prompt engineering different from tra ...
1. The Teacher's Role Is Shifting From "Knowledge Giver" to "Knowledge Guide" For centuries, the model was: Teacher = source of knowledge Student = one who receives knowledge But LLMs now give instant access to explanations, examples, references, practice questions, summaries, and even simulated tutRead more
1. The Teacher’s Role Is Shifting From “Knowledge Giver” to “Knowledge Guide”
For centuries, the model was:
- Teacher = source of knowledge
- Student = one who receives knowledge
But LLMs now give instant access to explanations, examples, references, practice questions, summaries, and even simulated tutoring.
So students no longer look to teachers only for “answers”; they look for context, quality, and judgment.
Teachers are becoming:
Curators-helping students sift through the good information from shallow AI responses.
- Critical thinking coaches: teaching students to question the output of AI.
- Ethical mentors: to guide students on what responsible use of AI looks like.
- Learning designers: create activities where the use of AI enhances rather than replaces learning.
Today, a teacher is less of a “walking textbook” and more of a learning architect.
2. Students Are Moving From “Passive Learners” to “Active Designers of Their Own Learning”
Generative AI gives students:
- personalized explanations
- 24×7 tutoring
- project ideas
- practice questions
- code samples
- instant feedback
This means that learning can be self-paced, self-directed, and curiosity-driven.
The students who used to wait for office hours now ask ChatGPT:
- “Explain this concept with a simple analogy.
- “Help me break down this research paper.”
- “Give me practice questions at both a beginner and advanced level.”
- LLMs have become “always-on study partners.”
But this also means that students must learn:
- How to determine AI accuracy
- how to avoid plagiarism
- How to use AI to support, not replace, thinking
- how to construct original arguments beyond the generic answers of AI
The role of the student has evolved from knowledge consumer to co-creator.
3. Assessment Models Are Being Forced to Evolve
Generative AI can now:
- write essays
- solve complex math/engineering problems
- generate code
- create research outlines
- summarize dense literature
This breaks traditional assessment models.
Universities are shifting toward:
- viva-voce and oral defense
- in-class problem-solving
- design-based assignments
- Case studies with personal reflections
- AI-assisted, not AI-replaced submissions
- project logs (demonstrating the thought process)
Instead of asking “Did the student produce a correct answer?”, educators now ask:
“Did the student produce this? If AI was used, did they understand what they submitted?”
4. Teachers are using AI as a productivity tool.
Teachers themselves are benefiting from AI in ways that help them reclaim time:
- AI helps educators
- draft lectures
- create quizzes
- generate rubrics
- summarize student performance
- personalize feedback
- design differentiated learning paths
- prepare research abstracts
This doesn’t lessen the value of the teacher; it enhances it.
They can then use this free time to focus on more important aspects, such as:
- deeper mentoring
- research
- Meaningful 1-on-1 interactions
- creating high-value learning experiences
AI is giving educators something priceless in time.
5. The relationship between teachers and students is becoming more collaborative.
- Earlier:
- teachers told students what to learn
- students tried to meet expectations
Now:
- both investigate knowledge together
- teachers evaluate how students use AI.
- Students come with AI-generated drafts and ask for guidance.
- classroom discussions often center around verifying or enhancing AI responses
- It feels more like a studio, less like a lecture hall.
The power dynamic is changing from:
- “I know everything.” → “Let’s reason together.”
This brings forth more genuine, human interactions.
6. New Ethical Responsibilities Are Emerging
Generative AI brings risks:
- plagiarism
- misinformation
- over-reliance
- “empty learning”
- biased responses
Teachers nowadays take on the following roles:
- ethics educators
- digital literacy trainers
- data privacy advisors
Students must learn:
- responsible citation
- academic integrity
- creative originality
- bias detection
AI literacy is becoming as important as computer literacy was in the early 2000s.
7. Higher Education Itself Is Redefining Its Purpose
The biggest question facing universities now:
If AI can provide answers for everything, what is the value in higher education?
The answer emerging from across the world is:
- Education is not about information; it’s about transformation.
