traditional finance and corporate go ...
Quiet Quitting: The First Wave It was last year's buzz term, "quiet quitting." It did not mean quitting one's job — it meant quitting on the culture of working more than necessary. Employees clung to their job title, did the bare minimum, and protected their personal time. For others, it was a survRead more
Quiet Quitting: The First Wave
It was last year’s buzz term, “quiet quitting.” It did not mean quitting one’s job — it meant quitting on the culture of working more than necessary. Employees clung to their job title, did the bare minimum, and protected their personal time.
For others, it was a survival technique in the climate of:
- Burnout from working too many hours.
- Being undervalued by their employers.
- The pandemic causing individuals to reassess what work ought to look like in their lives.
- Quiet quitting was a form of soft protest. Rather than quitting, individuals checked out — emotionally disengaged while still receiving paychecks.
Step in “Resenteeism”
Now we’re seeing the rise of something a little different — resenteeism. This is when employees do stay in their jobs, but they’re not just disengaged; they’re actively unhappy about it.
Imagine showing up every day, feeling trapped, resentful, and vocal (even if passively) about your dissatisfaction. You’re there in body, but your energy is negative.
Resenteeism is fueled by factors like:
- Economic duress — inflation, debt, and fewer opportunities make individuals feel they can’t quit, even when they despise their job.
- Toxic cultures — micromanaging, no recognition, or discriminatory pay instigate resentment.
- Uncertainty — layoffs and unstable markets hold people back in jobs they’d otherwise leave.
Lame Quitting vs. Resenteeism
- Quiet Quitting: A survival tactic. Maintains mental well-being by establishing boundaries.
- Resenteeism: A pressure cooker. People stay, but resentment seeps and brews.
Quiet quitting was withdrawal. Resenteeism is bitterness. Weak quitting is passive resignation; resenteeism is active discontent.
The Human Factor
Resenteeism isn’t so much about people — it resonates across teams and organizations:
- An unhappy employee can demotivate others, spirits sag.
- Customers sense the tension when interacting with disengaged employees.
- Managers are most likely to churn over as discontentment goes viral.
- It’s like having someone come to a family meal who clearly doesn’t want to be there they change the whole vibe.
- For the employees themselves, resenteeism exhausts them. Rising every morning to show up for work to a location you don’t want to be at, with no choice but to go, can contribute to depression, anxiety, and even physical sickness.
Why This Matters Now
We are living in a time of economic and cultural transformation:
- Job insecurity and inflation cause people to “stick it out.”
- Social media normalizes complaining about dissatisfaction in the workplace publicly.
- Smaller generations crave purposeful employment, flexibility, as much of the workplace lags behind.
- This cocktail of stress makes resenteeism look like the next destination in the office revolution after quiet quitting.
How Businesses Should Respond
- Listen, Not Punish
Addressing workers as “negative” won’t fly. Employers need to hear the whys of frustration. - Address Pay and Fairness
All too frequently resentment stems from being overworked, underpaid, or unfairly treated. Transparency and fair policies can make a huge difference. - Invest in Culture
Humans accept long hours if they feel valued, supported, and respected. Toxicity more than workload is likely the real issue. - Career Pathways
Employees who are left without career development opportunities are more likely to resent work. Small steps toward development can limit frustration. - Mental Health Support
Supplying support and placing dialogue around burnout and discontent assist in keeping quiet quitting from spilling over into resenteeism.
The Future of Work Attitudes
- Increased resenteeism will occur if fiscal stresses persist, but it highlights inappropriate management practices as well.
- Companies that prosper by offering flexibility, incentives, and fair treatment will retain and attract the best and brightest.
- Employees, especially Gen Z, are less afraid of griping about poisonous workplaces. They may grit it out for a little while but that resentment is something that businesses can’t afford to ignore.
Bottom Line
Quiet quitting was all about rebating to survive. Resenteeism is all about being present but resentful and trapped. It’s noisier, more infectious, and perhaps even more poisonous to workers and organizations as well.
Companies have a choice: deny resenteeism and let it gnaw at culture from the inside out, or confront it with empathy, equity, and actual change.
Because in the end, employees don’t only want a paycheck they want to feel valued, respected, and empowered to succeed.
See less
Setting the Stage: What Web3 Promises Web3 is most accurately described as the second web age, where control and ownership shift from centralized powers (banks, corps, governments) to distributed communities based on blockchain. In essence, it promises two big disruptions: Finance (DeFi — decentralRead more
Setting the Stage: What Web3 Promises
Web3 is most accurately described as the second web age, where control and ownership shift from centralized powers (banks, corps, governments) to distributed communities based on blockchain.
In essence, it promises two big disruptions:
How Web3 Could Shake Finance
Millions of individuals in the world’s developing countries are “unbanked.” Web3 wallets will allow them to send, save, and borrow without needing a traditional bank account. Consider a rural Kenyan farmer receiving foreign remittances directly via blockchain, bypassing middlemen and high fees.
These are enforceable contracts which can be coded onto the blockchain — no lawyer, no banker, no wait. As a concrete example, an artist might get automatic royalties every time her digital artwork is resold, something that the existing system cannot do.
Property, stocks, even copyrights to music can be tokenized and bought and sold on the planet. That makes possible fractional ownership — you don’t need $1 million to purchase property; you might own 0.01% of a New York skyscraper.
Finance is controlled today by huge institutions — credit card networks, clearing houses, regulators. Web3 builds a second world of finance where people do business directly with one another. Institutions no longer get to be the central authority.
How It Might Remodel Corporate Governance
A DAO is a code + community-led company. Decisions (employment, investment, alliances) are token-holder voted, not ordered by a board or CEO.
Voting and expenditure is open to view on the blockchain in a DAO. Compare that to typical corporations where shareholder power is frail at best and decisions are often made behind closed doors.
Anyone, anywhere in the world, with tokens talks. That makes corporate governance borderless, no longer controlled by Wall Street or Silicon Valley.
The Challenges & Human Realities
As exciting as this is, reality is more complex:
Cryptocurrencies remain very volatile. A farmer may appreciate new access to capital, but when the currency plunges overnight, his savings vanish.
Governments fear losing money streams (to crime, tax evasion, money laundering) out of their control. Overregulation can trap or kill Web3’s revolutionary power.
Even in DAOs, dominant players can hold more tokens and hold votes — same traditional power dynamics. The utopian dream of pure democracy traditionally conflicts with the reality of wealth concentration.
To most everyday humans, Web3 is intimidating — wallets, gas prices, private keys. Unless user experiences become more intuitive, it’ll be in the hands of tech-savvy elites.
The Human Impact
To the average consumer: Web3 might bring increased access and economic empowerment, but higher risk for scams, volatility, and no consumer recourse.
The Future: Disruption or Integration
It’s unlikely Web3 will completely replace traditional finance or governance. Instead, we’re heading toward a hybrid future:
Bottom Line
Yes, Web3 and blockchain-based ownership can revolutionize finance and governance — but not a clean sweep. They will pressure, disrupt, and reconstruct old systems rather than removing them entirely.
The most human way to think about:
- Web3 is an empowerment technology, putting people more in charge of money and decisions.
- But given over to cynical design and unjustice, it will also recreate old injustices in new digital form.
- The real test is not whether Web3 will splinter things — but whether it will remain true to its vision of democratization, or whether human greed and power plays will pervert it into the same old practices.
See less