Home/Questions/Page 14

Qaskme Latest Questions

daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 02/10/2025In:

like teaching, design, or journalism

aiindesignaiineducationaiinjournalismcreativeautomationhumanaicollaborationmultimodalai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    1. Why Multimodal AI Is Different From Past Technology Transitions Whereas past automation technologies were only repetitive tasks—multimodal AI can consolidate multiple skills at one time. In short, one AI application can: Read a research paper, abstract it, and create an infographic. Write a newsRead more

    1. Why Multimodal AI Is Different From Past Technology Transitions

    Whereas past automation technologies were only repetitive tasks—multimodal AI can consolidate multiple skills at one time. In short, one AI application can:

    • Read a research paper, abstract it, and create an infographic.
    • Write a news story, read an audio report, and produce related visuals.
    • Help a teacher develop lesson plans, as well as adjust content to meet the individual student’s learning style.

    This ability to bridge disciplines is the key to multimodal AI being the industry-disruptor that it is, especially for those who wear “many hats” on the job.

    2. Education: Lecturers to Learning Designers

    Teachers are not just knowledges-educators-teasers, motivators, and planners of curriculum. Multimodal AI can help by:

    • Having quizzes, slides, or interactive simulations create automatically.
    • Creating personalized learning paths for students.
    • Transferring lessons to other media (text, video, audio) as learning demands differ.

    But the human face of learning—motivation, empathy, emotional connection—is something that is still uniquely human. Educators will transition from hours of prep time to more time working directly with students.

    3. Design: From Technical Execution to Creative Direction

    Graphic designers, product designers, and architects will likely contend with technical proficiency (computer skills) and creativity. Multimodal AI is already capable of developing drafts, prototypes, and design alternatives in seconds. This means:

    • Designers might likely spend fewer hours on technical realization and more hours on curation, refining, and setting direction.
    • The job can become more of a creative director role, where the directing of the AI and the creation of its output is the focus.

    Or, freshman design work on iterative production declines.

    4. Journalism: From Reporting to Storytelling

    Journalism involves research, writing, interviewing, and storytelling in a variety of forms. Multimodal AI can:

    • Analyze large data sets for patterns.
    • Write articles or even create multimedia packages.
    • Develop personalized news experiences (text + podcast + short video clip).

    The caveat: Trust, journalistic judgment, and the power to hold powers that be accountable are as important in journalism as AI can rapidly analyze. Journalists will need to think more as investigation, ethics, and contextual reporting—area where human judgment can’t be duplicated.

    5. The Bigger Picture: Redefinition, Not Replacement

    Rather than displacing all such positions, multimodal AI will likely redefine them within the context of higher-order human abilities:

    • Empathy and people-skilling for teachers.
    • Vision and taste for artists.
    • Ethics and fact-finding for journalists.

    But that first-in-line photograph can change overnight. Work that at one time instructed beginners—like trimming articles to size, creating first draft pages, or building lesson plans—will be computer-assigned. This raises the risk of an empty middle, where low-level jobs shrink, and it is harder for people to upgrade to higher-level work.

    6. Preparing for the Change

    Experts in these fields may have to:

    • Learn to collaborate with AI, but not battle with it.
    • Highlight distinctly human skills—empathy, ethics, imagination, and people skills.
    • Reengineer functions so AI handles volume and velocity, but humans add depth and context.

    Final Thought

    Multimodal AI will not displace work like teaching, design, or journalism, but it will change their nature. Instead of spending time on tedious work, the experts may be nearer to the heart of their work: inspiring, designing, and informing in human abundance. The transformation can be painful, but if done with care, it can create space for humans to do more of what they cannot be replaced by.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 02/10/2025In:

creative, logical, and empathetic

aimodelaireasoningconsistencyinaicreativeaiempatheticailogicalai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    1. The Nature of AI "Modes" Unlike human beings, who intuitively combine creativity, reason, and empathy in interaction, AI systems like to isolate these functions into distinct response modes. For instance: Logical mode: applying facts, numbers, or step-by-step calculation as reasons. Creative modeRead more

    1. The Nature of AI “Modes”

    Unlike human beings, who intuitively combine creativity, reason, and empathy in interaction, AI systems like to isolate these functions into distinct response modes. For instance:

    • Logical mode: applying facts, numbers, or step-by-step calculation as reasons.
    • Creative mode: generating ideas for fiction, creating images, or creating new ideas.
    • Empathetic mode: providing emotional comfort, reassurance, or comprehension of a person’s emotions.

    Consistency is difficult because these modes depend on various datasets, reasoning systems, and tone. One slipup—such as being overly analytical at a time when empathy is needed—can make the AI seem cold or mechanical.

    2. Why Consistency is Difficult to Attain

    AI never “knows” human values or emotions the way human beings do. It learns patterns of expressions. Mode-switching is a matter of rearranging tone, reason, and even morality in some cases. That creates the opportunity for:

    • Contradictions (sympathetic initially then providing emotionally unfeeling advice).
    • Over-simplifications (pre-digested empathy-talk that is out of context).
    • Loss of user trust if the user perceives the AI as “covering” too much.

    3. Where AI Already Shows Promise

    With rough edges set aside, contemporary AI is unexpectedly adept at combining modes in directed situations:

    • An AI instructor can instruct math (logical mode) while addressing a struggling student (empathetic mode).
    • A design program can generate innovative ideas but similarly scrutinize them with logical advantages and disadvantages.
    • Medical chatbots increasingly blend empathetic voice with plain, fact-based advice.

    This indicates that AI is capable of combining modes, but only with careful design and context sensitivity.

    4. The Human Factor: Why It Matters

    Consistency across modes isn’t a technical issue—it’s ethical. People are more confident in AI when it seems rational and geared toward their requirements. If a system seems to be switching between various “masks” with no unifying persona, it can be faulted on the basis of being manipulative. People not only appreciate correctness but also honesty and coherence in communication.

    5. The Road Ahead

    The possible future of AI would be to create meta-layers of consistency—where the system knows how it reasons and switches effortlessly without violating trust. For instance, AI would have a “core personality” and switch between logical, creative, and empathetic modes—much like a good teacher or leader would.

    Researchers are also looking into guardrails:

    • Ethical limits (to avoid being manipulated when using empathy).
    • Transparency features (so the user has an idea when the AI is changing modes).
    • Personalization options (so users can select how much empathetic or creative ability they require).

