Medal tables keep changing while events are being completed. An interim tally should always retain its reporting time.
What would you like to clarify? Share official sources and explain what they establish when joining this discussion.
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Qaskme editorial answer
The 88-medal figure in the 23 October morning update was an interim snapshot: 21 gold, 26 silver and 41 bronze. It should not be presented as India’s final total at the Aichi–Nagoya Asian Para Games.
A later official update on the same day marked India’s 100th medal. Both figures can describe different reporting times without being contradictory. For a final tally, use the organising body’s completed results or a clearly dated official post-event summary.
The earlier report highlighted achievements in archery and athletics, including Sheetal Devi’s compound-archery success, a men’s T42/T63 high-jump podium sweep and Solairaj Dharmaraj’s long-jump performance. When discussing records, retain the event classification, stage and official result rather than comparing unlike categories.
Readers can use this thread to share the official result for a particular athlete or event. Include the date and explain whether the figure is an event result, a running national tally or the final medal table; that makes sports coverage more useful than repeating an undated number.
Read the sources