the latest techniques used to reduce hallucinations in LLMs
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
the latest techniques used to reduce hallucinations in LLMs
1. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG 2.0) This is one of the most impactful ways to reduce hallucination. Older LLMs generated purely from memory. But memory sometimes lies. RAG gives the model access to: documents databases APIs knowledge bases before generating an answer. So instead of guessingRead more
1. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG 2.0)
This is one of the most impactful ways to reduce hallucination.
Older LLMs generated purely from memory.
But memory sometimes lies.
RAG gives the model access to:
documents
databases
APIs
knowledge bases
before generating an answer.
So instead of guessing, the model retrieves real information and reasons over it.
Why it works:
Because the model grounds its output in verified facts instead of relying on what it “thinks” it remembers.
New improvements in RAG 2.0:
fusion reading
multi-hop retrieval
cross-encoder reranking
query rewriting
structured grounding
RAG with graphs (KG-RAG)
agentic retrieval loops
These make grounding more accurate and context-aware.
2. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) + Self-Consistency
One major cause of hallucination is a lack of structured reasoning.
Modern models use explicit reasoning steps:
step-by-step thoughts
logical decomposition
self-checking sequences
This “slow thinking” dramatically improves factual reliability.
Self-consistency takes it further by generating multiple reasoning paths internally and picking the most consistent answer.
It’s like the model discussing with itself before answering.
3. Internal Verification Models (Critic Models)
This is an emerging technique inspired by human editing.
It works like this:
One model (the “writer”) generates an answer.
A second model (the “critic”) checks it for errors.
A final answer is produced after refinement.
This reduces hallucinations by adding a review step like a proofreader.
Examples:
OpenAI’s “validator models”
Anthropic’s critic-referee framework
Google’s verifier networks
This mirrors how humans write → revise → proofread.
4. Fact-Checking Tool Integration
LLMs no longer have to be self-contained.
They now call:
calculators
search engines
API endpoints
databases
citation generators
to validate information.
This is known as tool calling or agentic checking.
Examples:
“Search the web before answering.”
“Call a medical dictionary API for drug info.”
“Use a calculator for numeric reasoning.”
Fact-checking tools eliminate hallucinations for:
numbers
names
real-time events
sensitive domains like medicine and law
5. Constrained Decoding and Knowledge Constraints
A clever method to “force” models to stick to known facts.
Examples:
limiting the model to output only from a verified list
grammar-based decoding
database-backed autocomplete
grounding outputs in structured schemas
This prevents the model from inventing:
nonexistent APIs
made-up legal sections
fake scientific terms
imaginary references
In enterprise systems, constrained generation is becoming essential.
6. Citation Forcing
Some LLMs now require themselves to produce citations and justify answers.
When forced to cite:
they avoid fabrications
they avoid making up numbers
they avoid generating unverifiable claims
This technique has dramatically improved reliability in:
research
healthcare
legal assistance
academic tutoring
Because the model must “show its work.”
7. Human Feedback: RLHF → RLAIF
Originally, hallucination reduction relied on RLHF:
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback.
But this is slow, expensive, and limited.
Now we have:
Combined RLHF + RLAIF is becoming the gold standard.
8. Better Pretraining Data + Data Filters
A huge cause of hallucination is bad training data.
Modern models use:
aggressive deduplication
factuality filters
citation-verified corpora
cleaning pipelines
high-quality synthetic datasets
expert-curated domain texts
This prevents the model from learning:
contradictions
junk
low-quality websites
Reddit-style fictional content
Cleaner data in = fewer hallucinations out.
9. Specialized “Truthful” Fine-Tuning
LLMs are now fine-tuned on:
contradiction datasets
fact-only corpora
truthfulness QA datasets
multi-turn fact-checking chains
synthetic adversarial examples
Models learn to detect when they’re unsure.
Some even respond:
10. Uncertainty Estimation & Refusal Training
Newer models are better at detecting when they might hallucinate.
They are trained to:
refuse to answer
ask clarifying questions
express uncertainty
Instead of fabricating something confidently.
11. Multimodal Reasoning Reduces Hallucination
When a model sees an image and text, or video and text, it grounds its response better.
Example:
If you show a model a chart, it’s less likely to invent numbers it reads them.
Multimodal grounding reduces hallucination especially in:
OCR
data extraction
evidence-based reasoning
document QA
scientific diagrams
In summary…
Hallucination reduction is improving because LLMs are becoming more:
grounded
tool-aware
self-critical
citation-ready
reasoning-oriented
data-driven
The most effective strategies right now include:
RAG 2.0
chain-of-thought + self-consistency
internal critic models
tool-powered verification
constrained decoding
uncertainty handling
better training data
multimodal grounding
All these techniques work together to turn LLMs from “creative guessers” into reliable problem-solvers.
See less