    Final Thought

    AI still can’t quite mimic the effortless way humans switch between reason, imagination, and sympathy, but it’s getting there fast. The problem is ensuring that when it does switch mode, it does so in a way that is consistent, reliable, and responsive to human needs. Bravo, this mode-switching might transform AI into an implement no longer, but an ever more natural collaborator in work, learning, and life.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 02/10/2025In:

electronics and smartphones

consumer electronicselectronicsglobal pricing strategymanufacturingsmartphonestrade policy
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

    Why tariffs are so critical to electronics Supply chains globally: A single smartphone has pieces from 30+ countries (chips from Taiwan, screen from South Korea, sensors from Japan, assembly in China, software from the U.S.). Tariff on any one of these steps can ripple through the whole cost. Thin mRead more

    Why tariffs are so critical to electronics

    Supply chains globally: A single smartphone has pieces from 30+ countries (chips from Taiwan, screen from South Korea, sensors from Japan, assembly in China, software from the U.S.). Tariff on any one of these steps can ripple through the whole cost.

    Thin margins in certain markets: Although premium phones (such as iPhones or Samsung flagships) enjoy good margins, mid-range and low-end phones tend to run with thinner margins. A 10–20% tariff can drive or destroy pricing plans.

    Consumer expectations: Unlike furniture or automobiles, consumers anticipate electronics to improve in quality and become less expensive annually. Tariffs break that declining price trend and may cause anger.

    How tariffs reallocate global pricing strategies

    1. Absorbing vs passing on costs

    • Absorb: An Apple brand may absorb some of the tariff expense so that prices do not have to go up too much, particularly in value-sensitive markets. That compresses their margins but shields market share.
    • Pass on: Low-cost makers can pass the expense on to consumers because their margins are too thin to absorb additional tariffs. That hits price-sensitive consumers hardest.

    2. Product differentiation & tiered pricing

    Firms might begin launching lower-tier models of smartphones in tariff-dense markets (less storage, fewer cameras) to make them more price-competitive.

    Flagship models could become even more premium in pricing, which could enhance the “status symbol” factor.

    3. Localization & “made in…” branding

    Tariffs tend to compel businesses to establish assembly factories or even part-factories within tariff-charging nations. For instance:

    • India: Tariffs on imported smartphones led Apple, Xiaomi, and Samsung to increase local assembly. Today, “Made in India” iPhones account for an increasing proportion.
    • Brazil: Tariffs on electronics since the early days coerced most companies into localizing assembly to address the market.

    This doesn’t only shift pricing — it redesigns whole supply chains and generates new local employment (albeit sometimes with greater expense).

    4. Rethinking launches & product cycles

    Firms can postpone introducing some models in high-tariff nations since it becomes hard to price them competitively.

    They can alternatively introduce aged models (which have already been written off in terms of R&D expenses) as “value options” to soften the impact.

    • The customer experience: how things feel on the ground
    • Increased initial prices: A $500 phone would be $550 or $600 with tariffs, particularly when added to increased VAT/GST. For most families, that’s the equivalent of a month’s food.
    • Extended upgrade periods: Consumers keep the phones longer, getting an extra year out of their existing phone. This lengthens the tech refresh cycle.
    • Second-hand boom: Increased new-phone prices create demand for refurbished or used phones, with parallel markets.
    • Inequality of access: Low-income workers or students might not be able to afford even entry-level smartphones, expanding the digital gap.

    Real-world examples

    US-China trade war (2018–2019): Suggested tariffs on laptops and smartphones created fears that iPhones might get $100–150 more costly in the US. Apple lobbied aggressively, and though tariffs were suspended for a while, the scare urged Apple to diversify production to Vietnam and India.

    • India’s tariff policy: 20%+ import tariffs on smartphones and components raised local assembly but also priced devices higher for Indian consumers than international prices. The same model iPhone, for instance, costs much more in India than it does in the U.S. or Dubai.
    • Latin America (e.g., Brazil, Argentina): Taxes and tariffs make electronics famously costly. A $1,000 iPhone in the United States can cost between $1,500–$2,000 in São Paulo. Shoppers frequently go abroad or use “gray market” imports to get around inflated prices.

    The bigger picture for businesses

    • Strategic relocation: Tariffs speed up the “China+1” strategy — businesses relocating production to Vietnam, India, or Mexico to cut exposure.
    • Regional pricing models: Companies increasingly price markets individually instead of worldwide — an iPhone could be $799 in the United States, $899 in Europe, and $1,100+ in India, just due to tariffs and local regulation.
    • Risk of slowdown in innovation: If tariffs continue to increase expenses, companies might reduce R&D spending in order to maintain margins, which would decelerate innovation in consumer technology.

    Humanized bottom line

    Tariffs on smartphones and electronics do more than adjust the bottom line for companies — they reframe what type of technology individuals can purchase, how frequently they upgrade, and even how connected communities are.

    For more affluent consumers, tariffs may simply result in paying a bit more for the newest device. But for students using a phone to take online courses, or small businesspeople operating a company through WhatsApp, increased prices can translate into being locked out of the digital economy.

    Yes — tariffs are indeed altering global pricing strategies, but standing behind the strategies are real individuals forced to make difficult decisions:

    • Do I get the new phone or milk the old one another year?
    • Do I opt for a lower-priced brand over the one I believe in?
    • Or do I spend that extra on the things that matter rather than connectivity?

    In that way, smartphone tariffs don’t merely form markets — they form the contours of contemporary life.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 02/10/2025In:

food imports affect household grocery ...

consumer impactcost of livingfood pricesgrocery billsimport policytariffs
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

    Why tariffs on food imports hit consumers so directly Food is an essential, not optional. People can delay buying a car or a new phone, but nobody can delay eating. When tariffs raise food prices, households don’t really have the option to “opt out.” They either pay more or downgrade to cheaper optiRead more

    Why tariffs on food imports hit consumers so directly

    1. Food is an essential, not optional. People can delay buying a car or a new phone, but nobody can delay eating. When tariffs raise food prices, households don’t really have the option to “opt out.” They either pay more or downgrade to cheaper options.

    2. High pass-through. In food, tariffs are often passed on quickly and almost fully because retailers operate on thin margins. A tariff on imported cheese, rice, wheat, or cooking oil usually shows up in store prices within weeks.

    3. Limited substitutes. Some foods (coffee, spices, tropical fruits, fish varieties) simply aren’t produced locally in many countries. If tariffs raise the import price, there may be no domestic alternative. That means consumers bear the full cost.

    The mechanics: how grocery bills rise

    • Direct price hike. Example: if a country slaps a 20% tariff on imported rice, the importer passes the cost along → wholesalers raise their prices → supermarkets raise shelf prices. Families see a higher bill for a staple they buy every week.

