AI enhance or hinder the relational a ...
The Core Dilemma: Assist or Damage? Learning isn't all about creating correct answers—it's about learning to think, to reason, to innovate. AI platforms such as ChatGPT are either: Learning enhancers: educators, guides, and assistants who introduce learners to new paths of exploration. Learning undeRead more
The Core Dilemma: Assist or Damage?
Learning isn’t all about creating correct answers—it’s about learning to think, to reason, to innovate. AI platforms such as ChatGPT are either:
- Learning enhancers: educators, guides, and assistants who introduce learners to new paths of exploration.
- Learning underminers: crutches that give students answers, with students having skimmed assignments but lacking depth of knowledge.
The dilemma is how to incorporate AI so that it promotes curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking rather than replacing them.
1. Working with AI as a Teaching Companion
AI must not be framed as the enemy, but as a class teammate. A few approaches:
- Explainers in plain terms: Students are afraid to admit that they did not understand something. AI can describe things at different levels (child-level, advanced, step-by-step), dispelling the fear of asking “dumb” questions.
- Personalized examples: A mathematics teacher might instruct AI to generate practice questions tailored to each student’s level of understanding at the moment. For literature, it could give different endings to novels to talk about.
- 24/7 study buddy: Students can “speak” with AI outside of class when teachers are not present, reaffirming learning without leaving them stranded.
- Brainstorming prompts: In art, creative writing, or debate classes, AI can stimulate the brainstorming process by presenting students with scenarios or viewpoints they may not think of.
Here, AI opens doors but doesn’t preclude the teacher’s role of directing, placing, and correcting.
2. Redesigning Tests for the Age of AI
The biggest worry is testing. If AI can execute essays or equations flawlessly, how do we measure what children really know? Some tweaks would suffice:
- Move from recall to reasoning: Instead of “define this term” or “summarize this article,” have students compare, critique, or apply ideas—tasks AI can’t yet master alone.
- In-class, process-oriented evaluation: Teachers can assess students’ thinking by looking at drafts, outlines, or a discussion of how they approached a task, not the final, finished product.
- Oral defenses & presentations: After having composed an essay, students may defend orally their argument. This shows they actually know what is on the page.
- AI-assisted assignments: Teachers just instruct, “Use AI to jot down three ideas, but write down why you added or dropped each one.” This maintains AI as a part of the process, not a hidden shortcut.
This way, grading becomes measuring human thinking, judgment, and creativity, even if AI is used.
3. Training & Supporting Teachers
The majority of teachers are afraid of AI—they think it’s stealing their jobs. But successful integration occurs when teachers are empowered to utilize it:
- Professional development: Hands-on training where teachers learn through doing AI tools, rather than only learning about them, so they truly comprehend the strengths and shortcomings.
- Communities of practice: Teachers sharing examples of successful implementation of AI so that best practices naturally diffuse.
- Transparency to students: Instead of banning AI out of fear, teachers can show them how to use it responsibly—showing that it’s a tool, not a cheat code.
When teachers feel secure, they can guide students toward healthy use rather than fear-policing them.
4. Setting Boundaries & Ethical Standards
Students need transparency, not guesswork, to know what is an acceptable use of AI. Some guidelines may be enough:
- Disclosure: Ask students to report if and how they employed AI (e.g., “I used ChatGPT to get ideas for outlines”). This incorporates integrity into the process.
- Boundaries by skill level: Teachers can restrict the use of AI in lower grades to protect foundational skill acquisition. Autonomy can be provided in later levels.
Talks of ethics: Instead of speaking in “don’t get caught” terms, schools can have open discussions regarding integrity, trust, and why learning continues even beyond grades.
5. Keeping the Human at the Center
Learning is not really about delivering information. It’s about developing thinkers, creators, and empathetic humans. AI can help with efficiency, access, and customization, but it can never substitute for:
- The excitement of discovery when a student learns something on their own.
- The guidance of a teacher who sees potential in a young person.
- The chaos of collaboration, argument, and experimentation in learning.
So the hope shouldn’t be “How do we keep AI from killing education?” but rather:
“How do we rethink teaching and testing so AI can enhance humanity instead of erasing it?”
Last Thought
Think about calculators: once feared as machines that would destroy math skills, now everywhere because we remapped what we want students to learn (not just arithmetic, but mathematical problem-solving). AI can follow the same path—if we’re purposeful.
The best integrations will:
- Let AI perform repetitive, routine work.
- Preserve human judgment, creativity, and ethics.
- Teach students not only to use AI but to critique it, revise it, and in some instances, reject it.
