2. So where does the fear come from?
The fear does not come from the companies.
It comes from the speed and magnitude of the stock price moves.
When prices rise too fast, human psychology flips:
From “Is this a good company?”
To “If I don’t buy now, I’ll miss everything forever.”
That is exactly the moment when:
Risk quietly becomes highest
Even though confidence feels strongest
3. The uncomfortable truth about buying after massive rallies
Let’s be emotionally honest for a moment.
Most people asking this today:
Didn’t buy when these stocks were boring
Didn’t buy during corrections
Didn’t buy when sentiment was fearful
They want to buy after the success is obvious.
That does not mean buying now is wrong.
It just means your margin of safety is much smaller than it used to be.
Earlier:
Even average execution = good returns
Now:
Execution must be nearly perfect for years to justify current prices
4. What “too late” actually means in investing
“Too late” does NOT mean:
“This company will fail”
“The stock can never go higher”
“Too late” usually means:
You are now exposed to violent volatility
Returns become slower and more uncertain
A 10 30% drawdown can happen without any business failure at all
A stock can:
Be a great company
Still give you two years of negative or flat returns after you buy
Both can be true at the same time.
5. How past market legends teach this lesson
History is full of examples where:
Apple was a great company in 2000
→ But the stock fell ~80% after the dot-com bubble
→ It took years for buyers at the top to recover
Amazon was a great company in 1999
→ Stock crashed ~90%
→ Business won, investors who bought at peak suffered for years
The lesson is not:
The lesson is:
6. Different answers for different types of investors
Let’s break this into real-world decision frameworks.
If you are a long-term investor (5–10+ years)
It is not too late if:
You accept that
You invest gradually instead of all at once
You emotionally prepare for
For long-term investors, the real risk is not:
It is:
“Never owning transformational companies at all.”
If you are a short-term trader or swing investor
Now the answer becomes much harsher:
Here, it can absolutely be too late.
Because:
Momentum is already widely recognized
Everyone is watching the same stocks
Expectations are extremely high
Any earnings disappointment can trigger brutal drops
Late-stage momentum trades pay quickly or punish brutally.
If you are entering purely from FOMO
This is the most dangerous category.
Warning signs:
You don’t understand valuations
You didn’t study downside risk
You feel “I must buy now or I’ll regret it forever”
You don’t know where you’d exit if things go wrong
This mental state is exactly how bubbles trap retail money at the top.
7. A hidden risk people underestimate: “Narrative saturation”
Right now:
Everyone knows these names
Every YouTube channel talks about them
Every article praises AI leadership
Every dip gets immediately bought
This is called narrative saturation:
At that stage:
Prices stop reacting positively to good news
But crash violently on bad news
8. What a realistic future may look like
Here are three very realistic paths from here:Scenario A: Slow compounding
Businesses keep growing
Stocks move sideways for 1–2 years
Valuations normalize through time, not crashes
Scenario B: Sharp correction, then higher
25–40% fall due to:
Scenario C: Melt-up then deep drop
One last euphoric leg higher
Retail floods in
Followed by painful unwind
All three are possible.
None of them mean the companies “fail.”
9. The most honest framing you can use
Instead of asking:
A much better question is:
If your answer is:
Yes → You can invest rationally
No → You should wait for fear, not euphoria
10. The grounded bottom line
Here is the clean, hype-free truth:
these companies are no longer:
“Hidden opportunities”
They are now:
-
-
-
-
See lessGlobal center-stage giants
And center-stage stocks
Reward patience
Punish impatience
And expose emotion faster than logic