    • Chain reaction. Some tariffs hit inputs like animal feed, fertilizers, or cooking oils. That raises costs for farmers and food processors, which trickles down into higher prices for meat, dairy, and packaged goods.

    • Substitution costs. If people switch to “local” alternatives, those domestic suppliers may raise their prices too (because demand is suddenly higher and they know consumers have fewer choices).

    Who feels it most

    • Low-income households: Food is a bigger share of their budget (sometimes 30–50%), so even a 5–10% rise in staples like bread, milk, or rice is painful. Wealthier households spend proportionally less on food, so the same increase barely dents their lifestyle.

    • Urban vs rural families: Urban households often rely more heavily on imported or processed foods, so their bills rise faster. Rural households may have some buffer if they grow or trade food locally.

    • Children and nutrition: Families under price stress often cut back on healthier, more expensive foods (fruits, vegetables, protein) and shift toward cheaper carbs. Over time, that affects nutrition and public health.

    Real-world examples

    • U.S. tariffs on European cheese, wine, and olive oil (2019): Specialty food prices jumped in grocery stores, hitting both middle-class consumers and restaurants. For households, that meant higher prices on imported basics like Parmesan and olive oil.

    • Developing countries protecting farmers: Nations like India often raise tariffs on food imports to shield local farmers. While this can help rural producers, it raises prices in cities. Urban families, especially the poor, end up paying more for staples like pulses or cooking oils.

    • UK post-Brexit: Changes in tariff and trade rules increased the cost of some imported produce and processed foods, adding to grocery inflation — especially for fresh fruits and vegetables that aren’t grown locally in winter.

    How it shows up in everyday life

    Think of a family in a city:

    • Their weekly grocery run costs ₹500–800 or $100, depending on where they live.

    • A tariff raises the cost of imported wheat or edible oil by 15%.

    • Suddenly, bread, biscuits, and cooking oil are each a bit pricier.

    • That might add $10–15 a week. Over a year, that’s hundreds of dollars — which could have been school supplies, healthcare, or savings.

    For higher-income households, it feels like annoyance. For lower-income ones, it can mean cutting meals, buying lower-quality food, or going into debt.

    Bigger picture — do tariffs ever help?

    • Yes, sometimes. If tariffs help local farmers survive and expand, the country may become less dependent on imports long-term. In theory, this could stabilize prices down the road.

    • But… food markets are complex. Weather, fuel costs, and global commodity prices often matter more than tariffs. And while tariffs may protect producers, they almost always raise short-term costs for consumers.

    The humanized bottom line

    Tariffs on food imports are one of the clearest examples where consumers directly feel the pain. They make grocery bills bigger, hit low-income families the hardest, and can even alter diets in ways that affect health. Policymakers sometimes justify them to support farmers or reduce dependency on imports — but unless paired with smart policies (like subsidies for healthy foods, targeted support for the poor, or investment in local farming efficiency), the immediate effect is:

    • Higher bills

    • Tougher trade-offs for families

    • Unequal impact across income levels

    So the next time your grocery basket costs more and you hear “it’s because of tariffs,” it’s not just political jargon — it’s literally baked into your bread, brewed in your coffee, and fried into your cooking oil.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 02/10/2025In:

“reshoring” and “friend-shoring”

economic policygeopoliticsglobal tradereshoringsupply chaintariffs
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

    Why tariffs do nudge companies to reshore or friend-shore Cost pressure from tariffs. When imported goods face new taxes, sourcing abroad becomes less attractive. U.S.–China tariffs, for example, raised the cost of importing everything from machinery to electronics. For firms with thin margins, thatRead more

    Why tariffs do nudge companies to reshore or friend-shore

    1. Cost pressure from tariffs. When imported goods face new taxes, sourcing abroad becomes less attractive. U.S.–China tariffs, for example, raised the cost of importing everything from machinery to electronics. For firms with thin margins, that price hike makes domestic or “friendly” suppliers more appealing.

    2. Uncertainty. Even when tariffs are moderate, the risk that they could go higher in the future makes long-term supply contracts riskier. Companies prefer to hedge by relocating production to “safer” trade jurisdictions.

    3. Signaling and risk management. Investors, boards, and governments are pressuring firms to reduce overreliance on politically fraught supply chains. Moving to “friendlier” countries reduces reputational and regulatory risks.

    Why it’s not just tariffs — the broader forces at work

    • Geopolitics. Rising U.S.–China tensions, Russia’s war in Ukraine, and Taiwan-related security concerns have made executives rethink global exposure. Even without tariffs, firms might diversify to avoid being caught in sanctions or sudden trade bans.

    • Pandemic scars. COVID-19 disruptions exposed how fragile “just-in-time” global supply chains can be. Container shortages, port delays, and factory shutdowns made companies want more local or regional control.

    • Subsidy pull. The U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the EU’s Green Deal Industrial Plan, and similar incentives are attracting firms with tax breaks and grants. Sometimes reshoring is less about tariffs pushing them away and more about subsidies pulling them home.

    • Automation and technology. With robotics and AI, labor-cost gaps between rich and developing countries matter a little less. That makes reshoring feasible in industries like semiconductors and advanced manufacturing.

    • Brand and politics. Companies want to be seen as “patriotic” or “responsible” in their home markets. Publicly announcing reshoring plans wins political goodwill, even if the actual moves are modest.

    What the evidence shows (real moves vs rhetoric)

    • Partial shifts, not wholesale exodus. Despite big headlines, data suggests that very few firms have completely left China or other low-cost hubs. Instead, they are diversifying — moving some production to Vietnam, India, Mexico, or Eastern Europe, while keeping a base in China. This is more “China+1” than “China exit.”

    • Sectoral differences.

      • Semiconductors, batteries, defense-related tech: More genuine reshoring because governments are subsidizing heavily and demanding domestic supply.

      • Textiles, consumer electronics: Much harder to reshore at scale due to cost structure; many companies are only moving some assembly to “friends.”

    • Announced vs delivered. Announcements of billion-dollar plants make headlines, but many are delayed, scaled down, or never completed. Some reshoring rhetoric is political theater meant to align with government priorities.

    Risks and trade-offs

    • Higher consumer prices. Reshored production usually costs more (higher wages, stricter regulations). Companies may pass those costs to consumers.

    • Supply-chain inefficiency. Over-diversifying or duplicating factories for political reasons may reduce global efficiency and slow innovation.

    • Job creation gap. While politicians promise “millions of new jobs,” advanced manufacturing often uses automation, so the actual employment impact is smaller than the rhetoric.

    • Geopolitical ripple effects. Countries excluded from “friend” lists may retaliate with their own trade barriers, creating a more fragmented global economy.

