(Amazon, Google, Apple, Tencent) limiting space for new startups
daniyasiddiquiFast Responder
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
The Platform Giants' Emergence Amazon, Google, Apple, Tencent (and meta-entities such as Meta, Microsoft, and Alibaba) are not merely companies — they're digital platforms. Amazon is not merely a shop; it's the infrastructure for e-commerce and cloud computing. Google is not merely a search engine;Read more
The Platform Giants’ Emergence
Amazon, Google, Apple, Tencent (and meta-entities such as Meta, Microsoft, and Alibaba) are not merely companies — they’re digital platforms.
Their size allows them to make the rules of the game, whereas startups will have the feeling of playing on the grounds of somebody else.
The Double-Edged Sword for Startups
The Opportunity Side
Startups can reach billions of customers via app stores, online marketplaces, or ad networks.
Cloud computing (such as AWS, Google Cloud) provides startups with infrastructure that could not have been imagined 20 years ago.
Individuals are more apt to trust a product when it is hosted on or distributed through a large platform.
The Limitation Side
App stores charge 15–30% commissions. Marketplaces charge large fees. For an infant startup, that margin is life and death.
A startup demonstrates that a concept is viable, and voilà, the platform itself rolls out a similar feature. (See how Amazon Basics poaches business from sellers or how Apple includes features originally pioneered by tiny apps.)
Perhaps it is Google search rankings, App Store ranking, or product listing on Amazon. Visibility is at the mercy of algorithms that startups have no control over. One small tweak can destroy their business in one night.
The Human Side of the Fight
A Bigger Economic Question
Others are sure that startups don’t perish — they get bought. That’s great for founders (fat checks) and users (increased integration). But it also centralizes power one more time in the hands of monsters.
The Future: Breaking or Bending the Cycle
U.S., EU, and Asian governments are resisting monopoly conduct — from antitrust lawsuits to forcing app store price cuts. It may create room for startups.
Web3, blockchain technologies, and open-source platforms have the potential to minimize dependence on corporate behemoths by flipping power to communities. But they’re just in their infancy.
Some goliaths are finding that nurturing startups can make their ecosystem flourish. Apple’s app store is successful because independent developers produce novel apps. Innovation disappears when the ecosystem becomes nasty enough.
Bottom Line
Platform dominance is both a curse and a blessing. It offers tools, reach, and visibility unimaginable a generation earlier to startups. But it also creates sensitive dependence — where one algorithmic tweak, policy update, or imitation gesture can erase years of effort.
The future will probably be balance: regulation to avoid abuse, fresh decentralized platforms to offer options, and wiser cooperation that allows giants and startups to flourish side by side.
Ultimately, innovation thrives when nobody controls the entire playground. The challenge of the coming decade is to make platforms launchpads and not speedbumps for tomorrow’s startups.
See less