- That’s how AI transforms from a cheat into an amplifier of learning.
The Promise: How AI Can Enrich Human Connection in Learning 1. Personalized Support Fosters Deeper Teacher-Student Relationships While AI is busy doing routine or administrative tasks — grading, attendance, content recommendations — teachers get the most precious commodity of all time. Time to conveRead more
The Promise: How AI Can Enrich Human Connection in Learning
1. Personalized Support Fosters Deeper Teacher-Student Relationships
While AI is busy doing routine or administrative tasks — grading, attendance, content recommendations — teachers get the most precious commodity of all time.
AI applications may track student performance data and spot problems early on, so teachers may step in with kindness rather than rebuke. If an AI application identifies a student submitting work late because of consistent gaps in one concept, for instance, then a teacher can step in with an act of kindness and a tailored plan — not criticism.
That kind of understanding builds confidence. Students are not treated as numbers but as individuals.
2. Language and Accessibility Tools Bridge Gaps
Artificial intelligence has given voice — sometimes literally — to students who previously could not speak up. Speech-to-text features, real-time language interpretation, or supporting students with disabilities are creating classrooms where all students belong.
Think of a student who can write an essay through voice dictation or a shy student who expresses complex ideas through AI-writing. Empathetic deployed technology can enable shy voices and build confidence — the source of real connection.
3. Emotional Intelligence Through Data
And there are even artificial intelligence systems that can identify emotional cues — tiredness, anger, engagement — from tone of voice or writing. If used properly, this data can prompt teachers to make shifts in strategy in the moment.
If a lesson is going off track, or a student’s tone undergoes an unexpected change in their online interactions, AI can initiate a soft nudge. These “digital nudges” can complement care and responsiveness — rather than replace it.
4. Cooperative Learning at Scale
Cooperative whiteboards, smart discussion forums, or co-authoring assistants are just a few examples of AI tools that can scale to reach learners from all over culture and geography.
Mumbai students collaborate with their French peers on climate study with AI translation, mind synthesis, and resource referral. In doing this, AI does not disassemble relationships — it replicates them, creating a world classroom where empathy knows no borders.
The Risks: Why AI May Suspend the Relational Soul of Learning
1. Risk of Emotional Isolation
If AI is the main learning instrument, the students can start equating with machines rather than with people.
Intelligent tutors and chatbots can provide instant solutions but no real empathy.
It could desensitize the social competencies of students — specifically, their tolerance for human imperfection, their listening, and their acceptance that learning at times is emotional, messy, and magnificently human.
2. Breakdown of Teacher Identity
As students start to depend on AI for tailored explanations, teachers may feel displaced — as if facilitators rather than mentors.
It’s not just a workplace issue; it’s an individual one. The joy of being a teacher often comes in the excitement of seeing interest spark in the eyes of a pupil.
If AI is the “expert” and the teacher is left to be the “supervisor,” the heart of education — the connection — can be drained.
3. Data Shadowing Humanity
Artificial intelligence thrives on data. But humans exist in context.
A child’s motivation, anxiety, or trauma does not have to be quantifiable. Dependence on analytics can lead institutions to focus on hard data (grades, attendance ratio) instead of soft data (gut, empathy, cooperation).
A teacher, too busy gazing at dashboards, might start forgetting to ask the easy question, “How are you today?”
4. Bias and Misunderstanding in Emotional AI
AI’s “emotional understanding” remains superficial. It can misinterpret cultural cues or neurodiverse behavior — assuming a quiet student is not paying attention when they’re concentrating deeply.
If schools apply these systems without criticism, students may be unfairly assessed, losing trust and belonging — the pillars of relational learning.
The Balance: Making AI Human-Centered
AI must augment empathy, not substitute it. The future of relational learning is co-intelligence — humans and machines, each contributing at their best.
For instance, an AI tutor may provide immediate academic feedback, while the teacher explains how that affects them and pushes the student past frustration or self-doubt.
That combination — technical accuracy + emotional intelligence — is where relational magic happens.
The Future Classroom: Tech with a Human Soul
In the ideal scenario for education in the future, AI won’t be teaching or learning — it’ll be the bridge.
If we keep people at the center of learning, AI can enable teachers to be more human than ever — to listen, connect, and inspire in a way no software ever could.
In a nutshell:
- AI can amplify or annihilate the human touch in learning — it’s on us and our intention.
- If we apply it as a replacement for relationships, we sacrifice what matters most about learning.
- If we apply it to bring life to our relationships, we get something absolutely phenomenal — a future in which technology makes us more human.
See less