    The humanized bottom line

    Tariffs are one piece of the puzzle — they make foreign sourcing more expensive and less predictable, nudging firms to move production closer to home or to allies. But the bigger story is that companies are now managing political risk almost as seriously as they manage financial risk. The real trend is not pure reshoring but strategic diversification: keeping some production in global hubs while spreading out capacity to reduce vulnerability.

    So when you hear a politician say “companies are bringing jobs back home because of tariffs,” that’s partly true — but it leaves out the bigger picture. What’s really happening is a cautious, messy, and uneven reorganization of global supply chains, shaped by a mix of tariffs, subsidies, security concerns, and corporate image-making.

    See less
mohdanasMost Helpful
Asked: 02/10/2025In:

electric vehicles and green tech slow ...

climate changeelectric vehiclesenergy transition xglobal tradegreen technology
  1. mohdanas
    mohdanas Most Helpful

    How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics) Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate. HighRead more

    How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics)

    1. Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate.

    2. Higher input costs and cascading effects. Many tariffs target intermediate goods (parts, components, machinery). That raises production costs for domestic manufacturers and raises prices across supply chains, not just the tariffed final products.

    3. Substitution and product mix effects. Consumers and firms may switch to more expensive domestic suppliers (trade diversion), which can keep prices elevated even if the tariffed product’s price falls later.

    4. Uncertainty and administrative costs. Frequent changes in tariff policy add uncertainty; firms pay to retool supply chains, hold extra inventory, or hire compliance staff — those costs can be passed on to consumers.

    5. Macro feedback and second-round effects. If tariffs push inflation higher and expectations become unanchored, wages and service prices can reprice, producing a more persistent inflationary effect rather than a one-time rise. 

    What the evidence and recent studies show (how big are the effects?)

    • Pass-through varies by product, but is often substantial. Micro-level studies of recent U.S. tariffs find nontrivial pass-through: some estimates put retail pass-through for affected goods in the range of tens of percent up to near full pass-through in the short run for certain categories. One well-known microstudy finds a 20% tariff linked with roughly a 0.7% retail price rise for affected products in its sample—pass-through is heterogeneous.

    • Recent policy episodes (2025 U.S. tariff episodes) provide real-time estimates. Multiple papers and central-bank notes looking at the 2025 tariff measures conclude the first-round effect is measurable but not massive overall — estimates range from a few tenths of a percentage point up to low single digits in headline/core inflation depending on which scenario is assumed (full pass-through vs partial, scope of tariffs, and whether monetary policy offsets). For example, recent Federal Reserve analysis and Boston Fed back-of-the-envelope work put short-run contributions to core inflation on the order of ~0.1–0.8 percentage points (varies by method and which tariffs are counted). Yale and other research groups that look at sectoral pass-through find higher short-run impacts in heavily affected categories. 

    • Tariffs on investment goods can have outsized effects. Studies highlight that tariffs on capital goods (machinery, semiconductors, tools) raise costs of producing other goods and can therefore have larger effects on investment and longer-term productivity; projected price effects for investment goods are often larger than for consumption goods. 

    One-time level shift vs persistent inflation — which is more likely?

    There are two useful ways to think about the impact:

    • One-time price level effect: If tariffs are a discrete shock and firms simply add the tax to prices, the general price level jumps but inflation (the rate of increase) reverts to trend — a one-off effect.

    • Persistent inflation effect: If tariffs raise firms’ costs, shift bargaining, or alter expectations such that wages and services reprice, the effect can persist. Which occurs depends on how long tariffs remain, whether central banks respond, and whether input costs feed into broad service wages. Recent policy debates (and Fed/central-bank analyses) focus on this distinction because it matters for monetary policy decisions.

    Who really pays — consumers or firms?

    • Short run: A large share of the tariff burden often falls on consumers through higher retail prices, especially for final goods with little cheap domestic supply or close substitutes. Microstudies of past tariff episodes show retailers do not fully absorb tariffs. 

    • Medium run: Firms that cannot pass through full costs may absorb some through lower margins, investment cuts, or shifting production. But if tariffs are prolonged, businesses may restructure supply chains (friend-shoring, reshoring), which involves costs that eventually show up in prices or wages.

    • Distributional note: Tariffs are regressive in practice: low-income households spend a higher share of income on traded goods (electronics, clothing, groceries), so price rises hit them proportionally harder.

    Recent real-world examples and context

    • U.S.–China tariffs (2018–2020): Research showed sectoral price increases and some consumer price impacts, but the overall macro inflationary effect was modest; distributional and sectoral effects were important. 

    • 2025 tariff escalations (selective large tariffs): Multiple U.S. measures in 2025 (and reactions by trading partners) have been estimated to add a measurable number of basis points to core inflation in the short run; some think-tank and Fed estimates put first-round impacts between ~0.1% and up to ~1.8% on consumer prices depending on scope and pass-through assumptions. Those numbers illustrate the concept: targeted tariffs can move aggregate prices when they hit big-ticket or widely used inputs. 

    Other consequences that amplify (or mute) the inflationary effect

    • Policy uncertainty raises costs. Firms’ inability to plan (frequent rate changes, threats of additional tariffs) increases inventories and compliance spending, which can raise prices even beyond the tariff itself. Recent business surveys report that tariff uncertainty is already increasing costs for many firms.

    • Trade diversion and higher-cost sourcing. If imports are redirected to higher-cost suppliers to avoid tariffs, consumers pay more even if the tariffed good itself isn’t sold at home.

    • Monetary policy reaction. If central banks tighten to offset tariff-driven inflation, the resulting slower demand can blunt price rises; if central banks look through one-off tariff effects, inflation may persist. That interaction is the crucial policy lever.

    Practical implications for consumers, businesses and policy

    • For consumers: Expect higher prices in targeted categories (appliances, furniture, specific branded goods, pharmaceuticals where applicable). Substitution (cheaper alternatives, used goods) will dampen some of the pain but not all. Low-income households are likely to feel the pinch more.

    • For firms: Short run — margin pressure or higher retail prices; medium run — supply-chain reconfiguration, higher capital costs if tariffs hit investment goods. Tariff uncertainty is itself costly.

    • For policymakers: Design matters. Narrow, temporary tariffs with clear objectives and sunset clauses reduce the risk of persistent inflation and political capture. Communication with central banks and trading partners helps reduce uncertainty. If tariffs are broad and long lasting, monetary authorities face harder choices to maintain price stability. 

