synthetic ones, or is that a marketing myth
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
The Comfort of "Natural" The term natural is highly charged. When one sees it on a label, they're envisioning something pure, wholesome, and harmless—something closer to nature, hence closer to health. It is more pleasant to claim, I take a natural herb for my stress than I take a synthetic compoundRead more
The Comfort of “Natural”
The term natural is highly charged. When one sees it on a label, they’re envisioning something pure, wholesome, and harmless—something closer to nature, hence closer to health. It is more pleasant to claim, I take a natural herb for my stress than I take a synthetic compound from a laboratory. Marketers are well aware of this, which is why “natural” is perhaps the strongest claim in the world of wellness. But in fact, natural does not always mean safer.
Nature Can Cure… and Kill
It is a fact that most medicines and supplements have natural origins in plants: aspirin derived from willow bark, morphine derived from poppies, penicillin derived from mold. But nature also makes poisons:
So just because something is “natural” does not make it necessarily gentle or harmless. Natural supplements such as kava (associated with liver damage) or ephedra (previously sold for weight loss, subsequently banned in light of heart dangers) demonstrate how unsafe “natural” can be when not used correctly.
The Case for Synthetic Supplements
Synthetic doesn’t have to equate to artificial in a negative sense. In most instances, synthetic vitamins are chemically equivalent to the natural one. For instance:
One great benefit of synthetics is consistency. Laboratories can manufacture vitamins with precise dosages, independent of the variability of farm conditions or plant genetics. That makes them dependable when precision is important—such as in prenatal vitamins, where a specific dose of folic acid is essential to avoid birth defects.
Where Natural Sometimes Wins
Whole food–based or plant-derived supplements may also provide advantages that isolated nutrients do not. Natural vitamin E, for example, exists in several forms (tocopherols and tocotrienols), whereas most synthetic ones provide one. Plant-based supplements are often full of antioxidants and other substances that might act synergistically in ways that science is not yet aware of.
But again, “more complex” does not always equate with “safer.” Sometimes the added compounds raise the likelihood of side effects or interaction with medications.
What Actually Controls Safety
The safety of a supplement—natural or synthetic—hinges less on its source and more on:
The Human Side of the Myth
It’s not difficult to understand why folks want to think natural is safer—it sounds traditional, something that fit with the way humans existed for millennia. And there is some merit in that: many natural treatments work. But depending solely on the term natural is dangerous. It’s similar to thinking that because sunlight is natural, it won’t burn you—or that because water is natural, it won’t drown you.
The Takeaway
So, when you notice “all-natural” emblazoned on a supplement label, don’t be lulled into complacency. It’s not the term that makes it safe—it’s the science, the testing, and how you take it.
See less