The emphasis of universities is now on:
- critical thinking
- Human judgment
- emotional intelligence
- applied skills
- teamwork
- creativity
- problem-solving
- real-world projects
Knowledge is no longer the endpoint; it’s the raw material.
Final Thoughts A Human Perspective
Generative AI is not replacing teachers or students, it’s reshaping who they are.
Teachers become:
- guides
- mentors
- facilitators
- ethical leaders
- designers of learning experiences
Students become:
- active learners
- critical thinkers
co-creators problem-solvers evaluators of information The human roles in education are becoming more important, not less. AI provides the content. Human beings provide the meaning.
See less
What Is Traditional Model Training Conventional training of models is essentially the development and optimization of an AI system by exposing it to data and optimizing its internal parameters accordingly. Here, the team of developers gathers data from various sources and labels it and then employsRead more
What Is Traditional Model Training
Conventional training of models is essentially the development and optimization of an AI system by exposing it to data and optimizing its internal parameters accordingly. Here, the team of developers gathers data from various sources and labels it and then employs algorithms that reduce an error by iterating numerous times.
While training, the system will learn about the patterns from the data over a period of time. For instance, an email spam filter system will learn to categorize those emails by training thousands to millions of emails. If the system is performing poorly, engineers would require retraining the system using better data and/or algorithms.
This process usually involves:
After it is trained, it acts in a way that cannot be changed much until it is retrained again.
What is Prompt Engineering?
“Prompt Engineering” is basically designing and fine-tuning these input instructions or prompts to provide to a pre-trained model of AI technology, and specifically large language models to this point in our discussion, so as to produce better and more meaningful results from these models. The technique of prompt engineering operates at a purely interaction level and does not necessarily adjust weights.
In general, the prompt may contain instructions, context, examples, constraints, and/or formatting aids. As an example, the difference between the question “summarize this text” and “summarize this text in simple language for a nonspecialist” influences the response to the question asked.
Prompt engineering is based on:
It doesn’t change the model itself, but the way we communicate with the model will be different.
Key Points of Contrast between Prompt Engineering and Conventional Training
1. Comparing Model Modification and Model Usage
“Traditional training involves modifying the parameters of the model to optimize performance. Prompt engineering involves no modification of the model—only how to better utilize what knowledge already exists within it.”
2. Data and Resource Requirements
Model training involves extensive data, human labeling, and costly infrastructure. Contrast this with prompt design, which can be performed at low cost with minimal data and does not require training data.
3. Speed and Flexibility
Model training and retraining can take several days or weeks. Prompt engineering enables instant changes to the behavioral pattern through changes to the prompt and thus is highly adaptable and amenable to rapid experimentation.
4. Skill Sets Involved
“Traditional training involves special knowledge of statistics, optimization, and machine learning paradigms. Prompt engineering stresses the need for knowledge of the field, clarifying messages, and structuring instructions in a logical manner.”
5. Scope of Control
Training the model allows one to have a high, long-term degree of control over the performance of particular tasks. It allows one to have a high, surface-level degree of control over the performance of multiple tasks.
Why Prompt Engineering has Emerged to be So Crucial
The emergence of large general-purpose models has changed the dynamics for the application of AI in organizations. Instead of training models for different tasks, a team can utilize a single highly advanced model using the prompt method. The trend has greatly eased the adoption process and accelerated the pace of innovation,
Additionally, “prompt engineering enables scaling through customization,” and various prompts may be used to customize outputs for “marketing, healthcare writing, educational content, customer service, or policy analysis,” through “the same model.”
Shortcomings of Prompt Engineering
Despite its power, there are some boundaries of prompt engineering. For example, neither prompt engineering nor any other method can teach the AI new information, remove deeply set biases, or function correctly all the time. Specialized or governed applications still need traditional or fine-tuning approaches.
Conclusion
At a very conceptual level, training a traditional model involves creating intelligence, whereas prompt engineering involves guiding this intelligence. Training modifies what a model knows, whereas prompt engineering modifies how a certain body of knowledge can be utilized. In this way, both of these aspects combine to constitute methodologies that create contrasting trajectories in AI development.
See less