    Bottom line

    Tariffs do raise consumer prices — sometimes only slightly and once, sometimes more significantly and persistently. Empirical work and recent episodes show the effect is heterogeneous: it depends on the tariffs’ size, coverage (final vs intermediate goods), pass-through rates in particular markets, supply-chain links, and how monetary and fiscal authorities respond. In short: tariffs are an inflationary tool when applied at scale, but the real economic pain depends on the details — and on whether those tariffs are temporary, targeted, and paired with policies that limit rent-seeking and supply-chain disruption.

    If you want, I can:

    • prepare a table of recent studies (estimate, scope, implied CPI effect) so you can compare numbers side-by-side, or

    • run a short sectoral deep-dive (e.g., electronics, autos, pharmaceuticals) to show which consumer categories are most likely to see price rises where you live, or

    • draft a two-page brief for a policymaker summarizing the tradeoffs and suggested guardrails.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 01/10/2025In:

tariffs affecting inflation and consu ...

consumerpricesglobaleconomyinflationprotectionismsupplychainstariffstradepolicy
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics) Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate. HighRead more

    How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics)

    1. Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate.

    2. Higher input costs and cascading effects. Many tariffs target intermediate goods (parts, components, machinery). That raises production costs for domestic manufacturers and raises prices across supply chains, not just the tariffed final products.

    3. Substitution and product mix effects. Consumers and firms may switch to more expensive domestic suppliers (trade diversion), which can keep prices elevated even if the tariffed product’s price falls later.

    4. Uncertainty and administrative costs. Frequent changes in tariff policy add uncertainty; firms pay to retool supply chains, hold extra inventory, or hire compliance staff — those costs can be passed on to consumers.

    5. Macro feedback and second-round effects. If tariffs push inflation higher and expectations become unanchored, wages and service prices can reprice, producing a more persistent inflationary effect rather than a one-time rise.

      How tariffs can raise consumer prices (the mechanics)

      1. Direct pass-through to final goods. A tariff is a tax on imported goods. If importers and retailers simply raise the sticker price, consumers pay more. The fraction of the tariff that shows up at the checkout is called the pass-through rate.

      2. Higher input costs and cascading effects. Many tariffs target intermediate goods (parts, components, machinery). That raises production costs for domestic manufacturers and raises prices across supply chains, not just the tariffed final products.

      3. Substitution and product mix effects. Consumers and firms may switch to more expensive domestic suppliers (trade diversion), which can keep prices elevated even if the tariffed product’s price falls later.

      4. Uncertainty and administrative costs. Frequent changes in tariff policy add uncertainty; firms pay to retool supply chains, hold extra inventory, or hire compliance staff — those costs can be passed on to consumers.

      5. Macro feedback and second-round effects. If tariffs push inflation higher and expectations become unanchored, wages and service prices can reprice, producing a more persistent inflationary effect rather than a one-time rise. 

      What the evidence and recent studies show (how big are the effects?)

      • Pass-through varies by product, but is often substantial. Micro-level studies of recent U.S. tariffs find nontrivial pass-through: some estimates put retail pass-through for affected goods in the range of tens of percent up to near full pass-through in the short run for certain categories. One well-known microstudy finds a 20% tariff linked with roughly a 0.7% retail price rise for affected products in its sample—pass-through is heterogeneous. 

      • Recent policy episodes (2025 U.S. tariff episodes) provide real-time estimates. Multiple papers and central-bank notes looking at the 2025 tariff measures conclude the first-round effect is measurable but not massive overall — estimates range from a few tenths of a percentage point up to low single digits in headline/core inflation depending on which scenario is assumed (full pass-through vs partial, scope of tariffs, and whether monetary policy offsets). For example, recent Federal Reserve analysis and Boston Fed back-of-the-envelope work put short-run contributions to core inflation on the order of ~0.1–0.8 percentage points (varies by method and which tariffs are counted). Yale and other research groups that look at sectoral pass-through find higher short-run impacts in heavily affected categories. Federal Reserve+2Federal Reserve Bank of Boston+2

      • Tariffs on investment goods can have outsized effects. Studies highlight that tariffs on capital goods (machinery, semiconductors, tools) raise costs of producing other goods and can therefore have larger effects on investment and longer-term productivity; projected price effects for investment goods are often larger than for consumption goods. 

      One-time level shift vs persistent inflation — which is more likely?

      There are two useful ways to think about the impact:

      • One-time price level effect: If tariffs are a discrete shock and firms simply add the tax to prices, the general price level jumps but inflation (the rate of increase) reverts to trend — a one-off effect.

      • Persistent inflation effect: If tariffs raise firms’ costs, shift bargaining, or alter expectations such that wages and services reprice, the effect can persist. Which occurs depends on how long tariffs remain, whether central banks respond, and whether input costs feed into broad service wages. Recent policy debates (and Fed/central-bank analyses) focus on this distinction because it matters for monetary policy decisions.

      • Short run: A large share of the tariff burden often falls on consumers through higher retail prices, especially for final goods with little cheap domestic supply or close substitutes. Microstudies of past tariff episodes show retailers do not fully absorb tariffs. Medium run: Firms that cannot pass through full costs may absorb some through lower margins, investment cuts, or shifting production. But if tariffs are prolonged, businesses may restructure supply chains (friend-shoring, reshoring), which involves costs that eventually show up in prices or wages.

      • Distributional note: Tariffs are regressive in practice: low-income households spend a higher share of income on traded goods (electronics, clothing, groceries), so price rises hit them proportionally harder.

      Recent real-world examples and context

      • U.S.–China tariffs (2018–2020): Research showed sectoral price increases and some consumer price impacts, but the overall macro inflationary effect was modest; distributional and sectoral effects were important. 

      • 2025 tariff escalations (selective large tariffs): Multiple U.S. measures in 2025 (and reactions by trading partners) have been estimated to add a measurable number of basis points to core inflation in the short run; some think-tank and Fed estimates put first-round impacts between ~0.1% and up to ~1.8% on consumer prices depending on scope and pass-through assumptions. Those numbers illustrate the concept: targeted tariffs can move aggregate prices when they hit big-ticket or widely used inputs.

      Other consequences that amplify (or mute) the inflationary effect

      • Policy uncertainty raises costs. Firms’ inability to plan (frequent rate changes, threats of additional tariffs) increases inventories and compliance spending, which can raise prices even beyond the tariff itself. Recent business surveys report that tariff uncertainty is already increasing costs for many firms. 

      • Trade diversion and higher-cost sourcing. If imports are redirected to higher-cost suppliers to avoid tariffs, consumers pay more even if the tariffed good itself isn’t sold at home.

      • Monetary policy reaction. If central banks tighten to offset tariff-driven inflation, the resulting slower demand can blunt price rises; if central banks look through one-off tariff effects, inflation may persist. That interaction is the crucial policy lever. 

      Practical implications for consumers, businesses and policy

      • For consumers: Expect higher prices in targeted categories (appliances, furniture, specific branded goods, pharmaceuticals where applicable). Substitution (cheaper alternatives, used goods) will dampen some of the pain but not all. Low-income households are likely to feel the pinch more.

      • For firms: Short run — margin pressure or higher retail prices; medium run — supply-chain reconfiguration, higher capital costs if tariffs hit investment goods. Tariff uncertainty is itself costly.

      • For policymakers: Design matters. Narrow, temporary tariffs with clear objectives and sunset clauses reduce the risk of persistent inflation and political capture. Communication with central banks and trading partners helps reduce uncertainty. If tariffs are broad and long lasting, monetary authorities face harder choices to maintain price stability. 

      Bottom line

      Tariffs do raise consumer prices — sometimes only slightly and once, sometimes more significantly and persistently. Empirical work and recent episodes show the effect is heterogeneous: it depends on the tariffs’ size, coverage (final vs intermediate goods), pass-through rates in particular markets, supply-chain links, and how monetary and fiscal authorities respond. In short: tariffs are an inflationary tool when applied at scale, but the real economic pain depends on the details — and on whether those tariffs are temporary, targeted, and paired with policies that limit rent-seeking and supply-chain disruption.

      If you want, I can:

      • prepare a table of recent studies (estimate, scope, implied CPI effect) so you can compare numbers side-by-side, or

      • run a short sectoral deep-dive (e.g., electronics, autos, pharmaceuticals) to show which consumer categories are most likely to see price rises where you live, or

      • draft a two-page brief for a policymaker summarizing the tradeoffs and suggested guardrails.

    What the evidence and recent studies show (how big are the effects?)

    • Pass-through varies by product, but is often substantial. Micro-level studies of recent U.S. tariffs find nontrivial pass-through: some estimates put retail pass-through for affected goods in the range of tens of percent up to near full pass-through in the short run for certain categories. One well-known microstudy finds a 20% tariff linked with roughly a 0.7% retail price rise for affected products in its sample—pass-through is heterogeneous.

    • Recent policy episodes (2025 U.S. tariff episodes) provide real-time estimates. Multiple papers and central-bank notes looking at the 2025 tariff measures conclude the first-round effect is measurable but not massive overall — estimates range from a few tenths of a percentage point up to low single digits in headline/core inflation depending on which scenario is assumed (full pass-through vs partial, scope of tariffs, and whether monetary policy offsets). For example, recent Federal Reserve analysis and Boston Fed back-of-the-envelope work put short-run contributions to core inflation on the order of ~0.1–0.8 percentage points (varies by method and which tariffs are counted). Yale and other research groups that look at sectoral pass-through find higher short-run impacts in heavily affected categories. 

    • Tariffs on investment goods can have outsized effects. Studies highlight that tariffs on capital goods (machinery, semiconductors, tools) raise costs of producing other goods and can therefore have larger effects on investment and longer-term productivity; projected price effects for investment goods are often larger than for consumption goods. 

    One-time level shift vs persistent inflation — which is more likely?

    There are two useful ways to think about the impact:

    • One-time price level effect: If tariffs are a discrete shock and firms simply add the tax to prices, the general price level jumps but inflation (the rate of increase) reverts to trend — a one-off effect.

    • Persistent inflation effect: If tariffs raise firms’ costs, shift bargaining, or alter expectations such that wages and services reprice, the effect can persist. Which occurs depends on how long tariffs remain, whether central banks respond, and whether input costs feed into broad service wages. Recent policy debates (and Fed/central-bank analyses) focus on this distinction because it matters for monetary policy decisions. 

    Who really pays — consumers or firms?

    • Short run: A large share of the tariff burden often falls on consumers through higher retail prices, especially for final goods with little cheap domestic supply or close substitutes. Microstudies of past tariff episodes show retailers do not fully absorb tariffs. 

    • Medium run: Firms that cannot pass through full costs may absorb some through lower margins, investment cuts, or shifting production. But if tariffs are prolonged, businesses may restructure supply chains (friend-shoring, reshoring), which involves costs that eventually show up in prices or wages.

    • Distributional note: Tariffs are regressive in practice: low-income households spend a higher share of income on traded goods (electronics, clothing, groceries), so price rises hit them proportionally harder.

    Recent real-world examples and context

    • U.S.–China tariffs (2018–2020): Research showed sectoral price increases and some consumer price impacts, but the overall macro inflationary effect was modest; distributional and sectoral effects were important.

    • 2025 tariff escalations (selective large tariffs): Multiple U.S. measures in 2025 (and reactions by trading partners) have been estimated to add a measurable number of basis points to core inflation in the short run; some think-tank and Fed estimates put first-round impacts between ~0.1% and up to ~1.8% on consumer prices depending on scope and pass-through assumptions. Those numbers illustrate the concept: targeted tariffs can move aggregate prices when they hit big-ticket or widely used inputs. 

    Other consequences that amplify (or mute) the inflationary effect

    • Policy uncertainty raises costs. Firms’ inability to plan (frequent rate changes, threats of additional tariffs) increases inventories and compliance spending, which can raise prices even beyond the tariff itself. Recent business surveys report that tariff uncertainty is already increasing costs for many firms. 

    • Trade diversion and higher-cost sourcing. If imports are redirected to higher-cost suppliers to avoid tariffs, consumers pay more even if the tariffed good itself isn’t sold at home.

    • Monetary policy reaction. If central banks tighten to offset tariff-driven inflation, the resulting slower demand can blunt price rises; if central banks look through one-off tariff effects, inflation may persist. That interaction is the crucial policy lever. 

    Practical implications for consumers, businesses and policy

    • For consumers: Expect higher prices in targeted categories (appliances, furniture, specific branded goods, pharmaceuticals where applicable). Substitution (cheaper alternatives, used goods) will dampen some of the pain but not all. Low-income households are likely to feel the pinch more.

    • For firms: Short run — margin pressure or higher retail prices; medium run — supply-chain reconfiguration, higher capital costs if tariffs hit investment goods. Tariff uncertainty is itself costly.

    • For policymakers: Design matters. Narrow, temporary tariffs with clear objectives and sunset clauses reduce the risk of persistent inflation and political capture. Communication with central banks and trading partners helps reduce uncertainty. If tariffs are broad and long lasting, monetary authorities face harder choices to maintain price stability. 

    Bottom line

    Tariffs do raise consumer prices — sometimes only slightly and once, sometimes more significantly and persistently. Empirical work and recent episodes show the effect is heterogeneous: it depends on the tariffs’ size, coverage (final vs intermediate goods), pass-through rates in particular markets, supply-chain links, and how monetary and fiscal authorities respond. In short: tariffs are an inflationary tool when applied at scale, but the real economic pain depends on the details — and on whether those tariffs are temporary, targeted, and paired with policies that limit rent-seeking and supply-chain disruption.

    If you want, I can:

    • prepare a table of recent studies (estimate, scope, implied CPI effect) so you can compare numbers side-by-side, or

    • run a short sectoral deep-dive (e.g., electronics, autos, pharmaceuticals) to show which consumer categories are most likely to see price rises where you live, or

    • draft a two-page brief for a policymaker summarizing the tradeoffs and suggested guardrails.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 01/10/2025In:

developing countries use tariffs as a ...

developingeconomieseconomicgrowthindustrialdevelopmentprotectionismtariffstradepolicy
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    Why people think tariffs can help The infant-industry argument is simple and intuitive: new industries may need temporary shelter from world competition while they learn, reach scale, adopt technology, and get more productive. If you expose them immediately to global rivals with mature factories andRead more

    Why people think tariffs can help

    The infant-industry argument is simple and intuitive: new industries may need temporary shelter from world competition while they learn, reach scale, adopt technology, and get more productive. If you expose them immediately to global rivals with mature factories and deeper pockets, they may never get off the ground. Tariffs can:

    • Give domestic firms breathing room to reach minimum efficient scale.

    • Create incentives for local suppliers and upstream industries to develop.

    • Raise government revenue that can be ploughed into infrastructure, skills, or R&D that support industrialization.

    • Allow governments to pursue strategic goals (e.g., build an electronics base, heavy industry, or green manufacturing) rather than relying only on market signals.

    Historical narratives about late-industrializers like the U.S., Germany, Japan and — in the 20th century — the East Asian tigers emphasize selective protection plus active industrial policy as part of their success stories. But note: these countries rarely relied on blanket tariffs forever; they combined protection with export push, state coordination, and learning targets. 

    Why tariffs often backfire

    Empirical work and recent policy analysis show clear pitfalls. Tariffs can easily produce:

    • Inefficiency and higher prices. Protected firms face less competition and therefore have weaker incentives to innovate or cut costs; consumers pay more. Cross-country studies link long spells of protection to lower productivity growth. 

    • Rent-seeking and capture. Firms lobby to keep protection, political coalitions form, and temporary measures become permanent. That’s how import-substitution regimes in some Latin American countries became stagnation traps.

    • Retaliation and trade diversion. Higher tariffs invite counter-measures or shift trade toward higher-cost suppliers, hurting export competitiveness. Recent episodes show developing countries suffer heavily when big powers raise tariffs.

    • Macroeconomic harm. Tariffs can be inflationary and reduce the efficiency of labor allocation, sometimes contributing to slower overall growth. 

    What the evidence actually says

    The modern empirical literature is nuanced. Broad cross-country evidence warns that long-term, undisciplined protection tends to reduce growth and welfare. But careful industry-level and case-study research shows that time-bound, targeted industrial policy — sometimes including tariffs — plausibly helped South Korea and other East Asian economies build advanced manufacturing capabilities. The difference lies in design, complementary policies, and institutions. Recent IMF and academic work emphasize the conditional success of industrial policy rather than a blanket endorsement of protectionism. 

    Key conditions that make tariff-led industrial policy more likely to succeed

    If a developing country is thinking of using tariffs as one tool toward industrial growth, the following elements matter a lot:

    1. Clear, time-bound objective. Tariffs must be temporary with explicit sunset clauses and measurable performance benchmarks (productivity gains, export competitiveness, R&D targets).

    2. Selective and targeted application. Target sectors where learning-by-doing and scale economies are plausible, not broad protection of low-value activities.

    3. Complementary policies. Tariffs alone rarely build competitiveness. Pair them with subsidies for R&D, workforce training, infrastructure, export promotion, and access to finance.

    4. Strong governance and anti-capture mechanisms. Transparent rules, regular reviews, and independent evaluation reduce the risk of permanent rent extraction.

    5. Export orientation or credible exit strategy. Successful cases combined protection with an eventual push into exports; domestic protection that never leads to export competitiveness is a red flag.

    6. Macro and trade diplomacy awareness. Policymakers must manage exchange-rate, fiscal, and diplomatic implications to avoid harmful retaliation or loss of market access. 

    Practical checklist for policymakers (a short playbook)

    • Define which industries and why (technology challenge, scale, spillovers).

    • Set performance metrics (cost reductions, productivity, export share, R&D intensity) and a strict sunset (3–7 years, extendable only on clear evidence).

    • Offer graduated, conditional support (tariffs + matching R&D grants + export incentives), not unconditional lifelong tariffs.

    • Create an independent evaluation body to audit progress and publish results.

    • Keep trade partners informed and seek carve-outs or temporary arrangements in regional agreements where possible.

    • Combine with education, infrastructure, and competition policy so protection does not create permanent monopolies. 

    Realistic expectations

    Even when well designed, tariffs are only one piece of an industrial strategy. They can buy time and help create space to learn, but they do not automatically create globally competitive industries. Many successful modern industrializers combined a mix of: selective protection, state support for technology adoption, heavy investment in skills and infrastructure, and policies that pushed firms to export or otherwise face competition eventually.

    Bottom line

    Tariffs are a blunt tool: useful in carefully circumscribed, temporary, and well-governed cases where market failures block infant industries from developing. But used as a default policy, or without credible performance rules and complementary interventions, tariffs are much more likely to backfire — producing higher prices, stagnation, and political rents. History and recent research both warn: the how matters far more than the whether. 

    If you want, I can:

    • write a policy brief (2–3 pages) that applies this checklist to a specific country (pick one), or

    • prepare short case studies comparing South Korea, Argentina, and India to show contrasts, or

    • pull a readable list of the best academic/agency resources (WTO, UNCTAD, IMF, World Bank papers) so you can dig deeper.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 01/10/2025In:

text, image, video, voice

aiuxconversationalaihumancomputerinteractionimagerecognitionnaturaluserinterfacevoiceai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

    Single-Channel to Multi-Sensory Communication Old school engagement: One channel, just once. You typed (text), spoke (voice), or sent a picture. Every interaction was siloed. Multimodal engagement: Multiple channels blended together in beautiful harmony. You might show the AI a picture of your kitchRead more

    Single-Channel to Multi-Sensory Communication

    • Old school engagement: One channel, just once. You typed (text), spoke (voice), or sent a picture. Every interaction was siloed.
    • Multimodal engagement: Multiple channels blended together in beautiful harmony. You might show the AI a picture of your kitchen, say “what can I cook from this?”, and get a voice reply with recipe text and step-by-step video.

    No longer “speaking to a machine” but about engaging with it in the same way that human beings instinctively make use of all their senses.

     Examples of Change in the Real World

    Healthcare

    • Former approach: Doctors once had to work with various systems for imaging scans, patient information, and test results.
    • New way: A multimodal AI can read the scan, interpret what the physician wrote, and even listen to a patient’s voice for signs of stress—then bring it all together into one unified insight.

    Education

    • Old way: Students read books or studied videos in isolation.
    • New way: A student can ask a math problem orally, share a photo of the assignment, and get a step-by-step description in text and pictures. The AI “educates” in multiple modes, differentiating by learning modality.

    Accessibility

    • Old way: Assistive technology was limited—text to speech via screen readers, audio captions.
    • New way: AI narrates what’s in an image, translates voice into text, and even generates visual aids for learning disabilities. It’s a sense-to-sense universal translator.

    Daily Life

    • Old way: You Googled recipes, watched a video, and then read the instructions.
    • New way: You snap a photo of ingredients, say “what’s for dinner?” and get a narrated, personalized recipe video—all done at once.

    The Human Touch: Less Mechanical, More Natural

    Multimodal AI is a case of working with a friend rather than a machine. Instead of making your needs fit into a tool (e.g., typing into a search bar), the tool shapes itself into your needs. It mimics the manner in which humans interact with the world—vision, hearing, language, and context—and makes it easier, especially for those who are not so techie.

    Take grandparents who are not good with smartphones. Instead of navigating menus, they might simply show the AI a medical bill and say: “Explain this to me.” That adjustment makes technology accessible.

    The Challenges We Must Monitor

    So, though, this promise does introduce new challenges:

    • Privacy issues: If AI can “see” and “hear” everything, what’s being recorded and who has control over it?
    • Bias amplification: If an AI is trained on faulty visual or audio inputs, it could misinterpret people’s tone, accent, or appearance.
    • Over-reliance: Will people forget to scrutinize information if the AI always provides an “all-in-one” answer?

    We need strong ethics and openness so that this more natural communication style doesn’t secretly turn into manipulation.

    Multimodal AI is revolutionizing human-machine interactions. It transposes us from tool users to co-creators, with technology holding conversations rather than simply responding to commands.

    Imagine a world where:

    • Travelers communicate using the same AI to interpret spoken language in real time and present cultural nuances in images.
    • Artists collaborate through talking about feelings, sharing drawings, and refining them with images generated by AI.
    • Families preserve memories by inserting aging photographs and voice messages into it, and having the AI create a living “storybook” that springs to life.
    • It’s a leap toward technology that doesn’t just answer questions, but understands experiences.

    Bottom Line: Multimodal AI changes technology from something we “operate” into something we can converse with naturally—using words, pictures, sounds, and gestures together. It’s making digital interaction more human, but it also demands that we handle privacy, ethics, and trust with care.

    See less
daniyasiddiquiImage-Explained
Asked: 01/10/2025In:

persuasive than humans—and what ethic ...

aiaccountabilityaiandethicsaimanipulationaitransparencymultimodalaipersuasiveai
  1. daniyasiddiqui
    daniyasiddiqui Image-Explained

     Why Artificial Intelligence Can Be More Convincing Than Human Beings Limitless Versatility One of the things that individuals like about one is a strong communication style—some analytical, some emotional, some motivational. AI can respond in real-time, however. It can give a dry recitation of factRead more

     Why Artificial Intelligence Can Be More Convincing Than Human Beings

    Limitless Versatility

    One of the things that individuals like about one is a strong communication style—some analytical, some emotional, some motivational. AI can respond in real-time, however. It can give a dry recitation of facts to an engineer, a rosy spin to a policymaker, and then switch to soothing tone for a nervous individual—all in the same conversation.

    Data-Driven Personalization

    Unlike humans, AI can draw upon vast reserves of information about what works on people. It can detect patterns of tone, body language (through video), or even usage of words, and adapt in real-time. Imagine a digital assistant that detects your rage building and adjusts its tone, and also rehashes its argument to appeal to your beliefs. That’s influence at scale.

    Tireless Precision

    Humans get tired, get distracted, or get emotional when arguing. AI does not. It can repeat itself ad infinitum without patience, wearing down adversaries in the long run—particularly with susceptible communities.

     The Ethical Conundrum

    This coercive ability is not inherently bad—it could be used for good, such as for promoting healthier lives, promoting further education, or driving climate action. But the same influence could be used for:

    • Stirring up political fervor.
    • Pricing dirty goods.
    • Unfairly influencing money decisions.
    • Make emotional dependency on users.

    The distinction between helpful advice and manipulative bullying is paper-thin.

    What Ethical Bounds Should There Be?

    To avoid exploitation, developers and societies should have robust ethical norms:

    Transparency Regarding Mode Switching

    AI needs to make explicit when it’s switching tone or reasoning style—so users are aware if it’s being sympathetic, convincing, or analytically ruthless. Concealed switches make dishonesty.

    Limits on Persuasion in Sensitive Areas

    AI should never be permitted to override humans in matters relating to politics, religion, or love. They are inextricably tied up with autonomy and identity.

    Informed Consent

    Persuasive modes need to be available for an “opt out” by the users. Think of a switch so that you can respond: “Give me facts, but not persuasion.”

    Safeguards for Vulnerable Groups

    The mentally disordered, elderly, or children need not be the target of adaptive persuasion. Guardrails should safeguard us from exploitation.

    Accountability & Oversight

    If an AI convinces someone to do something dangerous, then who is at fault—the developer, the company, or the AI? We require accountability features, because we have regulations governing advertising or drugs.

    The Human Angle

    Essentially, this is less about machines and more about trust. When the human convinces us, we can feel intent, bias, or honesty. We cannot feel those with AI behind the machines. Unrestrained AI would take away human free will by subtly pushing us down paths we ourselves do not know.

    But in its proper use, persuasive AI can be an empowerment force—reminding us to get back on track, helping us make healthier choices, or getting smarter. It’s about ensuring we’re driving, and not the computer.

    Bottom Line: AI may change modes and be even more convincing than human, but ethics-free persuasion is manipulation. The challenge of the future is creating systems that leverage this capability to augment human decision-making, not supplant it.

    See less
Load More Questions